« Joe Lieberman Hateboard | ☠enghis's Blog | Korea, Madagascar, and Nouveau Colonialism »

Japan: Recessive Again


Japan's economy is now officially in recession according to those in charge of labeling such things, which means that they beat us again. While most believe that the U.S. has already entered a recession, it's not official until we have two consecutive quarters of negative growth, so we're just going to have to wait until January. Thus, despite the fact that Japan's auto companies run circles around the befuddled behemoths in Detroit and clobbered our electronics companies long ago, even though Japanese save like misers and Americans spend like sailors, and notwithstanding our $5B trade deficit with Japan, they still out-recessioned us.

While the news may surprise some, Japan has proved itself to the recession-master for the past two decades. After pioneering the modern real estate bubble in the 80's, Japan fell into recession in 1990 and pretty much stayed there, on and off, until 2003. Then they managed to get in a few years of sustained if unexceptional growth only to relapse this year, which is a remarkable feat for what is the second largest economy in the world and which, unlike certain voracious consuming nations I know, consistently runs massive trade surpluses.

I'm no international psychologist, but it seems to me that Japan suffers from bipolar manic-recession, alternating between periods of extreme stagnation and hyper-productivity. In 1639, the ruling shogunate instituted sakoku, the policy under which foreigners could not enter Japan and Japanese could not leave on penalty of death. Translated literally, sakoku means "country in chains." Translated metaphorically, it means "I don't want to grow up." And so Japan languished in feudal stagnation for two centuries until Commodore Perry sailed his "Black Ships" into the Bay of Tokyo and opened it up at cannonpoint. There were only seven British colonies in America when Japan isolated itself. By 1854, the United States had become a world power. During that time, Japan remained largely unchanged.

Shocked from its stupor, Japan went manic. The breadth of change was astonishing. It established a centralized state and embraced Western-style political, judicial, and military institutions. By the 20th century, Japan had become an industrial power and morphed from secluded hermit to avaricious imperialist, culminating in its invasion of China and World War II. Then, after surrendering in 1945, Japan underwent a second manic growth spurt, adopting the modern democratic and corporate practices that created the foundation for Japan's 30 year "economic miracle." In the early 80's, when the U.S. was in a recession, Americans wrote amorous books about the "Japanese model" with titles like Japan As No. 1 (Lessons for America).

Then the miracle bubble popped, and we Americans returned to our natural state of condescending superiority towards our Asian competitors, which is much more fun than fawning imitation. Japan has stagnated because, though it has democratic institutions, the voters seem to miss the whole point of the exercise. The chief benefit of democracy is the opportunity to throw the bums out every decade or so. Americans love to the throw the bums out as we so aptly demonstrated a few weeks ago. Were we to experience two decades of recession under the same bums, we'd be barricading the streets and seceding en masse. But in its entire history as a democracy, Japan has never thrown the bums out. Except for a short-lived coalition government in 1993, the Liberal Democratic Party has governed Japan for over fifty years. Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi enacted a few much needed reforms, but since he left office, he's been replaced by a series of controversy-prone bureaucrats who have deftly succeeded in doing absolutely nothing, which is just how the party likes it. The latest PM, Taso Aso, took office in September and appears to be no different. In short, Japan has stagnated again. There is some hope that the opposition Democratic Party of Japan, which managed to take control of the less powerful Upper House last year, will at long last win the Lower House a year from now. But history counsels against underestimating the self-destructive intransigence of the Japanese people during a recessive phase.

If we haven't learned from Japan's successes, we should at least learn from its failures. One reason for Japan's sustained recession was the government's policy of propping up struggling banks and corporations which it deemed too large to fail (and which had too much influence in the government), leaving large, inefficient, debt-ridden companies to mutely weigh down the sputtering economy. Sometimes, change is a good thing even when it hurts.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On a related note, does anyone get the sense that other countries are blaming us for their economic woes? Whatevs. Get your own economy, dudes. If your GDP is based on selling us products that we can't afford, and you contributed to our bubble by buying our real estate and derivatives, you don't get to whine when the bubble pops and we stop buying your crap.

Cross posted at dagblog.com, where the comments are never turned off. For dyspeptic commentary on the auto industry bailout, check out Deadman's Dealing out a bunch of hooey and driving me mad...


