« Three Personal Examples of What's Wrong with Health Insurance | Mr. Conspiracy's Blog | insurance is insurance is insurance »

In Favor of a 10% Flat Tax


Made ya look!

No, I'm not talking about replacing the progressive income tax. What I'd like to address today is how to pay for healthcare for everyone.

In a perfect world, the simplest solution would be to just scale up Medicare to cover everybody. Why this wasn't the goal from the very beginning is only apparent when you realize that the debate is being driven not by the needs of the many but the greed of the few. It doesn't take a long, complicated argument to explain this.

All you need to do is ask, "How much is your health insurance?" I'll use me as an example, since my family is solidly middle class, national median income, two children, two jobs, two cars, two cats, and a mortgage. Our health insurance comes through my wife's employer and costs us roughly 15% of our combined gross income. Add to that the cost of copays, deductibles and co-insurance and you're getting closer to 18% of gross income. We get our insurance from my wife's employer because my employer charges 25% of gross income (not including copays and deductibles) for the same level of coverage.

That 18% is like a tax. A healthcare tax charged by a for-profit company. And it's 18% because not everybody is covered and not everybody pays into the system. But mostly because it's a for-profit system.

If we had Medicare for All, not only would that simple message be easy to communicate to the masses and easy to understand, it would be easy to pay for with a simple flat income tax with no income limits. More than likely, the tax would be significantly less that what the average American currently pays in health insurance premiums, deductibles, copays. How hard is that to explain?

The whole problem with this debate is caused by the need to keep the current employer-provided health insurance system intact, while also attempting to provide coverage for everyone else. This introduces confusing levels of complexity, complexity that leads to misunderstandings, complexity that leaves the issue vulnerable to misinformation, propaganda and damned lies. In other words, fear. Fear of losing coverage. Fear of the other. Fear of the unknown.

The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown. - H.P. Lovecraft

The current hodgepodge of proposals and counterproposals has created the environment of fear that could lead to a poor bill or even total defeat. That is, after all, why there's been a hodgepodge of proposals and counterproposals.

Draw them in with the prospect of gain, take them by confusion. - Sun Tzu

A simple, effective message would resolve everything. But a simple, effective message requires a simple, effective healthcare solution.

That solution, and its message, are one in the same:

Medicare for everybody, paid for with a flat tax on income, cheaper than what you're paying now.

 


2 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

You have the right idea except for the flat tax. You would be giving the rich health care for what to them is nothing while still charging the poor nearly their entire annual income. What is fair about that. The rich have been getting a free ride on the backs of the poor for a very, very long time. It's payback time. Health care for all should be paid for with a progressive tax on those most able to pay, gross income of $250,000 and up with an additional surtax on all bonuses, stock options and especially a ninety-five percent tax on the golden parachutes that they use when they abandon the corporations they have sucked dry and driven into the ground leaving only an empty husk where the lives of the employees and a prosperous business used to be in the name of the shareholder greed (you know, the ones that used to consider less than twenty-five percent profit a fantastically good return.

user-pic

I recommend a flat tax as an example of some Obamaish political jujitsu. The Republicans will find it very difficult to argue against a flat tax to pay for the system. Once you get it passed, then in a few years when money is tight, you "realize" that a flat tax just isn't going to work and institute a progressive tax structure. By that time, everybody is already enrolled and enjoying universal health care and they'll be less opposed to the proper funding structure needed to make sure it continues working like it should.

Leave a comment

Mr. Conspiracy

user-pic

Following: 0
Followers: 6

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address