« Obama and the Human Rights Council. Uh-- Mr. President, Did You Forget Something? | icetree's Blog | Marching Resolutely Backward »
Well, So Much for the Stimulus
Heard on The NewsHour with Jim Lehrer:
Hartford
Connecticut is poor. Two years ago, it's kids scored among the lowest
in the nation on performance tests. Connecticut also has some of the
richest communities in the country. As a result, the state has the
widest performance gap of all the states among its students.
One district in Hartford did a massive overhaul of its schools. With no new money, it redesigned its systems to include 4 separate 'academies' within each school. The campus that was profiled had the Freshman Academy, the Law Academy, the Green Academy and the Nursing Academy. Except for the Freshman Academy which serves as an introduction to high school, each provides the basic high school curriculum as well as focusing on its own core area of study. For the first time in a long, long time, 2008/2009's test scores began moving upward.
The
kids who were interviewed by the NewsHour reporter sang the praises of
their school saying that, for the first time, they believe they have a
shot at attending college.
When the stimulus came along, the 4 principals of the school were elated. They intended to hire a school nurse, a counselor, a health teacher, a math teacher as well as raising salaries across the school in order to entice better teachers to come to their system.
I believe any reasonable person can agree--an increase in college attendance and graduation would, more than almost any other development, serve to bring Connecticut [or any other state] out of its economic doldrums and jump-start the economy. It's too bad the governor of Connecticut cannot be counted among the reasonable people of the world.
True to form, Jodi Rell cut all programs the stimulus would affect by the exact amount
of the expected infusion from the Federal Government. What do you want
to bet she refunded $300.00 to each of her constituents?
Goodbye, new money--hello, status quo. And so long, prospects of bringing in new teachers, raising salaries, adding support staff. In other words, so much for creating new jobs. Gee, thanks, Governor Rell.
I guess she's looking out for her and her neighbor's kids. After all--we can't have just any riff-raff in those poor towns going to good schools and getting into college. What if the rich children can't get into those good universities because their poorer counterparts make better grades than they do? And, what will those rich kids do for jobs in such an Alice-In- Wonderland world?
Of course, another possibility is that this Republican Governor has joined forces with Rush Limbaugh and simply wants the stimulus to fail. To hell with the country, to hell with her own kids' future if we can see to it that Obama falls flat on his face and we can elect Sarah Palin in 2012.
Hartford
Connecticut is poor. Two years ago, it's kids scored among the lowest
in the nation on performance tests. Connecticut also has some of the
richest communities in the country. As a result, the state has the
widest performance gap of all the states among its students.One district in Hartford did a massive overhaul of its schools. With no new money, it redesigned its systems to include 4 separate 'academies' within each school. The campus that was profiled had the Freshman Academy, the Law Academy, the Green Academy and the Nursing Academy. Except for the Freshman Academy which serves as an introduction to high school, each provides the basic high school curriculum as well as focusing on its own core area of study. For the first time in a long, long time, 2008/2009's test scores began moving upward.
The
kids who were interviewed by the NewsHour reporter sang the praises of
their school saying that, for the first time, they believe they have a
shot at attending college.When the stimulus came along, the 4 principals of the school were elated. They intended to hire a school nurse, a counselor, a health teacher, a math teacher as well as raising salaries across the school in order to entice better teachers to come to their system.
I believe any reasonable person can agree--an increase in college attendance and graduation would, more than almost any other development, serve to bring Connecticut [or any other state] out of its economic doldrums and jump-start the economy. It's too bad the governor of Connecticut cannot be counted among the reasonable people of the world.
True to form, Jodi Rell cut all programs the stimulus would affect by the exact amount
of the expected infusion from the Federal Government. What do you want
to bet she refunded $300.00 to each of her constituents?Goodbye, new money--hello, status quo. And so long, prospects of bringing in new teachers, raising salaries, adding support staff. In other words, so much for creating new jobs. Gee, thanks, Governor Rell.
I guess she's looking out for her and her neighbor's kids. After all--we can't have just any riff-raff in those poor towns going to good schools and getting into college. What if the rich children can't get into those good universities because their poorer counterparts make better grades than they do? And, what will those rich kids do for jobs in such an Alice-In- Wonderland world?
Of course, another possibility is that this Republican Governor has joined forces with Rush Limbaugh and simply wants the stimulus to fail. To hell with the country, to hell with her own kids' future if we can see to it that Obama falls flat on his face and we can elect Sarah Palin in 2012.
Advertisement
















Or you could say that Jodi Rell was actually doing her job and trying to prevent Connecticut from becoming another California or New Jersey.
July 11, 2009 9:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
you could, I suppose, except for the fact that, Hartford notwithstanding, Connecticut is one of the richest states in the country.
I'm sticking with my original analysis -- if only because the Republicans, generally, have balked at every move Obama has made. if any of them had shown any inclination to cooperate with him I'd be more willing to give this one the benefit of the doubt.
July 12, 2009 11:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for reminding us of this story, icetree. I rememember it from the Newshour.
What Governor Rell did was presumably legal, but unconscionable. The purpose of the stimulus money was to increase the total amount of capital states would be able to spend, rather than to replace state money with federal money. In the short run, it might not work to her disadvantage, but the type of disregard she exhibited for the intended beneficiaries of increased spending exemplifies an attitude that harms everyone in the long run.
July 11, 2009 7:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
agreed, Fred.
what a cynical ploy. when the promised jobs don't materialize the people may recognize that her maintenance of the status quo, rather than the stimulus itself, caused the problems. I hope so, anyway.
those governors who refuse the money or refuse to use it responsibly will, I hope, be shown the door in 2010 and 2012.
July 12, 2009 11:59 AM | Reply | Permalink