« Torture and interrogation -- from the disciplined subject, and the interrogators who did and didn't. | Howard C. Berkowitz's Blog | The prayer isn't necessary, but the message is worth thinking about »

An anniversary to remember: November 19, 1863


Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting-place for those who here gave their lives that this nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate…we cannot consecrate…we cannot hallow…this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us, the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us…that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion; that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain; that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom; and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.


12 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Thanks, Howard.

I don't know if you recall the idea of the song for a wounded nation... or whatever it was going to be called. But at that time, I took the trouble to extract words and phrases from The Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address. And I think they belong here.

If you recall, I had the image of that phrase from the oath of office... which... in my mind I envisioned being said in a cadence ... as if to drums. With rests. I'm going to use "\\" as a rest sign. If the reader does not read music, then think of it as a "blank space" where you wait for a beat (or two).

(You could think of it like a cross between funeral march and battle hymn)

So here's the refrain:

Preserve ..\\.. Protect ..\\.. And defend the Constitution ..\\..\\..

Of the United ..\\.. States

Refrain repeats twice. (Again... as if you were marching to it... a cadence)

 

Now for the stanzas - blank verse

declare the causes
self-evident truths
all men are created equal
to secure just powers from the consent of the governed
the Right of the People
to alter or to abolish
a long train of abuses
a design to reduce them
under absolute Despotism
it is their right, it is their duty,
to throw off
absolute Tyranny

He has refused
He has endeavoured to prevent
He has obstructed the Administration of Justice


We
have Petitioned for Redress
solemnly publish and declare
Cruelty & Perfidy
Oppressions
whose character
marked by every act which may define a Tyrant

conclude Peace

It is for us
to be dedicated
to the unfinished work
dedicated to the great task remaining before us
increased devotion to that cause
that we here highly resolve
that this nation shall have a new birth of freedom
and that this government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

 

user-pic

Thank you.


JFK once said, to a dinner of American Nobel Prize winners in the White House, that the room had not seen such a concentration of brainpower since Thomas Jefferson had dined there, alone. At times, I have had similar thoughts about the power of words about government, involving Winston Churchill dining (and, of course, drinking) alone.


We cousins on the other side of the pond, however, have had some of our own brilliance and eloquence in expressing the true "values" of this nation. There is no accident that some of our greatest Presidents were among them, although there have been many other voices. While I have mixed feelings about Hillary, when I think of eloquence, I regret that Barbara Jordan never was a Presidential candidate.


Now, we are faced with recovery from great national tragedies. I can think of no better observations with which to move into the future, one from an American and one from an Englishman.


Senator Carl Schurz said,

I confidently trust that the American people will prove themselves … too wise not to detect the false pride or the dangerous ambitions or the selfish schemes which so often hide themselves under that deceptive cry of mock patriotism: "Our country, right or wrong!" They will not fail to recognize that our dignity, our free institutions and the peace and welfare of this and coming generations of Americans will be secure only as we cling to the watchword of true patriotism: "Our country—when right to be kept right; when wrong to be put right."

and there is no better closing than the epigraph from Winston Churchill's History of the Second World War

  • In War: Resolution
  • In Defeat: Defiance
  • In Victory: Magnanimity
  • In Peace: Good Will
  • --

    Howard

    user-pic

    Barabara Jordan. Oh, yes!!! What a speaking voice. What an ear for the dramatic phrase... the dramatic pause.

    We are sorely lacking in eloquence! And I wonder if eloquence is really only given to those whose role is a self-less one, those whose eye is on what really matters. And when that person is able to speak the truth, without fear, without expectation, then true eloquence comes to reside within that soul.

    I also think the black experience of sitting and listening to wonderful preachers plays a role. Then again, the greatest preachers probably have that quality I mentioned.

    Again. Wonderful post! And good commentary.

    user-pic

    Sometimes, we learn things through foreign eyes. I was playing tourguide to a Swedish friend, who has married an American, is finishing her doctorate (including teaching American history), and speaks a depressing number of languages. She did call once in great glee, to inform me that she could now think in Texan as well as American and English.


    Anyway, we walked from the Lincoln Memorial to the Vietnam Wall, and she commented "how appropriate these two are so close together."


    Puzzled, I asked her to explain. "Weren't these the two times your country suffered the most internal dissent?"


    We may have a third, but with no monument.


    I have been somewhat amused to find that while the Lincoln Memorial itself is incredible -- the statue looks into one's soul -- I suspect that like many Americans, I associate it with Martin Luther King and the "I have a dream" speech, certainly one that will be immortal in the books of eloquence.


    Nevertheless, foreigners tend to look at it and say "Yes! This is where Forrest Gump stood!"


    Sigh. In all fairness, Tom Hanks has an incredible acting range. Still, I still laugh over my experience in watching Apollo 13 in a theater. A boy ahead of me whispered to his father, "Uh-oh. I know they're in trouble, if they have Forrest Gump as a rocket scientist."

    --

    Howard

    *equal opportunity offense to both extremes*

    "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it" [George Santayana]

    user-pic
    We may have a third, but with no monument.

    YET!

    Now, my idea of a monument for what we've been through would be the defendant's box at the Court in the Hague. (Others can submit their own ideas. The Saloon could sponsor a contest.)

    As for the Lincoln Memorial, I went to College in DC. And I never tired of seeing the monuments lit up at night. But if there's one monument i always wanted to go past and see up close again and again, it was the Lincoln Memorial. Wow! Especially at night.

    user-pic

    Thanks. I always get a little chokey from those words.

    Speaking of the Lincoln Memorial, my mother heard Marian Anderson sing there. And I like the Swede view--add to the dissent that both wars were civil wars. Guess we're doing that again, now.

    user-pic

    "Georgie" and Dick "The Monster" Cheney have done all they could to see that our system of government DOES perish from the earth.

    But we hold some truths to be self-evident, that "We The People" SHALL prevail!

    user-pic

    Probably that he wrote it himself, was a good orator, and had a certain purity of vision and pure heart from an emotional point of view.  

    I think when you mind and heart are in the right place, then from deep inside you can draw on wisdom and it speaks for itself. 

    user-pic

    It wasn't a one-off.

    Fellow-Countrymen:

    At this second appearing to take the oath of the Presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.

    On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war--seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.

    One-eighth of the whole population were colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."

    With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.

    user-pic

    Here's a question: What makes this a great speech?

    That many people, over a long time, admire it and keep it alive, might suffice.

    That when spoken aloud, its cadences match the gravity of the occasion, and the depth of despair, along with the desperate hope and grim determination all knew was required, is enough for me.

    user-pic
    user-pic

    Nice work Howard.

    Leave a comment

    Howard C. Berkowitz

    user-pic

    Following:
    Followers:

    Posts
    Comments & Recommends


    Favorites

    All Reader Posts
    How to use myTPM

    Advertise Liberally
    Share
    Close Social Web Email

    "To" Email Address

    Your Name

    Your Email Address