Education for the future...
I wrote this originally in 1998, with Al Gore as the future President, and 2004 as the date of the uplink imagined here. Now I've changed the names to match our current history, and it still makes sense, aty least to me. We need to get "knowledge" out of the brick-and-mortar trap and more and more, onto the internet. A dedicated satellite would be an ideal way to manage the system, and still provide educational tools to anyone who might want to tune in, from the comfort of their home theater. Or their bedroom.
Knowledge can "happen" anywhere it is given a chance to blossom.
"K-12" HEADLINES FROM THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN EDUCATION;
by John Patterson
circa 2010, JULY 4 WEEKEND, FROM HUTCHINSON, KS
During a gala V.I.P. celebration at the first graduation ceremonies of
NASA University in Hutchinson, Kansas, President Obama dedicated the official
uplink of the Franklin Digital Public Education signal to the newly named
Christa McCauliffe Satellite School, in synchronous orbit directly overhead.
The signal was immediately broadcast back to more than two thousand public and
countless private receiving dishes in schools and homes across the nation.
In a ceremony that initiated the highly popular, but politically
controversial National Digital Satellite School, dubbed "K-12" by its
originators, Obama spoke to an enthusiastic crowd of mixed educational,
aeronautical, political and corporate icons, along with the first graduating
class and most of the underclassmen of the new NASA University in Hutchinson.
The president drew a standing ovation when he referred to NASA's
turn-of-the-millennium conversion from a "cold-war military laboratory..., into
a comprehensive, world-class educational institution."
"We stand on the threshold of a greater age." Obama began, "Now, more than
ever in our nation's history, we hold a key to democracy that our founders
could only dream of at our nation's inception. Thomas Jefferson and Ben
Franklin both recognized the essential value of public education, to provide
our citizens their most important tool for an effective democracy ...
Knowledge.
Throughout our nation's colonial and democratic history, educators have
sought to offer students access to this knowledge, in its most efficient and
fluent form. In our nation's infancy, this endeavor became manifest in a
thousand bell-towered buildings, each holding a single class of children of
all ages. Not only were they able to effectively learn in this pioneer
environment, they also had a chance to teach what they learned to younger
classmates. Surely, our nation's greatness was born in that one-room
schoolhouse. The first seeds of our democracy were sown and nurtured there.
But time can change even our most cherished institutions. As it crossed
the centuries, that one-room schoolhouse was transformed into a costly,
fragmented mosaic of inefficiency, plagued with bureaucratic excess and
crumbling superstructure. Diffused even more by the lack of national
standards, the house of American education was divided against itself. It
could not stand. Compared to their Asian and European counterparts, American
students toppled from their lofty perch of excellence into the obscurity of
entrenched, self-perpetuating mediocrity.
In a single generation, this lack of vigilance and diligence towards our
educational system put our nation at risk. The evidence was clear. The
statistics coldly implied that we had a very serious problem. But recognizing
a problem is only the beginning. Through ten more years of conservative
agendas and taxpayer revolts, these problems languished and became entrenched.
By the time we developed our "Goals 2000" education-standards program under
the first Clinton administration, a decade of mismanagement and neglect had
set our educational progress back immeasurably.
We were seeking guidance in formulating a national testing program and a
standard curriculum. We looked for school systems and particular teachers who
consistently produced improvements in their students. As we compared their
success formulas, some very striking similarities were evident. In most cases,
these teachers prepared a separate computer study course for their top
students, to free more of their teaching time for students who needed personal
help. Many of these exemplary teachers grew up with the advent of the computer
generation, and their students were even more experienced with computers. Their comprehensive study programs used videos, compact and lazer discs and other front-line technology to provide more intensive learning than ever before.
Clearly, the advent of multimedia computers had opened a new window of
educational opportunity. We proceeded to embrace and develop this new medium,
adding daily to the available reference resources for teachers to provide to
their students. The learning capacity of our nation's youth had never been
better fulfilled. Their self-dependence was challenged and increased.
In its first form, this became the "Education Online" program that began
in l998, and resulted in the creation of our Franklin Education Database
Centers. But after the internet crash of y2k left so many Franklin branches
with a blank screen, we decided to look for another, more reliable delivery
system for the Franklin signal.
At the end of the Iraqi war, we were watching our space program end an era as a
space-hardware delivery contractor. And after the shuttle disaster of 2003, we were compelled
to look for new directions for NASA, to bring the public back in with confidence and enthusiasm.
