Dump Michele Bachmann! Outrage at Minnesota Republican's Hardball Comments Fuels Opposition Effort
Representative Michele Bachmann of Minnesota set off a firestorm of outrage Friday with comments on MSNBC's Hardball suggesting that Barack Obama and other liberals in Congress are "anti-American." Wittingly or unwittingly, Bachmann assumed the mantle of McCarthyism in her comments to interviewer Chris Matthews, suggesting also that members of Congress ought to be subject to investigation to "find out if they are pro-America or anti-America." Bachmann's comments were followed by a sharp rebuke from Katrina vanden Heuvel, editor of The Nation, who accused Bachmann of "channeling Joe McCarthy, channeling a politics of fear and loathing and demonization and division and distraction..., a politics at a moment of extreme economic pain in this country that is incendiary, that is so debased that I'm kind of almost having a hard time breathing."
Outrage at Bachmann's remarks is sweeping the internet at light speed, sparking a demand for congressional censure of Bachmann and boosting Democratic efforts to unseat her on Nov. 4. An online petition to censure Bachmann posted Oct. 17 has already gathered more than 18,000 signatures; and a Democratic fundraising effort against Bachmann has thus far raised more than $57,000 from over 1200 new supporters. Bachmann's Democratic opponent, Elwyn Tinklenberg, is currently in a close race with Bachmann to represent Minnesota's 6th congressional district in Washington, and stands to gain a strong boost from efforts such as these now that national attention has been drawn to the need to dump Bachmann. Most recent polling shows Tinklenberg trailing Bachmann by only 4% (42-38) with 15% undecided, a hopeful picture for Tinklenberg now made a little more hopeful. A brand-new TV attack ad against Bachmann links her to the Bush administration and may be of further help to Tinklenberg.
Readers are encouraged to support these efforts against Bachmann by all means at their disposal (sign the censure petition, donate to the fund to unseat her, link to them on your blog and e-mail them to friends along with videos). Expressions of disgust may be addressed directly to Bachmann at her contact page (Minnesota 6th District residents only) or by direct e-mail at: michele.bachmann@mail.house.gov. Angry telephone calls may also be made to Bachmann's Washington DC office at (202) 225-2331, to her Woodbury MN office at (651) 731-5400, and to her Waite Park MN office at (320) 253-5931.
UPDATE: The Elwyn Tinklenberg campaign has now picked up contributions totalling an astonishing $450,000 since Michele Bachmann's comments yesterday on Hardball.
Mark C. Eades
http://www.mceades.com






Censuring on the basis of a single comment lowers the meaning of censure, just as trying to impeach someone on the basis of a perjury about a blowjob lowers the meaning of impeachment.
It is far more effective to simply remove her from Congress by votes, or as you point out, by donations to her opponent in this election year.
October 19, 2008 6:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
I could not agree with ClearThinker more. OK, the dingbat said some truly outrageous things, but this does not warrant censure. Censure in the past has been reserved for such things as corruption, bonking pages, physically attacking colleagues, et al. What would be appropriate here would be a chorus of congressmen and women--hopefully including a few Republicans with a sense of common decency and fairness--condemning her remarks in an appropriately strongly-worded fashion.
But let's not hold our breath.
Robert
October 19, 2008 4:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's a pattern here. You've established that. This is a woman who has sworn an oath to the Constitution. And is actively undermining colleagues through lies and smears.
October 19, 2008 11:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
i was happy to see Colin Powell just call out her message. If the republican party was closer to his image than Bachmann's then it would be much more difficult to decide who to vote for.
October 19, 2008 12:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's unfortunate that Powell's comments are being dismissed by some as "obviously" race motivated. Expect those arguments from the Right -- they were already playing on AM radio yesterday, before Powell even said anything!
October 19, 2008 2:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
That Powell was endorsing Obama merely because he happens to be African-American is just silly. If you listened to what Mr. Powell said after taping Meet the Press, you know his exact reasoning. He complimented McCain, but pointed out that he did not appreciate the tenor of the campaign that he is running. This was not inevitable, he could have simply kept quiet. That he chose to speak says it all in my opinion.
October 19, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I donated $50 to Tinklenberg last night and signed the petition. Censure or not the numbers make a statement. It gives me pleasure to feel I've helped in some small way to further the effort to unseat that heinous asshat Bachmann
October 19, 2008 3:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
You are attacking this problem all wrong. Why not begin with a definition of what is unAmerican, anti-American or just American in terms of their historical values.
Americanism: a trait, custom, or tradition especially characteristic of the people of the United States or some of them.
So what are these traits, customs, or traditions. I submit that perhaps they are the work ethic, patiotism, personal responsibility, a willingness to make the most of one’s talents and intellect, self-sufficiency, a recognition that what one man receives without working for, another man must work for without receiving, that the government cannot give to the people what it does not first take from them, that you cannot multiply wealth by dividing it, that you cannot legislate the poor independence by legislating the most productive members of society out of it. It is also a recognition that population-driven economic growth is unsustainable, that open borders mean Mexico Norte will replace the U.S., that the limit of finite natural resources per capita as population increases without bounds is zero, that the American culture, language, ideals, standard of living, quality of life, etc. are worth defending against all enemies foreign and domestic.
It then follows that the opposite of these ideas constitutes anti-Americanism. Such ideas as socialism, socialized medicine, wealth redistribution, robbing Peter to pay Paul, open borders, unrestricted immigration, multi-lingualism, ancient religious doctrines that deprive women of their rights and that contribute to overpopulation, the idea that the 1st amendment only applies to liberals, that the fourth estate has no obligation to provide the unbiased news, that buying votes is democratic, that the millionaires and billionaires who finance campaigns through 527s still represent a one person = one vote concept.
October 19, 2008 4:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
the real way to attack her is to beat her in the election. "un-American" is way to GOP for my tastes. Run the idiot out of town and be done with her.
October 19, 2008 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink