CQ Politics strangely frames the budget vote as a victory for Cantor.
"Cantor Scores Perfect on Stimulus Test"
That's their headline. Craig Crawford must be on vacation or something, this seems so slanted to make the R's look good, one might suspect the hand of moderation is missing.
Anyone who thinks the Republicans gained anything by this obstructionism, in the face of overwhelming public support for Obama, is playing with a short deck.
Obama was masterful in his approach to the Republican good-old-boys on The Hill. He played their game to reach out to them, and they stabbed him, and the public in the back.
If this is supposed to represent Republicans displaying party unity, they had best look forward to a big split in their ranks, especially when Palin peels off her fundamentalist wing, who are probably the only Republicans who supported this act of bad faith.
The R's have been played like a fiddle, and Cantor was the bow Obama used to play them.
Why? Because henceforth, throughout his term, every time someone tries to say the Democratic majority is bullying the minority R's, you will hear this common refrain; Obama tried.
Had just a few Republicans voted for the bill, there might be some reasonable doubt left in the public psyche as to their pernicious intent. But the fact they conspired to make it unanimous is just proof they are more concerned about playing bitter politics than making good laws or saving the country from depression.
2010 just got a lot more interesting, by at least a couple dozen seats, and while the R's and their media advocates revel in their strange Cantor-led "victory" (didn't they ultimately lose anyway?) their house of cards is falling down around them.












Tax cuts are only stimulating IF they are converted to jobs and employee wages or benefits, rather than added to potential corporate profits or dividends.
Obama needs to press the Republicans, PUBLICLY, to point out where their formula GUARANTEES those tax cuts will make that stimulating conversion.
If Republicans immediately nod affirmatively, fully willing to make that assurance as part of the bill, then I'd say we have a deal.
HOWEVER, if the R's start to fidget and fudge and fanigle their way out of actually assuring those tax cuts DO become jobs and benefits, it should be pretty clear we are on our way to another subsidy of the rich and famous, not of the middle class in general, or the economy as a whole, if they get their way.
Seriously, someone needs to ask the R's if they would be willing to add this guarantee, in writing, to the stimulus package. It is an easy litmus test, and could be worded very clearly to assure those tax cuts be used for job creation and wages increases for working class employees, but only if they are sincere in their intentions, which I doubt sincerely.
IF they are willing to tag those tax cuts to job creation, in the bill, I would be both shocked and contrite.
And I don't shock and contrite easily.