Our Surrender
The Bush Hangover: Guantanamo Undercuts Our Protests of North Korea -- by Mitchell Bard
George W. Bush has been out of office for more than four months now, but I fear that the damage done during the Bush years has inflicted serious injury to the American psyche and reputation, and it will take years, if not decades, to recover.

I woke up this morning to the chilling news that two American journalists had been sentenced to 12 years of hard labor by a North Korean court for
the "crimes" of illegally entering the country and committing "hostile acts."
^^^
[T]he international community has to stand against the heinous actions of the North Korean government. Clearly, the United States should be at the head of such international action.
But today, I also read
about
Lakhdar Boumediene, and the truly disturbing story of what happened to
him after the 9/11 attacks. An Algerian man living with his wife and
two children in Sarajevo, Bosnia, he was working for the Red Crescent
in October 2001 when he was arrested and charged with conspiring to
blow up the American and British embassies in the city. An
investigation revealed no evidence of his involvement in any plot, so a
Bosnian judge ordered him released, but the Bush administration
intervened, and in January 2002 he was shackled and flown to Guantanamo
Bay.
^^^
In the end, Boumediene was held for 7 1/2 years in Guantanamo, during which time, he says, he was tortured. He says he was kept up for 16 days straight, beaten, "stretched" (pulled up from under his arms while his feet were shackled to a chair) and forced to run while chained to guards, and if he could not keep up, he was dragged until he was bloody and bruised. After he began a hunger strike, he had food tubes put up his nose and, he claims, soldiers would purposely poke IV needles into the wrong parts of his arm, just to induce pain. But the one thing that was not done to him? Nobody asked if he was involved in a plot to blow up the U.S. and British embassies in Sarajevo. Rather, all he was repeatedly asked was about his connections to al-Qaeda and Osama bin-Laden (he insists he had no connection at all to the terrorist group).
But there was one thing in the article that not only amazed me but brilliantly illuminated why the U.S. should never torture, and why it is so important that we repudiate what happened during the Bush years and chart a clear and unequivocal new path forward, one that reflects the country's traditional values. Boumediene said:
"I thought America, the big country, they have CIA, FBI. Maybe one week, two weeks, they know I am innocent. I can go back to my home."
In other words, Boumediene had faith that a country like the United States could not possibly keep an innocent man prisoner with no way to contest his guilt. His view of America is one that many in the world shared before the Bush years . . . .
That is supposed to be the difference between a country like North Korea and a country like the United States.
Click here for the complete article.
xxx
This says it all. The US willingly surrendered what high ground we had had before.
Of course, even before Bush, our 'high ground' had been tenuous at best:
A country founded on genocide and slavery.
Jim Crow and, even now, capital punishment and imprisonment that allows strikingly different statistics depending on race.
The sham of The War On Drugs.
The only western country which does not offer reasonable health care to its citizens [unless they happen to hold high government office].
That has 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' as a very real law and denies marriage to 1.5% of its population.
Whose education is falling apart.
That tolerates children going to bed hungry every night.
That accepts the fact that some of its people still kill in the name of God.
Whose people are urged to take their guns to church----
All this doesn't leave us a lot of room to talk, does it?
Still before Bush was appointed president, we had slightly more room than we do now.
And Cheney just goes on telling us how right he and his cronies were all that time--spouting the lie that 'torture saved lives' just as if that were the question [which it is not].
But, today, the real issue comes home. Two of our citizens are being illegally and immorally held by another country and we are powerless to even raise our voice in protest--all because we have done the same thing--and right recently.
George W. Bush has been out of office for more than four months now, but I fear that the damage done during the Bush years has inflicted serious injury to the American psyche and reputation, and it will take years, if not decades, to recover.
I woke up this morning to the chilling news that two American journalists had been sentenced to 12 years of hard labor by a North Korean court for
^^^
[T]he international community has to stand against the heinous actions of the North Korean government. Clearly, the United States should be at the head of such international action.
But today, I also read
about
Lakhdar Boumediene, and the truly disturbing story of what happened to
him after the 9/11 attacks. An Algerian man living with his wife and
two children in Sarajevo, Bosnia, he was working for the Red Crescent
in October 2001 when he was arrested and charged with conspiring to
blow up the American and British embassies in the city. An
investigation revealed no evidence of his involvement in any plot, so a
Bosnian judge ordered him released, but the Bush administration
intervened, and in January 2002 he was shackled and flown to Guantanamo
Bay.^^^
In the end, Boumediene was held for 7 1/2 years in Guantanamo, during which time, he says, he was tortured. He says he was kept up for 16 days straight, beaten, "stretched" (pulled up from under his arms while his feet were shackled to a chair) and forced to run while chained to guards, and if he could not keep up, he was dragged until he was bloody and bruised. After he began a hunger strike, he had food tubes put up his nose and, he claims, soldiers would purposely poke IV needles into the wrong parts of his arm, just to induce pain. But the one thing that was not done to him? Nobody asked if he was involved in a plot to blow up the U.S. and British embassies in Sarajevo. Rather, all he was repeatedly asked was about his connections to al-Qaeda and Osama bin-Laden (he insists he had no connection at all to the terrorist group).
But there was one thing in the article that not only amazed me but brilliantly illuminated why the U.S. should never torture, and why it is so important that we repudiate what happened during the Bush years and chart a clear and unequivocal new path forward, one that reflects the country's traditional values. Boumediene said:
"I thought America, the big country, they have CIA, FBI. Maybe one week, two weeks, they know I am innocent. I can go back to my home."
In other words, Boumediene had faith that a country like the United States could not possibly keep an innocent man prisoner with no way to contest his guilt. His view of America is one that many in the world shared before the Bush years . . . .
That is supposed to be the difference between a country like North Korea and a country like the United States.
Click here for the complete article.
xxx
This says it all. The US willingly surrendered what high ground we had had before.
Of course, even before Bush, our 'high ground' had been tenuous at best:
A country founded on genocide and slavery.
Jim Crow and, even now, capital punishment and imprisonment that allows strikingly different statistics depending on race.
The sham of The War On Drugs.
The only western country which does not offer reasonable health care to its citizens [unless they happen to hold high government office].
That has 'Don't Ask Don't Tell' as a very real law and denies marriage to 1.5% of its population.
Whose education is falling apart.
That tolerates children going to bed hungry every night.
That accepts the fact that some of its people still kill in the name of God.
Whose people are urged to take their guns to church----
All this doesn't leave us a lot of room to talk, does it?
Still before Bush was appointed president, we had slightly more room than we do now.
And Cheney just goes on telling us how right he and his cronies were all that time--spouting the lie that 'torture saved lives' just as if that were the question [which it is not].
But, today, the real issue comes home. Two of our citizens are being illegally and immorally held by another country and we are powerless to even raise our voice in protest--all because we have done the same thing--and right recently.
Advertisement
















Thanks for sharing Bard's piece with us, icetree. I saw a glimpse of it yesterday but didn't get a chance to read the whole thing. It is so true. Cheney and Bush, et.al., squandered our standing in the world.
June 10, 2009 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Right you are, LisB--
We can no longer hold other governments accountable when it comes to human rights. We abdicated that position.
And we are less safe than we were.
And our Constitution is in tatters.
June 11, 2009 12:33 AM | Reply | Permalink
It wasn't just the left who saw the damage that a second term for Bush would wreak on our nation and our ability to gather support from around the world. From 'The American Conservative', election issue, 2004:
This election is all about George W. Bush, and those issues are enough to render him unworthy of any conservative support.
It was kind of remarkable when they published it at the time, and unbelievable, when one considers what the Rs have devolved into today.
June 11, 2009 3:26 AM | Reply | Permalink
You're exactly right. It is appalling that no one in the US has gone to jail for participating in these criminal, totalitarian "detentions."
June 11, 2009 3:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
wow, miguelitoh2o, just wow.
a conservative paper calling Bush a caricature and saying that he would discredit conservatism?
had they traveled to the future and reported back, or what?
well, sure, the LEFT saw it coming, but we were able to see his faults.
just as, today, so many on the left need some moderates to point out to us the flaws in OUR Great Leader.
seems to me both sides are getting more extreme-- but the GOPpers are providing more entertainment, when you come right down to it.
June 11, 2009 3:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
hi, oleeb--
if I could only count the petitions I've signed calling for that.
oh, sure, a few pawns were labeled 'bad apples' and imprisoned. but, with the talk shows spouting All Cheney All The Time, can there be ANY doubt where it all began? So, WHY is he not only not in prison [and not a Club Fed but a REAL prison] but allowed to spout his treason in public for all to hear?
June 11, 2009 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought of this as well when I heard the news of the journalist's fate. Our moral standing has been made into a joke by the former mafioso administration. We have no moral standing. I feel both anger and sorrow that we show no signs of holding the criminals accountable because this would be the best way for our country to regain some integrity.
June 11, 2009 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
hi Synchonicity--
fwiw-- I believe the Dems have a bad taste in their mouth, still, from the Nixon retirement. the Repubs have been calling for their heads ever since.
And, I think the Dems are laboring under the false assumption that the R's will let up on them if they [Dems] let Bush/Cheney et al get away with their crimes this time.
It won't work, of course -- so they will let the criminals go free and get nothing in return except more trampling from the Repubs AND a discredited nation in the eyes of the world.
June 12, 2009 1:39 PM | Reply | Permalink