« Ashley Todd: Sarah Palin's Twisted Little Soul Sister | eades's Blog | More Anti-Obama Hate at Palin Rally outside Las Vegas »

Palin Pathology: What's Wrong with Sarah and Her Fans?


The revelation that McCain/Palin campaign volunteer Ashley Todd mutilated herself in an apparent race-baiting attempt to draw white voters away from Barack Obama again raises troubling questions about the McCain/Palin campaign and many of its most zealous supporters. By her own admission to Pittsburgh police, the 20-year-old Texan chose to submit a fictional report that she was attacked and robbed at an ATM the night of Oct. 22 by a tall black man who became enraged, beat her, and carved a "B" into her cheek after seeing a McCain-Palin bumper sticker on her car. Todd said the man told her that he was going to teach her a lesson for supporting McCain, and that now she was going to be a "Barack supporter." To support her claim she apparently blackened her own eye and carved a backward "B" on her own face in a mirror (see AP, KDKA, Huffington Post).

Unfortunately, I am not the least bit surprised by Ms. Todd's actions. I would never suggest that all McCain/Palin supporters are crazy, but a significant number particularly of Sarah Palin's most zealous supporters have exhibited behavior sufficiently extreme to suggest that some form of social pathology is indeed taking root in the grotesque traveling circus the McCain/Palin campaign has become. McCain/Palin rallies, and particularly Palin rallies, have turned into festivals of hate as attendees shout "Terrorist!" and "Kill Him!" at each mention of Obama's name and vent their rage at the media by attacking reporters. Numerous written accounts and video clips now circulating online attest to the rabidly hateful behavior of many supporters at McCain/Palin rallies, as well as to their insistence on believing that Obama is a secret Muslim, a terrorist, and perhaps even the Antichrist, even though such rumors have been denounced as lies by Republicans as well as Democrats. Presented with the facts of Obama's American roots and Christian faith, these zealots prefer to hide behind paranoid theories of an unholy, foreign Obama no rational person would take seriously.

Comparisons with Nazis and other historical extremes are all too often facile and gross overstatements of one's case, and are usually best avoided. It is worth noting, however, that the rise of the Nazis in Germany and other examples of extreme demagoguery from history such as the Cultural Revolution in China under Mao Zedong and the Khmer Rouge genocide in Cambodia contained elements common to many such movements, if in less extreme forms. The Nazis, Mao's Red Guards, and the Khmer Rouge all made use of xenophobia and anti-cosmopolitanism, hatred of intellectuals, disdain for cities and the people who inhabit them, and other forms of divisive populism and "anti-elitism" to build working-class and peasant support and to fashion scapegoats at which popular anger might usefully be directed. Infamously in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, even possessing the soft hands of an educated urbanite was enough to get one executed; and at Chinese universities during the Cultural Revolution professors were thrown from their classroom windows to their deaths on the pavement below. Hitler's Nazis are known not only for the death camps they operated, but also for the persecution of artists and intellectuals as well as for festive book-burnings before cheering mobs of working-class Nazi supporters.

John McCain, Sarah Palin, and other Republicans today are cynically making use of these same forms of demagoguery in their attempt to frighten voters away from Barack Obama and the Democrats. Cultural buttons are pushed in ads and speeches inflaming fear and hatred of the "Other." Attendees at McCain/Palin rallies are told that they are the only "real Americans," and that liberals and other enemies are out to subvert their values and destroy their way of life. They are invited to spew hate at Democratic politicians and news reporters. They are whipped into a frenzy and then sent out to spread the McCain/Palin message of irrational fear and hatred among their fellow Americans. Just as these methods produced extreme results in Nazi Germany, Mao's China, and Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, so they are producing extreme results today across Sarah Palin's America, if not so very extreme.

American writer Sinclair Lewis wrote, "When fascism comes to America, it'll be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." A McCain/Palin rally today is not quite the same as those at Nuremberg in the 1930s or on Tiananmen Square in the 1960s, and most McCain/Palin supporters aren't exactly Brownshirts or Red Guards. A significant number particularly of Sarah Palin's most zealous supporters do, however, seem to have drifted into comparable forms of thinking and behavior, convinced that as the last bastion of "the real America" they are surrounded not only by foreign enemies but by domestic enemies as well: liberals, big-city news editors, university professors and their brainwashed students, arugula-eaters, latte-drinkers, immigrants, "uppity" blacks, socialists, gays, secret Muslims. Sarah Palin seems to have awakened something in certain members of the Republican base that John McCain has not, and this is something far darker than mere "enthusiasm." Palin has lit a xenophobic fuse among her most ardent fans, has drawn out all the ugliest hatreds and fears that can take root among people in hard times, and has convinced them that even among their fellow citizens walk mortal enemies.

Ergo, Ashley Todd: An obviously disturbed young woman, willing to use racist tactics in a sick attempt to make white voters nervous about Obama, Ashley Todd is precisely the type of personality I would expect to be drawn to Sarah Palin. Indeed it isn't hard to imagine the 20-year-old Todd as a younger, less fortunate mirror image of Palin herself, and I wouldn't be surprised if Todd identified personally with Palin in ways a psychoanalyst would find fascinating. Her willingnes to mutilate herself suggests anything but good mental health, and the pathological feelings about African Americans her actions reveal put her in good company with others we have seen turning up at Palin events. Sarah Palin's own behavioral history - in particular an apparent fixation on power, delusions of grandeur, and obsessive vindictiveness that as mayor of Wasilla and governor of Alaska has led her to committ impeachable ethics violations - suggests an outlook on life scarcely healthier than Ms. Todd's.

It seems likely that Ms. Todd had emotional problems long before Sarah Palin came along and illuminated her reason for living. It is obvious also, however, that there is a political and racial element in her recent actions that can only be fully understood, if at all, within the context of the McCain/Palin campaign, its alarmingly negative cultural messaging, and the behavior of many of Ms. Todd's fellow McCain/Palin supporters, particularly those who identify most intensely with Sarah Palin. John McCain's campaign might have been in ill health even before Palin's arrival, but her coming has since brought something truly sick to the campaign, truly pathological. Of this, Ashley Todd is but a poster child.


Mark C. Eades
http://www.mceades.com

31 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Thank you for a well-reasoned and informative essay. I absolutely agree, there is something in the rhetoric of Palin's entire gestalt that enables the fringe to come out from the shadows. Once this sick young woman's hoax was proven, I really thought her first public sentiments would be along the lines of "I did it to save the babies who are aborted." Maybe this will ultimately be her cry for help, because sooner or later it wasn't going to be herself she harmed in her terror to save the world from whatever she feared at the time.

Honest -- she gives me Squeaky Fromme flashback.

user-pic

OK, folks now we need to go to work to support Dennis Shulman (D-NJ) against the republican who is running a dishonest campaign against him.

http://www.newyorker.com/talk/2008/07/28/080728ta_talk_toobin

http://shulmanforcongress.com/

user-pic

Nice post. rec'd. Palin in particular seems to play on her followers desire to recapture something they have lost in America. I think that is why most of the R's support come from rural Americans who see their way of life slipping away. Unfortunately for them they are going to have to scrap their gas guzzlers regardless of the expansion of drilling in the US. They will have to adapt to changes in their other ethnological proclivities, (like living in a majority Caucasian country for example), in the face of a world that no longer resembles a Norman Rockwell Saturday Evening Post cover. They believe the 'cultural elites' are the one's responsible for this seachange and as such hold them as such responsible, lashing out willy-nilly at a Mc/P rally or on a blog for the perceived transgression. As you say, Palin in particular plays to this sentiment with her 'pro-America' statements and proclivity to polarize the electorate. Following the election, (and presumably an Obama victory), I think Obama and the rest of us 'Cultural elites" will need to give them the sociological equivalent of a group hug to help them understand that it's gonna be all right.

user-pic

We don't want a hug from you leftists. We don't want anything from you at all, other than for you to leave. There are plenty of screwed up countries in the world that follow your insane ideology (Cuba for example). Please move there and stop destroying this country.

user-pic

OMG Bulldog, are you completely insane or completely brainwashed? America is THE MOST CAPITALIST country I know (there may be others, but probably not in the "known" world). And you're acting that by a Democrat vicroty it's suddenly going to turn into COMPLETE COMMUNISM?! To you it's all either black or white, you don't see any other colors. You don't see that MOST other countries in the world are more "leftist" than the US (because the US is a very right-leaning country) and in many of them life is as good as or better than in the US. Now if the US moves just one inch to the left (which in reality means moving to the center), you think the only possible outcome is it becomung like Cuba?!

