<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>EthanQ&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ethanq/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/ethanq/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/ethanq//1831</id>
   <updated>	2008-10-23T22:18:28Z	</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://14.239485-comment:3247171</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/23/all_likely_voters_are_not_alik/#c3247171" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[EthanQ Commented on All &quot;Likely Voters&quot; Are Not Alike by George Bishop]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-23T22:18:28Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-23T22:18:28Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I think this answers most of your questions.  If you look at the internals of the poll, you'll find that a FULL 44% of their "likely" sample were EVANGELICALS!!!</p>

<p>This is unconcionable cooking of books.  Any other reasonable survey would consider that DOUBLE the maximum number of evangelicals in a likely voter sample.  For shame, for shame!</p>

<p>Here's the link:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com/pdf/AP-GfK_Poll_3_Topline_FINAL.pdf">http://www.ap-gfkpoll.com/pdf/AP-GfK_Poll_3_Topline_FINAL.pdf</a></p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    



</feed>

