<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>barth&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619</id>
   <updated>2010-09-13T15:12:53Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Monday morning quickie</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/09/monday-morning-quickie.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.351268</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-13T15:07:01Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-13T15:12:53Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Don Draper may have decided against a quickie last night, astounding the Mad Men voyeurs, but here is a little post for a Monday morning.&nbsp; It is based on this and a similar entry on the New Republic site which...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[Don Draper may have decided against a quickie last night, astounding the Mad Men voyeurs, but here is a little post for a Monday morning.&nbsp; It is based on<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/2010/08/29/how-obama-got-rolled-by-wall-street.print.html"> this</a> and a similar entry on the New Republic site which I cannot access in full and don't care to given its editor's comments of the past week.&nbsp; <br /><br />But keep this in mind:&nbsp; the "Franklin Roosevelt" who we correctly honor was dragged into the New Deal by his "brain trust" and wise heads in Congress (Glass and Steagall for instance).&nbsp; As Krugman has pointed out, he had this budget balancing thing still in him until after 1938, when he made a big mess trying to do just that.<br /><br />A presidency is full of fits and starts.&nbsp; The current one said they would make mistakes on their way to getting it right.&nbsp; That he has done so hardly justifies the hand wringing we are seeing.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Days of Awe</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/09/days-of-awe.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.351138</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-11T14:18:55Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-11T14:21:50Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[It seemed impossible to post here yesterday, and I thought that was curtains for Barth at TPM Cafe.&nbsp; Today, I find that I continue to exist, so here is what you would have seen here yesterday, if I could have...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="332" label="Jews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="125" label="Muslims" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5365" label="Palin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5245" label="prayer" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50624" label="Rosh hashanah" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[<i>It seemed impossible to post here yesterday, and I thought that was curtains for Barth at TPM Cafe.&nbsp; Today, I find that I continue to exist, so here is what you would have seen here yesterday, if I could have posted it.</i><br /><br />No, not of "shock and awe."  Just plain awe.  The ten days which begin 
on Rosh Hashanah and end on Yom Kippur are collectively the days of awe.
  They began on Wednesday evening and rather quietly this year.  Maybe 
it escaped this blogger's ears, but the ritualistic best wishes to "our 
Jewish friends" did not seem as prevalent this year as in other years.  
Maybe it is because while bashing Muslims, sending greetings to Jews 
seems somehow unfair or contradictory.  <br /><br /><br /> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<br /><br />My religious observation
 seems to increase by the year.  Synagogues have rarely been a place 
where I want to go, but, since recent years and technologies have 
allowed me to pray in my living room and, in the morning, while still in
 pajamas, I have.  A childhood as a Reform Jew, which (if anything) I 
remain, made Rosh Hashanah a one day holiday.  I am announcing today, 
though, that the increasing celebration of the "second day"---the Rosh 
Hashanah sheni---has finally made its mark on me and will become part of
 my life  next year.  <br /><br />There are several reasons for this.  One, 
perhaps the most significant, will be posted here shortly, but it is not
 available right now.  Another reason is a growing realization that 
whatever objections I have had to ritual and synagogue attendance 
(largely traceable to the forced versions of it---including---almost 
unforgiveably it seemed on that day, on the Sunday after President 
Kennedy's murder) my Jewishness---the things I have been taught as a 
Jew, has had an enormous impact on how I see myself as part of the 
larger community.<br /><br />So, yes, I watched the webcast of services on 
Wednesday evening and found this part---roughly the same thing I have 
heard on the same day every year for more than fifty years---almost 
screaming out at me, and explaining why the idea that all those who 
follow Islam are required to pay for the sins of murderers who also 
claimed to be followers of Islam, so repels me.<br /><br />It was this passage that crashed over me as I read it in sync with the people on my computer screen:<br /><br /><blockquote>We shall not hate others; we shall love our neighbors as<br />ourselves. We shall consider the strangers among us as our own; we<br />were strangers in the land of Egypt. May all who are oppressed burst<br />forth from bondage.</blockquote><br /><br />Sarah
 Palin, some hateful pastor in Florida, or Senate candidates in Delaware
 and Nevada who claim some moral high ground will not preach to me.  I 
have my own faith and it tells me something radically different from 
what their faith tells them.  Fortunately, I live in the United States 
where, at least at this moment, I am allowed to ignore them and follow 
different teachings.<br /><br />Yes, these are days of reflection and hope.  L'shana tova.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Nine, Eleven</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/09/nine-eleven.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.351137</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-11T14:09:03Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-11T14:22:13Z</updated>
   
   <summary></summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="1760" label="9/11" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5344" label="civilians" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="268" label="military" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50621" label="PATH" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50623" label="Trade Center" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
       
      <![CDATA[Someday those words will not mean what they do today. Even with Mad 
Men's searing retelling of it, November 22 comes and goes these days 
with very little mention.  Even December 7, 1941, which I did not live 
through, but once held strong meaning, seems to have lost its emotional 
force and if our parents remember where they were when they heard of 
President Roosevelt's death on April 12, 1945, the rest of us have not 
taken notice for decades.<br /><br />My own story of 9/11 is not worth 
mentioning again.  I lost my next door neighbor, and while friends lost 
loved ones, I lost colleagues.  <br /><br />The first office I could call my
 own was in Two World Trade Center.  It was an odd thing to have your 
office looking over your shoulder almost everywhere you would go in the 
city in which I lived.  When we moved across the street in the late 
1980s, it was stayed behind me all the time, and I continued to commute 
through the Trade Center until about two years before That Day.<br /><br />Its
 memory will never cease to bring me to my knees, not in prayer 
necessarily, or in supplication, but in the force of its horrible 
terror.<br /><br />What nine years has done, though, is allowed perspective.
  On that horrible day, the thought that ran through my head was that 
the reduction of politics and government to sound bytes, photo ops and 
feeding the beast of the broadcast media had led to so many deaths 
because protecting us was now subordinate to fluffery.  I learned 
shortly thereafter, that, indeed, President Bush was reading a book to 
schoolchildren for a photo op as the Trade Center was under attack and 
it was many months before we learned of how annoyed he was a month 
earlier when told of the imminent danger facing our country.<br /><br />That
 he was not forced to resign immediately after that became known 
remains, for me, evidence that we have not learned from our mistakes.  
That somehow the Republican Party may take control of the United States 
Congress shows how empty our politics have become.  <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2010/9/11/900981/-Sept-11-againA-victim-speaks">I read the diary of a direct survivor of the attack of that day</a> and just shuddered.<br /><br />But
 today, as I hear those names again:  a former Boston Bruins defenseman,
 my next door neighbor, the son of a friend, the brother of another 
friend, the husband of a woman who has become, at least in someways, a 
hero to me, the husband of another woman with whom I worked, who has 
remarried, but will always have a sadness around her, it seems to me 
that it is time to retire once and for all expressions such as "Ground 
Zero."<br /><br />The name of the place is the World Trade Center:  "the 
Trade Center" to those of us who have come and gone from there so many 
times.  I have been there since, taking the train that runs from Hoboken
 and that used to be the final and first leg of my daily commute.  The 
name of the station to which it runs was and is called the World Trade 
Center, and, except for a few months right after 9/11/2001, it has gone 
right into the Trade Center just as it has since the early 1970s.<br /><br />Ground
 Zero sounds like a military site, and the Trade Center was, and is, 
anything but.  In fact, that is the whole point.  It is a place where 
people went to work or traveled through on the way to work.  Tourists 
came to eat at the restaurant on the top of 1 WTC (those "north tower" 
and "south tower" expressions are from those who do not know the area.  
Most of us knew the buildings by their address.)  It was not a military 
base, nor a legitimate target for anyone.  The people who died there 
were, for the most part, people who simply went to work and those who 
tried to rescue them.<br /><br />And it is right to celebrate, finally, the 
restoration of the Trade Center as a place where people go to work 
again.  My heart sings every time I see the buildings, more beautiful 
than the fairly pedestrian ones they are replacing, arise once again.<br /><br />Those
 who want to use that other expression, the transformation of the Trade 
Center into nothing more than the site of an attack or the place itself 
as a monument to hate should be ashamed of themselves.  Its use in a 
political commercial should assure that the candidate who "approved of 
this message" be defeated, if not reviled.<br /><b><br />A TPM Cafe Postscript.</b> It is hard to tell whether this site is closing, closed or what.&nbsp; I tried to post the other day and could not, but find that I am able to do so today.&nbsp; I will continue here if I can:&nbsp; I find the community here to be the best and most enlightening anywhere on the internets and the two way conversations here have been enormously helpful in dealing with what faces us all.&nbsp; <br /><br />If I cease to exist on this platform, I hope you will find me at my home base <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/">The Public Servant</a> or, if you can wade through the piles of useless blather that collects there, on old friend <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/user/Barth">Daily Kos</a>.<br /><br />Otherwise, my own drivel will continue to show up here.<br /><br /><br />]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Friends</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/09/friends.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.350307</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-04T20:14:45Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-04T20:15:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>We saw this first during the primary campaign in late 2007 and the first half of 2008, where the dueling factions supporting either Senator Obama, Senator Clinton or even Senator Edwards felt it necessary to demonize the candidates they did...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="12658" label="Boehner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="32098" label="Edwards" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2234" label="elections" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16720" label="Eugene Robinson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12246" label="G W Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3637" label="Gore" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="139" label="Hillary Clinton" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5384" label="Katrina" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="3723" label="Kerry" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="151" label="primaries" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6083" label="Reagan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5360" label="students" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[We saw this first during the primary campaign in late 2007 and the first
 half of 2008, where the dueling factions supporting either Senator 
Obama, Senator Clinton or even Senator Edwards felt it necessary to 
demonize the candidates they did not support.  One candidate was a "war 
monger," another was unelectable and shallow, and so on and so forth.<br />
<br />
The idea that a unified party finding a way to support a single candidate and to try to get him or her elected <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/comments/2008/3/7/95750/00799/27#c27">seemed quite out of reach</a>.
  To some people, indeed, the idea that one might support a different 
candidate than the one he first supported seemed somehow dishonest or a 
betrayl of important beliefs, though to others, this blogger included, <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/3/508298/-One-foot-off-the-bus">the idea was to elect someone</a>---not just anyone but either Senator Obama or Senator Clinton. ]]>
      <![CDATA[<br /><br />Somehow
 we pulled it together, after all. President Bush surely helped; 
Governor Palin helped, too.  May these continue to be their lasting 
contributions to this republic. <br /><br />Those who saw their support for a
 particular candidate to be more important than the election of a 
Democrat always seemed to be a problem.  The cult of personality, the 
idea that ones vote could only go to a candidate who agreed with the 
voter on every issue imaginable (could a Cubs fan vote for a White Sox 
fan? Could someone who opposed the war in Iraq ever forgive a candidate 
who voted in support of the resolution which permitted the use of 
force?), was likely to result in the election of a Democrat, if at all, 
by people who would quickly lose interest if the new President did not 
usher in an era radically different than the political one we were in.<br /><br />A
 divided country united only in the view that President Bush was 
incompetent, though, is not going to embrace the abrupt return to 
embrace the New Deal foundations which The Great Reagan and his acolytes
 all but wrecked in 1980.  It was not going to adopt the Daily Kos view 
about war criminals, illegal wars, the use of terror to scare an 
electorate and so forth, simply because the presidency of George Bush 
required the election of President Obama.<br /><br />That is why it was imperative that the new president use the giddy optimism to get what could be gotten <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/26/642979/-Rounding-Third">in the first hundred days or so</a>.
  In substantial measure, that happened even with a Loyal Opposition 
simply turning its back on the new president and simply voting against 
whatever the president supported, and a new view of the filibuster as 
simply requiring a super-majority for any piece of legislation to pass 
the Senate.  Still, <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2010/06/coin.html">as Rachel Maddow detailed it a few weeks back</a>,
 with compromises even to get the votes of Democrats which we wish were 
unnecessary, it was as successful a first year plus as could reasonably 
be imagined and, given the nightmare of the past eight years, one would 
think it would be enough to cause those who so wanted change two years 
ago to press ahead for more in the next session of Congress.<br /><br />Instead,
 the press and broadcasters, always eager to tear down whatever they 
think they have created, aided and abetted the sense of a government 
that has failed by not being able to undo so much damage in so short a 
period of time.  Instead of the young people stimulated by a 
presidential candidate to push him into the White House, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/03/us/politics/03students.html?_r=1&amp;hp">we get this report of "disillusioned" students</a> either uniterested in voting or even in supporting Republicans and an electorate well described by Eugene Robinson <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/02/AR2010090203992.html?hpid=opinionsbox1">as spoiled brats</a>.<br /><br />People
 who could not bring themselves to vote for Vice President Gore, because
 he was stiff, or for Senator Kerry, because he likes windsurfing, 
complained bitterly about President Bush, but those complaints fall on 
deaf ears.  The reasons people do not want to support democratic members
 of Congress and are willing to see John Boehner as Speaker and <a href="http://firedoglake.com/2010/09/02/preview-of-the-doings-our-our-forthcoming-lords-and-masters-non-birther-hearings-related/">a rerun of the subpoena happy nonsense that led to the impeachment of President Clinton</a>
 (a diversion at least as responsible for many of our current problems, 
as anything else), should not be heard to complain at what we will have 
to endure.<br /><br />The posts under this name which appeared just before 
and shortly after the Great Day of Election worried that the election of
 President Obama owed more to President Bush and his post-Katrina 
discovered failings than anything else and that the transformation of a 
presidential candidate into a celebrity would work against any long term
 change in the Reagan dominated thinking that continues to pass for 
political thought in this country.<br /><br />It is quite sad, and not just a little scary, that this prognostication has come true.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>September 1</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/09/september-1.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.349978</id>
   
   <published>2010-09-01T21:10:20Z</published>
   <updated>2010-09-01T21:12:45Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A special midweek post:You were not born in 1939, no doubt, and neither was I, but yet this date has great resonance even today. It is the day when, in 1939, Germany invaded Poland and the day on which the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7465" label="F D Roosevelt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="141" label="Iraq" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50388" label="isolationists" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50383" label="Lodge" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50385" label="Marshall Plan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25017" label="tea party" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50387" label="Word War II" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[A special midweek post:<br /><br />You were not born in 1939, no doubt, and neither was I, but yet this 
date has great resonance even today.  It is the day when, in 1939, 
Germany invaded Poland and the day on which the Second World War began.<br />
<br />
By
 the time it ended the world had changed substantially.  The forces of 
hate had been defeated but at a terrible cost.  Aside from the many 
millions who perished, at war and as civilians, the world which emerged,
 particularly in Europe, was a shell of the civilization which existed 
at the turn of the twentieth century and the era of scientific progress 
had shown its ugliest side.<br /> ]]>
      <![CDATA[<br /><br />Half of Europe emerged from the war 
as essentially captive states of a new Soviet empire.  The United 
States, whose shores escaped the physical brunt of the war was not the 
leader of the rest of Europe:  the free Europe.  Our foresighted 
investment in the recovery of those devastated lands was part of an 
economic success story in our country that altered our approach to the 
economy in ways we have never seriously reconsidered.<br /><br />That 
victory in the war that began on this day, sixty-one years ago, was 
unassailable, and the causes for which we fought unquestionable, at 
least to decent people, or those who understood who we are, and what our
 place was in an increasingly smaller world.  <br /><br />The tea-partiers 
of those day---they called themselves isolantionsists---threw down the 
same gauntlets they use today.  American democracy itself, Senator Henry
 Cabot (Palin) Lodge told the Veterans of Foreign Wars the day before 
Hitler invaded Poland, <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=F60E11FA3E5A137A93C3A91782D85F4D8385F9">could not "survive" any U.S. "participation" in "another world conflict."</a>
  That stifling foolishness and sense of U.S. superiority required that 
the United States remain "neutral" for over two years, and after much of
 Europe was occupied by the Nazis or their sympathizers, before the 
United States joined the war.<br /><br />Yesterday, as our President 
brilliantly announced the end of another military experience, one whose 
commencement and conclusion mirrored that in Vietnam far more than in 
World War II, the descendants of those fools from 1939 were out there 
braying again:  wondering how President Obama could take "credit" for 
our "success" in Iraq.<br /><br /><a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/31/reaction-to-president-obamas-iraq-address/">Gloria Borger, CNN</a>: <blockquote>Republicans right now ... are saying this is a president who ought to credit George W. Bush.</blockquote><br /><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/01/obamas-iraq-speech-shifts-focus-economy-draws-gop/"> Sen John McCain</a>:
  ""What [President Obama] should have said: 'I opposed the surge. I was
 wrong. I made a mistake and George W. Bush deserves credit for doing 
something that was very unpopular at the time.' "<br /><br />Success in 
Iraq?  There is no government, save a "caretaker."  Violence continues 
and is likely to increase.  Nobody on the planet thought that a surge in
 troops would not present a temporary edge for our forces.  The idea was
 not to see what American might could accomplish, but whether Iraq could
 become a democratic state in a region that has seen none, save Israel. 
 The jury is, at best, still out on that question.<br /><br />My favorite 
bit of nonsense was Chris Matthews reminding us of a column he wrote at 
the edge of the Iraq war suggesting it might be a bad idea.  Bully for 
him.  What most of us remember is his <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/200604270005">gushing
 over the President pretending to be a military pilot and announcing the
 successful end to major military activities in Iraq about seven years 
ago</a>.<br /><br />President Roosevelt knew what was right and what our 
country would need to do even before September 1 dawned in 1939, but he 
also knew what it would take to get a country which was as delusional 
then as it is today o understand its responsibility.<br /><br />Today, we 
face new crisis and require the same degree of leadership.  Our 
President made a start last night with an excellent explanation of how 
interconnected our world is and the consequences of foolish actions on 
our part.  But he needs to stay on this theme and hammer it daily while 
ignoring the people who think we did something historic by invading 
Iraq.

]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>The Same Old Thing</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/08/the-same-old-thing.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.349450</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-28T18:27:31Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-28T18:36:30Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Well, this was not easy---finding out how to post under the secret identity I have established for myself.&nbsp; As I have explained elsewhere this assumed identity is necessary only because of how and by whom I am employed, and the...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="17984" label="Beck" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50253" label="Dr Martin Luther King" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="469" label="education" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7383" label="FOX News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50255" label="Hertzberg" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50256" label="Jr" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="50258" label="The New Yorker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[<i>Well, this was not easy---finding out how to post under the secret identity I have established for myself.&nbsp; As I have explained<a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/"> elsewhere</a> this assumed identity is necessary only because of how and by whom I am employed, and the need to protect that officeholder from being held responsible for opinions that are those of Barth, and nobody else.<br /><br />I do not expect my secret to remain intact.&nbsp; It would take very little effort to identify the human being masquerading in this guise but that guy may not necessarily own up to Barth's views in any event.&nbsp; Barth is his own person, y'know, even if he does not exist away from a computer.</i>&nbsp; <i>Here's what he has to say this week:<br /><br /></i>There was a week in May when two stories appeared in what we used to 
call "the press" that captured the source of my sadness and fear for the
 world my daughter and whatever other twenty-somethings that might be 
available will have to try to fix.  One story talked about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/20/nyregion/20teachers.html?src=me&amp;ref=general">school districts being forced into draconian cutbacks</a> and the other about <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/20/nyregion/20teachers.html?src=me&amp;ref=general">Texas politicians and other useless fools requiring schools to teach things that are not so</a>:  sort of a might makes right for education.<br /><br />Just
 as Clark Kent, seeing people in danger, will take his glasses off and 
leap into action, a blogger will publish and for this blogger that 
meant, in May,<a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2010/05/dumb-and-dumber.html"> yet another version</a> of virtually <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2009/09/drowning-in-delusions.html">the same post</a> repeated over and over about the country that  is <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/22/104922/955/89/473843">increasingly stupid and proud to be so</a>.<br /><br />Now, the New York Times chimes in with <a href="http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/25/building-a-nation-of-know-nothings/?hp">this little number</a>.
 Coming after a few weeks of mosque hysteria, and while people collect 
under the banner of one of the most prolific of the many mean spirited 
among us to take advantage of our growing ignorance who has fooled the 
easily fooled into thinking that their hope to destroy the New Deal's 
safety net is somehow akin to the  speech given by Dr. Martin Luther 
King, Jr. forty-seven years ago today, it is impossible to resist 
posting more of the same today.<br /><br /><br /><br />  ]]>
      <![CDATA[During the 2008 campaign, <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2008/09/new-yorker-and-supposedly-progressive.html">The New Yorker magazine famously published a cover</a>
 that made light of the numerous lies and nonsense being peddled to 
scare the public away from the candidate whose father was black and who 
considers himself to be so, as well.  Many ostensibly progressive web 
sites were filled with the gnashing of teeth and screams of betrayal 
that generally ran along these lines:<br /><br /><blockquote>Out here in the heartland, not so many folks read The NewYorker, but they have seen the drawing on this week's cover.<br /><br />Bingo.
  They now have a visual image to justify all the rumors about Barak and
 Michelle Obama.  This is "Willie Horton" in cartoon form. </blockquote> or<br /><br /><blockquote>Sure,
 you and I would understand the intention of the cover, but if we think 
that Mr and Mrs. America out there pays attention to this kind of subtle
 attempt at humor and won't just accept the cover at face value, well, 
we have not been paying attention.</blockquote> <br /><br />But that was, of
 course, missing the point.  The "heartland" or "Mr. and Mrs. America" 
who saw proof that the Obamas were un American in a New Yorker cover 
were not going to vote for President Obama, and, in their racism and 
ignorance, resent the idea that they are ill equipped to have a voice in
 the affairs of this republic.<br /><br />Yes, the same New Yorker, in the voice of Henrik Hertzberg, m<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/talk/comment/2010/08/16/100816taco_talk_hertzberg#ixzz0xvNCQtKR">ade the point very well a week or so back in discussing the mosque kerfuffle</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>A
 couple of weeks before the last election, the Republican nominees for 
President and Vice-President granted a joint interview to Brian 
Williams, of NBC. "Governor," he asked, turning to the distaff half of 
the ticket, "what is an élite? Who is a member of the élite?" Sarah 
Palin replied, "Anyone who thinks that they are, I guess, better than 
anyone else--that's my definition of élitism." "It's not geography?" 
Williams pursued. "Of course not," she said. The ticket's other half 
blinked and smiled a tight smile. John McCain had something to say.<br /><br /><br />MCCAIN: I know where a lot of them live.<br />WILLIAMS: Where's that?<br />MCCAIN: Well, in our nation's capital and New York City. I've seen it. I've lived there.<br /><br />These
 élitists, he went on to explain, "think that they can dictate what they
 believe to America rather than let Americans decide for themselves."</blockquote><br /><br />Te resort to reason and education makes someone an elitist who should be reviled or at least pitied as a deluded member of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html?_r=1&amp;ei=5090&amp;en=890a96189e162076&amp;ex=1255665600&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;adxnnlx=1283018536-HxPNN0/AHyN9aAaB1G9ewQ">the reality based community</a>, snide winking and conspiratorial asides are far more worthwhile:<br /><br /><br />Psst, did you know the previous Democratic President had his wife's lover killed?<br /><br />Psst, did you know that President Kennedy had a secret relationship with a mafia boss named Sam Giancana?<br /><br />Psst, Saddam Hussein was really behind 9/11...<br /><br />...and he has weapons of mass destruction<br /><br />And
 that's where we are today.  They last time there was a president who 
they did not want, they impeached him.  This time they not only did not 
want this President, he is black and in their racism and ignorance 
that's all they need.<br /><br />What is it about Dr. King's address they believe they are celebrating today.  Surely not this passage:<br /><br /><blockquote>We
 can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of
 travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the 
hotels of the cities.<br /><br />We cannot be satisfied as long as the colored person's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one.<br /><br />We
 can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their 
selfhood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating "for white only."<br /><br />We cannot be satisfied as long as a colored person in Mississippi cannot vote</blockquote><br /><br />or this<br /><br /><blockquote>I
 have a dream that one day down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, 
with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of 
interpostion and nullification; that one day right down in Alabama 
little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little
 white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers.</blockquote><br /><br />But
 if you want government to keep its hands off your medicare, or use your
 social security checks to support your campaign against the government,
 the fact that Dr. King stood for almost the exact opposite of what your
 demented leader "teaches" you on what is laughingly called "FOX News" 
is hardly worthy of note either.<br /><br />They are winning.  They are 
stupid fools coddled by a news media afraid to call them that, and 
permitted to occupy a field by others who cannot rouse themselves except
 in support of candidates who believe exactly the same thing they do and
 would rather cede the government to forces of craziness than work 
against it on behalf of a candidate who disagrees with them on one issue
 or another.<br /><br />So maybe they are right in one way:  too much education can be a dangerous thing, too, in the hands of the wrong people.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Our Country</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/08/our-country.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.348666</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-21T15:52:53Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-21T16:06:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary>So many of the people with who we commune said it that we allowed ourselves to at least consider the possibility that the election of President Obama marked the end of the racial politics that had bedeviled the nation from...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="49978" label="Emma Lazurus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49980" label="Imans" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="21283" label="John F Kennedy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7470" label="Lyndon Johnson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49114" label="mosque" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49982" label="Reform Judaism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="33557" label="Ted Olson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="17004" label="World Trade Center" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[So many of the people with who we commune said it that we allowed 
ourselves to at least consider the possibility that the election of 
President Obama marked the end of the racial politics that had bedeviled
 the nation from its first days.  Yet even in our euphoria <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/9/19396/99788/922/533013">we knew better or at least suspected the truth</a>:<br />
<blockquote><br />There
 is every reason to believe that the general election will be a rout.  
It will have no precedential value because, like 1932 and, to a lesser 
extent, 1976, there are aberrational forces at work which will alter 
normal voting patterns.</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2008/10/vice-presidency-updated-red-sox-and.html">or</a><br />
<br />
<blockquote>This is not a new or original thought but it is worth repeating that this whole election is skewed by the presidency of G W Bush</blockquote>
<br />
<br />
We
 know this truth now.  We are not only far from the post-racial period 
of our dreams, we have disintegrated into thousands of small 
communities, bound together by race, religion, ancestry or political 
views, each more than simply suspicious of the other, but hostile almost
 to the point of warfare. ]]>
      <![CDATA[<br /><br />It is hard to even consider how empty the week's events leave this optimist.<br /><br />I
 fear for our country's future today, more than any other day we have 
lived through.  In my lifetime, we have survived McCarthyism, Richard 
Nixon, the assassination of our beloved President, the murder of so 
many---<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06YCqfPwV08">Schwerner, Chaney and Goodman</a>
 among them, on the road to ensuring the civil and voting rights of many
 of our citizens, the riots that swept through our country, the death of
 astronauts preparing to explore new worlds, the Vietnam War, Watergate,
 Ronald Reagan, AIDS, George W. Bush and so much more, but we did so 
because in the end we are all Americans, and to most of us, that meant 
something.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.americanrhetoric.com/speeches/lbjweshallovercome.htm">President Johnson may have put it best </a>when he told us why we had to provide for the civil rights of all our fellow citizens:<br /><br /><blockquote>There
 is no cause for self-satisfaction in the long denial of equal rights of
 millions of Americans. But there is cause for hope and for faith in our
 democracy in what is happening here tonight. For the cries of pain and 
the hymns and protests of oppressed people have summoned into 
convocation all the majesty of this great government -- the government 
of the greatest nation on earth. Our mission is at once the oldest and 
the most basic of this country: to right wrong, to do justice, to serve 
man.<br /><br />In our time we have come to live with the moments of great 
crisis. Our lives have been marked with debate about great issues -- 
issues of war and peace, issues of prosperity and depression. But rarely
 in any time does an issue lay bare the secret heart of America itself. 
Rarely are we met with a challenge, not to our growth or abundance, or 
our welfare or our security, but rather to the values, and the purposes,
 and the meaning of our beloved nation.<br /><br />The issue of equal rights for American Negroes is such an issue.<br /><br />And
 should we defeat every enemy, and should we double our wealth and 
conquer the stars, and still be unequal to this issue, then we will have
 failed as a people and as a nation. For with a country as with a 
person, "What is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and 
lose his own soul?"...<br /><br />This was the first nation in the history 
of the world to be founded with a purpose. The great phrases of that 
purpose still sound in every American heart, North and South: "All men 
are created equal," "government by consent of the governed," "give me 
liberty or give me death." Well, those are not just clever words, or 
those are not just empty theories. In their name Americans have fought 
and died for two centuries, and tonight around the world they stand 
there as guardians of our liberty, risking their lives.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />
 That country---the nation with a purpose---is no more.  We are barely a
 nation anymore; just interest groups looking out for ourselves and 
people who are just like us.  There is no more room for anyone else.  We
 are unable to co-exist together, and, in fact, cannot even stand for 
the idea that others live amongst us.  We want to build a fence to keep 
"them" out, want to deny them medical care if they entered our country 
"illegally" and even to deny them benefits for helping our fellow 
citizens when our country was attacked on 9/11.<br /><br />And this 
disgusting week showed where all that leads.  The families of those 
killed at the World Trade Center, we are told, cannot abide the idea of a
 mosque---a place of prayer for Muslims---which could be built too close
 to where the Trade Center once stood, and will again someday.  Even 
among people who know much better---who repeatedly affirm the "right" of
 Muslims to build whatever house of worship they like on private 
property they own---it is necessary to add that just because they have 
that right does not mean they should do so.  After all, should they not 
respect the wishes of the survivors of the attacks of 9/11?<br /><br />And 
what is it about the mosque (or the community center, with a small space
 for prayer) that so offends us?  Well, we are told with knowing looks, 
it is a place where Moslems will gather, and will pray, and, after all, 
the people who attacked us on 9/11 were of the same faith.  Isn't it a 
bit insensitive for other members of the same faith to want to pray so 
close to the ground where their co-religionists brought upon us such 
misery and pain?<br /><br />If this is what the United States has become, we
 are no longer the nation we once were.  We are just Christians, Jews, 
Moslems, atheists or whatever, sharing space as best we can, taking care
 of "our own" with no regard for others.<br /><br />I am a native of New 
England and hence, a Native American.  The first English speaking 
settlers of the place where I was born, Boston, Massachusetts, came to 
these shores because they were not permitted to pray the way they 
wanted.  <br /><br />By the time my own direct ancestors showed up, though, 
the descendants of those first settlers had decided that only they 
should be given full rights in this new land and that so many Jews, such
 as those whose arrival led to mine, or so many Irish, or Italians, or, 
certainly, black people, imperiled their enjoyment of our nation and all
 it could provide. Decent people, though, fought back and our glorious 
melting pot was born, with millions heeding the message inscribed on a 
"Statue of Liberty" in the harbor of the port of New York <a href="http://jwa.org/historymakers/lazarus">(and, written, it should be added, by the daughter of immigrants of my faith</a>):<br /><blockquote><br />"Give me your tired, your poor,<br />Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,<br />The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.<br />Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,<br />I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"</blockquote><br /><br />This
 is what the United States of America has meant to so many people around
 the world.  The haven.  The place where we might get a fair shake, 
where almost everyone is descended from immigrants:  the melting pot.<br /><br />We
 know better.  We know of the "nativism," the "Know Nothings" the 
isolationists, the bigots among us, but, particularly in the aftermath 
of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, we have, for the most part, 
known those sentiments to be wrong:  that the KKK was bad, that Bull 
Connor made us look bad in the worldwide fight against communism.  <br /><br />Our President<a href="http://www.jfklibrary.org/Historical+Resources/Archives/Reference+Desk/Speeches/JFK/003POF03CivilRights06111963.htm"> told us this </a>  and we knew he was right because of what our country was supposed to mean to oppressed people everywhere:<br /><br /> <blockquote>
 We preach freedom around the world, and we mean it, and we cherish our 
freedom here at home, but are we to say to the world, and much more 
importantly, to each other that this is the land of the free except for 
the Negroes; that we have no second-class citizens except Negroes; that 
we have no class or caste system, no ghettoes, no master race except 
with respect to Negroes?</blockquote><br /><br />Where are the people who 
will remind the nation of its better nature today?  Even the president, a
 man of extraordinary intelligence and moral stature, the embodiment of 
what this country can mean both as the offspring of a white woman and a 
black man, and someone whose presidency can be traced back to the 
courageous leadership of the 1960s, can affirm our traditions of 
religious freedom but temper those views <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/08/14/2010-08-14_president_obama_hedges_on_endorsement_of_ground_zero_mosque_supports_right_quest.html">by pretending that there is another issue</a>
 concerning "the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there" as
 if Muslims are not allowed to build a mosque until the public votes on 
the "wisdom" of such building.<br /><br />If that is how zoning will work, 
let me simply go on record right now as saying that the huge lighted Wal
 Mart sign about three blocks from where I live does not seem wise.  
Most of my neighbors agree.  Do they have to take it down now?<br /><br />Jon
 Stewart is, of course, a comedian, but his point (actually John 
Oliver's) was exactly right.  If a religion becomes provocative when its
 adherents do something bad, and its rights to build on property it owns
 are limited by <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/911-widower-ted-olson-obama-was-right-on-cordoba-house.php">how the victims of the adherents crime feel about the entire religion</a>, then it may, <a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/the-daily-show-you-can-build-a-catholic-church-next-to-a-playground----but-should-you-video.php">indeed, be a bad time for churches to be built near playgrounds</a>.<br /><br />Somewhere in the din of all the hate and fear there was this spectacular post <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/08/ground-zero-imam-i-am-a-jew-i-have-always-been-one/61761/">about the Iman who is behind the mosque to be built in the Burlington Coat Factory on Park Place</a>.
  To read about a Muslim cleric reciting the Sh'ma---the essence of my 
religion---almost brings tears to my eyes.  It would suggest that 
healing is possible, but, sadly, that does not seem to be so.<br /><br />Nonetheless, after  <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/08/key-religious-groups-opposed-to-or-silent-on-mosque-controversy.php?ref=fpi">reading
 about the many religious figures falling into the same disgusting trap 
where Muslims are not be treated as they would treat themselves, because
 some Muslims did a hateful thing</a>the many religious figures falling 
into the same disgusting trap where Muslims are not be treated as they 
would treat themselves, because some Muslims did a hateful thing, there<a href="http://rac.org/Articles/index.cfm?id=21580"> was the shining beacon of the organization which supports the branch of Judaism under which I grew up</a> and for which I am particularly grateful today:<br /><br /><blockquote>We
 welcome the planned construction of the Cordoba House mosque and 
community center in Lower Manhattan. Although we fully recognize the 
strong sentiments that have characterized the debate over the center, we
 strongly believe that Cordoba House's presence will reflect our 
nation's historic commitment to religious liberty</blockquote><br /><br />As
 noted previously, you are all welcome to become Reform Jews but since 
we also abhor proselytizing, the only point to be made is pride in the 
statement---made, by the way, more than two weeks ago.<br /><br />This post 
would not be complete without the following, which appeared in various 
places last weekend, but requires re-posting with apologies for the 
repeat:<br /><br />In a country whose first European settlers came to these 
shores seeking the right to worship freely the way their faith dictates,
 the answer is so unbelievably obvious that this "controversy" is 
sickening.<br /><br />I worked in the World Trade Center for several years 
early in my professional life, and commuted through the Trade Center for
 many years later after my office moved a few blocks away. I still 
frequently commute through the PATH Station there and it is not "ground 
zero" to me but, as it has been for as many years as I have spent there,
 "the Trade Center."<br /><br />I lost several former co-workers and 
my next door neighbor on 9/11 and I attended funerals and memorials for 
several others who I did not know personally, but who were related to 
friends of mine.  I am entitled to no special consideration for that, 
but to say that I am offended by people who are building a mosque is 
almost obscene and unquestionably un-American.<br /><br />For most of the 
time I worked in 2 WTC, my office overlooked the Statue of Liberty.  The
 inscription on it quoted elsewhere in this post does not indicate which
 religions will be tolerated here and, well, thank God for that since I 
imagine that if such a rule existed, this Jew might not have had the 
opportunities he has had by the grace of this nation of ours.]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Right and Wrong, an addendum</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/08/right-and-wrong-an-addendum.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.347888</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-15T00:26:07Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-15T01:09:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary>It is unclear to me exactly what the White House is trying to say in the face of Peter King&apos;s blustering and other sad sacks impugning the comments the President made last night. There is no reason for him to...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[It is unclear to me exactly what the White House is trying to say in the face of Peter King's blustering and other sad sacks impugning the comments the President made last night.<br /><br />
  <p>There is no reason for him to get into the NYC approval rules, 
zoning, etc., but, of course, these are not the real issues. &nbsp;The only 
issue is should Muslims be able to build a mosque on property they own, 
wherever it may be.</p>

