« THE ARROGANCE OF AIG | econmavin's Blog | GEITHNER IS TOO CLOSE TO THE STREET »

MATERIALITY AND THE AIG BONUS PROBLEM


When I was reading about the AIG bonuses I was as outraged as anyone else. The first thing that came to my mind was "How could Geithner let them get away with this?" Then I stopped and thought about the days when I managed a half-billion dollar portfolio. Number in the thousands didn't seem very significant. The problem arises from the fact that large numbers contain a lot of digits. Most people working with large numbers drop several digits due to what accountants call immateriality. For example: Most company financial statements have (000) written under the title of the individual financial statement and all of the numbers are in thousands of dollars. So, $1,985 is really $1,985,000. We're talking millions of dollars, not thousands and hundreds of dollars get lost in the shuffle.

So, how did Mr. Geithner miss $250 million? It is easy to do when the bailout is in the billions. Simply, most of the numbers crossing Mr. Geithner's desk were probably written in billions. The bailout package to AIG was probably written as $185 instead of $185,000,000,000. This means that the bonuses would have been written as $0.165. This is a number that looks insignificant in the overall scheme of things and could easily be missed. Especially by a person who is dealing with a national debt number in the trillions. Let's face it, if all day long you're seeing number like $9,654.4 which is the national debt, $0.165 looks like peanuts. That fact that the true numbers are $9,654,400,000,000 and $165,000,000 gets become obscured.

What is needed is to have people working with the Treasury Secretary and the Fed Chairman who understand that apparent small percentage numbers have a high impact when read as whole numbers. People in the rarified air of Washington and New York do not realize that the AIG bonuses could eliminate the debt of many smaller cities and pay for the complete budgets of many school districts. I do not blame Mr. Geithner for missing the impact news of the Bonuses would have on the public. I do blame the loud mouthed critics who would have claimed that the Obama administration was destroying the capitalist system if the bonuses had been blocked. Once the bonus contracts were written, it became a loose-loose situation for the Obama team.


8 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Rec'd for and from the accounting standpoint.

However, it's "lose-lose", not "loose-loose". I always nitpick on this point, so please don't take it personally.

user-pic

geez, writers, always looking down on the rest of us plebs!
;0)

user-pic

This from a big talking pug, oy.

user-pic

mea-culpa

user-pic

de nada

user-pic

This is exactly why nobody in the government should be running AIG or any other private company. The government has owned 80% of AIG for months now and SHOULD have been conducting a proctology exam on the company's P&L. But somehow they didn't do a "line-by-line" exam like Obama said he'd do with the federal budget. But now everybody is "outraged" about the bonuses. It's like a parent being outraged when they discover their kids are doing drugs. It's just as much their fault as it is their kids' fault

user-pic

Bill;
You seem to forget that it was unregulated private industry that got us into this mess to begin with. AIG is big enough that the bonus would have gotten lost in their numbers fog as well as they would have by government people. The head of AIG, although appointed by government, came out of the private sector. The bonus contract were written before the government owned 80% of AIG.

Your biases are now showing.

user-pic

Who is unregulated? Are you saying that AIG is not regulated? Citi and BofA are not regulated? Lehman not regulated?

I thought you were smarter than that as a former treasurer of a multinational corporation that managed a half billion dollar portfolio.

You can call it bias, but you're sounding just as biased by throwing around terms like "unregulated".

Leave a comment

econmavin

user-pic

Following: 0
Followers: 6

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Quotes Insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting different outcomes

Bio

Former Corporate Treasurer in multinational corporation. Currently teaching Economics and Finance at the college level. BS, MA, MBA

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address