« Why He Owns a Gun | Donal's Blog | Until We Run Out Of Idiots »

Right Hooks and Left Crosses


Trends and lessons emerge from review of Fort Collins bike, car crashes

I'll be cycling to work again soon, so here's another earnest discussion of cycling safety. In this small study, four types of collisions predominate:

The most common collision is "The Broadside," at 60.5% of crashes. That's when a motorist goes straight through an intersection even when there's a bike right in front of him.

Broadsides seem to result from traffic violations by both bikers, such as riding on the sidewalk, riding the wrong way, blowing through stop signs, and by drivers, who blow through signals and fail to yield. As a cyclist, I have little fear of broadsides because I don't ride that way, and I no longer expect cars to yield, but I do see people riding that way every day. What scares me are the 2nd, 3rd and 4th most common accidents.

The infamous Right Hook -- or what the city calls "Overtaking Turn Accidents at Intersections" -- is the second most common collision at 13% of the total in their count.

Cars are so much faster that it is hard to see this coming. I have been cut off by the Right Hook as a runner, cyclist and moped rider. My feeling is that once a car driver passes a slower entity, his attention transfers to what is ahead. Practicing Lane Control, or riding in the center of a lane, is supposed to avoid this situation, but also tends to aggravate auto drivers.

The third most common collision type is the left cross at 9.3% of collisions. This is when a left turning motorist slams into a cyclist going straight through an intersection. Of the 33 left crosses, 3 involved a cyclist riding on the sidewalk, 2 were going the wrong way, and two failed to stop at a signal or sign. The overwhelming number of these were motorists who just kept going in spite of the presence of a bike in their path.

The Left Cross is a notorious killer of motorcyclists, too. I had my worst motorcycle accident when a car turned left right in front of me on a slick road. I put the bike down, sprained both wrists and essentially gave up motorcycling.

After that, the next collision type is the dreaded "Hit From Behind." The 30 "sideswipes" recorded account for 8.5% of bike collisions. With the exception of a single head on, all fatalities are these types.

"All fatalities" is a small number in a small study, but this collision involves the highest degree of auto driver misbehavior: DUI, erratic driving, etc., and therefore is least preventable by cyclists. Again, the standard advice is Lane Control, but on faster roads, lane control is practically asking for road rage. Hence, in a more suburban situation, I will choose the empty sidewalk rather than go rubber to rubber with SUVs going 50 mph.

I always wear a helmet, but a friend on Facebook sent me this article:

Wearing helmets 'more dangerous'

Cyclists who wear protective helmets are more likely to be knocked down by passing vehicles, new research from Bath University suggests.

The study found drivers tend to pass closer when overtaking cyclists wearing helmets than those who are bare-headed.

...

To carry out the research, Dr Walker used a bike fitted with a computer and an ultrasonic distance sensor to find drivers were twice as likely to get close to the bicycle, at an average of 8.5cm, when he wore a helmet.

...

To test another theory, Dr Walker donned a long wig to see whether there was any difference in passing distance when drivers thought they were overtaking what appeared to be a female cyclist.

While wearing the wig, drivers gave him an average of 14cm more space when passing.

I'll bet he got a lot more funny looks, though.


16 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Ahhhhh.... cross-dressing saves lives. (just couldn't resist that! - only works for men, though, if it works!)

Excellent blog!

user-pic

Countless times, I've seen bicyclists blow through stop signs without even slowing down. There must be a mindset that rules of the road don't apply to them. Also, there seems to be a bizarre, unwarranted "moral" dimension to bike riding in this country. Bicycles don't burn petroleum fuel, ergo, rate higher on the invisible, counterintuitive political-correctness scale. This delusion enables many bike riders to approach drivers with contempt, to hog lanes and, of course, ignore road signs and street directions. No matter what happens, it's the drivers' fault. Long-term misfortune: The dismissive bicyclist is still badly injured or dead.

user-pic

I ride a motorcycle, and I think bicycles and motos share a common denominator Curt. We're much smaller, presenting a minimal profile when viewed from front or rear. To some extent we're "invisible" to many drivers. I suspect that some bicyclists may ride with fewer concessions to motorized traffic as a way or making themselves more 'visible', thus forcing cars to give wider berth. Just a guess.

user-pic

Countless times, I've had drivers roll through crosswalks and stop signs, cell phones in their ear, past me and the other pedestrians, only stopping if another car is in the way. There must be a mindset that the rules of the road don't apply to them.

user-pic

That's all well and good, Donal, though it's important to remember that as a cyclist, the ultimate responsibility for your well-being rests with you. Not me, though I'm not out to run anyone down. You. You, who are riding on something that both offers no protection and is far less visible than a full-size vehicle. Taking chances in traffic under those circumstances is downright self-destructive.

