Connecticut Education Association's endorsement of Ned Lamont
UPDATE: This is old news, not a new endorsement. Via spazeboy below.
Sue from MyLeftNutmeg tells the tale
from the article...
As a member of the U.S. Senate, Ned Lamont would be a strong advocate for public schools, and thats why Connecticuts two teacher unions are endorsing his candidacy.
Rosemary Coyle, president of the Connecticut Education Association, said, Lamont will challenge the current administration and its priorities. He understands that the answer to even better schools is not more standardized tests or vouchers. The key is adequate resources from the federal government to support universal preschool and expanded educational opportunities at every level. This is a critical time in the history of public education as the federal government imposes unrealistic requirements on schools, and its time that Connecticut had a champion for students, teachers and public education in the U.S. Senate.
And before anyone gets on Ned's case about whether or not Ned was a teacher, the CEA addresses the issue very nicely:
Coyle pointed out that Lamont volunteers in a 50-year old inner-city public school, and he has said that quality public education is our best hope for providing every child the best opportunity in life. He has felt the same frustrations teachers face, and he is listening to their concerns. Across Connecticut, his vision resonates with teachers who have dedicated their lives to helping children. He has the energy and determination to refocus our nations priorities. A win for Ned Lamont in November will be a win for Connecticuts teachers and students.





I actually reported on this four months ago when it was announced. With video. If you (or readers) are interested, check it out.
October 10, 2006 9:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Shows that theTPMCafe community is a self-correcting resource. Thanks spazeboy.
October 11, 2006 5:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
I think Ned did the right thing when he changed the text on his website to read volunteer so it no longer states teacher. A teacher's aide is NOT the same thing as a teacher--of course we know that would be similar to a candystriper calling herself a nurse because she does patient care.
So I'll praise Ned for, with this one thing, making an effort to stop giving a false impression of having credentials for the job.
October 11, 2006 8:13 AM | Reply | Permalink