Voters want Republicans to be Republicanier
In a comprehensive study, voting experts recently conducted a series of interviews, polls, and focus groups to find out why American voters turned away from Republicans in 2008. While many reasons were cited, analysts observed a clear consensus among swing voters who had voted for President George Bush and other Republican candidates prior to 2006 but changed to Democratic tickets in the past two years. In one poll, 9 out of 10 respondents replied that they were dissatisfied with their candidates' "lack of commitment to right-wing ideology." In answer to the question, "How Republican is your congressperson?", the average rating for Republicans was 2 out of 10, slightly less than the average rating of 3 for Democratic congresspeople.
In a focus group, one angry young man railed against Republicans for "appeasing the terrorists," stating:
"We shouldn't of stopped at Iraq and Afghanistan. We should of bombed Iran and Cuba and Korea and France. Now the world thinks we're a bunch of wussies because can't stand up to the towel-heads and the beret-heads and whatever they wear on their heads in Korea. Probably fortune cookies."
In another focus group, a self-described "amateur economist" explained that he changed his vote because of Republicans' failure to deregulate.
"Bankers are very frustrated with all the forms that they have to fill out whenever they invest people's money, so they just stopped investing. That's why we're in a recession now. We needed to let the bankers do what they do best--make smart investments that are good for the country."
Other interviewees were primarily concerned about social issues. One voter complained that the Bush administration was soft on homosexuals,
"They should all be put in prison. Then they could buttscrew each other as much as they want and they wouldn't try to get married all the time."
Some voters criticized the GOP for neglecting its nativist roots. According to one concerned citizen,
"I hear the Republican bigwigs talking about how they need the Hispanic vote, but we don't need none of that. They'd just vote to open up the borders and pretty soon we'd all have to speak Spanglish and wear sombreros and all the streets would be named after Mexicans. We'd have to say, 'Turn right at Speedy Gonzales Street.' How dumb is that?"
Respondents almost universally agreed that Republicans in Washington were out of touch. As one woman explained,
"They like to talk about shooting their guns and driving pickups and going to church, but we all know that they're driving Priuses to Starbucks to buy their triple decaf lattes. They probably do crossword puzzles in their spare time. It's sickening."
Republican Party leaders refused to comment on the results of the study. Most didn't answer their phones. In one case, a Republican leader answered but when asked about the study, switched to a high-pitched voice and pretended to be someone else. Another unnamed congressperson was chased by reporters but managed to escape by hurling a lukewarm latte at them. One journalist's shirt was reported to be in critical condition.
The only prominent Republican to speak on the record was Dick Cheney, who promised to "interrogate the turncoats," but it was not clear of whom he was speaking. A reporter who witnessed the comment explained, "I was too scared to ask him."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross posted at dagblog.com. You can subscribe to all my posts via RSS feed or email.
















Turn coats and turn shirts and there go the styles right down the tubes.
Buttscrew in prison. hhahahaahahha
This is too much. I know you could give a damn with seventeen cross blogs but I hereby award you the Knightly blog of the Day Award for this here TPMCafe site, given to all of you (and all your sites) from all of me.
hahah
May 12, 2009 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you, dd. Dag is my home now, but TPM is still my hometown, and your award is an honor. (For the record, I don't post anywhere else, except Kos every once in a while, but the discussion is always disappointing.)
May 13, 2009 12:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not Re-Republicany?
May 13, 2009 12:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
re-publickanz
or
re-publicantz?
May 13, 2009 7:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak the proper term is Republicants. As in they can't. Or they are just spouting "cant" i.e. "insincere, esp. conventional expressions of enthusiasm for high ideals, goodness, or piety" or "the private language of the underworld" or "whining or singsong speech, esp. of beggars".
Take your pick, they all fit.
May 13, 2009 3:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
Noted!
May 13, 2009 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Interrogate the turncoats FTW
May 13, 2009 5:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
I notice none of these "Republicans" even mentioned Jesus.
Much less Ronnie.
May 13, 2009 7:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Aren't they usually one and the same in a Republican's 'brain'?
May 13, 2009 5:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now I'm scared to leave my house. What if I come across one of the respondents and they sneeze on me? Will I catch something I can't get rid of with penicillin?
May 13, 2009 8:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Penicillin would work perfectly, but the pharmaceuticals now have a new drug. It costs five times as much and you need to take it once a week for the rest of your life.
May 13, 2009 11:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I wish I could give more than one rec just for the quotes. Now, which quotes were legit and which were just playing up to the interviewer?
And another question: Did these folks become Democrats? If so, um, well, um, damn.
May 13, 2009 1:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know that this is all tongue-in-cheek, right? Just checking.
May 13, 2009 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great, I've become one of TPM's over-sincere.
One thing I haven't figured out is how doctors get the tongue out of the cheek................oh bloody hell I did it again!
May 13, 2009 3:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's medication for that
May 13, 2009 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
IOW, "I stand by all the misstatements that I've made."
Also.
May 13, 2009 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ooops. There was supposed to be a :-) after the Quayle quote.
May 13, 2009 7:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I was wondering where that quote came from.
May 13, 2009 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, I howled through the whole thing. But the fortune cookie head gear and Speedy G Street brought down the keyboard.
May 13, 2009 8:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
You made this up?
Oh, dang.
May 13, 2009 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
so we have a two party system:
Democrats and Banana Republicans.
May 13, 2009 7:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cute
May 13, 2009 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well done, Genghis. I bit. I have heard some of them make similar comments so I suppose you don't have to write for The Onion to pull it off. Nevertheless, a tap of the space key (in lieu of a hat).
May 13, 2009 8:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
By intention. Republicans seem to have confused frustrated right-wingers with the American electorate.
May 13, 2009 11:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sad to see you succumbing to terminal snarkitis, Genghis. Your post is too clever by half and dreary on the whole.
I miss your color-flashing avatar, which was far more witty and eye-catching than your current choice. On the other hand, this one's murky and humorless so at least it fits.
May 13, 2009 9:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you kidding? He could easily write for the Onion...
May 13, 2009 11:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks, stilli, but that's cool. I don't want anyone's pity. Yes, I do suffer from terminal snarkiness. With the help modern medicine and the good Lord, I can beat this thing. I had to change the avatar because one of the side effects of snarkotherapy is that your head falls off.
May 13, 2009 11:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you "suffer" from it? Or enjoy every moment of it? I would think the latter...I know I do!
May 14, 2009 12:29 AM | Reply | Permalink