You know, there's a difference between putting a grain of salt in your bowl of soup and putting a ton of salt in it. The former makes it taste better, the latter makes it "like Cuba". I'd like you to see that difference.

user-pic

... said the NotSoCleverBulldog...

user-pic

I agree that these trends are disturbing but I disagree that they are new or recent. Reagan was the founder of the "anti-intellectual" brand of Republican and the theme has remained strong since. And one can go back to the '60's and see a consistent theme of anti-Democratic feelings on the Right, constantly telling those who sought to change the country by using their Constitutional freedoms to "love it or leave it" and "go back to Russia." I myself have been told to leave the country many times for my efforts to make the country better. And in fact I have now left the country since I gave up on it being a Democracy.
It disturbs me that no one points out that the real anti-Americans are the ones who oppose our system of government; for example Bush and his "unitary executive" and his "signing statement" and his contempt for the rule of law. Or the Bush Justice Department with its blatant efforts to install partisanship in the courts, again showing contempt for our country and the rule of law. Or the blatant violation of the laws against wiretapping which lead Bush to commit more felonies, literally, than every other American who ever lived, combined.
It is horrific that they would accuse people of being anti-American because of their views on health care and so on. But it is simply correct to describe the bulk of Republican Conservatives today as anti-American. They do not believe in or support the system of government created by our Constitution and they have contempt for the laws created by the people of this country. Nothing could be more anti-American than that and we should be out there saying so. Time to tell them to "love it or leave it!"

user-pic

Now and again I wonder what sort of country I'd be living in now if Adlai Stevenson, George McGovern, John Kerry, and Al Gore had won the presidency. I suspect it would be a far better one than we are now living in, with hatred and religious intolerance accepted as part of GOP politics.

user-pic

I POST MY POST FROM ELSEWHERE:

Although it ain't over until it is over, what is certainly over is forty plus years of madness. And, yep it ain't never perfect and battles will continue, but the republican nonsense reached the high point with Bush & Co, and its end is shown by McCain and Palin who are burying the remaining elements that are mostly destructive and toxic. This is Obama's achievement; the rest is fodder for conversation and blogging.

user-pic

Far more likely that the country would be a satellite of the Soviet Union in your scenario.

user-pic

Bark! Bark Bark!! Bark, ____ __ ____ ________, le Bark!!!

user-pic

Who said that the Antichrist had to be a man!!!

user-pic

What the FUCK! I am SO SICK OF THIS BULLSHIT whereby someone cites Nazi analogies as being facile & gross overstatements, then uses the specter of the Nazi Holocaust to justify their facile comparison with the enemy of the moment.

Give me a fucking break. The Nazi regime systemically murdered 6 million Jewish people and millions of others, including homosexuals, Russian POWs and Gypsies.

The murdered millions of people. The innate need of some to cast their political opponents with that murderous regime belies an inability to express one's own feelings articulately, thus the lazy writer descends into overwrought Nazi comparison.

Six million Jews. Millions of others. Murdered. In cold blood. Comparisons of that with Bush or his supporters is weak and discredits the liberal cause which you claim to support. I am so fucking sick of it.

Millions of people, murdered in cold blood. Try to count to 6 million. Try to read 6 million names. How long would it take you? For each name, this is one life intentionally ended by the murderous Nazis. I can't stand it, and I'm embarrassed to see posts containing these sentiments recommended on a site I enjoy every day.

The Nazi regime murdered millions of people. Some mentally disturbed McCain supporter tried to perpetrate a hoax. Is there really any point of comparison.

Enough.

Comparisons with Nazis and other historical extremes are all too often facile and gross overstatements of one's case, and are usually best avoided. It is worth noting, however, that the rise of the Nazis in Germany and other examples of extreme demagoguery from history such as the Cultural Revolution in China under Mao Zedong and the Khmer Rouge genocide in Cambodia contained elements common to many such movements, if in less extreme forms. The Nazis, Mao's Red Guards, and the Khmer Rouge all made use of xenophobia and anti-cosmopolitanism, hatred of intellectuals, disdain for cities and the people who inhabit them, and other forms of divisive populism and "anti-elitism" to build working-class and peasant support and to fashion scapegoats at which popular anger might usefully be directed. Infamously in Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, even possessing the soft hands of an educated urbanite was enough to get one executed; and at Chinese universities during the Cultural Revolution professors were thrown from their classroom windows to their deaths on the pavement below. Hitler's Nazis are known not only for the death camps they operated, but also for the persecution of artists and intellectuals as well as for festive book-burnings before cheering mobs of working-class Nazi supporters.

user-pic

I have warned against spurious comparisons to the more known fascist organisations before, but you neglect one very important detail: time.

The NSDAP was established in 1920 (some insist 1919.)

If we omit the early years and go to the "serious business," Hitler got out of jail in 1925.

The party seized power and Hitler became Chancellor in 1933.