Like most of history's great success stories, what began as a small seed of
reasoning, became a tree much greater than its planters could have ever hoped.. Once the program was begun, the clear sensibility of its simple plan inspired a whole new generation of future astronaut/teachers, and captured the imagination of the entire, war-weary nation.
Never in the history of war and peace has such a great endeavor been accomplished so successfully, in such a short period of time. Just two years ago, as I began my first term in office, I would never have imagined that, in my lifetime, I could push a button that would deliver an
entire pre-school through 12th grade education to any digital receiving dish
in the continental United States. And who could have ever dreamed that NASA
might change from a cold-war military laboratory, and satellite delivery and
maintenance service, into a comprehensive, world-class educational
institution. Yet today, thanks to a nation of creative and courageous
citizens, we take this giant leap forward for mankind.
These graduates who sit before you are the first-fruits of our new Nasa
University. Following their year on the space station, they will go out across
our nation to help local school systems establish their own digital programs.
As they identify those students who will best adapt to and excel with the
Franklin System, the nation's crowded classes will grow smaller, along with
the local tax burdens. Our goal is to provide all our teachers with smaller
classes and better resources, but at a fraction of traditional costs.
Our founding fathers could hardly have foreseen the incredible technology
we know today. But if all of history's clues are correct, I feel certain they
would have been part of K-12, and by reason of their deep-buried roots in the
living history of American education, they stand with us here, today, as we
dedicate the one-room schoolhouse of the future.
Above all, the decision honor Christa McCauliff as we name our National
Eduaction Satellite puts a spirit of reborn fulfillemnt into our endeavors.
More than anyone in history, she gave her life for education, as she reached
into the heavens to teach to her students. We can not deny, or ever delete
that tragic day. But in our act today, we restore Christa's name for all
students to remember not in tragedy, but in victory. Broadcasting through
this satellite named for her, we offer children throughout our nation a
quality education, free of charge, and available to any home or school system
in the country. By providing this standard of curriculum and testing, we free
our best teachers to help the students who need close personal instruction.
And the testing standards that accompany the K-12 programming will help our
educators recognize and remedy problems before they become entrenched.
Christa McCauliff's namesake will now shine brightly from the heavens, a
tiny hand-made star beaming more truth and understanding than any
constellation could ever pretended. The mightiest light in the depth of space
will never shine so brightly. I hereby christen the Christa McCauliff
National Digital Satellite School."





It's an interesting idea, but I don't believe that K-12 (or at least K-8) education can be conducted by distance learning programs. Students in that age range really need to be engaged directly with hands-on learning. Our traditional model certainly fails them in that regard, but some exemplary teachers are still able to break through.
Now, something on the higher education level would be more worthwhile. Not just random streaming lectures on University TV stations, but a streaming database of lectures on any subject at the user's fingertips. That'd be cool, and ultimately more beneficial to students.
Barely related at all, but you might find this TED talk on open-source textbooks interesting.
December 16, 2008 2:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It's an interesting idea, but I don't believe that K-12 (or at least K-8) education can be conducted by distance learning programs."
I think I mention that not all students would successfully utilize this construct.
Too many teachers' precious hours are wasted on students who can learn without prodding or even without oversight.
In my opinion, the teachers' time should be concentrated on the underachievers, not the overachievers or even the achievers.
December 16, 2008 4:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
"It's an interesting idea, but I don't believe that K-12 (or at least K-8) education can be conducted by distance learning programs."
I think I mention that not all students would successfully utilize this construct.
Too many teachers' precious hours are wasted on students who can learn without prodding or even without oversight.
In my opinion, the teachers' time should be concentrated on the underachievers, not the overachievers or even the achievers.
December 16, 2008 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right, I'm just saying -- even for the overachievers, direct interaction is absolutely a necessity. In fact, getting more hands-on creative time would be arguably more important for them.
December 16, 2008 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
My thought is that the overachievers might attend school just a couple days a week or just a couple hours a day, leaving the bulk of teacher and classroom time to the students who need it the most.
It would virtually increase the size of every schoolbuilding, without a single brick being laid.
And I will argue that the overachievers do not need more teacher-time, they just need more information made available online. And they should have access to their mentors whenever they choose, or if their test scores start to drop. But I'm talking about a constant testing system that gauges WEEKLY, not yearly, how they are progressing.
December 17, 2008 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
PS: If someone told you back in HS that you could skip a half day of school if you maintain a 3.0 or better grade average, how would it have affected your education?
December 17, 2008 1:18 PM | Reply | Permalink