<p>In a country whose first European settlers came to these shores 
seeking the right to worship freely the way their faith dictates, the 
answer is so unbelievably obvious that this "controversy" is sickening.</p>

<p>I worked in the World Trade Center for several years early in my 
professional life, and commuted through the Trade Center for many years 
later after my office moved a few blocks away. I still frequently 
commute through the PATH Station there and it is not "ground zero" to me
 but, as it has been for as many years as I have spent there, "the Trade
 Center."</p>

<p> I lost several&nbsp; former co-workers and my next door neighbor on
 9/11 and I attended funerals and memorials for several others who I did
 not know personally, but who were related to friends of mine. &nbsp;I am 
entitled to no special consideration for that, but to say that I am 
offended by people who are building a mosque is almost obscene and 
unquestionably un-American.</p>

<p>For most of the time I worked in 2 WTC, my office overlooked a statue
 of a woman holding up a lamp which sits in the harbor between New York 
and New Jersey south of the Trade Center. I believe there is an 
inscription on the statue which says something about sending the tired 
and the poor here as well as "huddled masses yearning to be free." &nbsp;It 
does not indicate which religions will be tolerated here and, well, 
thank God for that since I imagine that if such a rule existed, this Jew
 might not have had the opportunities he has had by the grace of this 
nation of ours.</p>


  <br /> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Right and Wrong</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/08/right-and-wrong-1.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.347874</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-14T18:53:08Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-14T18:54:54Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There are few independent economists (that is, someone who has not singed up as a partisan for any of the political arguments we have) who do not look at the situation we are in and does not see the need...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="49701" label="econmists" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="17305" label="Elizabeth Warren" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7465" label="F D Roosevelt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="29838" label="G H W Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12246" label="G W Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14609" label="Gibbs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="14220" label="Mark Halperin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49702" label="mosques" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="125" label="Muslims" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6547" label="New Deal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12033" label="recovery" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[There are few independent economists (that is, someone who has not 
singed up as a partisan for any of the political arguments we have) who 
do not look at the situation we are in and does not see the need for 
massive government spending.  The best ways to get the most stimulus out
 of that spending <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/business/01view.html?scp=1&amp;sq=%22what%20would%20roosevelt%20do%22&amp;st=cse">may be worthy of reasoned debate</a>.  What strings, if any, should be attached to federal funds sent to state and local governments <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/01/AR2010070106443.html?hpid=topnews">also presents a legitimate subject for debate</a>.<br />
<br />
Expressing
 concerns about excessive government spending, when unemployment is as 
high as it is, particularly when those raising this issue want to cut 
taxes on the wealthy and had no problems with running up a deficit as 
long as the president was a Republican, is to advance partisan political
 goals and to subordinate the well being of the public at large to the 
desire for control of the government.<br />
<br />
Yet that is exactly the debate we are having.  Why is that? ]]>
      <![CDATA[<br /><br />It
 is not, Mr. Gibbs, because of the whining of liberals.  Yes, there are 
the perpetually unhappy and people from our side of the political road 
who fail to look at what this President has accomplished despite our 
broken political system.  Their failure to step up and to place their 
own political goals over the President's efforts to get what can be 
gotten are not helpful and one of the reasons the minority right wing in
 this country succeeds so often.  We know <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2010/06/losing-if-not-lost.html"> that</a>.<br /><br />The debate is whether the government should do what it obviously must against <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/05/AR2009020503413.html?sid=ST2009020600806&amp;s_pos=">politically motivated drivel</a>
 is because you, Robert Gibbs, and the White House as a whole, allowed 
that to happen.  Hellbent on achieving a bipartisan consensus, the White
 House saw the heirs of the New Deal as being unrealistic about what 
could be achieved without Republican support and, given the President's 
own good relations with Republicans such as Senator Lugar, believed that
 compromise was the best way to achieve success.<br /><br />Sadly, though, 
one of the lessons the Republican hierarchy drew from the New Deal was 
that the ambitious rescue of the country by aggressive government 
intervention put their party in the congressional political wilderness 
for almost fifty years, except for a couple of years here and there.  <br /><br />Yes, that was what was called for when this administration took office.  As one thumb sucker <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2008/10/rounding-third.html">wrote back then</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>There
 is no question that the 100 days after March 4, 1933 changed our 
country, the electorate and the very way we think about the federal 
government in ways that still apply today....<br /><br />So, yes, thanks, 
oddly to George W Bush, our time has come. He has made his mark on our 
country and we owe some thanks to him for showing why more competence 
and less ideology is necessary in the presidency. But he will not be on 
any more ballots and will soon become forgotten (though Hoover managed 
to be a useful word to campaign on as late as 1964).<br /><br />The point is
 not to replicate the Roosevelt hundred days. That is ridiculous. The 
point is to change the country in a way that will command the support of
 a large majority of the public before the general cynicism about 
government takes root. It does not mean sending Dick Cheney to prison, 
though that may be where he belongs. There are more important things at 
stake.</blockquote><br /><br />The New Deal became possible because 
responsible people saw what was happening in Europe and feared 
revolution in our country.  If some people wanted to hold he government 
back, <a href="http://www.austincc.edu/lpatrick/his2341/fdr36acceptancespeech.htm">the President called them out</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>The
 royalists of the economic order have conceded that political freedom 
was the business of the government, but they have maintained that 
economic slavery was nobody's business. They granted that the government
 could protect the citizen in his right to vote, but they denied that 
the government could do anything to protect the citizen in his right to 
work and his right to live.<br /><br />Today we stand committed to the 
proposition that freedom is no half-and-half affair. If the average 
citizen is guaranteed equal opportunity in the polling place, he must 
have equal opportunity in the market place.<br /><br />These economic 
royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of 
America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their
 power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow 
of this kind of power. In vain they seek to hide behind the flag and the
 Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the flag and the 
Constitution stand for. Now, as always, they stand for democracy, not 
tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship by mob 
rule and the over-privileged alike.</blockquote><br /><br />FOX News and 
John Boehner should not be setting the political agenda in this country.
  Answering Mourning Joe is not a high priority.  They will never be on 
our side.  Never.<br /><br />Last night's speech was a good first step.  
After a week of avoiding the issue (which made technical sense, since it
 has nothing to do with the federal government), <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/08/14/text-of-obamas-address-at-white-house-iftar-dinner/">the President spoke plainly and directly</a> and said what we all know to be the right thing:<br /><br /><blockquote>Muslims
 have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this
 country.  And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a
 community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance 
with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our commitment to 
religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all 
faiths are welcome in this country and that they will not be treated 
differently by their government is essential to who we are. The writ of 
the Founders must endure.</blockquote><br /><br />This is not really a debatable point among reasonable people.  Even President Bush (II) understood this point, <a href="http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/military/terroristattack/bush_speech_9-17.html">attending a mosque less than a week after 9/11</a>:<br /><br /><blockquote>In our anger and emotion, our fellow Americans must treat each other with respect.<br /><br />Women
 who cover their heads in this country must feel comfortable going 
outside their homes. Moms who wear cover must be not intimidated in 
America. That's not the America I know. That's not the America I value.<br /><br />I've
 been told that some fear to leave; some don't want to go shopping for 
their families; some don't want to go about their ordinary daily 
routines because, by wearing cover, they're afraid they'll be 
intimidated. That should not and that will not stand in America.<br /><br />Those
 who feel like they can intimidate our fellow citizens to take out their
 anger don't represent the best of America, they represent the worst of 
humankind, and they should be ashamed of that kind of behavior.<br /><br />This is a great country. It's a great country because we share the same values of respect and dignity and human worth. <br /><br /></blockquote><br /><br />The
 lesson is an old one.  Doing the right thing might offend some people, 
but that does not make it the wrong thing.  Elizabeth Warren should be 
appointed the position designed for her.  The White House should propose
 a program where, by the expenditure---the investment----of massive 
amounts of federal money we can begin to dig out of the mess we are in <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2010/07/spewing.html">after  three decades or gross irresponsible beliefs in the fantasy once called, by George H.W. Bush, no less, voodoo economics.</a><br /><br />We have the best president we have had since, at the very latest, 11:59 a.m., on January 20, 1969 but, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38487969/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts">as even the generally ridiculous Mark Halperin has been able to see</a>,
 there is more to this leadership thing than an ability to talk about 
what the President himself has done.  It is vitally important that 
Democrats maintain control of Congress and we must all stand united in 
that goal.  <br /><br />But the White House needs to motivate this country, 
and the President's supporters.  If it would just focus on what needs to
 be done and how to do it, rather than how it should be packaged or how 
to answer the unanswerable, we can all move forward together.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Summer Vacation Reading</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/08/summer-vacation-reading.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.347016</id>
   
