« Express yourself: | JaneEyrez's Blog

Dear David (a letter to my older conservative brother),


I think you know how much I love you and I truly believe that in our hearts we are much closer in our beliefs than we are different. I'm not trying to make you change teams; I'd just like to convey as best I can how I see the differences between us in an attempt to separate out and put aside the things we can't reconcile. Yesterday I made an attempt to talk about the differences between conservatives and liberals in terms of conservatives being of a patriarchal mindset, wanting to set the rules for everybody, as opposed to liberals being content to set the rules for themselves and allow other people to make different choices.

Today I've been thinking about it in another way. Many of the ideological differences that divide us (you and me, conservatives vs. liberals) revolve around culture war issues, such as abortion and gay rights. One of the huge triumphs of America's form of government is the separation of church and state, the fundamental right of all Americans to practice the religion of their choice OR to practice no religion at all.

If your opposition to abortion, for example, is based on your moral principles, informed by your religious beliefs, doesn't the separation of church and state guarantee that you should NOT impose that on people who don't share your moral principals? If your Bible tells you that homosexuality is a sin, wouldn't legislating that into laws that have to be followed by everybody be a clear violation of the right of others to hold their own beliefs, even if those beliefs are supported by different religious beliefs, or by the practice of no religion at all?

It seems clear to me that we have not yet reached a point in America where a candidate for the Presidency, for example, could state simply that his religious beliefs are private and none of our business. Every candidate has to affirm their Christianity, even though our Constitution is supposed to free us from the shackles of such a declaration. One of the most successful whisper campaigns against Obama was that he was a "secret Muslim." Clearly after 9/11, being a "secret Muslim" would pretty much guarantee that you would be unelectable, even though freedom of religion should make that a shameful thing, since Islam is one of the major religions of the world and it does not equate with being a terrorist, although it's hard for a certain simple mind to grasp that concept.

Anyway, I want you to know that I love you and I respect you and I think it's valuable for me, and I hope for you, to continue this dialogue. I know it's made me dig a little deeper to understand and justify my own beliefs.
Love, your little sister.




5 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

It's nice to know that other families struggle with issues similar to the ones I'm dealing with in my family. I'm telling you, if we can't come to terms with issues in our own families, how are we ever going to do it on the national stage?

Thanks for sharing your story...

user-pic

I think we all have family or other kinds of relationships where there are painful differences in beliefs or values and that underlies the political differences. This has been a particularly painful and conflict-filled election year. Both the primary and the general. And I think we're all trying to repair the frayed edges of those relationships.

Thanks for this, Jane.

user-pic

Gee, are the conservatives in my family really conservatives, or just FOX-Hannity-Limbaugh clones? Hard to tell.
Love then, yes. Respect them, no, absolutely not.
Hard to respect people for a I-got-mine-by-working-for-the-government-so fuck-you-and-I-hate-taxes attitude.
Perhaps when they actually live by the beliefs they espouse and accept the consequences of those beliefs, they will get respect. But I doubt it, after 20 years of watching them develop as conservatives.
At least they know if they make any racially tinged remarks about Obama I will take their heads off. And I'll never loan them money again.

user-pic

Your argument is flawed. You are asserting the idea of moral relevancy, that what is wrong for me is not wrong for you. However, there are moral absolutes. It is wrong to steal. It is wrong to kill. The fact that these ideas are embodied in Judeo/Christian orthodoxy (ie Ten Commandments) does not mean that they are up for debate. By your argument, laws against bigamy, prostitution, bestiality, pedophilia, and drugs should all be voided.

user-pic

My examples were abortion and homosexuality, both of which, in my opinion, are capable of more than one interpretation. I agree with you that pedophilia is never acceptable, but all of your other examples are okay with me.

Leave a comment

JaneEyrez

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 4

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address