Jews (and others) were stripped of their citizenship in 1935.

The first concentration camps are set up in 1938.

The extermination camps were created in 1942.

Even the strictest timeframe for the process whence the Holocaust came is 10 years. Realistically, it is 15-18 years.

You planning on waiting a few more before getting concerned? There is a poem you might like.

user-pic

If the Nazis had 24-hour cable news, it wouldn't have taken 15-18 years.

user-pic

Calm down. Nobody's saying that McCain, Palin and Bush are like Hitler. What Mark wrote (and I agree) is that they pushed some of the same buttons. Just replace "Jews" with "Muslims" and you'll get the picture. A lot of Americans today are convinced that Muslims (in general) are sworn enemies of the USA, and many people would agree to wipe them completely off the face of the Earth. And they didn't come to that idea alone (most of them never even saw a Muslim) - it was fed to them.

Same thing with liberals. The definition of the word "liberal" means only to support people's freedom, i.e. to be helpful and tolerant toward others. But to many people "liberal" means roughly the same as "evil people with no moral values who hate and want to destroy the country". This couldn't be further from the truth, but many Americans see liberalism as the root of all evil, much like the Germans saw Jews, once successfully brainwashed by Hitler.

It's not the same by far, but there are similar patterns. Also not unimportant is the fact that Hitler came in power and managed to brainwash an entire nation right after the big economic crisis, when people were very susceptible to the idea of a scapegoat, because they wanted to punish someone for their problems.

1930 is not that long ago and don't think that something like that can't happen again, given the right circumstances (a big enough crisis) and the right demagogue. And you know, there are still people (not few) who value their own ambition much more than people's lives.

user-pic

Good assessment JumpyJack.

user-pic

Todd is 23, not 20.

As for the rant against Nazi comparisons: I realize there is a segment of the Jewish community -- thankfully a tiny minority of zealots -- who claim a monopoly ownership of the word "holocaust". That no holocaust could possibly be so datardly as that committed against the Jews. To the degree that there are Holocaust memorials within the US, even though that Holocaust did not occur on this contenient.

And that that same zelous -- and supremacist -- faction OPPOSES erection of Holocaust memorials to memorialize the genocide which did occur on this continent -- that against its original inhabitants. And the holocaust that occurred on this continent -- that against blacks.

But enough is enough from that "Only we are important!" ffaction. There is no mistake in comparing and contrasting the WW II Germany Nazi regime and its characteristics with the features of the far-right supernationalist white supremacists in the US. Did Nazis disrupt the rallies of political opponents? Yes. And Republicans do it in the US. Did the Nazis shout down all opposition. Yes -- and the Republicans do it in the US. Did the Nazis use the power of the state to political ends against its opponents? Yes -- and the Republicans do it in the US: see the Buhsit criminal enterprises latest on "democractic" elections: Bushit himself has PUBLICLY directed the politiciazed DOJ to demonize voter REGISTRATION in the entity that is ACORN. And has directed teh DOJ to FORCE some 200,000 OH voters to cast PROVISIONAL ballots so it can later PREVENT those being Counted.

How blatant must the fascism be before the "Only we are important! bigots cease lying against reality in pursuit of self-aggrandizement of their sufferings as greater than everyone elses, and the ONLY ONE to be memorialized.

user-pic

The attitude of people like you and the flippant way you compare Bush to Hitler is exactly the reason why George W. Bush was elected twice. I pity you because you cannot see that.

user-pic

Ditto.

user-pic

HItler did not suddenly appear in Germany as the evil man that he was. He became that in a political process such that if the German people had wanted to and understood where he was going to lead them they could have stopped him many years before WWII and the holocaust.

By not speaking out against Bush and McCain/Palin as they ease ever closer to the form of politics that Hitler used we simply repeat the mistake of Germans. If there were a limit to how far those bigots could go, to how much power they could accumulate, it wouldn't be right to make the comparisons. But, there is no limit. The Constitution ceases to be relevant when Congress refuses to exercise their power of impeachment, and the US Supreme Court chooses to rule in favor of unlimited presidential power at every opportunity. That does mean that we too could fall into a fascist government. I'm in favor of trying to prevent that.

user-pic

It is your unquestionable Messiah that is far closer to Hitler. He, with the cult of personality, the 'great leader' who can not be questioned without being investigated, labeled a racist, etc. The media are his willing minions, trying to silence any opposition. Joe the plumber is investigated within 24 hours, but Ayers and even Obama himself are never even looked at.

user-pic

Hah! hah! Very funny, and creative too. Good joke man! Maybe you should be on Saturday Night Live.

user-pic

It is NOT about "fear and hatred". It is about ignorance-based RAGE and racism/racist hatred.