   <published>2010-08-07T16:13:41Z</published>
   <updated>2010-08-07T21:16:41Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Legend has it that Thou must read Trashy Novels Whilst on a Beach, or otherwise vacationing, but some of us did the next best thing: we read about the decline and fall. Not Gibbon: too much heft in that even...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="49476" label="Allison Weiss" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10213" label="anti-intellectualism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49477" label="E J Dionne" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12246" label="G W Bush" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5760" label="Ronald Reagan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5485" label="Sarah Palin" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="49479" label="Susan Jacoby" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12252" label="The West Wing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[Legend has it that Thou must read Trashy Novels Whilst on a Beach, or 
otherwise vacationing, but some of us did the next best thing:  we read 
about the decline and fall.<br />
<br />
Not <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Decline-Fall-Roman-Empire/dp/0753818817/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1281190988&amp;sr=8-1">Gibbon</a>:  too much heft in that even with Kindles, Nooks and their Droid/Ipod apps to make the physical weight of the book irrelevant.<br />
<br />
Besides,
 while Gibbon described how feckless politicians, obsessions with sex 
and religious othodoxy can bring a nation down, there is no reason to 
dwell on that past since we now have the opportunity to watch it up 
close and personal.<br />
<br />
Yes, as discussed ad nauseum both <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/22/104922/955/89/473843">here</a> and elsewhere, <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/search?q=anti-intellectualism">anti-intellectualism and know nothingism have always had a major place in this nation</a>
 which progressed in fits and starts despite it.  Still, the idea that 
we can better our lot by education, and that a ditch digger should want 
his children to do something which, while physically easier, could do 
more for the society in general as well as improving her or his own 
lifestyle has been<a href="http://www.servintfree.net/%7Eaidmn-ejournal/publications/2001-11/PublicEducationInTheUnitedStates.html"> the prevailing one even before Thomas Jefferson championed the idea of public education</a>. ]]>
      <![CDATA[<br /><br />Those days are over.  The <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x59wNGHe6iI">Great Reagan foretold our decline</a> by announcing that <br /><blockquote><br />government
 is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From 
time to time we've been tempted to believe that society has become too 
complex to be managed by self-rule, that government by an elite group is
 superior to government for, by, and of the people. But if no one among 
us is capable of governing himself, then who among us has the capacity 
to govern someone else?</blockquote><br /><br />The era of me, my, mine was 
now endorsed by the President of the Untied States.  Why should I pay 
taxes for things that do not immediately benefit me?  If I do not send 
my own children to a public school, why should I have to foot the bill?<br /><br />There
 was the answer in the lightest of summer reading:  a newspaper (or its 
electronic equivalent).  Many have spoken to the subject, of course, but
 this time it was  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/28/AR2010072804529.html">E.J. Dionne who asked the critical question</a>, which is almost rhetorical by now:<br /><br /><blockquote>Can a nation remain a superpower if its internal politics are incorrigibly stupid? </blockquote><br /><br />Dionne answers the question well, but barely mentions Sarah Palin, the epitome today, <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2007/01/what-did-we-expect-about-wednesdays.html">as George W. Bush (Rob Ritchie to fans of "West Wing") was before her</a>, of how gross ignorance has become something which<a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/10/zelizer.intellectual/"> can propel rather than derail a political career</a>.<br /><br />So, in the same newspaper, there is the great <a href="http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/spirited_atheist/2010/07/bristol_and_levi_poster_children_for_the_dumbing_down_of_america.html#more">Susan Jacoby</a> to tie it all together:<br /><br /><blockquote>In
 the Alice-in-Wonderland universe inhabited by the queen of the Tea 
Party and her subjects, people who can't make the grade at top 
universities are not only better Americans but are morally superior to 
those who can.</blockquote><br /><br />It was the aforedescribed fictitious 
Governor Rob Ritchie (G W Bush's doppleganger) who explained it best, in
 talking to the highly educated President he was trying to unseat on 
"The West Wing":<br /><br /><blockquote>You're what my friends call a 
superior sumbitch. You're an academic elitist and a snob. You're, uh, 
Hollywood, you're weak, you're liberal, and you can't be trusted. And if
 it appears from time to time as if I don't like you, well, those are 
just a few of the many reasons why.</blockquote><br /><br />Today's summer reading was, though, in the New York Times where Bob Herbert discusses <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/07/opinion/07herbert.html?_r=1&amp;hp">explains the consequences of the Ritchie/Bush/Palin appeal</a> where<br /><br /><blockquote>instead
 of exercising the appropriate mental muscles, we're allowing ourselves 
to become a nation of nitwits, obsessed with the comings and goings of 
Lindsay Lohan and increasingly oblivious to crucially important societal
 issues that are all but screaming for attention. What should we be 
doing about the legions of jobless Americans, the deteriorating public 
schools, the debilitating wars, the scandalous economic inequality, the 
corporate hold on governmental affairs, the commercialization of the 
arts, the deficits?</blockquote> <br /><br />When even Alan Greenspan gets it, you know that the end is nigh and that the circle has been completed.  Yet, there he was, <a href="http://www.thenextright.com/rick-moran/frums-fall-a-telling-blow-to-pragmatism-on-the-right-1">a pointy headed intellectual if there ever was one, but a quite conservative one</a> , on <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38487969/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts/">Meet the Press last Sunday</a> calling the supply side magic that the Great Reagan and his acolytes cannot stop repeating, to be the trick it is<br /><br /><blockquote>MR.
 GREENSPAN:  Look, I'm very much in favor of tax cuts, but not with 
borrowed money.  And the problem that we've gotten into in recent years 
is spending programs with borrowed money, tax cuts with borrowed money, 
and at the end of the day, that proves disastrous.  And my view is I 
don't think we can play subtle policy here on it.<br /><br />MR. GREGORY:  You don't agree with Republican leaders who say tax cuts pay for themselves?<br /><br />MR. GREENSPAN:  They do not.</blockquote><br /><br />Yet, of course, Republican orthodoxy teaches us that<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zaQf9kl248">tax cuts do not add to the deficit</a> and, as even Alan Greenspan has noticed, when such idiocy rules, it is hard to solve the real problems that face our nation:<br /><br /><blockquote>I've
 been in and out of Wall Street since 1949, and I've never seen the type
 of animosity between government and Wall Street.  And I'm not sure 
where it comes from, but I suspect it's got to do with a general schism 
in this society which is really becoming ever more destructive.  We've 
got to change it.</blockquote><br /><br />Yet, we tried to relax on a beach while listening to explanations that <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/22/gingrich-no-mosque_n_655493.html">religious freedom should not extend to any area where adherents of a religion killed thousands of people</a>, and that <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/capitaljournal/2010/08/01/assessing-arizona-courts-vie-with-lawmakers-voters-for-last-word/">judges should honor public votes for a law under which a state can have its own immigration policy</a>, or <a href="http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/california-federal-judge-overturns-voters-decision-on-gay-marriage/">prohibiting people from marrying others of the same sex</a>,
 even if those laws violate a Constitution which was intended to prevent
 exactly the sort of majority tyranny as we are urged to believe is an 
essential element of democracy.<br /><br /> A young musician---not Regina 
Spektor, not Jenny Owen Youngs (who have been celebrated previously in 
these posts) but Allison Weiss, after having graduated from the 
University of Georgia a month or so earlier, <a href="http://www.facebook.com/#%21/theallisonweiss?v=wall&amp;story_fbid=986369809880">had to explain to somebody 
upbraiding the District Court for ignoring the will of the voters that 
some things are too fundamental to be decided by majority vote</a>.<br /><br />So, people still do get educated, and maybe there is reason to hope.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Modern Times</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/07/modern-times.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.345145</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-24T19:27:17Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-24T19:29:30Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I missed the McCarthy era. Technically speaking, I was around at the tail end of his tenure as ruler of the airwaves and print, but, as a new born, my access to those organs of communication was quite limited, and...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="5215" label="communism" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="4823" label="Fox News" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48720" label="Fulton Lewis" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48722" label="Joe McCarthy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11653" label="race baiting" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5804" label="smears" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="26359" label="Truman" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48724" label="Walter WInchell" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48726" label="Westbrook Pegler" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[I missed the McCarthy era.  Technically speaking, I was around at the 
tail end of his tenure as ruler of the airwaves and print, but, as a new
 born, my access to those organs of communication was quite limited, and
 "Winky Dink and You" might have had more appeal to me than Joseph Welch
 lecturing McCarthy <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO2iiovYq70">about his lack of decency</a>.<br />
<br />
Still,
 we all know the story.  Bad man uses his position as chairman of a 
Senate committee to accuse the government of harboring communists who 
are aiding the Soviet Union to acquire the same atomic bomb as our 
country used to defeat Japan a few years earlier.  Crusading television 
broadcaster and his producer expose the ruthless techniques used by the 
villainous Senator and the nation, aroused by such a telecast, proprel 
the Senate to censure said Senator and goodness triumphs.<br />
<br />
But if 
that is the story of that era, why does it happen over and over and over
 again since then?  How is it that we can go to a George Clooney movie, 
cluck about how stupid people were "back then" and just let the same 
thing happen again without seeing the pattern, and what is being done to
 our country and our politics. ]]>
      <![CDATA[ <br /><br />You have seen the kinescope of 
Murrow's broadcast, no doubt, or at least you have seen parts of it or 
Clooney's version of it.  It is a fascinating work of journalism, in a 
medium that had never seen much of it before, and has not since, but its
 point is almost always missed. <br /><br />The desire to attribute our 
worst instincts to a specific person, to insist that it was he or she 
who did something wrong is a device to get the much beloved "closure" we
 crave, and to move on, but it also tends to exculpate the many people 
complicit in, for instance, the corruption of our political system.  
Murrow, though, spelled it out:<br /><br /><blockquote>The actions of the 
junior Senator from Wisconsin have caused alarm and dismay amongst our 
allies abroad, and given considerable comfort to our enemies. And whose 
fault is that? Not really his. He didn't create this situation of fear; 
he merely exploited it -- and rather successfully. Cassius was right. 
"The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves."<br /><br />Good night, and good luck.</blockquote><br /><br />Of
 course, Sen McCarthy did not "create" the climate of fear.  It was the 
predecessors of today's fear mongers who did so and they did it for the 
same reason.  To make Americans fear one another, to encourage them to 
believe that only one political party or one portion of a political 
party will protect them from what they fear and to use that fear to 
distract the public from the real problems we face and the means to face
 it.<br /><br />The first national election after World War II, for 
instance, presented several important questions to an electorate trying 
to figure out how to absorb returning soldiers into a civilian economy 
which included, in hitherto unheard of numbers, women.  The Depression 
had finally ended, thanks(!) to the war, and the question was whether 
the relationship between government and citizens which the New Deal had 
so radically altered was to be continued.  Since the New Deal remained 
very popular, too, the Republican Party needed something else to talk 
about and the idea that it might return to its "government for the 
wealthiest" meme that ended with the election of President Roosevelt in 
1932 basically unthinkable.<br /><br />Hence, Richard Nixon ran for Congress by<a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=aeYDAAAAMBAJ&amp;pg=PA43&amp;lpg=PA43&amp;dq=1946+voorhis+communist+nixon&amp;source=bl&amp;ots=qenl7HaN8Z&amp;sig=4P1ouxwOGyAuGur3GCu4wPqNnPU&amp;hl=en&amp;ei=qzJLTL3sNoH_8AbC8tAz&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=book_result&amp;ct=result&amp;resnum=3&amp;ved=0CCIQ6AEwAjgU#v=onepage&amp;q=1946%20voorhis%20communist%20nixon&amp;f=false"> suggesting his opponent was a communist </a>(complete
 with what are today called "robo calls" or "push polling" where voters 
were asked if they knew that the opponent---Jerry Voorhis---was a 
communist) and when that worked, an for Senate six years later using the
 same general claim against Helen Gahagan Douglas.<br /><br />In the 
meantime, with Sen McCarthy only one of the many contributors to all of 
this, the careers of thousands, most visibly in the motion picture, 
radio and fledgling television business were destroyed by whispers and 
those who claimed to be  "in the know" whose nod and wink about "the 
real reason" people disagreed with a particular political position, 
could do the damage without ever having to "prove" anything.  (Whittaker
 Chambers' "pumpkin papers," which Nixon helped to "uncover" contained, <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,917670-2,00.html">as we learned when they were finally disclosed in 1975</a>,
 nothing of even the barest interest such as how to use a parachute or 
what a microphone looks like.  "Uncovering them" was far more important 
than what they contained and, of course, they ended Alger Hiss' career 
and led to his imprisonment).<br /><br />Fox News has a big part in this, 
but it has many predecessors in fan the flames duty.  There was 
Westbrook Pegler, Walter Winchell, Fulton Lewis, the Hearst Newspapers 
and so on.  Fox now plays the same role these "red baiters" did since, 
of course, it worked.<br /><br />This is the same "game" being played today 
and if we want to wait another forty years to watch a movie about all of
 this, we can tsk, tsk again about how foolish people were in 2010.  
Somebody makes an outlandish charge, it gets repeated over and over in 
the echo chamber, and a new "truth" emerges.  <br /><br />The White House 
was complicit this time and, for that, they have been rightly scorned 
and forced to apologize, but it is not hard to understand why they did 
so.  This is a daily occurrence, fanned not just by Fox "News" but all 
over cable television and even more reputable outlets.  The President 
has been as defined by these falsehoods as by his achievements and is 
viewed as some profligate spender bent on creating a socialist state.  
That there is no evidence to support this is irrelevant because those in
 the know know better.  Wink. Wink.<br /><br />In 1950, the direct 
encounters between a President and the press were considered off the 
record unless the President permitted himself to be quoted.  (This 
allowed for a different give and take than is possible when every word 
is broadcast everywhere, but those days are gone forever.)<br /><br />Despite
 being "off the record" there are some transcripts of some of these 
"press conferences" around.  Thus, we have this insight from President 
Truman when asked to support his view that Senator McCarthy was just 
what the Kremlin wanted, diverting the nation from what was actually 
before it.  <a href="http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/8078">His answer</a>,
 just before an off year election sixty years ago, describes, sadly, 
almost exactly what is taking place during this off year election:<br /><br /><blockquote>
 the Republicans have been trying vainly to find an issue on which to 
make a bid for the control of the Congress for next year. They tried 
"statism." They tried "welfare state." They tried "socialism." And there
 are a certain number of members of the Republican Party who are trying 
to dig up that old malodorous dead horse called "isolationism." And in 
order to do that, they are perfectly willing to sabotage the bipartisan 
foreign policy of the United States. And this fiasco which has been 
going on in the Senate is the very best asset that the Kremlin could 
have in the operation of the cold war. And that is what I mean when I 
say that McCarthy's antics are the best asset that the Kremlin can have.<br /><br />Now,
 if anybody really felt that there were disloyal people in the employ of
 the Government, the proper and the honorable way to handle the 
situation would be to come to the President of the United States and 
say, "This man is a disloyal person. He is in such and such a 
department." We will investigate him immediately, and if he were a 
disloyal person he would be immediately fired.<br /><br />That is not what 
they want. They are trying to create an issue, and it is going to be 
just as big a fiasco as the campaign in New York and other places on 
these other false and fatuous issues. </blockquote><br /><br />Sixty years 
later, the same garbage is trotted out again in slightly different 
clothes with a side order of race baiting to make sure it works.  Nice 
to know we are making progress, huh?
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Things That Spew</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/07/things-that-spew.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.344213</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-17T18:07:52Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-17T18:08:53Z</updated>
   
