<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>IchorFigure&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ichorfigure/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ichorfigure/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/ichorfigure//5924</id>
   <updated>	2008-10-24T19:57:26Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://14.239530-comment:3249343</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/23/greenspan_follies_the_world_is/#c3249343" />
		
		    <title>IchorFigure Commented on Greenspan Follies: The World Is as Ayn Rand Would Have Predicted by Dean Baker</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-24T19:57:26Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-24T19:57:26Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a refreshingly honest description of the events.  Many other credulous news articles are claiming Greenspan's failure was a function of his naive adherence to Rand's philosophy.  That is utterly false, as you've rightly pointed out.  Saying that a central banking guru is an advocate for laissez-faire capitalism, is like saying a dictator who rigs elections is an advocate for democracy.  For any honest person it is untenable.</p>

<p>For a more in depth critique I recommend the following post starting at the 7th paragraph:<br />
<a href="http://www.dianahsieh.com/blog/2008/10/getting-rand-wrong.shtml">http://www.dianahsieh.com/blog/2008/10/getting-rand-wrong.shtml</a></p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

