« BREAKING: Obama Wins More Prizes | ☠enghis's Blog | Why Bankers Make So Much Money »

Persecution Politics: Paranoia Rules the Right


In early August, I began working on a book to document a growing sense of paranoia among right-wing conservatives. At the time, the media was fairly quiet on the subject. With the exception of liberal blogs (ahem), no one paid much attention to the wild rhetoric of the tea parties and occasional paranoid outbursts from commentators like Rush Limbaugh and politicians like Michelle Bachman. Then Sarah Palin loosed her "death panels" broadside, and the floodgates opened. Health care paranoia spewed from the orifice every conservative media outlet, Lou Dobbs embraced the "birther" conspiracy, Limbaugh raged about Obama's Nazi agenda, Glenn Beck launched a week-long tour de paranoia in which he accused Obama of preparing for a fascho-socialist revolution, and D.C. roiled as rabid conservative activists congregated in the Mall. Suddenly, the mainstream media took notice, and articles about the new "paranoid style" of the American right rolled across major newspapers, magazines, news sites, and talk shows. TIME Magazine even put Glenn Beck's tongue on its cover.

Now, as TPM's Eric Kleefeld has documented, the consulting firm of James Carville and Stan Greenberg has validated the thesis of my Persecution Politics series: there is a very large, very determined block of conservative voters who have thoroughly embraced paranoid extremism. Based on the results of a series of focus groups, the organization concluded:

The self-identifying conservative Republicans who make up the base of the Republican Party stand a world apart from the rest of America...First and foremost, these conservative Republican voters believe Obama is deliberately and ruthlessly advancing a 'secret agenda' to bankrupt our country and dramatically expand government control over all aspects of our daily lives. They view this effort in sweeping terms, and cast a successful Obama presidency as the destruction of the United States as it was conceived by our founders and developed over the past 200 years.

These voters "identify themselves as a minority in this country - a minority whose values are mocked and attacked by a liberal media and class of elites." They believe that these elites "are actively working to advance the downfall of the things that matter most to them in their lives - their faith, their families, their country, and their freedom." In short, they believe themselves to "persecuted."

The sense of persecution, along with egotistical confidence in the validity of their own world view, has fostered an attitude of quasi-religious evangelism. They feel "a responsibility to spread the word, to educate those who do not share their insights, and to take back the country that they love. Their faith in this country and its ideals leave them confident that their numbers will grow, and that they will ultimately defeat Barack Obama and the shadowy forces driving his hidden agenda."

Their hero, of course, is Paranoiac-in-Chief, Glenn Beck "They believe he embodies the best of conservative media - determination to unearth the stories the liberal media tries to bury, love of country, and refusal to be intimidated, even as the liberal media unleashes waves of attacks on his past and his credibility." They even fear for his life, believing "that his willingness to stand up to powerful liberal interests was putting his life, as well as the lives of those working with him, in danger. Of course, his willingness to face this danger head on only adds to his legend."

And their favorite candidate for the next presidential election is, no surprise, Sarah Palin, in whom they see their own reflection: "They see in her the uncompromising personal conviction and integrity that they admired in Bush, but with an authentic conservatism that reflects her personal background. The one point they all agree on is that Palin was a victim of an unprecedented smear campaign. Reflecting in many ways their feelings about themselves as a group, they say Palin was targeted by the liberal media like no other figure in modern history because they both feared her and hated her for her unwavering values and beliefs."

This paranoid Republican base represents "one-in-five voters in the electorate, and nearly two out of every three selfidentified Republicans," which means that current Republican legislators must accommodate them, and the next batch of Republican political candidates will likely be the most extreme that the nation has seen since the 1950s. If you haven't been taking them seriously, you should. The tidal wave of paranoia shows no sign of slacking. With a weak economy and an active Democrat-controlled government, conservatives are rattled and vulnerable to paranoid narratives. The growth of cable news, talk radio, and blogs have produced a right-wing echo chamber in which conservative commentators shout ever louder to make themselves heard over the shrill cries of their colleagues, and listeners measure the plausibility of each new conspiracy theory against a swiftly falling standard. We are witnessing a race to the bottom of a bottomless pit.

Unfortunately for the nation, I expect to have plenty of material to write about for the foreseeable future.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stay tuned for more crazy talk in my Persecution Politics series at dagblog.com.


30 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Chasing Rick Perlstein, but we need more writers on the subject, so weigh in.

user-pic

You mean is WaPo article? Or is he working on a new book that I don't know about.

user-pic

Think he does have a new project, but "Nixonland" led me to conclude the crazies are a permanent feature of the US gene pool, John Dean's authoritarian-type minds, stoked by jingoist demagogues.

user-pic

I agree with you, and the 1/5 figure that Genghis is using strikes me as low. If he's right that that's all they constitute right now, we're actually doing better than most historical periods. And you know, it would make sense in a way, that when the group is in a waning smaller period, their screaming gets louder.

user-pic

According to a May 2009 Pew poll, [t]aking an average of surveys conducted this year, 36% say they are independents, 35% are Democrats, while 23% are Republicans.

With the amount of Rs bailing out and registering as independents, the number could very well be down to 20% now.

user-pic

The 1 in 5 number came from the report. I've no idea where they got it or how accurate it is.

user-pic

Paranoia certainly isn't new to this country. Richard Hofstadter wrote his famous "Paranoid Style in American Politics" in 1964. But it comes in waves, and the character of the paranoia is different each time. The nation will survive this wave, of course, as it has survived the others, but it would be best for everyone if the hysteria is short and shallow rather than long and deep.

user-pic

You are probably correct in that the nation will survive, but, hopefully it will not require a Oklahoma City-style outburst of truly dangerous insanity to return people to reality.

user-pic
If you haven't been taking them seriously, you should.

If you are, I certainly will.

Can't we just laugh these idiots away? I'm afraid I have little sympathy for them.

Is there any reason that I should? It might help.

I'm actually serious.

Oh, and good to see you, happy Fried-day, and I will most certainly buy your book.

=D

user-pic

The Daily Show and the Colbert Report are arguably the most popular and pointed political satires in decades. Yet, the paranoia has grown under their watch, which suggests that "laughing these idiots away" doesn't work on its own. Worse, as the report suggests, the ridicule can actually feed the persecution complexes of the paranoiacs.

We should still mock of course, because some things demand mocking, but we shouldn't expect that mocking along will make the problem go away.

user-pic

Laughing the Far Right away didn't work out so well in the Weimar Republic.

However, that doesn't mean we can't enjoy a little humor at their expense.

user-pic

The last four weeks, up until the NFL crash for rush, limbaugh sounded more racist than ever. EVERY FUCKING DAY FOR THREE GODDAMNABLE HOURS HE JUST RANTED.

He ranted about all dems, liberals etc...but it was the White House he just creamed.

And Beck, how the hell could anyone call him a closet racist? Unless its a water closet with the door off.

Hell go get em.

A guy who kind of agrees with you is Scarborough. I despise him of course. But he thinks he is waiting in the weeds. If the far right fails, he could step into a powerful position.

He would not vote a ten dollar raise for a mother on minimum wage with three kids, so there would be no substantive change with these pretend 'moderates' either.

I honestly do not think that Imus would be fired under the current 'unwritten rules' of MSM. Even Scarborough says that half of what the liberals claim rush said was never said.

Media Matters says otherwise and always provides the clips.

Fathead Dobbs is so goddamnably racist that I do not understand how he keeps his show. CNN knew they could not abide Beck any longer but FOX has no trouble spewing out hate 24/7.

At any rate, good luck on the book.

user-pic

Thanks for the good wishes, DD. Check out the report. One of the points that it makes is that racism is not the primary driver here. Beck plays race politics for sure, but he's using the racial stuff to bolster his persecution narrative, rather than constructing the persecution narrative to support a deeper racist agenda. It's an important distinction IMO.

user-pic

Please do not overlook this treatment of the issue that includes a very clear look at the religious influence on these world-views. This persecuted minority finds much strength in their religious zealotry that allows them the comfort of having god on their side.

The passage linked above explains it in coherently frightening fashion.

Good luck with the book.

user-pic

Thanks for the link and the good luck wishes. Both I and the report touched on the religion point, but I agree that it demands more consideration. The last paragraph in your offers a helpful distinction between religion per se and political belief that takes on aspects of religious belief:

I don't mean "religious belief" literally. This transformation is less a function of the alliance between Protestant evangelicals, their fellow travelers and the right (though that alliance has had its effect) than it is a function of a belief in one's own rightness so unshakable that it is not subject to political caveats. In short, what we have in America today is a political fundamentalism, with all the characteristics of religious fundamentalism and very few of the characteristics of politics.
user-pic

Two-thirds of the republican party are represented by these views?

I looked at the referenced material and am not sure how you draw that conclusion. That would be about 39 million people using rough math. I am pretty sure if 39 million people believed the way you claim they do, this country would be on the edge of a second civil war.

I still you are taking a minority voice in a minority party and blowing it way out of proportion because it happens to be the loudest in the bunch.

user-pic

I can't verify the numbers but I believe the emphasis here is on self-indentified Republicans.
Your calculation of 39 million seems more like a guess of who votes Republican most of the time.

user-pic

That estimate is actually low as I multiplied the number of votes McCain got by 66% to reach 38 million. The actual number of republicans is much higher as we only had 61% turnout of eligible voters for 2008.

Given the make-up of the electorate, the statistics presented in this blog seem even less accurate with regards to the calculating the number of conservatives who believe this sort of crap.

user-pic

I think you are quite right here, jem. The report only addresses the Glen Beck/Michael Steele/GOP Congressional Leadership Wing of the Republican Party.

I didn't see the report reference you by name, either as "jason everett miller" or as "the silent majority Repubs who don't vote and aren't politically active and/or otherwise have no input/impact into today's political realities."

Better luck next time.

user-pic

I am not entirely sure what point you are trying to make here.

The cited article applies the far right beliefs of the Beck-Steele crowd to two-thirds of the republicans party, representing one-fifth of the electorate.

With 230 million voters in America, this statistic says that 39 million people are actively plotting against everything the democratic party is trying to do.

Sounds a little paranoid to me, making this blog particularly ironic.

user-pic

Jason, here's the quote from the report, with footnotes:

The conservative Republican base represents almost one-in-five voters in the electorate, and nearly two out of every three self-identified Republicans. The universe of our focus groups(2) is representative of this conservative Republican base(3).

(2) These voters are white, “strong” or “weak” Republicans who ideologically self-identify as conservative or moderate and who voted for John McCain AND the Republican congressional candidate in 2008. The groups, conducted in Atlanta, Georgia, were comprised of voters aged 45-60, with one group of women and one of men.

(3) Our combined survey data reveals that the Georgia group definition fits more than three-quarters (77 percent) of conservative strong or weak Republicans of the 45-60 age group, and an even higher proportion – 85 percent – of white strong Republicans of the same age.

I agree that the statistic is a bit tenuous, and there are no details provided about their "combined survey data." But even if it's not 1/5th, it seems to be a pretty large block. Larger than you might expect.

PS Not sure where you got your 230M voter statistic. There are only 206M eligible voters in the country and 146M registered voters, of which 131M voted in the '08 election.
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/voting/013995.html

user-pic

Paranoid and hysterical? Perhaps these rightish commentators are both. The question is, for me, "is are they justified in being paranoid?"

I'm only a casual observer of the passing political scene but the ongoing expose of Obama administration officials on Glen Beck's show gives me pause - at least some of these folks are dangerous and far outside the rational mainstream. Limbaugh's economic, social, and political freedom has been curtailed by statements he never made. What does this say about the "journalists" who made the statements up?

It is interesting, no doubt, to note the paranoia but it would be more useful to examine the instances in our political life that the incite the feeling. "Just because you're paranoid doesnt' mean they're not out to get you."

user-pic
Limbaugh's economic, social, and political freedom has been curtailed by statements he never made. What does this say about the "journalists" who made the statements up?/

To me it says that, if true, it mearly means that Limbaugh is literally being hoist by his own petard.

user-pic

"Are they justified in being paranoid?" If by justified you mean, "they have no evidence to support their wild accusations but that doesn't stop them from putting on a big show of how persecuted their are by the Obama conspiracy," then I suppose they are justified.

Calling yourself "a casual observer of the passing political scene" is no excuse for short circuiting your critical faculties.

user-pic

This isn't a criticism, genghis, but I'm not feeling I'm learning much with this report. And I'm wondering what more I'm looking for. Perhaps something about the dynamics at work? Perhaps something about how this movement is evolving? Perhaps about its growing or waning political power? Is their greater media dissemination exposing them as unhinged or forcing politicians to take their views more into account? Is their seemingly heightened presence a function of their takeover of the GOP? Or was that takeover a function of their increasing importance? What are the psychological mechanisms underlying their world-view? Is this paranoia rationally explicable?- I'm thinking in terms of the north-south, anti-government cultural history of which it is an outgrowth, of the self-reinforcing nature of mistrust, of the fear-inducing effects of impotence, of lack of control, etc. Just some ruminations. Looking forward to more on this from you...

user-pic

I think you're right but these questions go beyond the scope of the focus groups. The Democracy Corps is essentially a polling/strategy operation--what they offered was a snapshot of voter attitudes. Of course, it just raises more questions about why this is happening and where its going, questions that I'm researching and will probably blog about at some point.

user-pic

Pretty funny about the "Palin smear campaign". Remember when the Right was crowing about what a triumph it was to have her nominated? She was supposed to be some kind of game-changer in the election?

So she starts getting publicity, people start paying attention to what she has to say, and the general public finds her to be an empty suit who's way out on the political fringe. Just how was she smeared? Was it unfair to ask her what newspapers she reads?

user-pic

Treating every criticism as a deliberate smear by liberal conspirators is the modus operandi of the paranoid right. O'Reilly does it. Limbaugh does it. Beck does it. So of course, everyone applied the same strategy with even greater emphasis to Palin, who was so widely disparaged. Within days of her selection, long before any Couric interviews or Tina Fey imitations, William Kristol wrote,

So what we will see in the next days and weeks--what we have already seen in the hours after her nomination--is an effort by all the powers of the old liberalism, both in the Democratic party and the mainstream media, to exorcise this spectre. They will ridicule her and patronize her. They will distort her words and caricature her biography. They will appeal, sometimes explicitly, to anti-small town and anti-religious prejudice. All of this will be in the cause of trying to prevent the American people from arriving at their own judgment of Sarah Palin.
user-pic

Actually, it seems to me that Kristol was predicting that the liberals would take a page from the conservative playbook. Just start from "They will ridicule..." and substitute a few words -- "anti-intellectual" for "anti-small town" and "racial" for "anti-religious" and he pretty much describes the way the right reacted to Obama.

user-pic

It is all about projection with these folks. You are absolutely right on this, INCAgirl.

Leave a comment

☠enghis

user-pic

Following: 58
Followers: 82

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Website: dagblog.com
  • Location New York
  • Party Yes
  • Politics No

Favorites

  • Favorite Quotes "I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news." S.P.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address