<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>DrBB&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/drbb/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/drbb/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/drbb//435</id>
   <updated>	2008-11-14T20:55:29Z	2008-11-14T20:55:08Z	2008-11-05T19:27:44Z	2008-11-04T02:54:24Z		2008-11-03T16:24:06Z		2008-10-24T20:43:04Z	2008-10-24T12:49:47Z	2008-10-24T01:57:36Z	2008-10-23T21:24:06Z	2008-10-23T20:56:17Z	2008-10-23T20:40:35Z	2008-10-23T17:34:45Z	2008-10-21T16:12:57Z	2008-10-21T16:09:27Z		2008-10-21T15:35:05Z	2008-10-21T15:21:29Z	2008-10-19T15:41:34Z	2008-10-19T15:06:22Z		2008-10-17T14:59:12Z	2008-10-15T16:23:46Z		2008-10-13T14:34:22Z	2008-10-13T14:10:17Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://12.244416-comment:3287605</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/siegelman_new_revelations_are.php#c3287605" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[DrBB Commented on Siegelman: New Revelations &quot;More Frightening Than Anything That Came Before.&quot; by Zachary Roth]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-14T20:55:29Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-14T20:55:29Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<blockquote>...the news -- which came from a whistleblower in the US Attorney's office who passed on emails and other information to the House Judiciary Commitee</blockquote>

<p>Oh how fondly I do wish to see more like this. Time for a little conscience-clearing among those honest bureaucrats throughout the Executive who may be suddenly realizing the Great BushCheney Vengeance Machine is, hey, kinda toothless now. What are they gonna do, deny you a job on K Street? </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://12.244416-comment:3287604</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/siegelman_new_revelations_are.php#c3287604" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[DrBB Commented on Siegelman: New Revelations &quot;More Frightening Than Anything That Came Before.&quot; by Zachary Roth]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-14T20:55:08Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-14T20:55:08Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Now there's a suggestion I can get behind, at least from a cleaning house with a vengeance p.o.v. Don't know what kind of qualifications the guy has otherwise.<br />
</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.243005-comment:3275832</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/minnesota_senate_race_not_over.php#c3275832" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Minnesota Senate Race Not Over -- AP Retracts Projection Of Coleman Win by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-05T19:27:44Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-05T19:27:44Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Signing onto this one myself.  He gets away with this Great Apologizer schtick every time. How very convenient for him. But not this time. Too little, too goddamn late. But it is SOOOOOO predictable that the Villagers eat it up like honey. Now they can love him again. </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/flyontnewall//2060.242242-comment:3270203</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/flyontnewall/2008/11/just-peachy.php#c3270203" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Just Peachy by FlyOnTneWall</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-04T02:54:24Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-04T02:54:24Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p><i> The remaining voters are, by definition, a less engaged population. </i></p>

<p>"By definition"--you sure about that? I'm reading anecdotals about a lot of black folks waiting to vote tomorrow because it feels more like being part of the historic moment. That seems <i>more</i> committed rather than less. </p>

<p>/quibble</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>DrBB recommended Just Peachy by FlyOnTneWall</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/flyontnewall/2008/11/just-peachy.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/flyontnewall//2060.242242</id>
  <published>2008-11-03T17:34:37Z</published>
   <updated>2008-11-03T17:41:09Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.242157-comment:3268657</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/election_central_morning_round_200.php#c3268657" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-11-03T16:24:06Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-11-03T16:24:06Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Satriani's a great technoflash player, no question.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>DrBB recommended 10/23 - GA and NC - The Tsunami Continues    by John Nail</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/jnail/2008/10/1023---ga-and-nc---the-tsunami.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/jnail//3318.239573</id>
  <published>2008-10-24T04:14:30Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-24T04:25:28Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239746-comment:3249438</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/obama_campaign_early_voting_st.php#c3249438" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Obama Campaign: Early Voting Stats Put Us In Strong Position To Win by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-24T20:43:04Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-24T20:43:04Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>On one hand I'm totally with all the people who are warning against getting cocksure with 11 days still to go. Sound advice. </p>

