Disrupting Town Halls... The Absence of Reason


In all my 50 years, I have never seen anything as shocking and pathetic as the irrational opponents of health care reform! I remember as a boy how proud I was to see a copy of Norman Rockwell's series of paintings known as "The Four Freedoms." Freedom from want, freedom from fear, freedom of faith - freedom of speech!"

Read more »

Astroturfers - a Strategy Session


Originally posted on Daily Kos:

I have found the Right Principles instruction booklet from ThinkProgress and posted the text here, and highlighted certain portions that I feel need to be addressed, in order to come up with countermeasures to expose the tactics the Right uses to disrupt constituent's meetings with their Representatives.

 

1. Digitally record everything. I mean everyone brings a DV camera! And take photos!


2. If they want to "pack the hall," then the local chapters of every organization must pack it first. Better yet, host the meeting. The turfers will have to be on their guard inside a union hall. Spread out everywhere. Occupy the front row seats!

 

 

 


Read more »

Diva Sarah


The Right Wing idiocracy has gotten the Left wrong concerning Sarah Palin.

We are not afraid of Sarah Palin. Far from it. Sarah Palin is the butt of a joke. We wish to continue laughing.

Read more »

Letter to Senator Schumer


Dear Senator Schumer: There are no more excuses! Al Franken has given you the critical 60th vote. Please understand that "bipartisanship" is dead. It was murdered by the Republican party, who put it on life support during the last administration, then delivered the death blow at the beginning of this year. Now that we have to worry about fixing what was broken by the Republicans, we do not need their obstructionism to solve our problems.
You have the chance of a lifetime to deliver something long wanted by the people of New York who's health and welfare have suffered at the hands of corporate greed. D.I.N.O.S. like Max Baucus and Joe Lieberman should not be allowed to dictate the legislation coming from our party. 
I don't want you to be conciliatory. If compromise means weakening of Public Option, then that would not only be wrong, it would be undemocratic as 70% of the American people want a Health care system, and are sick and tired of being prisoners of the insurance companies. Senator, take the blinders off, see sense!

The Leaderless Republican Implosion



A funny thing happened on the way to Michael Steele's Republican resurgence - Kevin Stevenson lost his job. Here he was, a spokesperson for the Marathon County Republican Party for -- years, a hard working good Republican not in lockstep with Obama and yet he was fired - for criticizing Rush Limbaugh and being a moderate! Mr. Steele must be feeling like a jinxed aerialist.
You see, this is paranoia mode. How does a party in a paranoid state deal with adversity? It crawls deeper into itself, and even though that paranoia was the seed of it's destruction, the party clings to it all the more to the self-destructive exclusion of any other outlook that mlght save it. The hardcore party members say to the moderates, "We have the canon of the party! We are the pure, who damn the unbelievers! Moderates are back stabbers, and weak-willed fellow travelers!" Limbaugh:

We have a really huge tent in California, right?' Limbaugh said on his show. 'I mean, Schwarzenegger describing how to put the Republican Party together after helping destroy the state. And you know how he helped destroy the state? He fell for his own talk about big tents. If he would have just stayed the course that he was talking about when he announced his candidacy on Leno and when he had all these people out there to start his administration, when he was on the conservative path, he could have taken this by the gangbusters and maybe gotten the Supreme Court to change the Constitution so that foreigners could run for president. He had that opportunity, and he blew it big time going moderate.
So, on the one hand, it's okay to accuse the President of not being bipartisan, but on the other, if you're a Republican trying to be bipartisan, the Limbaugh Taliban will pick you apart! Not quite the way to attract the lndies! Maybe Obama gauged this intollerance well as he chose to pursue a fifty state strategy during the election. He separated out the Indies from the GOP. Independents must be really disgusted with the ideologically pure Right and the GOP politicians who all but ceded leadership of the party to it. How disgusted are moderates and Independents with the Right Wing mafia? USA Today and the Gallop company

So the dominant faces of the Republican Party are all men, all white, all conservative and all old enough to join AARP, ranging in age from 58 (Limbaugh) to 72 (McCain). They include some of the country's most strident voices on issues from Sonia Sotomayor's nomination to the Supreme Court to President Obama's policies at home and abroad. Two are retired from politics, and one has never been a candidate. came out with a report that broke down the demography of the GOP's public image, give demography and compared it to the present "leadership" of the GOP. Would the present leaders resurrect the GOP?

