« It's Gotta Be The Shoes | Boyd Reed's Blog | Geithner, Lynn and Uneasiness »

End Of An Error


I had given up writing blogs for a while, as my job is especially busy this time of year.  To write even a mediocre blog takes time and effort, and I just don't have as much of either to give right now.

But today - just for today - I have to make an exception.

It is entirely appropriate - and a personal joy - to read the expressions of hope and optimism on this board.  Many bloggers correctly note that the heavy lifting begins tomorrow, but today is certainly a day for celebration, reflection and happiness.

May God forgive me, but I still have a lot of anger inside me.  Even on a day such as today, when Barack Obama will become the President about an hour from when I type these lines, I still feel angry.

I'm angry that intelligence that could have perhaps prevented at least some of the 9/11 attacks was ignored.

I'm angry that my President bum-rushed us into a seven-year war with a country that had absolutely no responsibility for those attacks - by lying to our elected representatives and my fellow Americans about their weapons capabilities and terrorist sympathies.

I'm angry that we're stuck trying to rebuild this country after killing approximately two million of its citizens.  The "moral leader" of the free world commits its very own Iraqi Holocaust, and the Crawford Clown actually defends it on national TV. 

I'm angry that hundreds of thousands of Americans were allowed to suffer and die as a result of Katrina.

I'm angry that a nation whose legal system is based on the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" - that provides its accused with the fairest trials on earth - could be made to swallow something as draconian as FISA.

I'm angry that, somehow, over 59 million Americans managed to vote this doddering, manor-born fool in for a second term as our President.

I'm angry that we swallowed his Treasury Secretary's plea for $700 billion dollars, only to watch half of it disappear into the very coffers that were supposed to be unfrozen for credit, with absolutely no means or assurances of recouping our tax investment.

I'm angry that we - me, you and everyone else - tolerated the pure, unfiltered evil that was Dick Cheney dropping his pants and urinating all over the Constitution. 

I could go on for another four or five thousand words.  But you get the idea. 

Now, maybe we had to go through a Presidency as horrific as Bush 43's to finally wake up to the idea that change was needed - real change, not only in how we conduct our politics, but also in how we conduct our individual lives, how we get involved and plugged in to our communities and our country, and how we hold our elected leaders responsible for their decisions.

Perhaps it was necessary to suffer the debasement of environmental standards, the systematic erosion of Constitutional protections, and the willful defiance of the Geneva Conventions to remind us that, while freedom isn't free, the cost is minimal when compared to the benefits of living in an America that actually lives up to the promise of its creed.

It could be that we needed to be slapped with the disaster of neoconservative "charge-and-spend" philosophy to realize that fiscal conservatism isn't a prerogative of any political party, but rather a basic American value that we desperately need to reclaim if our broken economy is to ever work again.  We needed to see, in blaring headlines, that sucking money out of Social Security and running up a 13-figure bill with our First Beijing charge card will create many more problems than they could ever solve.

And maybe we needed to be shown the logical conclusion of what happens when we devalue intellect, reason, compassion and erudition.  We needed to see what would happen if we took the idea that our leaders should be people that we could have a beer with and took it to the extreme.

I don't see any of the foregoing as individual errors.  I see it all in the collective - as one humongous, gigantic, national lapse of judgment.  George Walker Bush should never have been elected to a first term, and to repeat the mistake was a colossal faux pas that, honestly, the world shouldn't forgive us for very easily. 

No, I didn't vote for Bush in 2000 or 2004.  But what if I'd worked harder?  What if I'd done more?  What if I'd lent a louder voice to the chorus against the Bush Maladministration?  Could I have stepped up more and maybe helped prevent what we've gone through?  Maybe not.  And, again, maybe getting Obama, Biden and the rest of the new team is the payoff for our suffering. 

Thirty minutes until the inauguration of President Obama.  At 12:01 p.m. Eastern time, we can celebrate the end of a national nightmare.  We can enjoy the end of our national embarrassment in our White House. 

I will celebrate and enjoy.  However, I also choose to reflect on the end of an error, what that error has cost me, what it will cost my son and what it will cost his own children, yet to be born.  I know it's not celebratory, but I never, ever want to be this angry at my government again.  George Santayana said that those who do not remember the past are destined to repeat it.  George W. Bush gives me ample reason to believe that maxim.

Celebrate today, everyone, in all its historical significance and renewed belief in our nation's inherent greatness.  But never, ever forget the hell we've been through, and remain guarded against the seductive voices of "compassionate conservatism" that led us there.


17 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Thank you, Boyd, for this stirring commentary!

This deserves to move up. Highly recommended!

user-pic

Thanks, Thera. Greatly appreciated.

user-pic

:)

user-pic

Boyd, I would recommend this blog just for the title.

And just a reminder, I prove everyday that it is really not that difficult to put out a mediocre blog.

Yours is not mediocre today. I feel the anger. But I feel a lot of joy today.

The American People reelected that clown. And we must not forget. We never want to blunder like that again.

user-pic

Thanks, DD. And, BTW, I suspect it's been many, many months of Sundays since you wrote anything "mediocre."

In general, I only make angry comments when someone is acting like a (s)pric. But I do try to stay on topic, even then. :-)

user-pic

Boyd, I believe that often times, things that appear to be bad at the moment turn out to be good things in the end. Your observation that maybe the last 8 years WAS what we needed to make a huge change in this country could well be the silver lining I've been looking for. Perhaps if the dems had won in 2000/2004, we would just be sluggin' along same as always, not ready to make the wholesale changes we need to make. In all likelihood we would not have PRESIDENT Obama.

