<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Ganesh Sitaraman&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/gsitaraman/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/gsitaraman/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/gsitaraman//54</id>
   <updated>2008-03-27T03:18:59Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>McCain&apos;s Mortgage Policy...and Economic Theory</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/mccains-mortgage-policyand-eco.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.185840</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-27T03:18:59Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-27T03:18:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary> The New York Times reported yesterday that Senator McCain thinks “it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers.” Indeed, even though the instruments...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Ganesh Sitaraman</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/gsitaraman/">
      <![CDATA[

<p>The New York Times reported <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/26/us/politics/26mortgage.html?ref=politics">yesterday </a>that Senator McCain
thinks “it is not the duty of government to bail out and reward those who act
irresponsibly, whether they are big banks or small borrowers.” Indeed, even
though the instruments of the credit crisis were so complicated they “weren’t
particularly well understood by even the most sophisticated banks, lenders and
hedge funds,” he offered no policy to address those or similar instruments –
and even suggested, in the words of the Times, that “government should
eliminate obstacles to the ability of financial institutions to raise more
capital.” <br /></p><p><br />When taken together, these extraordinary comments show just how
committed Senator McCain is to a particular theory of political economy that rejects government action in the economy. What
would it take for Senator McCain to acknowledge the need for government action
in the economy? Would he <i>ever </i>act?</p><p></p>

<p>I’m reminded of Franklin Roosevelt’s <a href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/fdrcommonwealth.htm">Commonwealth Club
address</a>: The question, Roosevelt said, was
“whether individual men and women will have to serve some system of government
of economics, or whether a system of government and economics exists to serve
individual men and women.” We should ask that question of Senator McCain today.<br /></p>

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
