« Dobson Caves to Evangelicals Who Call Glenn Beck a Cultist | Chino Blanco's Blog | Trapped in a Mormon Gulag »

Latter-Day Protest? Proposition 8 and Sports


By Dave Zirin

x-posted from Edge of Sports with permission.

As supporters of Gay Marriage have discovered, it's never easy to be on the Mormon Church's enemies list. The Church of Latter-Day Saints backed the anti-Gay Marriage Proposition 8 in California with out-of-state funds, and gave the right a heartbreaking victory this past election cycle. But the Mormon Church has been challenged in the past. Just ask Bob Beamon.

If you know Beamon's name it's almost certainly because he won the long jump gold medal in legendary fashion at the 1968 Mexico City Olympics. Beamon leapt 29 feet, 2.5 inches, a record that held for twenty-three years. Great Britain's Lynn Davies told Beamon afterwards, "You have destroyed this event." This is because Beamon was not only the first long jumper to break 29 feet, he was the first to break 28.

But you may not know that Beamon almost never made it to Mexico City. Along with eight other teammates, Beamon had his track and field scholarship revoked from the University of Texas at El Paso, the previous year. They had refused to compete against Brigham Young University. Beamon and his teammates were protesting the racist practices of the Mormon Church, and their coach at UTEP, Wayne Vanderburge, made them pay the ultimate price.

They weren't alone. As tennis great Arthur Ashe wrote in his book, Hard Road to Glory, "In October 1969, fourteen black [football] players at the University of Wyoming publicly criticized the Mormon Church and appealed to their coach, Lloyd Eaton, to support their right not to play against Brigham Young University. . . . The Mormon religion at the time taught that blacks could not attain to the priesthood, and that they were tainted by the curse of Ham, a biblical figure. Eaton, however, summarily dropped all fourteen players from the squad."

The players, though, didn't take their expulsion lying down. They called themselves the Black 14 and sued for damages with the support of the NAACP. In an October 25th game against San Jose State, the entire San Jose team wore black armbands to support the 14.

One aftershock of this episode was in November 1969, when Stanford University President Kenneth Pitzer suspended athletic relations with BYU, announcing that Stanford would honor what he called an athlete's "Right of Conscience." The "Right of Conscience" allowed athletes to boycott an event which he or she deemed "personally repugnant." As the Associated Press wrote, "Waves of black protest roll toward BYU, assaulting Mormon belief and leaving BYU officials and students, perplexed, hurt, and maybe a little angry."

On June 6th, 1978, as teams were refusing road trips to Utah with greater frequency, and the IRS started to make noises about revoking the church's holy tax-free status, a new revelation came ...

Whether a cynical ploy to avoid the taxman or a coincidence touched by God, the results were the same: Black people were now human in the eyes of the Church. African Americans were no longer, as Brigham Young himself once put it, "uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable, and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind." The IRS was assuaged, the athletic contests continued, and the church entered a period of remarkable growth.

Similar pressure must be brought to bear on the Mormon Church today for its financing of Proposition 8 in California. One nonprofit crunched the numbers and found that $17.67 million of the $22 million used to pass the anti-gay marriage legislation was funneled through 59,000 Mormon families since August. It was done with the institutional backing of the church, though many pro-gay Mormons have spoken out defiantly against the church's political intervention.

The question now is whether this latest tale of social conflict and the Church of Latter-Day Saints will also spill onto the athletic field. Men's athletics have been one of the last proud hamlets of homophobia in our society (although the attitudes of male athletes is more progressive than you might think). But women's sports has been historically more open around issues of sexuality.

Will any women collegians raise the specter of Proposition 8 if they have to travel to the schools of Utah? Will we see the ghosts of Black 14 emerge from the past? If any athletes choose to act, the ramifications could be "Beamonesque."

Chino Blanco


13 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Happy New Year!

I've compiled the 2009 Schedule of BYU Performing Arts and Mormon Tabernacle Choir Performances here:

http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=pTp_C8hS6i2IuU9u6Masiag&hl=en

Still working on the BYU 2009 (away) sports calendar.

My sense is that BYU is very concerned about becoming the target of protests next year. I made a brief mention over at my place about protesting their performing arts groups, and by the next day, BYU had taken down the schedules (thank goodness for the ol' Google cache).