30 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

The brine shrimp of nations.

user-pic

Genghis=Mark Twain. On the internet.

Actually, I sometimes wonder if the internet had been around when Mark Twain was growing up, if he wouldn't have just become a fairly annoying internet troll instead of America's preeminent satirist.

user-pic

Best compliment ever (as well as the most undeserved). Twain was too brilliant to be a troll. But he would have had 25 pseuds and relentlessly self-recommended.

user-pic

Then Billy Glad must be Mark Twain....not. :)

user-pic

I know you New Yorkers wanna find somebody else (preferably living on/near an island) with an economy that sucks worse than Manhattan's, but there's a couple of numbers that appear to have fallen off the Ginkho tree.

1. The US & Canada like to quote GDP growth, but those numbers (for some darn reason) ignore... population growth. So, our economies have to grow 1% more every year to stay even with Japan per capita. So when comparing Joe Plumber with Taso Aso (and wow, I admire your restraint in not touching the comedy potential there, Genghis), old el Taso's got a 10% advantage before the GDP growth bell even gets rung.

2. The Yen. Been doing fairly well vs the USD. As in, gaining 25% I think, in the last 18 months. Which makes it tougher for them to export, but also means... they're kinda richer.

P.S. And yes, the world blames you. People kinda bought that Last Superpower Standing, End of History, We Win, Woo Hoo, We're #1, The Dollar Rools 4ever thing. I know, bad world.

P.P.S. But when the Japanese buy Manhattan for a buncha beads, I'd keep the noise down. And delete this post.

user-pic

Thanks for the international perspective. (If Canada can be called international.)

1. The "Japan beat us to a recession" stuff was tongue in cheek. Our recession could well be longer and deeper than theirs, and they might end up buying us for beads. But there's no question that Japan's economy has been doing poorly for a long time, and it's hard to understand why its people stand for it.

2. I'll take the population growth, thank you very much. Japan will suffer a deflationary depression much worse than what we're seeing today if they don't increase immigration to make up for a shrinking labor force.

PS Genghis to world: GFYWAIR

user-pic

1. "PS Genghis to world: GFYWAIR." You are SO deleting that when the Japanese land.

2. In the meantime, 50 cents for your best 'Taso Aso' joke. C'mon, admit it, you'd do it if he were Republican.

3. How bad are we suffering up here? MICHAEL IGNATIEFF looks like he'll be the net leader of the Liberals. A liberal, "intellectual," who backed the Iraq War & who's lived outside the country for 25 years... and who looks (and talks) like Lurch.

Have pity.

user-pic

Shrinking jobs fits nicely with shrinking population. Long live the recession!

user-pic

1. I'm betting on the Chinese, who will revere me for dishing on Japan.

2. Not going there.

3. Do I have to say it? I pity the Canadians. Always have.

user-pic

Guess I'm gonna have to wait for Dij to come by and ring up the Tassacious Assacious jokes then. But it's a rule. You can't just straight up write "as."

Thanks for the pity though. Now I've got something for supper.

user-pic
Get your own economy, dudes.

Uh, careful. Because when they dump our worthless paper, that's what they will be telling us.

user-pic

I profoundly hope that they don't for everyone's sake, but if the worst should happen, I promise not to seek foreign scapegoats. We're ultimately responsible for the value of our paper.

user-pic

Of course, in order for them to do this someone would have to want to buy it from them.

user-pic

Not necessarily. In business, it would be called a "write off". Remember, the Chinese are hoarding their own currency. As are the Saudis (the Saudi currency is also known as "oil"). Indeed as Kevin Phillips discusses in his book BAD MONEY, the Saudis have already played this game a bit with us when they dumped dollars from their foreign currency holding to protest our entry into Iraq.

The US is in a very precarious position and I don't believe it's an issue of us being "too big to fail". Recall we don't even have the manufacturing capacity for many basic things anymore.

user-pic

One reason for Japan's sustained recession . . . . ?enghis

The principal if not sole reason for Japan's inability to grow its economy is its continuation of a mal-division of consumption and investment. Rather than pay high wages or distribute profits in the form of dividends or share buybacks, Japan's corporations retain an obscene percentage of their profits which they invest in unproductive capital goods.

Japanese corporate executives make these investments because their social status is tied to their positions in their corporations; they are desperately concerned that the corporation which employs them shall survive over their lifetimes. ROI considerations -- indeed, executive compensation, itself -- always take second place.

Until Japanese executives decide to end these malinvestments, regular recessions will be ongoing.

user-pic

not all their investements are unproductive. In fact most probably aren't, but if you've ever been inside big corps here -- you see the same projects to nowhere and money wasted. The shrinking population is their biggest weakness, and why they have to be an export economy.

user-pic

It seems to me that the "whose fault is it" game is useless in economics because the contributing factors are complex, and hypotheses are untestable. So I'll stick with my "one reason" but accept both the additional reasons offered as additional contributing factors that may be more significant than the one I presented. But whether the extended recessions have been caused by bailing out insolvent companies, mal-investment, a shrinking population, or all of the above, I don't see the nationwide problems being solved by spontaneous cultural changes at the grassroots level. Japan needs new leadership to change its fiscal policy, encourage dividend distribution and higher wages, and loosen immigration restrictions.

user-pic

For anyone interested in how Japanese firms operate (without reference to why*), the Nippon Life Professor of Finance and Economics' views are here.

* For so long as his status is tied to the corporate title the Japanese businessman holds, no amount of "leadership" will alter the forms of corporate governance.

user-pic

Thanks for the link. Definitely interesting, but I don't see how they're measuring the impact of the phenomenon on the economy.

user-pic

Ah, but I say, along with old Protagoras, that man is the measure of all things.

You Platonists never will give up the fantasy that numbers and the measurement thereof explain human behavior (here, economics and the economy it arrogantly purports to describe).

user-pic

Screw Plato. I'm an empiricist. Give me falsifiability or give me death.

Here's another take which goes with the Austrian Theory: http://mises.org/story/1099. Not ultimately testable either--it's econ after all--but he does offer a complete story about how the recessions unfolded and addresses competing Keynesian and Monetarist explanations, though as a good and pure economist, he doesn't discuss your sociological explanation. You can't have irrational agents concerned with social status rather than money mucking up the models.

user-pic

Falsifiability?

I dare you to say that 10 times fast.

user-pic

falsifiability
falsifiability
falsifiability
falsifiability
falsifiability
falsifiability
falsifiability
falsifiability
falsifiability
falsifiability

user-pic

Check the clock dude. It took you an HOUR from when Orlando asked to when you got the 10th F-word out.

O wins.

user-pic

Hmph. I was drawn back to this thread by the promise of the 10 F-words. I feel cheated.

user-pic

Free Money? In Japan, Most Say They Will Pass

The Japanese government would like to give $600 to a family of four. By 2 to 1 the Japanese say they don't want it; "[e]very age group opposes it."

Would Americans turn down free money? No way!

Economics ain't about economics; it's about sociology -- different strokes for different folks.

user-pic
Get your own economy, dudes.

When they tried that whole "get our own economy" thing in places like Chile, we arranged a coup. Nixon saying, "make the economy of Chile scream" before arranging for Schneider's and Allende's deaths (and a lot of other people went after).

When they tried it in Iran in 1953, we arranged a coup.

When we were not arranging coups, countries were forced by the IMF and World Bank into an export model even when it meant slashing social spending and self-sufficient agriculture.

So it's a little bit amnesic to suggest that people get off the model of exporting to us, since when they tried than in the past people got a bullet in the head or a visit from their friendly neighborhood economic hit men.

user-pic

Easy there, tigger. You're going to hurt someone with that kind of literalism. I never said that Japan wanted to sell us all those cars and gizmos. They'd obviously rather grow rice.

user-pic

Are you arguing for a .... paper tigger?

user-pic

Well, at least Japan's trains run on time.

Leave a comment

☠enghis

user-pic

Following: 47
Followers: 57

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location New York
  • Party Yes
  • Politics No

Favorites

  • Favorite Books Everything You Ever Wanted to Ask About Willies and Other Boys' Bits by Tricia Kreitman, Dr Neil Simpson, and Dr Rosemary Jones
  • Favorite Quotes "I have a vast variety of sources where we get our news." S.P.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address