Our insurance problem-and mine*
Private health insurance is an oxymoron. Like "socially useful Wall Street"
For exactly the same intuitively obvious reason.
Adam Smith eloquently manufactured an economic theory out of the common place observation that most people, most of the time will work harder for their own self interest than for any other reason.
Or more succinctly, greed is powerful.
We all know that. The rational rationale (if you'll permit me)for the Conservatives' defense of Capitalism is that people are motivated by self interest and almost not at all by the common good c.f. The tragedy of the commons..The rationale for the Liberals' enthusiasm for Regulation is that people are so motivated by self interest that they will lock fire exits, can poisonous food and foist sub prime mortgages on their fellow citizens if they can strike it rich while doing so.
As I blogged a couple of days ago the various explanations of the financial melt down omit the real one:that when US taxes ceased to be progressive , the resulting escalation in the after- tax return on Wall Street's bonuses become so enticing that a generation of smart young people shut their eyes to the disaster they were creating. The motto became "Pull up the ladder mate, I'm aboard".
And not just them.There was Bernie Madoff.
Now consider the insurance industry.It has share holders, ceo's , managers. They walk on two legs, went to college somewhere, have a mortgage , kids and aspirations to.: .... pay off that mortgage, send their kids to St. Grarklesex and some ivy covered college, ski at Chamonix, own a villa in Tuscany . And more . Much more. As much as all those Wall Streeters
Call it self interest, call it greed. Whatever. That's the way it is, folks.
And how do they achieve that?. By making a profit. And how does an insurance company make a profit? By not providing insurance..
Every dollar an insurance company pays to settle a claim from its customers is a dollar less profit,And moves the owners, the ceo and the managers that much further away from that goal to live like the Lords of the Universe.
It's not just that the goals of the health insurance industry are different from Obama's. It's that they are in complete conflict The industry can only achieve its goals by frustrating Obama's.
-and mine.
TPM has been mercifully free of my effusions while I've been dealing with , wait for it, an insurance company.
A contractor excavated the street in front of my house. The porch is falling down-it's dangerous to walk by. I filed a claim with my insurer and was told there's no damage.
Of course. No one's surprised. Not me. Not my attorney. Not the civil engineer who examined the damage.Because if the company pays my claim it will have lower profits. And that villa in Tuscany will be just that more unachievable for the ceo.
If that's the way my home owner's insurance works why should anyone expect health insurance will be any different.
Private health insurance is dangerous to the health of the nation and all its inhabitants-except for those eimployed by the private health insurers.
* with apologies to Norman Podhoretz for the rif on the title of his essay written as he was in the process of morphing from a brilliant literary critic to an unthinking conservative. reactionary













Well, heck, if your porch falls off in one piece, then there is no damage, right? It's just in a different place, maybe sideways. If it's dangerous, then obviously the solution is for you to pay more to your insurer for the liability component if your policy. It's a win/win. Sure, you become poorer, but your COVERED. Your insurer becomes richer, and they can hire one more claims adjuster to deny your next claim.
Don't take my sarcasm the wrong way, flavius. I'm on your side 100%. But I don't agree about self-interest translating to greed. I think greed is a cultural institution on it's own merits (or lack of merits.) In other words, I support your self-interest in getting your porch fixed, and I don't think you're being greedy about it.
July 23, 2009 12:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps I should have avoided the word "greed". If it's no-greedy self interest that causes the insurance industry executives to prefer their self interest to mine , we get to the same conclusion.
I am in fact a complete supporter of capitalism.I think Bill Gates' self interested activities have on balance probably enhanced the well being of his fellow citizens. Or to choose a less attractive example , Henry Ford.
But I am equally a complete supporter of the government's playing preventing the capitalist's self interested activities from hurting the rest of us.
Cheers. Just don't walk to close to my porch.
July 23, 2009 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink