« No Obama Takeover of Spill Response | Jamie Friedland's Blog | Send BP's Spokespeople Home »

Natural Oil Seeps vs. Oil Spills


Back when this all first started, after explaining that Deepwater Horizon had been sabotaged by militant environmentalists, everyone's favorite conservative radio host had the following to say about America's worst oil spill:

"The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there.  It's natural.  It's as natural as the ocean water is."  -Rush Limbaugh, 5/3/10.

Before we dive into the content, I must correct a misconception on ignorant display: "natural" does not equal "good." It can, and in advertisements it always does, but in reality, the two words are not synonymous. There are a lot of terrible things in nature: EbolaInfanticide (e.g. in lions); Rape (e.g. in dolphins); Murder (e.g. in chimps); Cannibalism (e.g. all over the place). All natural, but not good.  Sorry, pet peeve.

Back to oil, Limbaugh has also made the claim that more oil seeps into the Gulf of Mexico naturally, every year, than has spilled from Deepwater Horizon.  As it turns out, this claim is actually true.

Oil seeps are fairly common around the world both underwater and aboveground.  Oil seeps occur when enough cracks and fissures form above a reservoir to enable a small quantity of oil to escape naturally.  The La Brea Tar Pits in Los Angeles (pictured below) are a large terrestrial oil seep, and oil seeps have long been used to help identify submarine oil reserves.  Oil seeps are prevalent in many bodies of water, and the Gulf of Mexico is no exception.

Oil seeps are more common than you think, both on land and underwater.

A satellite survey published in January of 2000 counted at least 600 natural oil seeps within the Gulf.  And they release a lot of oil.

As you know, it is difficult to calculate underwater spill rates.  Especially for 600+ sites.  So the numbers here are pretty wide ranges, but the scale of the estimates is impressive.

A 2003 National Academies study estimated that about 980,000 barrels of oil, or about 41 million gallons, seep into the Gulf - every year.  Recall that the Exxon Valdez is estimated to have spilled about 250,000 barrels.

This link will take you to a table of annual petroleum releases into U.S. waters by source, but it is confusing to read.  If you are willing to wade through the paper, though, the pages that follow do explain each of the individual sources.

So if that much oil is released every year, why isn't the Gulf covered in oil slicks?  It actually is. You just can't see them (and it doesn't really matter).  Oil can spread out very, very thinly.  In fact, a gallon of oil can spread out to cover more than a full square mile, forming the tiniest film on the surface, one-hundredth of a millimeter thick.  At that dose, oil is not dangerous.  Note: in an oil spill, a lot of oil is released into the same place at the same time.  It is still hydrophobic and all wants to sit on top of the water, so it forms a thicker slick than that.

While invisible up close, microscopic oil slicks from natural seeps are visible from space because cohesion between oil molecules flattens wave action to form smooth areas on the water.

Close up. Image Source: Jesse Allen, NASA.

Because seeps are dispersed and oil only seeps from them instead of gushing, areas around seeps are still able to support thriving biological communitiesScientists don't even think the animals living near seeps have needed to evolve any adaptations*; seeping oil simply doesn't have that great an effect.

*One cool exception to this statement: you may have seen pictures or videos of the giant red tubeworms etc. that leave near deep ocean hydrothermal vents.  Those vents don't just expel superheated water; some are actually gas seeps too.  The chemosynthesis that supports those ecosystems actually uses methane as a feedstock.  So those animals have not adapted to natural gas as a toxin they can tolerate, they've adapted to natural gas as a food source they can eat, and gas seeps as a habitat they need to survive!  ...but oil is bad!

Strong oil seeps can lead to increased microbial productivity (as those bacteria break down more abundant oil) and result in some local hypoxia (lack of oxygen) on the ocean floor, but not to the point of causing large dead zones.  Further, individual seeps are not always active and the release rate can even vary considerably during a single day and from day to day.  As a result, only a small area around a seep is ever actually exposed to "fresh," un-degraded oil, and that is when it is most toxic.

What we know as "oil" is actually a varying combination of thousands of different compounds.  Many of these react differently and have different fates when released into the water: some molecules evaporate, others degrade in sunlight ("photolysis"), some dissolve in seawater, some get eaten by microbes, and others sink and end up in sediments.  That is, if they don't wash up on a beach or become entrained in the biosphere first.

A study published in May 2009 found that oil from natural seeps normally stays in the water for between 10 hours and 5 days.  In that time, those molecules that easily can be broken down are, leaving behind the remaining, heavier oil - consisting mostly of larger compounds that are more difficult to dissolve, evaporate or be digested by microbes.  These molecules sink to the floor.

