« Foreignews (Updated) | Donal's Blog | The Great American Speculation vs Demand Debate »

OPEC Waiting for Asian Demand


For the last week, I've been finding free copies of the Wall Street Journal outside my door, and it is an interesting read, if you ignore the opinion section. Various articles note the price of oil advancing to $73 before retreating, but there is no recap of the, "unauthorized buying" scandal that accompanied the advance. If not for reading Whipple's Energy Briefs, I would never have known that the largest oil trader gamed the market.

Yesterday the WSJ repeated much of what was in my Greater Transparency post. Today the lede is that OPEC will be spending less money on searching for new oil. Other articles mention OPEC cutting prices and the retreat to $60/bbl. The rally to $73 is characterized as a chimera brought about by over-enthusiasm for green shoots and economic recovery. Lack of increase in demand and the glut of distillates are again blamed for lower prices, but there are hints that the retreat might also be tactical in the face of greater regulation.

OPEC Forecasts Cut in Oil Investments as Demand Falls

The downward revision is likely to raise new concerns among oil consumers -- first and foremost the International Energy Agency, which has warned that reining in spending on oil-development projects could lead to a supply crunch by 2013. The IEA, which coordinates policies among energy-consuming nations, said in a May report that $170 billion of investment had been delayed or canceled in OPEC and non-OPEC nations.
...
The new assessment, however, drives them to opposite conclusions. IEA Executive Director Nobuo Tanaka reiterated in June that "huge investment is needed" to meet future Asian demand. William Ramsay, director of energy geopolitics at the French Institute of International Relations, who was deputy executive of the IEA until last year, said OPEC is "overreacting but understandably" because of the economic climate.

The real story, in my opinion, is that OPEC sees no growth in the OECD countries, the Industrialized or Wealthy nations, as far out as 2030. That means they don't see America and Europe climbing out of recession, contraction, depression, or whatever you choose to call it when, every month, thousands more lose jobs that aren't being replaced elsewhere in the economy.

After the fresh bite of the recession and of U.S. and European energy-efficiency laws, OPEC says growth in oil demand in developed countries is now over. In industrialized nations, oil demand is expected to fall continuously through 2030, after reaching a peak in 2005, OPEC said.

Emerging markets, particularly China, however, will make up for the decline.

Recovery will gather momentum only gradually, with the economy starting to emerge from the recession by year-end, but normal growth won't return until 2012, OPEC said. The statement is at odds with a view held by some in the market that stimulus plans will soon make the economic meltdown history. "The possibility of a lengthier global recession cannot be ruled out," OPEC warned.


8 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

"The real story, in my opinion, is that OPEC sees no growth in the OECD countries, the Industrialized or Wealthy nations, as far out as 2030."
- that bit seems a bit overstated, donal. OPEC is just projecting that the rate of improvements in energy efficiency keeps pace with the rate of economic growth. So EITHER they are optimistic about energy efficiency technology OR they are horribly pessimistic about economic growth prospects. Or a bit of both.

user-pic

Well, energy efficiency improvements will require significant investments of money and energy as we, or someone, build better infrastructure, vehicles, etc. to make efficiency possible. But OPEC sees our growth in oil demand as being "over." So if we're not going to be buying more of their oil, what energy do they think we are going to use to become more efficient?

user-pic

Hadn't thought of it that way. And don't know if it would be the right way to see it. Take vehicle emissions. We'll never go back to the SUV-heavy market of 15 million vehicles a year. We'll have maybe 10 million energy-efficient vehicles produced. No extra investment required up front in order to produce these vehicles. Actually less energy consumed in producing and using the vehicles.

Take electricity plants. More wind/solar based parks built instead of new coal/oil powered plants. No MORE energy used in the gradual transfer towards renewable energy.

Overall, I don't think anyone expects a wrenching transfer requiring much up-front investment. Just cost-saving measures of various sorts.

user-pic

I hope it is that easy, but every one of those industries are lining up at the government trough for money to invest in new technologies.

user-pic

My 'hopes' would go in the other direction. If massive investment were to happen that would mitigate the recession somewhat. Right now I don't see how this recession ends - there's nothing to pull us out. However, if OPEC and the speculators can keep the oil price above 70 dollars for awhile, that might spur a lot of energy-savings/renewables investment.

user-pic

And if all that happens, OPEC will have been wrong. So we should hope that OPEC is wrong.

user-pic

I believe it's the global recession we are seeing, especially that in the US, that is most affecting prices.

If there ever is a recovery, we will start consuming cheap energy again -- as before -- and then the skyrocketing price will quell any real recovery.

Meanwhile, as the world population continues to grow, we will continue to nibble away at what's left of the oil and that will drive prices as well, over the long term.

Have you seen Orlov's recent blog where he talks about the unfurling of oil production based on weakening economies? He talks about post-peak not being the easy "other side of the curve" but rather a non-linear steep decline following economic crash. Of course, he uses the situation in Russia, after the dissolution of the USSR, as the example.

user-pic

Yes, I love the part about importing oil from aliens.

PO theorists always acted like the oil shock would be uniform, and we'd all go nuts together without enough oil. What I see is that many of us are continuing to earn, spend and even drive as before, though paying a bit more for it, while many others find themselves without jobs, falling behind on debt service, scrimping on food and gasoline, and wondering what the hell happened to them.

Leave a comment

Donal

user-pic

Following: 43
Followers: 59

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Website: www.donalfagan.com
  • Location Baltimore MD
  • Party Democratic
  • Politics Moderate Green

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs Energy Bulletin, Casaubon's Book, Deus Ex Malcontent
  • Favorite Books Large print

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address