<p>But one thing that is good about these stories is that they create an Inevitability Narrative, just like Rove wove around W in 2000 and Clinton's campaign tried to weave around her in the Dem primary before Obama cracked it wide open. It's certainly building around Obama now and it can be effective in tipping undecideds toward your candidate. Everyone wants to vote for a winner and no one likes a loser. People are strongly influenced by what they perceive to be the opinions of others. It's also discouraging to the other team, and THAT message sure seems to be getting through, given the reports of circular firing squads inside the McCain campaign already. </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239568-comment:3247939</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/new_poll_bachmann_fighting_for.php#c3247939" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on New Poll: Bachmann Fighting For Political Life by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-24T12:49:47Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-24T12:49:47Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>That FRC Pac thing is really kinda revealing. Fact is, from what I read El's a pretty conservative Dem and pretty much with the Family Va-yuse crowd on most issues. I think those guys must just like Bachmann's positions on fascism (for it, big time). </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239524-comment:3247563</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/latest_mccain_robo-slime_says.php#c3247563" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[DrBB Commented on Latest McCain Robo-Slime Says Obama Will Slow Development Of &quot;Life Saving Drugs&quot; by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-24T01:57:36Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-24T01:57:36Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I knew I'd seen the original of this, and through diligent spade work with The Google I tracked it down. Transcript follows:</p>

<blockquote>As a senior citizen, you're probably aware of the threat robots pose. Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel. Well, now there's a company that offers coverage against the unfortunate event of robot attack, with Old Glory Insurance. Old Glory will cover you with no health check-up or age consideration. [ SUPER: Limitied Benefits First Two Years ] You need to feel safe. And that's harder and harder to do nowadays, because robots may strike at any time. 

<p>[ show pie chart reading "Cause of Death in Persons Over 50 Years of Age": Heart Disease, 42% - Robots, 58% ] </p>

<p>And when they grab you with those metal claws, you can't break free.. because they're made of metal, and robots are strong. Now, for only $4 a month, you can achieve peace of mind in a world full of grime and robots, with Old Glory Insurance. So, don't cower under your afghan any longer. Make a choice. [ SUPER: "WARNING: Persons denying the existence of Robots may be Robots themselves. ] Old Glory Insurance. For when the metal ones decide to come for you - and they will. </p></blockquote>

<p>Robots--I don't even know why the scientists make them!</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239388-comment:3247013</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/big_picture_mccain_shifting_hi.php#c3247013" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on McCain Shifting His Ad Spending From Kerry States To Bush States, A New Analysis Finds by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-23T21:24:06Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-23T21:24:06Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link. Let me share one bit, right off the top, that struck me. Klein points out Obama is known as a rational, deliberative decision maker and asks him what about having to decide fast, on your gut--asks for examples of that. I think Obama's answer about how he dealt with the Wright business is illuminating:</p>

<blockquote>Well, during the course of this campaign probably our response to those Reverend Wright videos had to be a spot decision, because frankly it was unanticipated and I hadn’t seen those incendiary videos before. <b>The decision to make it big as opposed to make it small. </b>

<p>[Q] To make the [Philadelphia] speech. </p>

<p>[BO] To write a speech in two days and deliver it at a time when there was a singular focus on the topic I think is an example of having to make decision based on what in my gut would make sense. </p>

<p>[Q] What was your gut telling you? </p>

<p>[BO] My gut was telling me that this was a teachable moment and that <b>if I tried to do the usual political damage control instead of talking to the American people like an adult—like they were adults and could understand the complexities of race</b> that I would be not only doing damage to the campaign but missing an important opportunity for leadership. </p></blockquote>

<p>That was a great speech, really remarkable, and for exactly the reason he specifies. First time in decades--maybe ever, including Clinton--that I really felt like a candidate was talking to me like an adult rather than a braindead product of some marketing genius's imagination. And he's doing it in this interview as well. Even when he was my 3rd favorite candidate during the primaries this ability has always impressed the hell out of me. </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239388-comment:3246938</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/big_picture_mccain_shifting_hi.php#c3246938" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on McCain Shifting His Ad Spending From Kerry States To Bush States, A New Analysis Finds by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-23T20:56:17Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-23T20:56:17Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link. Let me share one bit, right off the top, that struck me. Klein points out Obama is known as a rational, deliberative decision maker and asks him what about having to decide fast, on your gut--asks for examples of that. I think Obama's answer about how he dealt with the Wright business is illuminating:</p>

<blockquote>Well, during the course of this campaign probably our response to those Reverend Wright videos had to be a spot decision, because frankly it was unanticipated and I hadn’t seen those incendiary videos before. <b>The decision to make it big as opposed to make it small. </b>

<p>[Q] To make the [Philadelphia] speech. </p>

<p>[BO] To write a speech in two days and deliver it at a time when there was a singular focus on the topic I think is an example of having to make decision based on what in my gut would make sense. </p>

<p>[Q] What was your gut telling you? </p>

<p>[BO] My gut was telling me that this was a teachable moment and that <b>if I tried to do the usual political damage control instead of talking to the American people like an adult—like they were adults and could understand the complexities of race</b> that I would be not only doing damage to the campaign but missing an important opportunity for leadership. </p></blockquote>