Oil from natural seeps stays in the water for less than 5 days.

An analysis of sediment samples from different areas around a natural seep revealed a consistent rate of hydrocarbon loss in the oil that eventually sank.  This indicates that there is an upper limit to how much oil can be broken down by natural forces in the oceanThis appears to be the key finding for us.

The question we are trying to answer here is, "how are oil seeps different from oil spills?"  Oil seeps occur constantly, throughout the Gulf.  Although they do release a lot of oil together over time, their individual spill rates are far, far lower than the Deepwater Horizon gusher.  What's more, these much smaller seeps are dispersed around the Gulf, so each seep's oil can be degraded quickly.

That is not what happens in an oil spill.  It is true that the amount of oil that has spilled from this gusher so far is less than the ANNUAL AGGREGATE of all 600+ seeps in the Gulf.  But it's all coming out at the same time, in the same place.  The water in one location can only degrade so much oil at one time; an oil spill goes far beyond overwhelming the ocean's natural oil-coping mechanisms.

And remember, the oil from all those natural seeps escapes year-round.  Yes, the Gulf can degrade small amounts of oil within 5 days, continuously.  But that oil-disposal capacity is always already in use, year-round.  So any additional oil spilled does not follow that time line.  It lasts much longer and has a much greater impact.

So, in conclusion, the Gulf has a limited ability to deal with oil that seeps out slowly and is widely dispersed.  But those capabilities are constantly in use.  This spill is gushing massive amounts of oil into one place.  Marine ecosystems cannot cope with that assault.  And don't forget the toxic dispersants that are accompanying the toxic oil, and the fact that most of the oil is still underwater, where it remains "fresh" (which, like "natural," does not mean good here) longer because it weathers more slowly there.

This spill is and will continue to be devastating.  There's a reason why one gambling website is already letting users bet on which Gulf species will go extinct.

Rush Limbaugh and friends are using true facts to reach false conclusions.


This post was born not just out of Rush Limbaugh's deceit, but also some good questions from matyra.  Congratulations, you two - it's a blog!


26 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

and a solid blog it is. well done!

thanks for this

user-pic

The facts you have presented in this series of blogs are not pretty. But, the thoroughness with which you have researched them, and the straightforward, rational way you present them gives us some hope for the future. To wit: a world in which there are people of your generation like you, Jamie, is a world that may not be lost, after all.

user-pic
Congratulations, you two - it's a blog!

lol. But as one of the parents, I'll just say......ew.

Also, there are entire ecosystems in the deep Gulf that live off of oil in natural seep environments. Now we know of 3 ways (at least) for life to get energy: the Sun, from hydrothermal vents at mid-ocean ridges, and from oil seeps:

Well-developed Gulf chemosynthetic communities were first discovered near natural hydrocarbon seeps in the north central Gulf of Mexico. The image to the right was the first taken insitu by a deep-towed camera system at a depth of 635 m

Chemosynthetic Communities--pretty wild stuff.

user-pic

But, as you say, by far the most important ecosystem in the Gulf, the Sun-based one, is imperiled by this gusher on the sea floor.

user-pic

Some really interesting stuff there, Matyra. Like....

"All Gulf seep species studied to date have a very slow growth rate. Some of the larger tube-worms may be centuries old and are believed to be the oldest living animals on earth...."

"When disturbed; for example, buried and suffocated by natural events such as turbidity flows; the same type of community will eventually grow back, given the same local geochemical conditions. Community successions have been documented over 2,000 years, during which time there were several temporary extinctions."

user-pic

I know--I first read about these ecosystems a few years ago. The bacteria form the base, but the filter feeders (some tube worms and even corals) and the scary white crabs that eat those are just your average normal variety--except they live where it's completely dark.

Cool places.

user-pic

Interesting to know the all bodies of water have their very own oil washer and detergent that's in constant use 24/7 to clean up minor seeps of oil that occur naturally. So I would have to assume since the Gulf will be maxed out, any oil that does escape into the Atlantic will run into it's oil washer and detergent cycle as it works its' way up the North American coast line across the Arctic and down along western Europe to Africa. Eventually Mother nature will disperse what it can. In the mean time, we'll have to wait for nature to do it's thing in her own sweet time. Any idea how long it would take, given the amount of oil this particular well was thought to be able to produce?

user-pic

Interesting question. I don't have a good answer for a number of reasons. First, I have not seen any estimates for how many seeps there are along the Atlantic coast. However, I assume that means a good deal fewer than there are in the Gulf, Pacific coast (mainly CA) and Alaska, because I have seen estimates for all of those.