To my mind, protesting BYU (and the Mormon Tabernacle Choir) at their own scheduled (away) events in 2009 sure seems like a no-brainer. All it would take is a few folks with signs and the attendees would provide a made-to-order audience for the message.

user-pic

They should absolutely lose their tax-exempt status. This is insane. In fact, churches in general should pay taxes, since many of them have plenty of money and few manage to keep their noses out of politics.

user-pic

I tried to say howdy on my blog but its busted.
Happy New Year

user-pic

Great blog. I think this is a perfect response to a church sticking its nose directly into what should be purely secular discussions.

If they want to be a secular organization and have their money influence law, they should be made to pay taxes just like any other lobbying organization is taxed. In fact, the only organizations that should be tax exempt are those that provide social services or social benefits that would otherwise be paid for by government.

Our 501(c)3 laws are in drastic need of being modified to account for the modern mission of member-based "non-profits" who seek to influence our laws to the singular benefit of special interests.

user-pic

The late artistic genius Frank Zappa said it best (and most succinctly):

Tax the churches.

Tax the businesses owned by the churches.

user-pic

" ..uncouth, uncomely, disagreeable, and low in their habits, wild, and seemingly deprived of nearly all the blessings of the intelligence that is generally bestowed upon mankind."

Sounds like a good description of w's cabinet, don't you think?


user-pic

I recall a scandal surrounding the big Mormon Temple in Kensington, just outside Wash DC. and known for the Surrender Dorothy graffiti painted on a nearby train bridge over the beltway. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_D.C._Temple

In the early 70s, I heard that the Mormons were giving tours of the as yet undedicated temple to selected non-believers, particularly Boy Scouts, and that they were planning on thoroughly renovating the brand new interiors after the tours. Neverthless they wanted to keep the black scouts out, which put BSA in a tight spot. From what I heard, a lot of Mormon boys go into scouting, so they had a lot of clout with the organization. But they were asking for blatant racist discrimination. From what I read above, they adjusted their thinking just about that time.

user-pic

You know what sucks? I'm an Eagle Scout. And I've got nothing but fond memories of everything involved in achieving that.

BSA didn't have to end up this way, the way it is now. For any Walter Benjamin fans out there, consider what he wrote about the Hitler Youth before taking his own life on the Spanish border. For Benjamin, there was something about the HY - setting aside how suspect and evil that project is rightly viewed now - something that would've been enough for Benjamin's generation, but for the retarded adults, the ideologues who had to go and wreck it all by demanding, beyond youthful camaraderie, submission to their twisted grown-up fantasies of ideological purity.

Sorry, this is a pet peeve of mine. Having grown up Mormon, I think I've got a pretty good idea about the kind of pull our church had, and still has, with the BSA (iow, plenty). Camping, hiking, merit badges for getting out and doing a little orienteering? What's not to like? And yet the LDS leadership would rather allow this project for boys to wither on the vine rather than adapt to the times.

user-pic

Excellent post. Thanks for the fascinating and extremely relevant history lesson.

user-pic

Great post! Protests are fine but personally I'd prefer boycotts against church-owned or affiliated entities. We can start with Bonneville Media and MetLife and add any company owned by Bain Capital for the heck of it. Hit 'em where it hurts by using the tax regs. By the way, the brethren have quietly been trying to dismantle Title IX for years but that's another story.

user-pic

We'll manage to put together some targeted protests in 2009. Folks who aren't familiar with Mormonism tend to see those big gleaming temples and naturally think they constitute obvious targets. And that's all OK. The protests at the temples had to happen, but reality is, those temples are mostly unoccupied.

As you suggest, it's all about identifying the real assets and getting past symbolic gestures.

user-pic

Exactly. Temple protests will mostly amplify the widely-held belief among members that the world is still persecuting the Saints. The real targets should be the financial assets of the Corporation of the First Presidency's various holding companies.

user-pic

The 1978 revelation isn't as "black and white" as it seems. David O. McKay, who was church president almost 30 years before the revelation, stated the policy was not doctrine, but rather early leaders' interpretation of scripture, and that the policy could be changed. He wanted to change it but felt it would take a revelation to clear it up. (This is a man born in the 1870s, with relatively progressive views on race in the late 1950s.) Leaders had tried for a century and a half to get it changed, ever since Brigham Young instituted it in the late 1840s. It almost happened through a routine vote of the Quorum of the Twelve in the late 1960s, but there was one dissenting vote. Finally, there was the revelation.

Take that for what it's worth, but the bottom line is the actual sequence of events leading up to the revelation is not as pat as people make it out to be (e.g. a direct result of IRS pressure, for example).

Leave a comment

Chino Blanco

user-pic

Following: 25
Followers: 10

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

Bio

twitter.com/ChinoBlanco youtube.com/ChinoBlanco

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address