   <summary>We all know now, after months of this, that oil which does not remain where nature placed it, or does not get &quot;harvested&quot; in a way where we can use it, spews. Apparently, after more than 80 days of continuous...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="12658" label="Boehner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10173" label="David Gregory" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7465" label="F D Roosevelt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48360" label="George WIll" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="31766" label="Gulf" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11557" label="McConnell" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6547" label="New Deal" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="58" label="Obama" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="1290" label="oil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="6094" label="Republicans" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="32" label="stimulus" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[We all know now, after months of this, that oil which does not remain 
where nature placed it, or does not get "harvested" in a way where we 
can use it, spews.  Apparently, after more than 80 days of continuous 
spewing, it has been contained and, at least for now, we have been 
spared further spewing of oil.<br />
<br />
So, where else can we find 
spewing?  Spewing, is unquestionably a bad thing and, if you listen to 
those In the Know, it is almost always the fault of the President of the
 United States.<br />
<br />
Yet the spewing that seems to be doing the most 
damage---at least beyond the massive oil already spewed---comes 
principally from two places which do not appear to link to President 
Obama:  those who report what they call the news, and those of define 
what will be reported---the ever shrinking, and ever crazier group of 
crackpots called the Republican Party. ]]>
      <![CDATA[<br /><br />Of course, as discussed 
here <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2008/03/proudly-stupid.html">repeatedly</a>,
 an electorate which <a href="http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/07/26-of-americans-dont-know-us-declared-independence-from-great-britain.php">revels
 in stupidity</a>, and, now in a crisis, <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2010/06/losing-if-not-lost.html">lays
 off teachers so as to protect its franchise of stupidity</a> the truly 
ridiculous absurdities which gave us the supposed guy next door 
President  Bush over the qualified but perhaps slightly dull Vice 
President Gore or Senator Kerry seems to work.  The Republican Party is 
bound to pick up seats in Congress and the President---our first actual 
Democrat to hold the office since 1969 and the most competent we have 
since then---is treated as just some lame loser biding his time until 
Mama Grizzly or some other equally absurd candidate is put forward as 
just the kind of person we need in the White House.<br /><br />We are paying
 for this foolishness, as we will for many, many years to come.  The 
view among so many, that you can put the government in the hands of<a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=4621"> "at least you 
know where he stands"</a> or <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ixNPplo-SU">"government is not the
 answer; government is the problem" </a>and then, when the government 
falls into complete disrepair that it cannot come to aid of hurricane 
victims (and cannot even find a television to see what has happened) or 
allows its supporters to almost drag the economy into the same ditch 
they drove it into in the 1930s, elect a president and expect the mess 
to be cleaned up in a year and a half.<br /><br />And so out of what Rachel 
Maddow calls my tv machine spews such idiocy as that the economy is 
President Obama's responsibility now.  We cannot keep looking backwards 
or blaming the president who left office so long ago.<br /><br />That time 
in the age of twitter has sped up does not mean a) any president is 
"responsible for the economy" or, way more importantly that government 
policies which impact on the economy can repair the damage done by huge,
 corrupt policies, in a year and a half.<br /><br />The last Great Mess they
 made, the one caused <a href="http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3305">when</a>
 <br /><br /><blockquote>The hours men and women worked, the wages they 
received, the conditions of their labor--these had passed beyond the 
control of the people, and were imposed by this new industrial 
dictatorship. The savings of the average family, the capital of the 
small business man, the investments set aside for old age--other people's
 money--these were tools which the new economic royalty used to dig 
itself in.<br /><br />Those who tilled the soil no longer reaped the rewards
 which were their right. The small measure of their gains was decreed by
 men in distant cities</blockquote><br /><br />was not overcome until a 
world war, and the full employment it brought with it, engulfed us all. 
 Yet the seeds planted before that war, what we call the New Deal, 
changed this country, and the relationship of its government to the 
people, forever.  By the time the war was ended, there was no longer the
 talk of every person on his own, the survival of the fittest, and all 
of that.  The question in the first presidential election after the war 
was not whether to return to those great days before President Roosevelt
 rode to the rescue; it was which party and which president could best 
meet the new responsibilities of government after the war.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,887883-2,00.html#ixzz0txh7a7SM">Here,
 indeed, is Time magazine</a>, ever rooting for Republicans, a few weeks
 before the 1948 election:<br /><br /><blockquote>Tom Dewey also added was 
reassurance that a new team would tackle the job with new vigor, with 
new boundless confidence that the U.S. future had scarcely been tapped.<br /><br />For
 that future, he promised a program not unlike Franklin Roosevelt's New 
Deal. It included more irrigation and flood control projects, expanded 
rural electrification and soil conservation, protection and development 
of forests, oil reserves, mineral resources. To build the West's power 
supply he promised new river projects on the Columbia and Missouri.</blockquote><br /><br />Today,
 though, we have the two noise machines.   One votes against every 
single proposal to improve the situation and then tells us that what the
 President manages to get through a Congress hobbled by the need to 
defeat a filibuster on everything except the declaration of Arbor Day 
has been a failure.<br /><br />If the President proposes a stimulus, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/opinion/13krugman.html?partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">way
 too small for its Rooseveltian task</a> but all that can be enacted, he
 is to blamed for the fact that it did not alone get us out of the chasm
 (no ditch this) into which we have fallen by years of deregulation and 
coddling of the monied folk because it is their money that fuels the 
only thing that is important---political campaigns.<br /><br />If the 
chairwoman of the council of economic advisers warns that without a huge
 stimulus unemployment will soar over 8%, and after a smaller stimulus 
unemployment exceeds 8%, the President is called a snake oil salesman 
because his "promise" that any stimulus at all would keep unemployment 
under 8%.  This is not John Beohner or Mitch McConnell speaking, or 
Sarah Palin, for crying out loud, it is <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2010/jul/13/george-will/will-obama-said-stimulus-would-cap-unemployment-8-/"><br />George
 Will</a>.<br /><br />This is the nature of our political debate.  A 
ridiculous claim, <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2009/jul/09/eric-cantor/Cantor-and-other-republicans-say-obama-promised-s/">repeated
 over and over</a> and the staple of the Sunday morning programs aimed 
at "balance."<br /><br />Check out, for instance, last week's <a href="http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/2010/07/spewing.html">Meet the Press interview of White House 
press secretary Robert Gibbs</a>, with David Gregory and his GOP minded 
cronies at Politico trying to use that same Republican sledge hammer:<br /><br /><blockquote>And
 we know that there's a sense that even the stimulus is not producing 
the jobs that it was promised to; 9.5 percent unemployment now.  The 
original reporting was we'd keep unemployment with the stimulus at 8 
percent.<br /><br />And here's Politico just this morning, Jonathan Martin 
writing about some of the feeling among Democrats, let me put it up on 
the screen.  "While almost uniformly grateful for the financial windfall
 they enjoyed from the stimulus legislation, the Democrats," some 
Democrats, "believe it wasn't sold well to the public and more still has
 to be done to revive the lagging economy.  `I think the bottom line is 
they're not seeing the jobs that should have come with it,' said West 
Virginia Governor Joe Manchin," now running for Senate, "explaining why 
voters in his state were dissatisfied with the massive spending bill.  
`Are we just protecting government or are we really stimulating the 
economy?'"</blockquote><br /><br />Really, David?  Is that what they said as
 the administration took office.  Do what we say an unemployment will 
stay under 8%?  Put aside the fact that <a href="http://otrans.3cdn.net/ee40602f9a7d8172b8_ozm6bt5oi.pdf">the 
report to which you constantly refer</a>, explicitly said:<br /><br /><blockquote>all
 of the estimates presented in this memo are subject to significant 
margins of error...There is the more fundamental uncertainty that comes 
with any estimate of the effects of a program. Our estimates of economic
 relationships and rules of thumb are derived from historical experience
 and so will not apply exactly in any given episode. Furthermore, the 
uncertainty is surely higher than normal now because the current 
recession is unusual both in its fundamental causes and its severity</blockquote><br /><br />Instead,
 David, watch those <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2009/02/david_axelrod_tells_nbcs_meet.html">lovely
 recordings of you beating up on David Axelrod when they had not 
resolved the mess left for them in their first three weeks</a> and to 
his explanation of what might happen next:<br /><br /><blockquote>MR. 
GREGORY: ...here's the bottom line question: What will this stimulus 
plan do to ease the recession this year?<br /><br />MR. AXELROD: Well, I 
think that there's going to be some immediate activity. You know, let's,
 let's understand, this is the worst economic downturn we've had since 
World War II. So our first mission is to try and slow the trajectory of 
it and turn it around. This will do that. This will help do that. We 
believe in the next couple of years that it will create three and a half
 million jobs. That's going to be very important. We're also going to 
prevent the layoff of key personnel in states, like teachers, police, 
firefighters. We're going to help those who are caught in the, in the 
brunt of this with longer unemployment insurance, helping them with 
their health care. And ultimately we're going to put people to work 
doing the work that America needs done in energy, in health care, in 
education, rebuilding our roads, bridges, dams and levees. That's going 
to have a long-term effect and a short-term effect. But a lot of those 
projects are going to begin soon. But...<br /><br />MR. GREGORY: But--yeah.<br /><br />MR.
 AXELROD: ...let's be clear, though, it's not going to be an overnight 
turnaround. The president's been clear; it took a long time for us to 
get in this mess, it's going to take a while for us to get out of it.<br /><br />MR.
 GREGORY: Unemployment is at 7.6 percent. That doesn't even capture 
people who have stopped looking for work.<br /><br />MR. AXELROD: Yes.<br /><br />MR.
 GREGORY: Will this stimulus plan prevent unemployment from reaching 10 
percent, do you think?<br /><br />MR. AXELROD: Well, that's our hope. That's
 our hope. There's no doubt that without it that's what--that's where we
 were looking, double-digit unemployment. And that's what we're trying 
to forestall. We want to turn this thing around, and we think that this 
will, will happen. That's why the president had such a sense of urgency 
of acting now. As you know, we lost 600,000 jobs last month, over one 
and a half million in the last three months. The trajectory is horrible.
 This should help put the brakes on that and slow it down.</blockquote><br /><br />This
 is not political debate or journalism.  It is mud wrestling for 
entertainment value.  It is why Sarah Palin's daughter takes up airtime 
not otherwise being used to blame President Obama for electing Ronald 
Reagan, two George Bushes and Congresses that gave the country back to 
the very people FDR defeated so long ago.<br /><br />And tomorrow, when our 
big electronic noise machine revs up again, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/17/us/politics/17memo.html?scp=6&amp;sq=maine&amp;st=cse">we
 can debate whether the President should be in Maine this weekend</a>.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>If You Can&apos;t Say Anything Nice....</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/07/if-you-cant-say-anything-nice.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.343654</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-14T00:43:21Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-14T00:46:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary>A week or so ago, a cellist named Dan Cho, a young husband and father who also covered soccer for a few publications in his spare time, drowned in Lake Geneva. I did not know him, but his death has...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="14612" label="baseball" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48145" label="cello" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48138" label="Dan Cho" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48140" label="Kaoru Ishabashi" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="294" label="Nixon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48142" label="Steinbrenner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="48144" label="Winfield" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[A week or so ago, a cellist named Dan Cho, a young husband and father 
who also covered soccer for a few publications in his spare time, 
drowned in Lake Geneva.  I did not know him, but his death has moved me 
almost as much as his music has.  From what I know of him, his shirt 
life was filled with beauty and he gave me something that will be with 
me for many years to come.<br /><br />He often played with a man named Kaoru
 Ishabashi<br /><br /><a href="http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs200.snc4/38324_138115872874490_100000282348255_303412_6114673_n.jpg"><img src="http://sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc4/hs200.snc4/38324_138115872874490_100000282348255_303412_6114673_n.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />and the other night K (as he is called) 
sang to Dan<br /><br /><object width="480" height="385" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Lcc8t1PmUJg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Lcc8t1PmUJg&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385" /><object /><br /><br /><br />If,
 on the other hand, you want to mourn the person most responsible for 
the greed which has so badly hurt the game I love, whose desire to win 
at all costs ruined the fairness and level playing field which made our 
game what it was and should be, who personified the greed and 
selfishness which sadly pervades our country, then your humanity is 
subject to question.  He was not "a great owner" or a great anything.  
If after being suspended twice by major league baseball (once for making
 illegal campaign contributions to Nixon, and the other time for trying 
to ruin the career of a real Hall of Famer, Dave Winfield) I will never 
walk into the Hall of Fame again.
 <object /><object />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Fourth of July Guest Blogger:  President Franklin Delano Roosevelt</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/07/fourth-of-july-guest-blogger-p.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.342585</id>
   
   <published>2010-07-04T13:44:32Z</published>
   <updated>2010-07-04T13:45:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The following has appeared here in some form or another a few times. It is excerpted from the acceptance speech at the 1936 Democratic National Convention of our greatest President, but it has particular resonance on this glorious day of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="7465" label="F D Roosevelt" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="47883" label="Independence Day" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[The following has appeared here in some form or another a few times.  It
 is excerpted from the <a href="http://millercenter.org/scripps/archive/speeches/detail/3305">acceptance
 speech at the 1936 Democratic National Convention</a> of<a href="http://www.siena.edu/uploadedfiles/home/parents_and_community/community_page/sri/independent_research/Presidents%20Release_2010_final.pdf">
 our greatest President</a>, but it has particular resonance on this 
glorious day of the celebration of our independence.   It is an 
explanation of why and what we are celebrating, and could be given today
 with very few changes.  The last sentence quoted below is its most 
memorable, of course, but every word packs a punch that all the other 
stuff floating around today cannot begin to match.<br /><br />]]>
      <![CDATA[<br />
<blockquote>I 
cannot, with candor, tell you that all is well with the world. Clouds of
 suspicion, tides of ill-will and intolerance gather darkly in many 
places. In our own land we enjoy indeed a fullness of life greater than 
that of most Nations. But the rush of modern civilization itself has 
raised for us new difficulties, new problems which must be solved if we 
are to preserve to the United States the political and economic freedom 
for which Washington and Jefferson planned and fought.<br /><br />Philadelphia

