<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>HomelessScientist&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/homelessscientist/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/homelessscientist/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/homelessscientist//7882</id>
   <updated>	2008-11-14T05:13:32Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://14.244211-comment:3286699</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/13/card_check_is_more_democratic/#c3286699" />
		
		    <title>HomelessScientist Commented on Card Check is More Democratic than NLRB Elections by Nathan Newman</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-14T05:13:32Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-14T05:13:32Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I am generally pro-labor, and a member of the union at my current employer.  However, I was a postdoc at the University of California, Berkeley when the UAW ran a card check campaign several years ago.  The organizer who came to visit me several times told flat-out lies about the nature of the process: she told me that the card was only a petition to hold an election, not itself a vote.  My friends and colleagues reported similar conversations.  I was suspicious, and I did not sign the card, but apparently more than 50% did ... the UAW was finally recognized last week, after lots of legal maneuvering.</p>

<p>Consequently, I am suspicious of these card check elections.  Unions should be voluntary membership organizations.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

