<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Ernest Wilson&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ewilson/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ewilson/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/ewilson//44</id>
   <updated>2008-10-13T00:59:51Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Beyond Neo-Con Culture?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2006/02/beyond-neocon-culture.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2006:/talk/blogs//19.228798</id>
   
   <published>2006-02-25T03:56:33Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-13T00:59:51Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Appreciate the comments on &lsquo;cultural competence&rsquo;.&nbsp;&nbsp; A big problem is that the &lsquo;community&rsquo; (Bunch? Herds??) of foreign policy professionals is split along all sorts of lines, as the commentaries here demonstrate. There are traditional conservatives, neo-cons, liberals, realists,&nbsp;etc. But one...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Ernest Wilson</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ewilson/">
      <![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Appreciate the comments on &lsquo;cultural competence&rsquo;.&nbsp;&nbsp;</font> <p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /></p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" /></font><font size="3"><p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">A big problem is that the &lsquo;community&rsquo; (Bunch? Herds??) of foreign policy professionals is split along all sorts of lines, as the commentaries here demonstrate. There are traditional conservatives, neo-cons, liberals, realists,&nbsp;etc. But one especially deep, far reaching and dangerous cleavage&nbsp; is the stark dividing line between those who inhabit the traditional national security culture, and those in the globalist culture. Each has its own journals, think tanks, conferences and watering holes; each has is own norms and lingo; each has its own foundation sugar daddies. &nbsp;Each has its own culture. Those drawn to and acculturated into the globalist culture concentrate on the environment, human rights, and maybe a little humanitarian intervention. And they mostly like the UN. </font></font></p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" /></font><font size="3"><p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">The folks in the national security culture prefer force structures and throw weights. They&rsquo;re not crazy about the boys in blue helmets. &nbsp;Each culture&nbsp;thinks the other is deeply flawed, and often misguided. And as Huntington might predict, they rarely communicate directly with one another. &nbsp;</font></font></p><p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /></p><p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">If&nbsp; you are interested in framing a sensible &lsquo;progressive&rsquo; (yes, I know, as yet undefined) foreign policy, then there has to be a way to bridge these two cultures, and to do so consciously and deliberately. Alas, can&rsquo;t be done just with words on the page or the digital post. Requires more active engagement and long difficult conversations over scotch and soda &ndash; and white wine. But don&rsquo;t underestimate how difficult it will be to change institutional cultures.&nbsp;&nbsp;</font></font></p><p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" /></font></p><p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">ges asks if we should instill CC throughout the general population, or mainly train the foreign affairs elites to be more culturally competent. I think both. At the risk of sounding trite, America really is&nbsp; becoming more interdependent with the rest of the world, not less. CC really is, or should be, a growing priority for all Americans and taught in secondary schools everywhere. So far, it isn&rsquo;t. At the same time, the service academies (Annapolis, etc.) &nbsp;NDU, the Foreign Service Institute, as well as professional schools like Woodrow Wilson, LBJ, &nbsp;JFK etc.&nbsp; need to rapidly expand their CC offerings.</font></font></p><p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman" /></font></p><p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Munguza is on track about the neo-cons cultural obtuseness, especially the crew now in control.&nbsp;They do seem to think the other guys are stupid. Not sure this is moral relativism, though. Mostly it's &quot;my morals right or wrong. Your morals, wrong&quot;. They are pretty consistent on that note.</font></font></p></font></font></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
