Persecution Politics: The Sarah Palining of Lou Dobbs
GQ Magazine's editors believe they know why Lou Dobbs left CNN: persecution.
Members of the right-wing media love to tell their audiences about how they've been abused and censored by vicious liberal attackers. Bill O'Reilly insisted that he had been "libeled" and his civil rights "violated" when the L.A. Times and the Denver Post disputed his reports, calling the criticism "far left fascism." Michael Savage complained that he had been repeatedly attacked by the "homosexual, fascist website" Media Matters, the "brownshirts of our time." Glenn Beck bravely vowed that he was not afraid of liberal persecution, "What they have to do is break my legs. What they have to do is silence me. What they have to do is Sarah Palin me."
Often, the accusations include some kind of conspiracy. O'Reilly theorized that Media Matters was a tool of billionaire George Soros. Michael Savage claimed that it belonged to Hillary Clinton. Glenn Beck feared a coterie of secretive "czars" in the Obama administration.
And Lou Dobbs, who gained notoriety by pushing the "birther" theory that Obama was born in Kenya, claimed in a GQ interview that the administration was out to get him too:
They are coordinating with a number of groups, including the Center for American Progress. The usual suspects. To carry out constant and absolutely insidious and sordid attacks on me. And the reason they're doing so, I'm the leading independent voice, and I am critical on their policies and intent, on unconditional amnesty, and leaving the borders and ports unsecure.
Yet he vowed to soldier on...
But I will not be intimidated, and I understand that. Therefore they're trying to intimidate my network and my owners.
Evidently, Dobbs will not be soldiering on with CNN any longer. So ends a long and illustrious career with the network in angry paranoia. See ya later, Lou. Don't let the fascist liberal door hit you on the way out.
For more on Dobbs' battle with the CNN, check out NPR's What's Behind Lou Dobbs' Leaving CNN.
More fascist violations of commentators' civil rights at my Persecution Politics series at dagblog.com.
















Well, at least he admits he is owned.
November 12, 2009 5:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ooh, snap!
November 12, 2009 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
LooneyCon Loo
November 12, 2009 6:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
FRANKLY I would like to take a baseball bat to all of them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zc9zF8G2Pvc
Its all a matter of enthusiasms.
November 12, 2009 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was hoping we would not see "Palin" on our list, but I realize it is too much to hope for. But having said that:
WHAT IS WITH HER FAKEY HAIR EXTENSIONS! SHE HAD HER TEETH BLEACHED SO MUCH THEY LOOK LIKE LOU DOBBS'S!
OHHHHHHHH! I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE THE PICS OF THANKSGIVING WITH THE LEVI JOHNSON FAMILY INVITED! SHE IS SUCH A PHONEY!
not that i am focusing on the negative, or anything...
November 12, 2009 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
I somethings think I am the only one who experiences rage EVERYTIME I SEE HER FREAKING FACE.
Looks like im not alone.
November 12, 2009 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
And he's got a "magic wall"!
November 12, 2009 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
John King reflects the GOP ideologies, not his own. hehehe
November 13, 2009 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bork must be weeping in his whatever Republican style Spiderhole he hides in with his Glock.
Palined replaces Borked. Bah wahh wahh!
For people whose every breath is either a lie, self aggrandizing righteous blather, or a malicious attack on people who tell the truth, they are not brave and not worth the price of over working an individual brain cell to try and comprehend their latest insane unending vile fantasies and delusional bullshit.
November 12, 2009 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Bork" was a much better candidate for verbification; "Palining" is too awkward and doesn't sound like an amusing combination of "porking" or "boinking."
November 12, 2009 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
But "going Palin" sounds pretty good to me. Even "being Palined." "Pulling a Palin?"
November 13, 2009 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
The usual suspects.
Isn't this when someone is judged on their past and not the present? Does Lou have any particular afronts he is beating back, or is he tilting at windmills?!?
November 13, 2009 1:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wall Street Journal opinion piece: Can Palin Stage a Comeback? (or something close). Now don't be drinkin' anything you won't mind spittin' all over when ya read it, okay?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704576204574529770560352200.html
(Oh, these geniuses.)
November 13, 2009 11:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I watched Lou Dobbs for years. Initially, I identified him as a conservative, but he would not hesitate to call a Bush administration screw up just that. I considered him outspoken, but principled. Over the years, the prime time news shows (Fox, CNN and MSNBC) ceased becoming news programs and turned to sensationalism. Dobbs was the last to realize that ratings were more important than integrity. Although, I agree that illegal immigration "is", in fact, illegal, Dobbs went over-board. When his ratings started to slip, he got into the "birther" thing. Enough was enough! I started watching PBS and local news. Lou got caught-up in the ratings\salary game and he lost!
“If you have integrity, nothing else matters. If you don't have integrity, nothing else matters.”
Alan K. Simpson
November 13, 2009 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink