« I went to hear Turandot at the movies | flavius's Blog | The solution is a progresssive income tax »

John Boehner's performance Saturday night


was impressive. Relaxed and self assured ,talking in a near conversational tone and clearly in full  command of his material and himself he was a real life talking and walking example of why the Republicans' ideas are irrelevant in the debate on health care.

And on most other issues.

Turning the pages of the bill , with amused sarcasm he recited case after case of things  the health care  tzar will supervise.Clearly expecting that we , like him, will be appalled that the Government will actually do something. As opposed to the deeply held conservative position that it should do nothing, merely stand by wringing its hands and hoping for the best.

Today's Times magazine describes the vastly improved results a Colorado medical practice obtains by actually telling doctors what to do. That would no doubt elecit  a chuckle from Boehner. Whose idea for controlling medical costs(and outcomes) like  his idea for controlling the banking system bears an uncanny resemblence to the(naturally) least effective treatment for prostate cancer:watchfull waiting. Otherwise known as "do nothing and hope the cancer will cure itself ".

It is Adam Smith gone mad. Make no plans, give no directions, hope for the best.

It's not how Boehner conducts his own life. He prepared for his  remarks last night. Someone had gone through the bill and selected the pages containing the dire threat that if Health Care passes, the Government will actually take an interest in what the Medical Professions is doing. He didn't just open the bill at random, he had a plan.

In case you wondered why New Orleans and the occupation of Iraq were such disasters look no further. They were the necessary consequences of a philosophy which advocates  dealing with all problems  by "watchful waiting"..

 

 

 

    


8 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I can't comment on whether Boehner's performance was impressive because I was only half listening. Until he mispronounced "hyperbole" as "hyperbowl." After that, I was laughing too hard to listen at all.

user-pic

Either he mispronounced it, or he was discussing a very athletic toilet!

user-pic

Or perhaps he was suggesting that the Republican plan was actually hyper-bull.

user-pic

Interesting. That makes it seem as if he were reading a script to a greater extent than I realized.

user-pic

Most speeches on the floor -when the cameras are running-are prepared...Few are capable of extemporaneous - off the cuff speaking because they have not read the material!

Rangel cleaned his plow and laughed while doing it! The deals are done when you have something to bring to the table...and in the Cloakroom!

user-pic

"the(naturally) least effective treatment for prostate cancer:watchfull waiting. Otherwise known as "do nothing and hope the cancer will cure itself "."

Bad analogy. Many doctors do, in fact, recommend doing nothing about prostate cancer, as it is an extremely slow-devloping cancer that seldom kills before other diseases have taken over.

And, if we had "death panels" (i.e., government boards analyzing treatmetn outcomes and tying reimbursement to adherence to those guidelines) doing nothing about prostate cancer is what they would in fact recommend, as they do in most countries with national health insurance.

All of this is a good thing, in my opinion BTW. But I think you would be better off choosing a different cancer to warn of the dangers of doing nothing.


user-pic

Point well taken. I know the cliche is that almost all men have prostate cancer at death and almost no men die of it.

user-pic

Always excellent analysis by Flavius.

Leave a comment

flavius

user-pic

Following: 1
Followers: 27

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Long Island
  • Party Democratic
  • Politics slightly left of the party's center

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Brad Delong
  • Favorite Books Skidelsky's biography of Keynes; Naipaul's "In a Free State"
  • Favorite Quotes First they came for the socialists and I did not speak out because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists and I did not speak out etc. Then they came for the Jews and I did not speak out etc. Then they came for me-and there was no one left to speak for me.

Bio

Worked outside the US for 15 years.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address