Only McCain holds elective office, and his age and status as the loser of last year's presidential election make him an unlikely standard bearer for the party's future.

And Indies would be - alienated. 

But what about the moderates who are left in the party? Aren't they restless enough now to finally take a stand and wrest control from the ideologues who tyrannize them? Obama is going after the low - hanging fruit of the disillusioned moderates and poaching Spector, Huntsman and others from the GOP. And they are listening: The Washington Examiner:

The Republican strategist who helped Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman prepare for a possible presidential run says the Republican party is in for a devastating defeat if its guiding lights are Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh and Dick Cheney. 'If it's 2012 and our party is defined by Palin and Limbaugh and Cheney, then we're headed for a blowout," says strategist John Weaver, who advised Huntsman and was for years a close adviser to Sen. John McCain. "That's just the truth.'

That leaves the wide-open GOP presidential field even more open than it had been before. Whatever happens, the way forward won't likely be smooth; Weaver's 'headed for a blowout' comment indicates the depth of division over the GOP's prospects. 'I firmly believe that Huntsman and people like him are the prescription for what ails us,' says Weaver. 'But I have the feeling that our party maybe won't order that prescription in 2012.
In my opinion, either the Republican party will renew itself or implode. Something tells me its going to be the latter. And it will be a quiet implosion. The Right won't go easily. They have the money, and enough of a base to be a regional party. However in places like New York State, New England and California, l'm sure enough people will be so disgusted as to bolt. What the Right doesn't understand, is that by shoring up the base to the exclusion of everyone else, they are ceding the opportunity to expand it. According to Republican strategist Mike Murphy, in a telling article for Time Magazine, the changing demographics does not bode well for Right Wing thinking. In 2008, Obama lost no opportunity to exploit the situation. Time Magazine:

t was a huge shock to the GOP when Barack Obama won Republican Indiana last year. The bigger news was how he did it. Latino voters delivered the state. Exit polls showed that they provided Obama with a margin of more than 58,000 votes in a state he carried by a slim 26,000 votes. That's right, GOP, you've entered a brave new world ruled by Latino Hoosiers, and you're losing.
Murphy goes on to say that while in 1980, Latino cast 2% the vote, in 2008, they cast a whopping 9%. Obama took their vote by a 35-point margin. And the GOP's response would be denial.
Rather than face up to all this, too many in the GOP are stuck in a swoon of nostalgia. Most of our party leaders come from bloodred GOP states or safe districts, so they are far more at home in the tribal politics of Republican primaries than in those of the country as a whole. You could say their radio dials are stuck on AM. The result is we hear a lot about going back to "the winning ways of Ronald Reagan." Well, I love Reagan too. But demographics no longer do. In 1980, Reagan beat Jimmy Carter by 10 points. If that contest were held again today, under the current demographics of the electorate per exit polls, the election would be much closer, with Reagan probably winning by about 3 points.
The opportunity cost of such a head - in - the - sand attitude is that the Republicans are ceding fertile electoral ground with panicky, exclusionary denial. But courting the minority would require major changes in their attitude on things like welfare, privatization, health care, and of course, immigation. According to Salon.com, Democrats are taking full advantage of the changing voter demographics in the Hispanlc community.

By 2008, the Hispanic share of the electorate had increased by a third, to 41 percent, and voters in the demographic were much more Democlratic, going 69-30 for Obama over McCain. That change by itself can account for almost all of Obama's advantage in the state, especially since the white vote stayed essentially the same (though whites' share of the electorate was down by 7 percentage points) and the African-American population is small.

And if I may go back to my attitude argument, I don't see the Republicans getting any progress done precisely because of their past history with any minority and the obstacle of livng it down. From Bobby Kennedy marching with Cesar Chavez on down to Jesse Jackson, the Clintons, finally on down to Obama himself, we've had a history of breaking bread with the poor, acting on their behalf, and organizing with them. Political action on the street level is part and parcel of being a Democrat.
What do I expect will happen to the GOP? I expect either a civil war within, or over the years there will an exodus of the dissatified to the Democratic party, or the rise of a viable third party, with the GOP becoming a shadow of it's former self. I can't expect any moderate to stay in a party that keeps shooting itself in the foot, a party the has killed the better angels of it's nature. No wonder moderates will in the future, refrain from joining the party. And let me leave you with this:
The Republican Party can thank Karl Rove and George Bush for their current descent in obscurity. By injecting ideology into every personnel and policy choice, they cut their followers adrift. The constant historical lesson is that the American polity recoils from extremism. No matter the political bent of ideological excesses, Americans get a belly full and return to the middle as surely as the leaves turn in the fall.