Far too many cyclists will take to the road instead of available, well-defined bike paths. Far too many of those will take wild, unnecessary chances with their own safety. And then, they will resort to overt hostility when I mention it to them, making me out to be the bad guy. I'm not, though I admit I care far less for the safety of someone who is willing to recklessly ignore his own while tossing verbal abuse at me for suggesting he do so.

I bear no one any ill will - I do, though, insist that others take a measure of responsibility for their own safety. That includes following traffic laws and acting in their own best interests, which may or may not coincide with what is the most fun at the moment.

user-pic

The funny thing is, if you read it again, I was writing from the POV of a pedestrian, which I've mostly been for the last several years, not a cyclist. And as a pedestrian, I have to be just as careful of people that are careless or aggressive because they are in a large, fast vehicle.

Curt's dismissive comment could just as easily be written about truck drivers, taxi drivers, motorcyclists, joggers, or whoever happens to be in the way.

user-pic

When I've been a pedestrian, I have also nearly been run down by cyclists as often as by motorists. Oddly, motorcyclists seem far more careful of pedestrians than both the others.

user-pic

Like I said, you can criticize any group. I'm sure I can find someone with grief against motorcyclists.

user-pic

It;s call arrogance Curt and I have seem more arrogance on the part on bicyclists than anywhere else. Even those riding Harley's have more sense.

The worst are those all decked out in cycling garb - helmet and all.

C

user-pic

Important things to remember:

Some cyclists do not ride safely, or obey the rules of the road. Some. Not all.

A bicyclist is allowed to use the roads, and entitled to a lane on the road. THE WHOLE DAMNED LANE!! That's the law, folks. So it's hard to see how a bike could be "hogging" a lane, when the bicyclist is entitled to the whole lane. (Yes, the bicyclist is slower than the car, so you can make an argument that it's "rude" for him or her to ride on "your" road. But c'mon, give a biker a break!!)

Most importantly, we will see more and more bikers on the roads in coming years. Gas prices will rise significantly in the next two decades. So get used to the idea. Try it yourself, even.

-- ARG

user-pic

Imagine cyclists being so uppity as to expect to use the road. I mean this is America - burn some damn petroleum or the terrists win!

user-pic

Donal, without getting tendentious, the point is that while cyclists are allowed to use the road, they need to be mindful of their own safety and not depend solely on the awareness, skills, reflexes, and equipment quality (brakes?) of others.

From personal experience I have seen far too many cyclists take unnecessary and even foolish risks in traffic. Perhaps they are trying to prove a point. Maybe so. What point is worth proving with your life - or even a broken leg?

user-pic

In case you hadn't noticed, my post warns readers about common collisions and does not advise anyone to take unnecessary risks.

It amazes me that the same people who argue against all sorts of discrimination, can blithely accuse cyclists of being somehow more reckless and arrogant as a group than everyone else that drives.

user-pic

I learned to skate in Manhattan. Skaters and Bikers are separate tribes in this town. But we both agree the most unpredictable form of collision is the car door that is thrown open before you can dodge it or that dodging it would mean certain death.

I had the left turn collision happen once. The nice thing about being a skater is that I was able to jump on to their hood.
Freaked the crap out the driver, I must say...

user-pic

great. great book of instructions. ha

user-pic

Wow, bicycles were a big factor in my failing to complete a Master Degree program. I was at UC Davis, the bicycle campus. For four years I had a core campus gate card, and I was allowed to park on the curb with my disabled drivers placard. I had one friggen course left to complete my course work requirement, but at the begining of the fall quarter I discovered I was locked out of campus. I inquired, and discovered that there had been a policy change, and no cars were allowed in the core area. I fought it - there was no way I could get to the course I needed, and I could not access the library either. The reason for the change was to protect bicyclists. In part of my challenge, I researched the safety stats and discovered that there had never been a collision between an auto and a bicycle or pedestrian in the history of the campus. But every quarter there were two or three hundred bike on bike collisions, and several hundred bike on pedestrian collision. And cycling in the core area was stupid anyway. A lot of students left their bicycles off-campus, because it was quicker to walk between classes, due to the clog of 5K bicycles going every direction for 10 minutes between classes. What a circus.

The admins finally told me that I would have to throw away my cane and get a wheelchair to go to class. A wheelchair...among 5K speeding hormone-wracked bicyclists? Suicidal. And the whole thing was for a goddamn fashion system...Davis, the bicycle town, the bicycle campus. What a hoot.

Leave a comment

Donal

user-pic

Following: 43
Followers: 59

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Website: www.donalfagan.com
  • Location Baltimore MD
  • Party Democratic
  • Politics Moderate Green

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Energy Bulletin, Casaubon's Book, Deus Ex Malcontent
  • Favorite Books Large print

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address