 is a good city in which to write American history. This is fitting 
ground on which to reaffirm the faith of our fathers; to pledge 
ourselves to restore to the people a wider freedom; to give to 1936 as 
the founders gave to 1776--an American way of life.<br /><br />That very word
 freedom, in itself and of necessity, suggests freedom from some 
restraining power. In 1776 we sought freedom from the tyranny of a 
political autocracy--from the eighteenth century royalists who held 
special privileges from the crown. It was to perpetuate their privilege 
that they governed without the consent of the governed; that they denied
 the right of free assembly and free speech; that they restricted the 
worship of God; that they put the average man's property and the average
 man's life in pawn to the mercenaries of dynastic power; that they 
regimented the people.<br /><br />And so it was to win freedom from the 
tyranny of political autocracy that the American Revolution was fought. 
That victory gave the business of governing into the hands of the 
average man, who won the right with his neighbors to make and order his 
own destiny through his own Government. Political tyranny was wiped out 
at Philadelphia on July 4, 1776.<br /><br />Since that struggle, however, 
man's inventive genius released new forces in our land which reordered 
the lives of our people. The age of machinery, of railroads; of steam 
and electricity; the telegraph and the radio; mass production, mass 
distribution--all of these combined to bring forward a new civilization 
and with it a new problem for those who sought to remain free.<br /><br />For

 out of this modern civilization economic royalists carved new 
dynasties. New kingdoms were built upon concentration of control over 
material things. Through new uses of corporations, banks and securities,
 new machinery of industry and agriculture, of labor and capital-all 
undreamed of by the fathers--the whole structure of modern life was 
impressed into this royal<br />service.<br /><br />There was no place among 
this royalty for our many thousands of small business men and merchants 
who sought to make a worthy use of the American system of initiative and
 profit. They were no more free than the worker or the farmer. Even 
honest and progressive-minded men of wealth, aware of their obligation 
to their generation, could never know just where they fitted into this 
dynastic scheme of things.<br /><br />It was natural and perhaps human that 
the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for 
power, reached out for control over Government itself. They created a 
new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction. In its 
service new mercenaries sought to regiment the people, their labor, and 
their property. And as a result the average man once more confronts the 
problem that faced the Minute Man.<br /><br />The hours men and women 
worked, the wages they received, the conditions of their labor--these had
 passed beyond the control of the people, and were imposed by this new 
industrial dictatorship. The savings of the average family, the capital 
of the small business man, the investments set aside for old age--other 
people's money--these were tools which the new economic royalty used to 
dig itself in.<br /><br />Those who tilled the soil no longer reaped the 
rewards which were their right. The small measure of their gains was 
decreed by men in distant cities.<br /><br />Throughout the Nation, 
opportunity was limited by monopoly. Individual initiative was crushed 
in the cogs of a great machine. The field open for free business was 
more and more restricted. Private enterprise, indeed, became too 
private. It became privileged enterprise, not free enterprise.<br /><br />An
 old English judge once said: "Necessitous men are not free men." 
Liberty requires opportunity to make a living-a living decent according 
to the standard of the time, a living which gives man not only enough to
 live by, but something to live for.<br /><br />For too many of us the 
political equality we once had won was meaningless in the face of 
economic inequality. A small group had concentrated into their own hands
 an almost complete control over other people's property, other people's
 money, other people's labor, other people's lives. For too many of us 
life was no longer free; liberty no longer real; men could no longer 
follow the pursuit of happiness.<br /><br />Against economic tyranny such as
 this, the American citizen could appeal only to the organized power of 
Government. The collapse of 1929 showed up the despotism for what it 
was. The election of 1932 was the people's mandate to end it. Under that
 mandate it is being ended.<br /><br />The royalists of the economic order 
have conceded that political freedom was the business of the Government,
 but they have maintained that economic slavery was nobody's business. 
They granted that the Government could protect the citizen in his right 
to vote, but they denied that the Government could do anything to 
protect the citizen in his right to work and his right to live.<br /><br />Today

 we stand committed to the proposition that freedom is no half-and-half 
affair. If the average citizen is guaranteed equal opportunity in the 
polling place, he must have equal opportunity in the market place.<br /><br />These

 economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions 
of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away 
their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the 
overthrow of this kind of power. In vain they seek to hide behind the 
Flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the Flag 
and the Constitution stand for. Now, as always, they stand for 
democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a 
dictatorship by mob rule and the over-privileged alike.<br /><br />The brave
 and clear platform adopted by this Convention, to which I heartily 
subscribe, sets forth that Government in a modern civilization has 
certain inescapable obligations to its citizens, among which are 
protection of the family and the home, the establishment of a democracy 
of opportunity, and aid to those overtaken by disaster.<br /><br />But the 
resolute enemy within our gates is ever ready to beat down our words 
unless in greater courage we will fight for them.<br /><br />For more than 
three years we have fought for them. This Convention, in every word and 
deed, has pledged that that fight will go on.<br /><br />The defeats and 
victories of these years have given to us as a people a new 
understanding of our Government and of ourselves. Never since the early 
days of the New England town meeting have the affairs of Government been
 so widely discussed and so clearly appreciated. It has been brought 
home to us that the only effective guide for the safety of this most 
worldly of worlds, the greatest guide of all, is moral principle.<br /><br />We

 do not see faith, hope and charity as unattainable ideals, but we use 
them as stout supports of a Nation fighting the fight for freedom in a 
modern civilization.<br /><br />Faith--in the soundness of democracy in the 
midst of dictatorships.<br /><br />Hope-renewed because we know so well the 
progress we have made.<br /><br />Charity--in the true spirit of that grand 
old word. For charity literally translated from the original means love,
 the love that understands, that does not merely share the wealth of the
 giver, but in true sympathy and wisdom helps men to help themselves.<br /><br />We

 seek not merely to make Government a mechanical implement, but to give 
it the vibrant personal character that is the very embodiment of human 
charity.<br /><br />We are poor indeed if this Nation cannot afford to lift 
from every recess of American life the dread fear of the unemployed that
 they are not needed in the world. We cannot afford to accumulate a 
deficit in the books of human fortitude.<br /><br />In the place of the 
palace of privilege we seek to build a temple out of faith and hope and 
charity.<br /><br />It is a sobering thing, my friends, to be a servant of 
this great cause. We try in our daily work to remember that the cause 
belongs not to us, but to the people. The standard is not in the hands 
of you and me alone. It is carried by America. We seek daily to profit 
from experience, to learn to do better as our task proceeds.<br /><br />Governments

 can err, Presidents do make mistakes, but the immortal Dante tells us 
that divine justice weighs the sins of the cold-blooded and the sins of 
the warm-hearted in different scales.<br /><br />Better the occasional 
faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the 
consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own 
indifference.<br /><br />There is a mysterious cycle in human events. To 
some generations much is given. Of other generations much is expected. 
This generation of Americans has a rendezvous with destiny.</blockquote>
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>How long will this war last?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/e/s/esaslaw/2010/06/how-long-will-this-war-last.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2010:/talk/blogs/esaslaw//1619.342139</id>
   
   <published>2010-06-30T16:19:09Z</published>
   <updated>2010-06-30T16:57:33Z</updated>
   
   <summary>We interrupt our work imposed radio silence to bring you this special bulletin from Sunday&apos;s Meet the Press. While all its guests, as usual, read their scripts and say exactly what you would expect them to say given who they...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>barth</name>
      <uri>http://edsbarth.blogspot.com/</uri>
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   <category term="3994" label="Afghanistan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="47742" label="alternative energy" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10173" label="David Gregory" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7356" label="Meet the Press" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="47741" label="Tom Ricks" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/esaslaw/">
      <![CDATA[We interrupt our work imposed radio silence to bring you this special 
bulletin from Sunday's <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37943252/ns/meet_the_press-transcripts">Meet the Press</a>.  While all its guests, as usual, 
read their scripts and say exactly what you would expect them to say 
given who they are and what political or other stripe they wear, it was <a href="http://www.cnas.org/node/650">Tom Ricks</a>, the quite well 
respected former military affairs correspondent for the Washington Post,
 and before that, the Wall Street Journal, and the author of the two 
best books on the Iraq war that there are,<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Fiasco-American-Military-Adventure-Iraq/dp/0143038915/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1277914216&amp;sr=8-2">
 Fiasco</a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Gamble-Petraeus-American-Adventure-2006-2008/dp/1594201978/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1277914216&amp;sr=8-1">The
 Gamble</a> who just cut through the noise, when given the usual seconds
 to explain to David Gregory how the war in Afghanistan will end:<br /><blockquote><br />MR.
 GREGORY:  Twenty seconds, Tom.  How does it end?<br /><br />MR. RICKS:  I 
don't think it does.  I think we have landed in the middle of the Middle
 East, for better or worse, in a way that none of us expected us to. I 
think the war in Afghanistan was made much worse by the distracting war 
in Iraq, which never should have happened.  But we are dealing with 
phenomena in the Middle East that's going to be crucial to this country 
as long as we're dependent on Middle East oil.  So the best exit 
strategy I can think of is emphasize alternative fuels.<br /><br />Offscreen
 Voice #1:  Hear, hear.<br /><br />Offscreen Voice #2:  Amen.</blockquote> ]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 

