Ed Weissman's Blog | Churchill »

Caroline Kennedy and the Senate Seat


The U.S. Senate, despite the intent of some of the Framers, is not the House of Lords.    Even the House of Lords is not The House of Lords  It is no longer an  hereditary body.  I have long ago memories of supporting various members of the Kennedy family.  In 1960, as a kid, I campaigned with Myrna Loy for Jack.  Yes, that Myrna Loy.  It was a big deal for me.  In 1965, on returning from the Selma March, a friend and I reported our experiences to Bobby Kennedy's Senate Office.  I think Ted Kennedy's early endorsement of President-elect Obama was magical.  Caroline Kennedy  seems a fine person, but she has not earned the job.


There is a difference between coming from a political family and a sense of familial entitlement.  Nancy Pelosi comes from a political family.  She made her own way in politics.  No doubt she learned much on her father's knee, but it's a long long way from Baltimore to San Francisco.   


There may be a case for appointing someone who will not run when up for election.  They may keep the seat warm, try to complete the work of the person who vacated the seat, or wish to serve to bring up an issue which normal electoral politics ignores.  Ms. Kennedy is only seeking to jump start a political career.  The U.S. Senate is an august and powerful body.  It is not the House of Lords.



4 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Oh, come on. We all know what the U.S. Senate is: a haven for scoundrels, pretenders and ne'erdowells. An august and powerful body. Heh. That's a good one.

user-pic

Fabulous post!

user-pic

It's not about Royalty or the House of Lords.
Those who promote that idea are distracters.

Come on, we all know why some will not accept her. She’s not in someone’s hip pocket. Experience means, she’s not beholden to anyone, therefore she’s not experienced in the ways of being politically connected.

She can’t be controlled, she’s not on someone’s leash, and therefore she’s inexperienced in the ways of discipline.

It is about the Lords trying to keep control, and only allow those who have paid their dues towards those who want to maintain the feudal system, where the peasants know their place. It’s not a matter of name; it’s about paying to play.

user-pic

Entitlement

POV #1: What gives you the right to waltz right into the sty, if you've not rolled in the mud, and slopped with the hogs before?

POV #1: previous experience at an elective political office is properly assessed as a negative modifier, when considering possible candidates to hold a political office granted from a politician's appointment.

Leave a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address