And it is difficult to call it "hatred" -- though it is in fact that -- because its basis is FALSE.

To call it "fear" is to give comfort and compassion and "understanding" where it is not earned, and is certainly not deserved. It is, in short, to condescend to those "poor ignorant and pitiful" . . . . To pity is to CONDESCEND.

user-pic

Richard Hofstadter had this pretty well figured out in his 1964 The Paranoid Style in American Politics.

"American politics has often been an arena for angry minds. In recent years, we have seen angry minds at work mainly among extreme right-wingers, who have now demonstrated in the Goldwater movement how much political leverage can be got out of the animosities and passions of a small minority. But behnd this I believe there is a style of mind that is far from new and that is not necessarily right-wing. I call it the paramoid style simply because no other word adequately evokes the sense of heated exaggerations, suspiciousness, and conspiratorial fantasy that I have in mind."

Sound familiar?

user-pic

re: Ms Todd:

How is she going to explain to her daughter in 20 years why she can't get a tattoo?

user-pic

I find the article and the concept of social pathology portion very interesting. It is quite apparent that there are followers of this extreme camp who will do unlawful things to get their "leader" elected. A few things: this young and apparently sick girl perhaps looking for attention and approval; the lady on TV who was taking down signs for Obama; the inarticulate lady at a McCain rally calling Obama an Arab because she read it in literature obtained from a Republican campaign office; and the man that shot the Democratic Party leader in Arkansas and had right wing books from O'Reilly and Savage in his home. When one saw Guilliani at the Republican convention he reminded me of Mussolini in one of his rants. These seem to be people who would subvert the law to win and then get a Bush who subverts the constitution and laws to administrate. How is this different than fascism or a dictorship? People seem to be easily led and that right wing brain and thinking will lead this country to ruin. McCain has used all of his parentage lineage to get where he is with very modest talents; following the George Bush path. There is a good article to be read at www.rollingstone.com to read about the myth of McCain.

user-pic

As a mental health counselor, I can agree that the psychology of the angry, paranoid right is the same as that of the Nazis. Low self esteem and envy are projected onto the scapegoat, resulting in contempt, hostility, and fear. The political manifestation is the Rush Limbaugh type of toxic personality. Fortunately, 21st century America isn't early 20th. century Germany. Most Americans are too tolerant, to responsible, too independent, and have too much self-respect and too much respect and pride in our traditions for these kind of people to dominate our government.

We have hundreds of years of democracy behind us, which the Germany of the 1930's did not. We have the US constitution, and reverence for its founders and their thought. Germany had a tradition of obedience to harsh, autocratic rulers. I give thanks for Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, Nathan Hale, Thomas Paine, and the many others who gave us the bedrock of thought and example which expressed the best of liberal and enlightened English democracy.

user-pic

That is very reassuring. Thanks! So, I guess the news reports about the Patriot Act, the signing statements, the spying on American citizens, the torturing of POWs, the suspension of Habeaus corpus, etc were all wrong. And, Americans really did rise up against any threats to their basic rights, and Congress did impeach Bush, etc. I'm glad to hear that.

user-pic

There are fascist types everywhere, but you seem not to understand that they have not dared to try to overthrow the government. If we have a coup after Obama wins, then your opinions will be justified. The great majority of American wrongs were done to foreigners by nationality, not against domestic minorities. Hitler concentrated on domestic minorities, and then proceeded to widen his circle of intimidation and murder against others of his nationality.

I don't like Bush, but I think one of the few charges that can't honestly be leveled against him is racial or religious prejudice. I think Palin is much worse than Bush-her fringe group isn't racist either, but they are deeply, paranoidly hostile to all non-Protestant religions, including Catholics, Mormons and even Masons.

user-pic


Great post. The comparison to EARLY Nazism is entirely apt. Remember, popular, intelligent Americans like Charles Lindberg were Nazi sympathizers early on.

McKKKain and Palin are now unquestionably guilty of overt and intentional race-baiting. They made personal calls to the "victim" before any facts were known, and they publicized their calls. They need to be called on this every day by the media and by everyone else. What if this girl had stuck a little bit harder to her story? The campaign would have had her at the rallies next to Joe the Plumber, and some cracker would have shot a little black girl in retaliation. Miss Todd is mentally disturbed, but the McKKKain campaign has no excuse.

Leave a comment

eades

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 12

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address