fern's Blog | "Poisoned Paradise" Part I »

Crisis in Vieques


The purpose of the United States Navy, as with all branches of the armed services, is to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and the freedoms it provides. It is an organization that centers itself in accountability, honor and integrity. However, its actions in Vieques, Puerto Rico, have resulted in a situation that compromises the very ethics the Navy holds so dear.

For sixty-two years, the Navy conducted training exercises and tested weapons on Vieques. These weapons were created to destroy fighter jets, tanks, even aircraft carriers; in short, to defeat an opposing army. Is it at all shocking that the chemicals necessary to blow up a battle ship are harmful to a developing child? The Island of Vieques was a sponge for toxic waste, with the military dropping 80 million pounds of munitions from 1984-1998 alone! The results on the health of those living on the island are staggering.

Approximately half of the indigenous population suffers from two or more heavy metal poisonings. The infant morality rate on the island is 25% higher than anywhere else in Puerto Rico.  Residents of Vieques have a 30% higher occurrence of cancer than other parts of Puerto Rico with previously rare and extremely deadly cancers occurring with startling frequency. To deny that there is a causal relationship between the prolonged exposure to a multitude of poisonous chemicals and the development of debilitating illnesses, as the Navy is currently doing, is downright laughable.  Denying culpability in Vieques is not only cowardly; it calls into question the integrity the Navy has worked so hard to cultivate.

Vieques is a U.S. territory. The people that live there are citizens of the United States. They are entitled to the full protection of their freedom by the Navy. Not only has the Navy failed to protect the freedom of people of Vieques; it has put them at grave risk.  While it will undoubtedly be a blow to the Navy's pride and image to admit its mistake in Vieques, it is inherent to the character of the organization to do so.  By acknowledging that there is a crisis in Vieques, resulting from their actions and urging the government to take appropriate measures to correct the damage, the Navy would be stepping forward with the integrity for which it is known. There are risks to defending our country and with these risks come consequences.  The United States Navy took a great risk by testing weapons on Vieques. Now must step up honorably and accept these consequences. 


10 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Thanks for spotlighting this; there are so many disastrous consequences of oour past and present policies to pay attention to.

user-pic

I saw this ad on TPM just before I saw your blog:

http://americanvaluesnetwork.org/viequescnn/

user-pic

Seems to me that the powers that be view accountability and consequences as principles that should apply to other countries and anyone other than them including 'us'.

However I will contact my reps about this. It seems like a tip of the iceburg of consequences coming our way for a myriad of awful leadership, terrible judgement,willful arrogance, and mistakes.

user-pic

Shhhhhhhhhhhhh, you'll spoil the opening of the new resort...http://www.starwoodhotels.com/whotels/property/overview/index.html?propertyID=3170

Can't wait to stroll the beach and collect shrapnel.

user-pic

It is time America act honorably and do something to right these wrongs. Good point that the Navy serves to protect American citizens. The Navy has acted honorably many times before--it can do so again now. This is an opportunity for change!

user-pic

The Navy left in 2003 and the site has been declared an environmental superfund site for cleanup. The Navy has appropriated $200 million for further cleanup over the next 7 years. Whether that is sufficient remains to be seen. I'm not aware that they have actively denied any health consequences from toxic exposures, although it is probably true that they have yet to accept full responsibility as they should, given that absolute proof of causality in circumstances like this can only be inferred but never proved. The evidence certainly suggests a relationship. What they say is important, but less important than what they do.

user-pic

Of the various chemicals still present in high concentration, probably the most worrisome is cadmium, which is toxic to the kidney and other organs, and also potentially carcinogenic. It will be important to ensure that it does not find its way into seafood, other foods, or drinking water until concentrations have subsided to safe levels.

user-pic

Fern - The words of this post appear under your name. Are you the legitimate author?

user-pic

And is fern a "legitimate" name, but seriously, you raise an interesting question.

The source of this blog entry appears to be The American Values Network which expresses a singular interest in the Vieques matter.

As interesting is the fact that of the organization's several purported interests (climate change, healthcare, scripture, etc.) only Vieques is singular and particular.

Who funds the organization? What's its interest in Vieques? Which law firm(s) stands to benefit from any lawsuits pending or planned?

Curious.

Leave a comment

fern

user-pic

Following: 0
Followers: 0

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address