To All in the Professionally Angry - Easily Offended Club:


Carrie Nation GET OVER IT! Can't you surmise that your President is human? Well, in the immortal words of Steve Martin: "Well excuuuuuuuuse Meeee!!!" What do you want from the guy? I know people expect him to have a halo and shoot thunderbolts from his butt; however, walking on water must be reserved for saving the economy, and not for role modelism.


Read more »

Rush Limbaugh and the GOP Nervous Breakdown


It seems that the Republicans are suffering from a nervous breakdown.

It's cause is deep insecurity, which manifests itself in denial, as exhibited for example, by the attempt to obstruct the American Rescue and Recovery Act, and congratulating themselves for being irrelevant regarding it's passage.

A symptom is confusion, loss of self identity. What direction do they go in? Who is the leader? Do they go in a direction that puts them more in touch with the majority of people? Or do they retreat inward and hold on for dear life to the one core constituency they have left, and risk consigning themselves to a doctrinaire niche? Do they follow the lead of a chairman who wants to reorganize the party, and show some backbone, or do they turn into little lemmings and follow a pompous overinflated blowhard "with talent on loan from God," over the narrow cliff of their doctrines?

Well, the Republicans chose the  latter of each set of choices.


Read more »

Rush Limbaugh and the GOP Nervous Breakdown


It seems that the Republicans are suffering from a nervous breakdown.

It's cause is deep insecurity, which manifests itself in denial, as exhibited for example, by the attempt to obstruct the American Rescue and Recovery Act, and congratulating themselves for being irrelevant regarding it's passage. A symptom is confusion, loss of self identity. What direction do they go in? Who is the leader? Do they go in a direction that puts them more in touch with the majority of people? Or do they retreat inward and hold on for dear life to the one core constituency they have left, and risk consigning themselves to a doctrinaire niche? Do they follow the lead of a chairman who wants to reorganize the party, and show some backbone, or do they turn into little lemmings and follow a pompous overinflated blowhard "with talent on loan from God," over the narrow cliff of their doctrines? Well, the Republicans chose the latter of each set of choices.


Read more »

Obama's Inauguration - A New Day For Hate


I don't want to scare anyone, but I am concerned. Think that Progressives and Center Lefties are the only ones celebrating the election of Barack Obama? Think again. The Lunatic Right is overjoyed! And that makes me nervous! I'm not talking about loudmouths like Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, or Limbaugh. They are crying in their beer. I'm talking about the true nut cases who espouse violence in the name of "racial purity." The Nazis, the White Nationalists and the Klansmen are still here friends. Too much prejudice and narrow mindedness has been ingrained into our psyche to be wiped out in my lifetime. When I was born, the Civil Rights movement was only three years old. In 1964, the Voting Rights Act was signed, but on the way, Schwerner, Cheney, Goodman, Medgar Evers and Viola Liuso were murdered. Four years later, Martin Luther King was martyred. As I recall, a massive cultural effort was needed to make white America confront it's prejudices. And always there was that violent paranoid extremist element that stubbornly refused to open their minds. Tom Metzger, David Duke and Thomas Robb all started their careers in hate early under the John Birch Society and George Lincoln Rockwell. My point is this: We lost Abraham (Lincoln,) Martin (Luther King,) and John (F. Kennedy,) to the bullets of ignorance. Let's not lose Barack. Am I talking nonsense? The ban on assault weapons was repealed. Anyone with money and know - how can acquire weapons for a small army. And calling an act of domestic terror a hate crime doesn't make it any less lethal. Anyone who doesn't believe that can ask the ghosts of Oklahoma City if it's nonsense! We as a people are capable of violence. All we need to do is get on our high-horses to feel we have the right to do almost anything. That is the nature of most kind of extremism. The ultra-extremist, the revolutionary goes beyond that. That person deals in totalities. They want to create "new societies." In order to do that you must regiment society. Democracy is tiresome to the White Aryan. But the White Aryan / Nationalist must also defend the purity of the race, and this, as far as the racist revolutionary is concerned, can only be done with revolution and radical action. The problem is as far as the racist is concerned, it is the white race that is being oppressed, not the "so called" (by them,) minorities! And to make matters worse, white people don't know they've lost power, and are duped into participating in their own pollution! So now the Nazis, Klansmen and White Supremacists are overjoyed at the election of Barack Obama! In their eyes, now has come the right time to expose the "oppression of the white race." In the Southern Poverty Law Center's Intelligence Report, Mark Potok writes:
Even before the campaign was over, racial rage, clearly driven by fear of a black man in the White House, began to break out around the country. Effigies of Obama appeared hanging from nooses on university campuses. Angry supporters of John McCain and Sarah Palin shouted "Kill him!" at a campaign rally and even screamed "nigger" at a black cameraman, telling him, "Sit down, boy!" The head of the Hillsborough County, Fla., Republican Party sent an E-mail warning members of "the threat" of "carloads of black Obama supporters coming from the inner city to cast their votes." A reporter who has covered every presidential election since 1980 told me he had never seen such fury. Similar scenes were reported nationwide.
Improbable in the era of Cumbaya? Not for Dave Stancliff of the Eureka Times-Standard:

How far have we come? I'd say we've come a long way. We've elected the first African-American/Caucasian president. There are a lot of hate laws on the books now. Most people seem more aware of our diversity and are more respectful of different skin color. We should celebrate the upcoming changes we expect President-elect Barack Obama to bring about for the good of all, but that soft underbelly of hatred and intolerance shows signs of new growth. White supremacist anxieties over a black leader in the White House have grown rapidly with the worsening economic crisis and demographic trends that indicate whites will cease to be a majority of Americans within a generation, according to the FBI.
Thomas Robb's Knights of the Ku Klux Klan is a case in point In a post for his blog,

the author states:

The president elect now stands as a symbol to our people throughout this nation that change is indeed coming. What will it mean for those who are being disenfranchised from the very nation purchased by the blood of their forefathers? It could mean an awakening of our spirit and blood. Every time the television shows an image of Obama it will be a reminder that our people have lost power in this country. We actually lost that power 40 years ago, but with a white president people would go to sleep thinking at least white people were still running things. Now there is no reason to believe this. The betrayal will stare them in the face each time they watch the news and see little black children playing in the rose garden.

We are not asking you to hate anyone! We are not asking you to commit an illegal act. We are not asking you to hurt anyone. We just want you to love your people and do that which your forefathers did - give your children a bright future.

So we have to admit that this may be the best thing that has happened to us. It perhaps comes as a wake-up call to the sleeping giant deep in the heart of our people.

The author goes on to state:

So don't despair! Don't be discouraged! We have been saying this would happen. We have said that there is a growing subtle hatred for our people. This has not been a battle between Republicans or Democrats. This was not a battle between liberals and conservatives. This is a race war - a culture war - being waged against white people. As more and more non-whites come into this country the hatred for the founding people will grow.
Now Robb sees himself as a non-violent person and he may be right: But there is no denying the gist of his message - racial conflict is coming. Unfortunately, if it were simply a matter of propaganda vs. propaganda I'd say fine, bring it and let democracy decide, but not everyone on the extreme Left or Right are civil. And trust me, neither Commie or Nazi understand civil. They know guns though. Greg Evensen seems to think a civil war in the U.S. is inevitable.

I am faced with the certain realization that no matter how I may try to sugar coat it, this time -- those who voted or supported the socialist left, the democrats, the liberals, the "elitists" in the universities and business, the apostate "liberation theology" or do nothing church, and politics everywhere--are my enemy. It can be stated in no other terms. That's a fact, Jack.
Even before Election Day, Evensen said he must begin to view neighbors, co-workers as potential enemies. In his article for News with Views, THE NEXT CIVIL WAR FOR HISTORIC AMERICA: ARE YOU MY ENEMY? he states: But what he says a little later is chilling:

Minutemen and the militia were responsible for their own arms, ammunition and supplies. Can you muster with others and provide the essentials? Can you carry all that you need for two to three days at a time? Can you sleep with your back to a tree on cold, wet ground? Can you be still for an hour or two just watching and listening? How will you communicate with your fellow patriots--safely? When the bad guys start shooting, what will you do? Will you give away your position by firing randomly to "scare" them off? Will you remain defensive and not set yourself up for being killed? Will you learn how to move with stealth? Can you disarm someone and take them as a prisoner?
These are but a few examples of the rabid paranoia that is out there. But we are now in a new era, in new territory that most everyone in America but an ignorant, bigoted minority wants to explore. Mostly everyone in that minority won't act, but there is that militia fringe. All it took was one Lee Harvey Oswald to kill Kennedy, and one Timothy McVeigh to bomb Oklahoma City. The SPLC's Mark Potok is quite clear about this problem.

