The NFL: Where Sunlight is the Best Disinfectant
NFL = No F&cking Limbaugh!
That acronym has been keeping my lips curled up around the edges since yesterday! I am ecstatic that the NFL has made what I would call a real, American business decision, one that respects the rights of all Americans to have their own opinion. One where business appreciates the fact that its success is based on the participation of people of all politcal stripes. It was an Olympic decision, in that it ignores the politcal climate in the name of sport. Let's put politics aside and just play ball! Since the arrival of Rove, politics has been injected into every facet of our lives and any decision a person makes has become political. These decisions, virtually any decision, are seen as evidence of a person being in one party or another, and this revelation is generally made resembling an insult. Today, the NFL has made a very clear decision to not perpetuate the notion that everything one does will fly the colors of their party and be a political statement, meaning an affront to anyone who disagrees.
When I was young my father advised me that businesses seldom takes political stands. The owners might, of their own, but their business would usually be free of any partisan inclinations. This was because a business could only thrive if it was able to reach customers of both parties, and people of no party, or people from a fringe party. At the end of the day, the business didn't want to change your mind, they wanted your money. They valued every customer equally.
Non-partisan existence seems to have evaporated because today every decision gets painted by political alarmists. Today, many businesses are very clear about whom they support. But we, the people, have lost our voice by continuing to support these entities. Despite having an opinion opposed to those espoused by a business, we have continued to support those businesses and now, it seems, there are few businesses that stick to commerce. A prime example of this is CitiBank, whose recent reported losses are also contributing to a smile on my face.
Citi had the audacity to channel funds from the Bailout to an organization that opposed organized labor. They took federal money, money originating in people of all political stripes, and made a partisan stand. What is most agregious about this is that CitiBank has barely any employees that are part of any union! Being an institution originating in the NorthEast, they most assuredly have union members' money and owe their past success to those comfortable wages negotiated by unions. But, if one believes they are too big to fail, then it is problematic for a union to call for their members to remove their monies from this politcal assassin. Or is it?!? Maybe it is time we put our money into places that, if they are unable to share our values, can at least respect us enough not to take us for granted.
The NFL has taken a bold step in declaring they will not welcome Limbaugh into their ranks if he insists on broadcasting devisive rhetoric. The NFL has Republicans in its ranks, mostly at the top with the owners, but it also has its Democrats, mostly on the field, and it probably has a good mixture of asses and elephants among the coaches. Looking through the stands, it is probably a broad mixture of people in the crowds as well, having teams throughout the nation, in Red States and Blue States. What the NFL acknowledges and respects, is that its revenues come from everyone, and they are all Americans. It is a thoughtful reminder of what made this nation great. The NFL is declaring, in a very real way, that "United We Stand", as we all do when they play the national anthem before the games, and "we" means everyone.













NO FUCKING LIMBAUGH. NFL.
Well a lot of players were heard on this issue. They said NFW.
NO FUCKING WAY.
And the miserable son of a bitch comes on his radio show and is in tears. Why I am no racist.
Then that fucking Scarborough this morning says straight out that half the things they claim rush said were never said.
LIES. ALL LIES.
That miserable son of a bitch...
Barack the magic negro?
NFL games look like fights between the Bloods & the Crypts.
Take that bone out of your nose and call me later.
Colin Powell backed Obama BECAUSE HE IS BLACK AND ONLY BECAUSE HE IS BLACK.
I want people to get to Denver and start fires and turn over cars.
I am too lazy at this point to cite about half a dozen blogs on this asshole. Hell, just google Rush Limbaugh Quotes. There are literally hundreds of sites set up just quoting this felon.
Thank you for posting this. Now I have to do a half hour of meditation just to clear my mind.
October 15, 2009 3:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
All I can say to Rush is "Cry me a river..."
October 16, 2009 1:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y2Bs1ZZ-7b8&feature=fvw
October 15, 2009 5:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Someday people will react to Rush the way this guy reacted to one thin wafer.
October 15, 2009 5:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
C'mon Gregor - you may disagree with Rush but to not let him own a football team is a stretch. The NFL isn't known as a bunch of goody-two-shoes. They let Vick come back to play, for example.
You may hate Rush's viewpoints, but he's done nothing worthy of being banned from owning a football team.
And despite how much I've been vocal against Keith Olbermann in the past, I've never said that he should be banned from doing NFL games because of the vitriol he spews on TV.
October 16, 2009 9:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Here is a partial list of the people/organizations Rush Limbaugh has called racists recently.
Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates? "He's a racist," Mr. Limbaugh said. "He's an angry racist."
Sonja Sotomayor? "She's a bigot. She's a racist," Mr. Limbaugh said. "How can a president nominate such a candidate? And how can a party get behind such a candidate? That's what would be asked if somebody were foolish enough to nominate David Duke or pick somebody even less offensive."
President Obama? He's "the biggest reverse racist in history." On another occasion: "Just as he is ACORN, just as he is Van Jones, he is racism."On a third: "How do you get promoted in a Barack Obama administration? By hating white people." So implicitly Mr. Limbaugh is labeling multiple figures within the administration as racists too.
Democrats generally? "The racism that everybody thinks exists on our side of the aisle has been on full display throughout their primary campaign."
Liberals? "You know, racism in this country is the exclusive province of the left."
The media circa January? "We're witnessing racism all this week that led up to the inauguration. We're being told that we have to hope he succeeds. That we have to bend over, grab the ankles, bend over forward, backward, whichever, because his father's black, because this is the first black president."
Minorities generally? "The days of them not having any power are over, and they are angry. And they want to use their power as a means of retribution. That's what Obama's about, gang. He's angry, he's gonna cut this country down to size, he's gonna make it pay for all the multicultural mistakes that it has made, it's mistreatment of minorities. I know exactly what's going on."
Oh, and don't forget the NFL. As of this week, it is "an outpost of racism and liberalism." (Strange that a league that is supposedly racist against white owner candidates has so many white owners.)
Remember, the foregoing examples are exclusively taken from radio commentary spoken in 2008-9.
Is there anyone in America who's accused more people of racism this year than Rush Limbaugh?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-10-16/rush-the-race-baiter/?cid=hp:beastoriginalsL1
The Crips & Bloods commentary about the African-American players in the NFL and the Donovan McNabb as a token quarterback put the nail in the coffin for me.
October 16, 2009 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Awesome contribution, rmrd0000!
October 16, 2009 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gates - I agree with Rush.
Sotomayor - the "wise Latina woman" comment says it all.
Obama - putting people like Van Jones in office doesn't make him look very good
Democrats - they are making big stereotypical comments (just like people on here) who accuse people like me of being racist just because I don't like Obama
And things like "Barack the Magic Negro" - Rush may be a plagiarist for things like that but it doesn't make him a racist. I'm sure you know the source - http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-ehrenstein19mar19,0,3391015.story
And your question - "Is there anyone in America who's accused more people of racism this year than Rush Limbaugh?" Answer - people here on TPM.
October 16, 2009 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your response is what I expected. Rush, who makes he comparison of the Bloods & Crips to NFL players and calls Donovan McNabb an affirmative action quarterback, is blameless and not a race baiter.
African-Americans obviously want to exact revenge on "Whitey" for years of oppression and voted for Barack Obama for that reason.
You judge many of us here at TPM as being racially biased, we judge you in the same way. Rush may or may not be a racist, but he is willing to traffic in racially tinged language for ratings. MLK Jr made a comment that Barry Goldwater may not be a racist himself, but he is willing to walk in lockstep with them.
One statement by Sotomayor makes her a racist? Is that racism supported by her judicial record? Van Jones is a hater of White people? Gates is a racist? Note that the police Sergeant says that he (the Sgt) had a conversation with the witness that the witness says never occurred. We will see what the review panel has to say about what happened.
October 16, 2009 2:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
The comments made by Rush made be provocative and reactionary, but I don't think he's a racist. And I don't think he should be denied an opportunity to buy an NFL team.
October 16, 2009 4:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Too late for Rush
Oh by the way, Sonia Sotomayor is a Supreme Court justice and Henry Louis Gates is still a respected Professor at Harvard.
October 16, 2009 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's really besides the point that they are still in their positions. And it certainly doesn't validate their poor choices of words just because they still have day jobs.
Look, Rush is a bozo but last time I checked there wasn't a law against bozos owning NFL teams. I think that's really the point.
October 16, 2009 9:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rush is much more then a bozo, much, much more. Olbermann, at times, he is a bozo.
October 16, 2009 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps, but that doesn't mean he should be prohibited from owning a team.
October 17, 2009 9:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
The NFL is very careful about its politics. For all the wrangling they have experienced over the years, they have remained outside of the national political spotlight. This despite having numerous battles over collective bargaining with their players unions. It has never taken on the meme of conserative vs. liberal, capitalist vs. socialist. The NFL has gone to great lengths, I would imagine, to avoid this, and they obviously have achieved tremendous success doing so. Rush Limbaugh would destroy that precarious relationship the League has with its fans. In that he is completely incapable of withholding his opinions, I would say that no, he does not deserve to be an NFL team owner.
Oh, and I donot see it as some great harm that he is denied the opportunity to own a team. It's not as though he will be missing anything needeful for the remainder of his lonely, miserable days.
October 16, 2009 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rush would destroy the league's relationship with its fans? I respectfully disagree.
If Rush Limbaugh became owner of a team, there would be zero change in viewership on Sundays.
October 16, 2009 1:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Zero change? Really? Guess we will never know. It seems you underestaimte the repulsion Rush Limbaugh has on people of good will.
October 16, 2009 1:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
So if Rush Limbaugh became the owner of a team, you'd stop watching NFL games?
October 16, 2009 2:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
To be honest, I love football and might not give up all the games, but I would never watch his team play, ever. That's a promise.
October 16, 2009 3:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's too bad. Keith Olbermann could do play-by-play for the Super Bowl and I would still watch it.
October 16, 2009 3:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
You're making false equivalencies. Keith makes no where near the inflammatory rhetoric of Limbaugh. Sure, he pisses off the Right, but when were they ever enslaved, or segregated, or lynched? Take a closer look. They're far from equals.
October 16, 2009 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Should Keith be prevented from doing NFL games because he spews vitriol on MSNBC? Should he be allowed to buy a team?
I don't think it's an issue of "false equivalencies".
Limbaugh may be a clown but there's no law against clowns owning teams.
October 16, 2009 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wasn't aware of is vitriol during sports casting. It was not the law that prevented Rush from getting ownership, he was condemned in the court of public opinion, and he should be.
October 17, 2009 11:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Never said that Keith spew vitriol during games - I was referring to his MSNBC show. We don't know if/what Rush would say in the public domain about the NFL if he ever became an owner. We just know what he's said on TV, and he's been unfairly condemned for it. I'm not trying to defend his comments, but I think that people who make idiotic comments should still be able to own a team.
Please don't be so literal as to the "rule of law" versus "public opinion". I'm sure the NFL got a lot of heat from people like Reverend Sharpton and decided it was in their best interest to exclude someone who they are afraid will cause more distractions going forward.
And don't you think that the Players Union is using this against the NFL as part of their current collective bargaining discussions?
October 17, 2009 11:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
NFL ownership requires a 2/3 vote of all owners to step up. Limbaugh was part of a group making a bid on the Rams. The NFL owners averred and said that Limbaugh's presence on the group threatened to sink their bid. The group kicked Limbaugh off.
This isn't about the NFL, it is about negotiations, and the fact that Limbaugh's group "threw him under the bus" in order to maintain a competitive bid.
October 16, 2009 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
The actual decision was made by the cabal, but the NFL was not silent exactly about the proposition. For a decent account, check here:
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/robert-schlesinger/2009/10/14/dont-blame-liberals-when-limbaugh-cant-buy-the-rams-blame-the-free-market.html
But to save some time, you might just note this commetn by Roger Goodell, NFL Commissioner, "We're all held to a high standard here and divisive comments are not what the NFL's all about," said Goodell. "I would not want to see those kind of comments from people who are in a responsible position in the NFL, no. Absolutely not."
October 16, 2009 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
BTW, on Hardball, Al Sharpton made a clarification that it was NOT the NFL that rejected Limbaugh. It was his own potential partners withdrawing who his name. It does not, however, change my meaning of NFL.
October 15, 2009 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Is it me, or did Sharpton look ill? He looks like he has lost a lot of weight.
Now the bigot-in-chief, Pat Buchanan, is having a sad that Limbaugh is being outed! Poor old Rush -- I just want to cry!
Sharpton made a great point that these same people tried to go after Barack Obama for what his PASTOR said, and they are only holding Limbaugh responsible for his own words.
Hard to argue against that, but then Pat is bloviating about poor Michael Savage too.
Then Tweety is making an ass out of himself, as usual -- interrupting with stupid comments.
blah blah blah blah blah!
October 15, 2009 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, i thought Sharpton looked a little gaunt too!
Pat was making this false equivalency about the Reich being oppressed.
Limbaugh really is a crafty kinduva guy. He made it an attack on all Conservatives. It was not about him, or the NFL, it was about conservatives, so all the Bobbleheads can feel his oppression for themselves from those sneaky Liberals "wherever they are". {His actual words. We hide, you know.}
Rush, let me tell you something. People are not going to flock to your hatred unless they were raised with it and never given the chance to see any other way to live. If they ever did open up to a more socially considerate way of life, they would never go back. hehehehe
October 16, 2009 12:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
How sweet it is - and only to get better as Rush implodes and explodes.
Thanks GZ. So glad you did this!
Rec'd!
October 16, 2009 2:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
Limbaugh would only have been a minority partner had the deal gone through with his involvement. He would not have been in a decision-making position with the Rams.
October 16, 2009 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
And? As far as I'm concerned the entire collection of investors in the cabal that invited him to join should be banned fro the NFL long before any steroid using player.
And Gettysburg, would you PLEASE change your blog de plume to something like "Manassas", otherwise you seem quite hypocritical.
October 16, 2009 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
JEP
I'm pretty sure that Obama is about as far from the "Party of Lincoln" as he could possibly hope to get.
October 23, 2009 11:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
It would be a fine thing if more people and businesses started telling bigots that their money isn't green enough. I'd love to see Rush reduced to walking barefoot and digging in dumpsters because the shoe stores, taxis and grocers wouldn't accept his custom.
October 16, 2009 12:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sh^t! You reduced my post to two sentences! Yes, if people would return to the old ways and see that, whether they can make a difference or not, they can take their money elsewhere, I think things would change. Thanks!
October 16, 2009 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not like this was no-bid deal..
October 16, 2009 1:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
My "Thanks!" was not snark. I really do agree with kevbo.
No-bid deal! hehehehe
October 16, 2009 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink