Panicked Religious right attacks health care reform
The health care campaign launched last week by local pastors from across the country along with Faith in Public Life, Faithful America, PICO, Sojourners, Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good and Gamaliel brought together grassroots and national religious groups to call on Members of Congress to make quality health care truly affordable for every American family. The nonpartisan effort, which includes radio ads and events in congregations, has drawn attention to the moral urgency of our nation's health care crisis and the faith community's commitment to reform that makes care affordable for all families.
Unfortunately, in their Washington Update yesterday, the Family Research Council mischaracterized and distorted this effort to baselessly claim that it is advancing "an anti-faith, anti-family anti-freedom agenda." (Scroll down to bottom of FRC's page.)
FRC asserts that the effort is a "ploy" "in concert with the Obama administration to garner support for government-controlled health care." In fact, the radio ads as well as the leaders and organizations involved in the campaign lifted up values and broad principles for health care reform, all focused on making quality health care choices affordable for all families. Moreover, the ads have run in states and districts represented by both Democrats and Republicans. Leaders in both parties need to hear the faith community's concerns and work toward reform that addresses them.
FRC also claims that the effort is part of a "new strategy to use the veneer of religion to cover a socialist agenda that will federalize another 17% of our nation's economy." Not only does the campaign urge leaders of both parties to pass reform that simply puts quality health care within reach for all families, but the clergy participating in the campaign hail from progressive, moderate and conservative congregations alike. Their commitment to health care reform is rooted in firsthand experience with the unmet needs of families in their own congregations and communities, as well their faith commitment to caring for the well being of all people.
We have confidence that these faith leaders and the families they serve will be heard by the decision-makers who hold the power to reform our system, and that misleading claims and speculation will fall on deaf ears. But charges that quality, affordable health care for all Americans is "an anti-faith, anti-family anti-freedom agenda" require correction. As FRC ironically stated in their attack, "we must be careful to separate the rhetoric from reality."













Let me ask the question because other than party affiliation, I don't understand what Universal Health Care has to do with religion? I don't get it! Why would a faith based organization have a voice in this discussion any more than a group like the NFL players association?
May 29, 2009 2:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you asking why religious organizations would care about charity and public service?
May 29, 2009 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess I would (theoretically) wonder why a religious group would be AGAINST charity and public service. But then, when I think of how they operate, I totally get it. They are in it for the money and don't really care about people at all.
May 29, 2009 9:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The FRC is hardly "[calling] on Members of Congress to make quality health care truly affordable for every American family"
May 30, 2009 12:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I looked at the founding members of this group and three of the five listed on their website are also members of Obama's new 'New Faith Advisory Council', whose formation and mission seems nebulous to me. These are religious activists. I'm trying to figure out who funds them/what hidden agendas they may have.
May 29, 2009 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry. That was regarding Faith in Public Life, whose efforts seem bona fide in support of universal health care. Family Resource Council is the parent of 'Focus on the Family'. They're a conservative religious right organization. They're the organization whose funding would be interesting to see.
May 29, 2009 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well I see a connection between change on any politically charged issue and religion. I am never going to just attack all worshippers, all congregations.
If there is a religious movement that seeks to find a way to get more and better health care to the poor and the middle class, its ok with me.
May 29, 2009 3:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's a battle between two different religious groups DD. 'Faith in Public Life' is supporting Universal Health Care, while 'Family Resource Council' sees it as a communist plot or something akin to it, and is attempting to discredit the pro-universal HC ads being run by FPL.
May 29, 2009 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
THANKS FOR THAT MIGUEL!!!
May 29, 2009 3:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Also, these groups are separate from churches. Churches and church leaders who advocate for certain policy positions should be verboten, although they seem to get away with an awful lot of it.
When a group forms a C-4 or a PAC, they can advocate for whatever, as long as they follow the rules.
May 29, 2009 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
I doubt anyone in these "religious" councils sees the health care initiative as a "communist" plot - however fearsome, after the past quarter century, that charge possibly can still be. I think they're selling that kind of nonsense to gullible, confused folk who vote "rightish" not because of inherent evil or economic self-interest, but because that's the way voting swayed with grandpappy Amos an' the girls an' the boys... an' the familee known as the Real McCoys. Look, the bad guys here aren't the religious right, small-town bible-thumpers or dipshit shock-jock fans. Questionable groups like the FRC peddle disinformation hatched by insurance and medical industry giants to the Great Unwashed, undoubtedly with funding from these interests to do just that.
May 30, 2009 1:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think faith based groups used to care about equality and fairness. Over the past thirty os so years they have turned into a single issue group dedicated to outlawing abortion and birth control. I wonder if this isn't part of the reason self identified atheists under thirty now outnumber self identified republicans under thirty. It is good to see religous groups trying to make a positive difference in the lives of people again.
May 29, 2009 4:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Old age consists of ages nearing or surpassing the average life span of human beings, and thus the end of the human life cycle. Old age is something most of us will face at some point. The great American author Mark Twain referred to old age as the worst "wanton insult" possible. Age is just a number – just because other people lump you in with seniors and consider you aged doesn't mean anything if you don't let it. Remember, George Foreman knocked Michael Moorer straight to the canvas and into being the butt of jokes at age 45. Age discrimination is becoming a problem, leading to personal loans for medical care. An urologist won't conduct PSA tests normally. (PSA is a compound which is present in higher quantities in prostate cancer patients.) Some need debt relief well into old age.
June 5, 2009 4:57 AM | Reply | Permalink