Even with that info, though, I wouldn't be able to make a better guess. Without any independent knowledge about this phenomenon or more specific studies to draw upon, the only bound I can justifiably extrapolate is >5 days.

Suffice it to say that any area the oil from this spill goes will be exposed to far more oil than would ever seep naturally at one time, so I can't image the oil doesn't persist long enough to cause serious problems.

user-pic

I suspect as the slick works its' way north up the US coast line and south along Europe and Africa, there will be a lot of agitation action with nature's own solvents to disperse the slick back into nature's womb. From what you've covered, it's not the first time Mother Nature has had to deal with a leaky gasket and she has a few innovative methods already step up and waiting for such an occurrence. It wouldn't surprise me if the slick makes it to Europe it will be far less than was left the eastern seaboard and by the time it reaches western Africa even less so by the time it rounds the Cape there should hardly be a trace. Unfortunately, the Gulf will take the brunt of the slick and its' defensive mechanisms will be overloaded for years to come before its' able to effectively make a dent in cleansing itself. Sounds like some biologist have their work cut out for them to figure out how the cleansing mechanism works and what is used to break the oil up. On the other hand, if you can figure out how to break up the oil as nature does, you can reverse engineer it and create oil from the basic parts of the dispersal process. Interesting problem. Could be the solution to our oil energy needs. Might never have to drill again.

user-pic

Nicely done. One of your best yet.

user-pic

When informed that a purportedly edible object is okay because it is natural my immediate response is "So's poison ivy."

user-pic

Haha different words have different meanings - who knew?

user-pic

Again, unrelated but can't write a post right now - fishermen contracted for BP's cleanup but not issued protective gear have begun to fall ill:

http://climateprogress.org/2010/05/26/fishermen-bp-oil-spill-clean-up-health-problems/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+climateprogress/lCrX+(Climate+Progress)

user-pic

Jamie, where are you these days? We haven't heard from you in awhile.

user-pic

In the middle of moving...and the the LSAT is next week! Sorry!

user-pic

"and THEN* the"

user-pic

I was worried that you had perhaps got too close to some secret stuff and were now sleeping with the fishes....

Good luck with the LSAT!

user-pic

Haha that'd probably be more fun. Thank you!

user-pic

Being an Obama Whitehouse intern takes up some time...

user-pic

This is sooooooooooooooooooo gooooooooooooood.

What if we all got together and mounted this wonderful post on a beautiful baseball bat.

Not some ordinary bat mind you. But
one signed by Mickey Mantle or something.

Okay, then we find the local steak house where rush likes to linger and we dress up like the local right wing fascist pricks.

Then we honor him with an award (kind of like that director who likes 13 year olds) and as he comes to the podium, three of us hold him down while the master of ceremonies shoves the frickin bat right up his arse.

the end

Facebook

Arch-Microbes have demonstrated a 24-hour removal of crude oil and contaminants in Louisiana with over 99.97% effectiveness.

http://www.examiner.com/examiner/x-47225-Nashville-Green-Technology-Examiner~y2010m5d22-Natural-Solution-Will-Break-Down-Gulf-Oil-Spill

user-pic

thanks for the article. I do not mean to justify any of the horror we've seen over the past month, least of all the dispersants - But, as they were pumping much of it towards the bottom of the ocean where the well is (this was considered a new technique), could that preempt the natural oil seepage cycle by making most of it fall immediately to the floor where it would have ended up anyway? Either way, judging by what's washing up on shore this action wasn't adequate.

user-pic

Planetresource.net has a Eco friendly solution to clean up the tragedy British Petroleum has created, please watch the video animation:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=60bdQQQ3iVw and pass this along to as many people as you know.

One person can still make a difference in this world, is that simple interactions have a rippling effect. Each time this gets pass along, the hope in cleaning our planet is passed on.

Facebook

Thank you for the article, I worked for a research company in the early 90's and observed some of these seeps first hand, I still didnt realize there were so many, I will repost.

user-pic

Interesting, I didn't know that the tar pits were an oil seep. I have some questions:

1. will oil drilling slow or stop the natural seepage eventually?

2. could earthquakes increase natural seepage?

3. does the underground oil harm the species that live underground?

It is estimated that 90% of earths biomass is living underground in the rocks and using chemicals for food.

user-pic

In the interest of fair and full disclosure regarding the article...

Jamie Friedland was appointed an intern in the Obama Whitehouse in the fall of 2009.

Leave a comment

Jamie Friedland

user-pic

Following: 25
Followers: 31

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Climate Progress by Joe Romm
  • Favorite Books Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card
  • Favorite Quotes Reality has a well-known liberal bias. -Stephen Colbert

Bio

Grew up in Chicago, went to college at Duke, now living in DC.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address