<p>That was a great speech, really remarkable, and for exactly the reason he specifies. First time in decades--maybe ever, including Clinton--that I really felt like a candidate was talking to me like an adult rather than a braindead product of some marketing genius's imagination. And he's doing it in this interview as well. Even when he was my 3rd favorite candidate during the primaries this ability has always impressed the hell out of me. </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239388-comment:3246900</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/big_picture_mccain_shifting_hi.php#c3246900" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on McCain Shifting His Ad Spending From Kerry States To Bush States, A New Analysis Finds by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-23T20:40:35Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-23T20:40:35Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>fwiw, I saw a few posts by him t'other day touting the AP poll when it came out. But I guess it's pretty discouraging to try and fight it out with us when there's so little ammunition available. Still and all he's one of the better people from the opposite camp who posts here. </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.239388-comment:3246369</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/big_picture_mccain_shifting_hi.php#c3246369" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on McCain Shifting His Ad Spending From Kerry States To Bush States, A New Analysis Finds by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-23T17:34:45Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-23T17:34:45Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p><i>McCain has scaled back spending in New Hampshire, running 40 spots this past Monday, down from 55 the previous week.</i></p>

<p>Well, I hope this is EXCELLENT NEWS for me as well as McCain because hopefully it means I won't be catching so many of his asinine ads here in, of all places, Boston. Only thing I've been able to figure is that we're getting bleed-over from his New Hampshire-targeted advertising. I mean, I see the occasional McCain/Palin bumper sticker here but it's not like he's ever had a prayer in Massachusetts.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.238699-comment:3241370</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/a_day_at_the_congressional_rac_25.php#c3241370" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on A Day At The Congressional Races by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-21T16:12:57Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-21T16:12:57Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Now replaces Kathleen Turner Overdrive as one of my favorite ephemeral band names....</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.238699-comment:3241356</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/a_day_at_the_congressional_rac_25.php#c3241356" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on A Day At The Congressional Races by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-21T16:09:27Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-21T16:09:27Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>As an old Minnesota boy, top of my list has been Coleman defeated by Franken for sometime. So Bachmann getting cratered would be a MN twofer.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>DrBB recommended A Day At The Congressional Races by Eric Kleefeld</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/a_day_at_the_congressional_rac_25.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.238699</id>
  <published>2008-10-21T15:17:20Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-21T15:52:29Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.238671-comment:3241269</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/obama_entered_october_with_ove.php#c3241269" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Obama Entered October With Over $130 Million Cash On Hand by Greg Sargent and Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-21T15:35:05Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-21T15:35:05Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Good points. And let's not forget massive legal teams on hand for contested results. Which the Obama team to their credit already have started putting together, given the obvious signals from the GOP that they're going to pull out all the vote-suppression stops.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.238693-comment:3241228</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/republicans_ceding_colorado_ne.php#c3241228" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Republicans Ceding Colorado, New Mexico And Iowa? Not So Much, They Claim by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-21T15:21:29Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-21T15:21:29Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I'm a big Frontline fan, but... day-amn. Big problem is that for what ever reason the white div backgrounds on Josh's site often don't load right away--always been that way--so you get this huge orange ad with the text unreadable for a few seconds before the CSS finally finishes loading. U-u-u-u-u-gly! Hope they paid TPM a pile for this. Hope it's not going to be a regular feature. </p>

<p>Ow.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.238219-comment:3237483</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/breaking_colin_powell_endorses.php#c3237483" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Colin Powell Endorses Obama by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-19T15:41:34Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-19T15:41:34Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Right. This is the time when it actually *counts* to play the game of dominating the 24-hour news cycle. </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.238219-comment:3237384</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/breaking_colin_powell_endorses.php#c3237384" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Colin Powell Endorses Obama by Greg Sargent</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-19T15:06:22Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-19T15:06:22Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Yup, the obvious ploy and I'm not at all surprised that it's already in play. They've probably been all set to pull that trigger since the buzz on this started last week. SOOOoooooo predictable, these asshats.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    




	
	<entry>
		
	<title>DrBB recommended Election Central Saturday Roundup by Eric Kleefeld</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/election_central_saturday_roun_34.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.238115</id>
  <published>2008-10-18T16:43:45Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-18T16:53:13Z</updated>
	</entry>
	




