Ultimate Power Corrupts Ultimately...

It moved here.

Sending tens of thousands of men and women into war is something to be weighed to the last grain of judgement.

Again, your arrogance is arrogant.

Go ahead, you make the call 'dog, you don;t have to ponder how many children will be fatherless or motherless, for a deployment or for a lifetime, based on that decision.

It is easy to pontificate when you aren't really responsible.

THE GUY IS PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES!

You are completely delusional, that was a cheap political argument beore the election, and now it is just arrogant and disingenuous, and exemplary of vain delusions of superiority.

Get over yourself, 'dog. You're literally sounding dumb.

"Total lack of experience"
...and he's the President of the United States?
...it just doesn't get any more stupid than this.

As for Palin, according to Conservative values, she's a lazy quitter.

Everything else is spin.

They do respect her overt opportunism, though, it may be her only saving grace in their greedy eyes.

As long as she cashes in, regardless of her damage to impressionable and vulnerable people, the Right will embrace her, overlooking that lazy quitter thing cuz she's got dough.

"The mother bear knows how to protect her cubs.... just like Mutual of Omaha can help you protect your family..."

As for the blog;s final quesiton, I would posit "Both!"

The gravy train might outlast 2012.

I'm still betting on a wingnut talk show at the end of her rainbow.

Certainly not the White House. Can you just see that old moose head hanging in the oval office?

Give them the truth early on, so when the influence of their knuckledragging relatives and neighbors takes that inevitable pernicious turn, they have the intellectual tools to discern it's bad intent.

And please, none of that Pilate "What IS truth?" crap. We know right from wrong, but of late it has been mistaken for "right from left." It is deeper than that.

We need to teach our children tolerance, compassion and fairness, starting as young as possible, to give them a chance to know that true Spirit of America, the one we all here yearn for again.

that was my thought, too...

Maybe we should call them the "Noitalls?"

If you really were a majority, you wouldn't be flailing in the wind.

Like a CEO surrounding himself with "Yes Men", the 'baggers intentionally insulate themselves from reality.

I got such a hoot out of hearing and watching the the 'baggers distance themselves from the term "teabaggers" immediately after they started using it, just because someone suggested it had an alternative sexual meaning in the gay community.

They are so homophobic, they bit down hard on that bigot bait, and swallowed it hook-line-and-stinker.

Do they know what the term "Partiers" means in some places, like The Castro or Christopher Street?

Our language is so full of ambiguities, they had better be prepared to defend their own definitions, rather than changing their name to avoid association with "undesirables."

It just makes them look weak and timid.

hear hear!