David Duke, the former Klan leader and convicted felon who is the closest thing the radical right has to an intellectual leader these days, believes this could all work to his benefit. In an essay this summer, the neo-Nazi ideologue argued that an Obama victory would serve as a "visual aid" to white Americans, provoking a backlash that Duke believes will "result in a dramatic increase in our ranks."Even as we embark on a new national adventure, the signs are worrying. It may be that the hate mongers are wrong, that Americans' better angels will prevail and the changes that are sweeping America will not result in a growing rage on the right. But experience tells us that while we hope for the best, we also must prepare for what could be a dangerous, racially motivated backlash of hate.
Look, we have to be vigilant ourselves. Use my links. Monitor the sites. Read what those people are writing, and what they are reading. Talk to whomever it is you must talk to if you hear something. I've already lived through the assassination of one President. I don't need another.

John McCain's Glass House


The nerve! Last week, we heard cries of "Terrorist!" and "Kill him!" when McCain or Palin rhetorically asked who Obama was, or what to do about him. It wasn't just that the crowd yelled these things, it was also that neither candidate repudiated, or even mildly corrected the crowd until three days later. Instead, McCain stood there with his stupid smile. And Palin? Her accusing a political opponent of "palling around with terrorists," not only crossed a line, it shows a tremendous lack of understanding and intellect. Then there are the McCain surrogates who feel free to slander and insult their opponent with the seemingly tacit approval of the principals.
Which makes the crocodile tears and false indignance of McCain over John Lewis's protest all the more galling.

John Lewis lived through the era he is comparing McCain's campaign with. I know that McCain's absence from the Freedom Rides  or Mississippi's Freedom Summer was excusable, but didn't the public schools of Wasilla, or the five colleges that Sarah Palin attended teach about those things?

The brutal reception by the Klan of the Freedom Riders at every stop was a  result of the atmosphere created by men like George Wallace, Orville Faubus and Lester Maddox. In the South, many politicians gave a wink and a nod to Klan activities. With the atmosphere that the McCain / Palin ticket is creating, such politicians may soon be returning.

McCain accuses Obama of having more negative  ads than him, but answer me this Johnny, did Barack ever associate McCain any characters of ill repute? No! Obama took the high road in his attacks, and did not engage in innuendo and character assasination!

And yet to listen to John McCain's whine over John Lewis's written words, you'd think that Lewis was some Democratic Sarah Palin  claiming that McCain was "palling around with Klansmen."

This Bill Ayers situation that's been going on for weeks became something of a central point of the campaign," Powell said. "But Mr. McCain says that he's a washed-out terrorist. Well, then, why do we keep talking about him?

Colin Powell just gave his endorsement of Barack Obama. The above quote illustrates that he considered the  behavior of his long-time friend McCain to be unconscionable.

What McCain & Co. have done is paint themselves into a corner, and now that they have run out of any talking points with any hint of verisimilitude, they have been reduced to a dog and pony show.

The loss of Powell for John McCain betrays  another weakness in him that we don't want in a President, an inability to adapt.

MR. MATTHEWS: If you have liberal views, does that mean you have anti-American views? What's the connection? I don't get the connection. What's the connection between liberal and leftist and anti-American?

REP. BACHMANN: Anti-American is the point, because --

MR. MATTHEWS: I mean, if you're liberal, are you anti-American?

REP. BACHMANN: Well, the liberals that are Jeremiah Wright and that are Bill Ayers, they're over-the-top anti-American. And that's the question that Americans have. Remember, it was Michelle Obama who said she's only recently proud of her country. And so these are very anti-American views.

MR. MATTHEWS: Okay.

REP. BACHMANN: That's not the way that most Americans feel about our country. Most Americans, Chris, are wild about America, and they're very concerned to have a president who doesn't share those values..

And now we have the latest episode of Republicans shooting themselves in the foot with their attempts at slander as '>Michelle Bachman gets her Joe McCarthy on.

This is the same person who blamed the Minnesota Democrats for failing to pass a bill that she herself voted  against - The Protect America Act.

She also has this fetish  for old-fashioned light bulbs, introducing a "Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act" to combat the government intrusion of phasing out conventional light bulbs! Will the A.C.L.U. back her? Will the onslaught of incandescent bulbs lead to communism? Stay tuned!

Anyway, her jaunt into McCarthyism will cost her her job now that the RNC has pulled out of her campaign, and people incensed by her remarks have contributed enormously to her opponent's campaign.

John McCain: Meet Hank Martin - And Morris Dees: Part Six


It didn't take long for the mean to come out. No sooner did the Republican National Convention end, then did the broad brush lies about how Obama would raise taxes on "you" came out. Never mind that only one percent of the people would feel the pinch, McCain had buttons to push. At the time, he was twenty points ahead of Obama. There was no earth - shattering economic crisis then. McCain's insecurity was showing. And of course, that meant that the showmanship had to start. It started with the stunt casting of Sarah Palin as his running mate. My what a feminist our Johnny is! Of course, it pleased McCain's adopted by necessity base that she was against taxes, pro-drilling and pro-life! Well, I'm sure the base enjoys Sarah's endless verbatim repetition of the same stale talking points.

John McCain: Meet Hank Martin - And Morris Dees: Part Six


It didn't take long for the mean to come out. No sooner did the Republican National Convention end, then did the broad brush lies about how Obama would raise taxes on "you" came out. Never mind that only one percent of the people would feel the pinch, McCain had buttons to push. At the time, he was twenty points ahead of Obama. There was no earth - shattering economic crisis then. McCain's insecurity was showing. And of course, that meant that the showmanship had to start. It started with the stunt casting of Sarah Palin as his running mate. My what a feminist our Johnny is! Of course, it pleased McCain's adopted by necessity base that she was against taxes, pro-drilling and pro-life! Well, I'm sure the base enjoys Sarah's endless verbatim repetition of the same stale talking points.

John McCain: Meet Hank Martin - And Morris Dees: Part Five


Out came Sarah Palin with all the beauty and superficiality of a Miss Alaska runner-up. As she cheerleaders her way around the lower 48, with her Stupid Smile and her script of tired catchphrases, has stoked up the base, some of whom wish that she'd run for the top of the ticket, instead of that tired old man hiding behind her! That brings me to the worm in this apple. The real inner insecurity of John McCain. McCain is competing against a younger, more energetic opponent called Barack Obama, not old Kankles Clinton. He is afraid that when people compare him to Obama, they will see a decrepit old man, devoid of possibities, trying to beat a younger man - who is out to change the world. This makes him desperate. And in an election that's favoring the Democrats, a desperate Republican feels rotten and mean.

John McCain: Meet Hank Martin - And Morris Dees Part Four


And the economy continued to fail. While people and yes, mortgage and investment banks continued to gorge themselves on the high cholesterol of subprime mortgage loans, McCain said "OK" to continued deregulation of the securities market. With this bankruptcy of ideas, McCain has sought to lead his soulless party to four more years of Bush's madness. Only how to do it? His campaign, his party and his allies were going to be out organized, outspent and outproduced by Obama and the Democrats. The answer? Free publicity! How to get it? Stunts! You see, if you don't have thought one on how to change the country, you have to follow the old magician's rule of misdirecting the audience in order to scam them. Now, a magician only wishes to entertain the audience with his illusions. McCain wants to pull the Presidency out of his magic hat.

John McCain: Meet Hank Martin - And Morris Dees Part Three


And so, in 2007, John McCain, the maverick who in 2004 opposed Bush's wartime tax cuts for the upper 1%, decided in 2007 that it just as "maverick-y" to suddenly be for them! Again regarding the Iraq War, McCain showed his convenient ambivalence. Though he wasn't against the war, he made noises like he was reluctant to go to war. The U.N. was to referee the end game, and the pitiful few troops in lraq had to be reinforced. But after the Surge, McCain was all ready to jump into the war bandwagon. Suddenly it wasn't important that we rendered the U.N. helpless, and were continuing a military adventure that was bleeding our economy. We needed "victory!" Despite that, people are still unmoved about the war, and want it to end.

gwojtowy

user-pic

Following: 1
Followers: 5

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Party Democratic
  • Politics Center Left

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Daily Kos Talking Points Memo MyDD
  • Favorite Books The Eagle and The Raven by Pauline Gedge In the High Uplands by Stanislaw Vincenz
  • Favorite Quotes Cold hearted orb that rules the night that robs the color from our sight. Red is gray and yellow white. But we decide which is right, And which is an illusion.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address