So maybe we all need to forgive ourselves for our contributions to the pain of the last 8 years (mine being far worse than yours)and focus on how that pain may have been something necessary for us to feel the awesomeness of our Nation's rebirth today.

Rec'd the post (even though my rec list will show I didn't!!!)

user-pic

You make a very good point, stilli. It's not so far off the mark that if the Dems had won in '04 we might still be slogging through the same ole same ole instead of actually having enlightened leadership.

I can still remember that crushing feeling when w got his second term. I kept pulling on my braids yelling, "What is wrong with people! Are they actually that blind or are they choosing not to see?"

After a while I calmed down even though things got worse. All I could do was shake my head and hope some one would come along and shake things up.

Liberal or progressive activity did not/does not exist where I live and I didn't know there were blogs for such things back then. I'm glad I found TPM. And it is a tremendous joy to read Reed and GregorZap and dd and TheraP and everyone else I can't remember right now. :o) Miguelito! I reckon I will remember them all after I hit submit.

user-pic

Thank you for your very kind words, Flower. I found myself pretty numb after w made round 2. I worked hard for Kerry and signed up a lot of people to vote in my office, which was a very conservative insurance company, as well as getting them to see through w and vote for Kerry.

After all that, I see the point that we needed to hit bottom before we could recover. I think this country just made the first step. Now we have to get them to the second step, whatever that is!

user-pic

Boyd...off point question...I noticed you are not following anyone. Have you tried, and can't or just haven't tried? I can't and it's frustrating me...

user-pic

Hey...first, thank you for the positive comments.

As for following people, I haven't tried. It's mainly because I want to make sure I read everyone, and I worry that I'll get lazy if I have a faves list to fall back on.

user-pic

Your anger places you in great company Boyd, or so I'd like to think. ;)

user-pic

Thanks. You said it better than I could, without even one curse-word --- amazing!

user-pic

President Obama is to some extent a person upon whom we have projected all our hopes---or at least an enormous helping of our hopes. After all, he has invited us to fell hope, not fear.

Which is a telling phrase. I think that the enormous crowds, and the atmosphere of cheerfulness, elation, even euphoria, were there as much because we as a people have had more than our quota of fear and loathing at the hands of the criminals who have hijacked our nation's government and wrecked, not the World Trade Center buildings, but world trade itself---along with stealing elections, subverting the Constitution, waging unprovoked war for political aggrandizement and petroleum profits, and fiddling while the planet melts.

President Obama makes a great impression, both in public and (based on what I have heard and read) also in private, personal encounters. Nevertheless, he is still largely unknown. Whereas Bush and Cheney and their gang are known and are despised, feared, and repudiated by the majority of Americans. And the need to demonstrate that repudiation was a powerful motive for a lot of the individuals who congregated in DC this week.

Speaking of the District of Columbia, when do the people there get to be represented in Congress? And what about our invisible colony---Puerto Rico? Let the new Man from Illinois note that the Union has some unfinished business.

user-pic

Puerto Rico was given the opportunity for a vote some years ago- stay the way they are, apply for statehood, or petition for independence. The people of Puerto Rico voted to stay the way they are. This is a case, while its hard to understand why they want it, their wants and needs should be respected

user-pic

Take caution against over-emphasizing one president as the cause of our woes. You do not say enough about the special interests and systemic distortions. I understand that there's at least partly a cathartic purpose to your post.

Beyond catharsis, it would make sense to re-examine what was going on before the Iraq invasion. Reports were that Iraqi children were dying from lack of adequate medical care; that the government was intercepting the medical supplies and aid; and that many organizations were calling on the US to "do something" about the humanitarian situation related to its enforcement of sanctions against Iraq.

So could you imagine if the US had gone in with the rationale of a humanitarian mission alone? For many troops patrolling and battling in Iraq, that is part of what their mission became, whatever strategic energy interests waited in the wings.

To stabilize countries that might otherwise become failed or chronically unstable states, what is necessary? This remains a challenge for every administration whatever its party affiliation.

I recall after the invasion how presses and pundits talked about all of the needs Iraq had immediately after the invasion. Then they shifted to the ratings-sick body count dualism..the blow by blow.

user-pic

My impression is that you've spent a lot of time looking for some "deeper" meaning in this post. The problem is, as Fred Allen once said about Hollywood, that there's no "there" there.

The post's main purpose isn't catharsis, though everyone may take something different out of it. Most anti-Bushies can achieve catharsis quite easily without this post. It's designed to remind people about just how consistently, painfully awful Bush's decision-making skills and deception were, in the hopes of avoiding a repeat.

Also, I'm afraid that revisionist history on the Iraq War will not fly. The humanitarian angle simply was not part of Bushco's considerations. Publicly, the argument they presented to Congress in support of a war resolution was that Iraq was clearly linked to al-Qaeda, and that Saddam had WMDs he intended to use against us. Both those contentions are now known to be completely false.

Never mind that King Hussein - one of our biggest ME allies - warned us BEFORE the invasion that an invasion of Iraq would destabilize the entire region. Sadly, it looks like His Highness was quite right. Shame we didn't listen, huh?

user-pic
Never mind that King Hussein - one of our biggest ME allies - warned us BEFORE the invasion that an invasion of Iraq would destabilize the entire region.


The Neocon’s intent was the destabilization of the ME!

We need to remember what occurred and why to move ahead if not those involved will keep remaking history.

Thank you for your effort to make time to post this and hope you find time for more posts.

A seminal article from the past by Josh Mica Marshal in the Washington Monthly
brings back memories of past discussions on the old TPMcafe blog quite succinctly.

Practice to Deceive
Chaos in the Middle East is not the Bush hawks' nightmare scenario--it's their plan.
By Joshua Micah Marshall April 2003

Leave a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address