	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.237852-comment:3234005</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/election_central_morning_round_186.php#c3234005" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-17T14:59:12Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-17T14:59:12Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>Colin Powell is many things, but above all he is a Good Soldier. On balance I respect the guy, but this is not a man who rocks the boat. I'd be very very surprised if he deviated from that lifelong pattern of deferring to the existing power structure, whether it be the Pentagon brass who wanted a "nothing to see here, move along" report on My Lai or the Cheneyist neocons in the Bush admin who used him as their patsy. Endorsing Obama would go a long way toward redeeming the worst consequences of that deference. A very long way. But I really don't think he has it in him to do that kind of thing at this late date.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.237185-comment:3228987</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/obama_campaign_tonights_debate.php#c3228987" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[DrBB Commented on Obama Campaign: Tonight&apos;s Debate Is McCain&apos;s &quot;Last Chance&quot; by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-15T16:23:46Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-15T16:23:46Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>It's taken me a long time to come around to being convinced that Obama's tactical and strategic skill in this campaign wasn't just luck or wishful thinking. He's just so low-key about it all, and Dems in general have displayed so much evidence of disastrous ineptitude in this regard that overcoming my skepticism has been difficult. But I found this article in <a href="http://blogs.tnr.com/tnr/blogs/the_plank/archive/2008/10/14/the-triple-dog-dare.aspx">The Plank ("The Triple Dog Dare")</a> on the corner McLame has painted himself into re Ayres and tonight's debate pretty much puts the final nail in my doubt. </p>

<blockquote>Even apart from the particulars, McCain's promise seems to fail three general debating rules:

<p>1) Don't fence yourself in before the debate begins. <b>McCain now pretty much has to bring up Ayers,</b> even if there are no questions that make it easy to do, even if his advisers decide the issue is a loser for him, even if, when push comes to shove, he feels uncomfortable about it, etc. If he doesn't, Obama and Biden's taunts will really start to stick.</p>

<p>2) <b>Don't tell your opponent how you're going to attack him before you do.</b> Yes, of course, Obama already had an Ayers response ready before McCain's comments today. But now he'll be that much more certain to have it neatly polished--and he'll be prepared to rebut McCain implicit claim that he's only bringing up Ayers because Obama forced him to.</p>

<p>3) Perhaps most importantly, if you've already lost two debates to your opponent, the second by a large margin, <b>don't do something just because he dares you to</b>.</p></blockquote>

<p>What they don't say, but what should be obvious is that <b>this isn't just McCain screwing up, it's Obama deftly and devastatingly outmaneuvering him.</b> </p>

<p>A lot of us saw this coming with the original taunting--that it was a way of boxing McCain in. It's yet another instance that he plays a long game and plays it brilliantly.</p>

<p>And as someone who started out with a LOT of misgivings about the whole lack of experience thing, this talent above all is what makes me think he has it in him to be a capital-g Great president. These GOPers and Rove proteges are not pikers. Neither was Hillary. To outflank experienced, hardcore political adversaries in the highest-stakes game in politics with this degree of 8-moves-ahead smarts is a hell of an ability to bring into the office. And to do it with such low-key, unhurried and unpanicked ease, so that your opponents aren't even aware you're that kind of player--so that they continually underestimate you--is just breathtaking. </p>

<p>I think I just may be getting over that "Okay, so when does he start blowing it" feeling. Just maybe. Finally. Getting over it.</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.236612-comment:3224792</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/mccain_declines_to_condemn_vir.php#c3224792" />
		
		    <title><![CDATA[DrBB Commented on McCain Declines To Condemn Virginia Republican&apos;s Comparison Of Obama And Osama  by Greg Sargent]]></title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-13T14:34:22Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-13T14:34:22Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I kinda like me with an 18th C powdered wig. </p>

<p>Anyway, so the theory is: we crank the Wurlitzer to the max and make Obama apologize and disavow etc etc etc for the last 3 weeks of the campaign. Put 'im on defense! Yeah! Only the old surefire recipe, venerable as it is, just doesn't seem to be working. Nobody's taking 'em seriously and nobody's being forced to apologize except McCain, rather fecklessly, for turning his campaign into the Hate Talk Express. God how that must burn.</p>

<p>I'm reminded of Moe Greene: "The Corleone Family don't even have that kind of muscle anymore." Only in this case it's actually true. Must be frustrating as all blazes to keep pumping away on those organ pedals and watching Obama's numbers edging up into Historic Realignment Territory. </p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    





	
        
			<entry>
            <id>tag:tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008://9.236595-comment:3224745</id>
		    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/election_central_morning_round_182.php#c3224745" />
		
		    <title>DrBB Commented on Election Central Morning Roundup by Eric Kleefeld</title>
		        
			<published>2008-10-13T14:10:17Z</published>
			   <updated>2008-10-13T14:10:17Z</updated>
		    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="">
		        <![CDATA[<p>I believe the correct phrasing they were looking for is "We've got them right where they want us!" </p>

<p>Always glad to help out....</p>]]>
		    </content>
		    
		</entry>
        
    









</feed>

