Meet your neighbors, the bubblers.
People talk a lot about not wanting to reward people who made bad decisions about buying houses. But who exactly are the bad decisionmakers?
To put a human face on it, think about your street or condo area. Or, if you live in a spot entirely composed of rentals owned by giant corporations, think about your parents' neighborhood or your hip friends who live in a semi-urban suburb--just someplace with homes, that you know a little bit about.
Now think about the people who moved in between 2000 and 2006 or so. Guess what--these are your neighbors, the bubblers. If there are more than three families who meet that qualification, there's a good chance that at least one family paid a whopping price for their house and/or used a mortgage product that they now wish they hadn't. Do any of your friends change the subject when housing comes up in conversation?
Don't forget to consider the empty houses on your street. Think about the people who lived in them until a few months ago--did any of them move out without saying much about where they were going? There's a good chance they're your ex-neighbors, the bubblers. Maybe your kids miss their kids a little.
Now ask yourself if you would be willing to go up and down your street and quiz your remaining neighbors about whether they're underwater on their mortgages, or used an ARM on which they soon won't be able to make the payments. And more importantly, if they did, would you be willing to tell them to their faces that they helped ruin our economy and therefore don't deserve to live on the same street as you? Would you be willing to cheerfully pack them up, take their kids out of school, and send them off to live in a rental somewhere until things turn around and they can rebuild their credit? And having done that, would you expect them to greet you with open arms if your neighborhood tanks just in time for you to change jobs and try to sell your house, and something similar happens to you?
I know this is histrionic, and you can feel free to take me to task about that, but I just don't know how else to make the point. People speak so casually about the need for the market to reset housing prices, to pop the bubble. We are talking not only about theoretical families, but about our own friends and neighbors. Is it really our capitalist duty to shun them? If it is, then we've definitely moved out of America and into Charles Dickens' England.
God help us, every one.





I've been wondering where our unemployment rate will top out during this 'recession'. Unemployment is currently 6.5%. In 1933 25% of all workers, and 37% of all non farm workers were out of work. In 1940 unemployment still averaged 14.6%. If things continue to deteriorate, as most economists seem to think they will, we're gonna see a lot more mortgage defaults. Those of us who own our homes had better hope there isn't a compelling reason for us to liquidate anytime in the near future or we'll be one of those 'bubblers' ourselves. It's been one of the misrepresentations in this financial fiasco from the outset that there hasn't been a human face put on it from the Treasury or the White House. It's all been about injecting liquidity, and frozen credit. Rec'd.
December 4, 2008 3:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
That official unemployment rate excludes those who have taken lesser jobs just to get by, and those who have not looked in the last four weeks (though how they determine that I don't know) and some of the self-employed.
If you look at line U-6 in the Bureau of Labor Statistics report, "Total Unemployment" in October was 11.8%:
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t12.htm
December 4, 2008 10:25 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Once I built a railroad..."
Erica, you have spelled it out here in excellent fashion. Thanks!
"...buddy, can you spare a dime?"
December 4, 2008 8:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks SJ--BTW, the Greenspan piece was fantastic.
December 5, 2008 1:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was all for putting the bailout money into a program to refinance mortgages and help keep people in their homes. That would create a floor for housing and for the Economy as a whole to build on. It would have been nice to do it with the first $1 trillion, but it's all debt anyway, so we may as well try again, this time with a program for Main St., not Wall St. (I hate that phrase, but it is concise)
December 4, 2008 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Erica, I subscribe to the "if it happened in my neighborhood" school of thought. Every event, I run it through my mind that way. I really helps to clarify my thinking about so many things. And I recommend it highly. So your description is so apt here. Every single for sale sign that has gone up in my neighborhood prompts concern. Indeed, one of the families that moved here within the last few years is owned by someone who was a mortgage broker himself, but is now unemployed and a stay-at-home dad. (I'm surprised he even told me what he used to do, but that it was August when I met him.)
There are so many stories that we know of and so many more we can run through our minds, just based on where the economy is. People who need to take second jobs to make ends meet. People fearful of losing a job and thereby a home and health insurance.
It's this kind of thing that prompted my idea of the Public Health census - because a stressed person has a lowered immune response or may be depressed, for sure is anxious, likely sleepless.
It disrupts kids to lose a house and friends and their school. Pretty soon you have a whole distressed family. If houses are empty, the neighborhood can fall prey to crime - drug lords moving in or simply vandalism - or housing values can drop even further. A city loses its tax base and services drop. Schools cut budgets. Fewer police and fire fighters. It's a feedback loop like a whirlpool, dragging everything down and down. We can all do the thought experiment. It's not pretty. Very scary.
Erica, you are not being histrionic at all! God help us. Exactly!
December 4, 2008 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
We all do things we regret. In a situation like this we need to pull together and help those who got over in over their head while working to see what we can do to prevent the situation in the future. Playing the blame game is a great way of avoiding the issue, but doesn't accomplish anything.
December 4, 2008 5:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe you should try channeling Dickens.
"I know this is histrionic, and you can feel free to take me to task about that, but I just don't know how else to make the point. People speak so casually about the need for the market to reset housing prices, to pop the bubble."
I don't get the point. Few take this casually. Housing prices already have had a drastic fall and the bubble was popped at least a year ago in the macro view.
I know two women who bought in the past 3 years. Neither is whining about it. One got her house re-appraised at about 20% less than the purchase price, so her taxes are lower. She's running a thriving business and did not over-spend when she bought, so for her the purchase wasn't a great investment timing-wise but she's fine anyway. I don't know the details of the other but have no reason to believe she's in trouble (good job, sound judgment).
I see almost no signs of foreclosures or home sales where I live. That's not to say that other areas have not been hit hard. It's to establish a counterpoint to whatever vague point was supposed to have been made by erica's post.
btw, I've moved twice since 2000, choosing to rent both times because I couldn't understand or afford the local housing market. Maybe 2009 will give me a chance to buy in.
December 4, 2008 6:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Erica, you've made a very good point here. Our neighbors weren't buying millions of houses. They were buying one. The lenders, on the other hand, were making millions of loans. So it's time for the lenders, not the borrowers, to bear the brunt of the burden, especially as all of us as taxpayers are bailing them out directly.
The lenders pay us all back in future profits for our bailout.
The lenders more than borrowers know what bad financial decisions look like (high leverage, lack of liquidity, etc). The lenders have a duty to say no and decline deals. They didn't. The price is they lose future profits, and the people they failed as financial counselors keep their homes.
December 4, 2008 11:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks to all who posted and provided insights.
December 5, 2008 1:08 AM | Reply | Permalink