Foreignews (Updated)

Update: The Guardian is maintaining a spreadsheet to try to track the fates of Iranian election protestors: Iran election: faces of the dead and detained.
Update: Although stipulating that it has not been independently verified, the Guardian presents similar testimony from a doctor to that in Le Figaro below:
Many of my friends and my cousin even (who was wounded) saw snipers up on the rooftops during the protests. They said these snipers were targeting people through their rifle lenses. The injuries we witnessed in hospital testify to this. One 32-year-old patient had gunshot impact entering the sub-umbilical region with an exit wound on the thigh, which proves the bullet came from above.
Iran : des médecins dénoncent la terreur dans les hôpitaux
I stumbled through the French to see if I could, but there's a translation here.
According to an official report, at least 17 people have been killed since the beginning of the conflict. However, a list quietly made by the nursing staff from different hospitals showed that to date more than 92 people died in Tehran and its suburbs. A woman eight months pregnant is one of the victims. Shot and killed, near the presidential palace, she was then transported to the hospital. Other disturbing stories are beginning to emerge in broad daylight, as one of the six corpses of young men found last week in Shahriar, on the outskirts of the capital. "They all died from wounds in the neck. Their skulls had been smashed and their brains had been opened, presumably to retrieve the bullet to erase the trace of the crime," says the second doctor informed of this terrible massacre by a trusted colleague.
To cover this kind of attack, the doctors have been asked to certify that the persons whose bodies have been transferred to their hospitals died during surgery. "In several hospitals - including Rasoul Akram and Imam Khomeini - we have organized a sit-in protest. But state television said it was a strike for better wages. That's terribly shocking," says the second doctor. One of his friends, doctor on call for emergencies Erfan Hospital, has been "punished" for having stood up to the militia. "After missing for thirty-six hours, he was found half-conscious and disfigured on the sidewalk of the hospital," he says.
Pathology indicates that much of the deadly fire came from rooftops. Now they're hunting the wounded. My short advice to those considering political revolt is, "You'd better win."
Peter Tertzakian published an early expose of oil prices some five years ago, and continues at the Calgary Herald:
The Wealthy World at its 'oil break point'
First, let's be clear that we are not in a recession, but a contraction. Recession means a slowdown in growth, contraction means outright shrinkage. The wealth of Wealthy World economies, of which the United States is the largest, kept shrinking through the second quarter, making them poorer on a year-over-year basis for the first time since the Second World War. Consensus estimates suggest that when the second-quarter numbers get reported, U.S. shrinkage will be around two and three per cent, a major bout of wallet tightening that, not surprisingly, has led to unemployment of 9.5 per cent (as reported last week).
That 9.5% is 16.5% in Table A-12 of the Bureau of Labor Statistics and considered over 20% in some circles.
... However, there is also the Wanting World, the large collection of non-Wealthy-World countries with 5.9 billion people that are determined to achieve the standard of living that the mere 800 million citizens of Wealthy World enjoy. Led principally by energy-hungry countries such as China, Wanting World's oil dependency is still linear, with a robust growth dynamic and scale similar to the Wealthy World's in the 1990s. It's there that the next chapter of the oil story will be written. For sure, the financial crisis has hosed down economic activity in the Wanting World, too, but unlike like here, Asian countries like China are already showing greater signs of early recovery. Last week, for the first time since the crash, business consumer confidence in China surpassed the important "50" mark, the level above which sentiment is net positive.
Which puts the uneven status of Han vs Uighur in a different light.
















I don't want to derail this fine thread, however you say American media has kept its eye focused on only one object and I think it's important to realize that this is not entirely accurate, see BBC. (Also, looking at Xinhuanet's English home page right now, in the flashing "top stories" box on the left, #1 is "Tens of thousands pay tribute to Michael Jackson" and the first photo slideshow below the top stories box is "Jackson's daughter in tearful tribute.")
I think one mischaracterizes even apparently a silly global phenomenon as "American" at one's own peril. I think the Han/Uighur story is tremendously important and has "human interest" so one cannot give the "but it's boring" excuse, but I also think that it will never get the coverage in the blogosphere that the Palestinian vs. Israeli story will continue to get, and I think when you get down to it, the reasons for that are not totally different from some of the same reasons for Michael Jackson overkill. I guess it all boils down to "life is unfair, some people get all the attention, are more popular than others"?
July 8, 2009 3:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
OMG, I can't even joke about it.
July 8, 2009 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
artappraiser
Anyone talking about American media giving Gaza/Palestine genocide ongoing for decades the attention it deserves - despite the outrage of Israeli citizens - needs to think for a moment about who defends Palestinians most assertively. That'd be Dr. Ahmadinejad.
He made the invidious comparison of the victims of one Holocaust inflicting another on Palestinians.
Whatever politics and repression are engaged in in Iran...they can't hold a candle to the outrageous ongoing bullshit against him...or ignoring the implications of a totally unaffordable $30 billion annual gift to Israel of American-made weaponry.
You do know about the cluster bombs in Lebanon, I trust.
Global phenomenon ? Well, the Brits have the longest history of media manipulation that I am aware of - but I certainly know who owns Hollywood. Give the UK credit - Fox News is a fine b.s. factory.
But 'Media' ? When the Celebrity Circus loses a fine distraction, I find no inconsistency in noting the loss.
The Han ? The VOA never sleeps.
July 8, 2009 3:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
BTW I have a cache of news-finding tools. I'm in the process of migrating some from Opera to Blogger, so it is a bit of a pain to find...like my blog here!
Google has translation tools that mount in the browser. If you've never clicked on a site in some strange tongue to get translation of a webpage bing-bing you're missing a treat!
Google Tools
Also http://my.opera/com/oldephartte/links/
See Utilities - though the list is partially exported already to opitslinkfest.blogspot.com
July 8, 2009 3:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Donal.
Perhaps you could present more credible articles than that one promoted by the officially-designated-by-the-US Iranian terrorist group, the MEK. Who do you think runs the organization that hosted it? Check your sources.
That "Le Figaro" piece, as it stands, is a bunch of sourceless agitprop and a joke.
Due diligence is required even when the picture painted is one you are inclined to find agreeable.
July 8, 2009 5:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
The article was written for Le Figaro by Delphine Minoui, who seems reputable, and simply translated on the other site:
http://www.iranian.com/main/singlepage/2007/delphine-minoui
http://www.iranian.com/PhotoDay/2006/May/minoui.html
Can you back up your claims against the article?
July 8, 2009 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
You can choose to believe whatever you want, but sorry, anon sources for some rather questionable, but highly dramatic vignettes and speculation about ballistics and mass removal of evidence don't impress me without some corroboration. How in the bloody hell would the anon sources know? Have they made a comphrehensive survey of all the dead?
This is a lousy article and reads like agitprop to me.
There are liars and confabulators on all sides of this mess. Caution is advised all the way around.
July 9, 2009 1:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
With all due respect, that is all the respect due to someone who calls another's work a joke and lousy, your post may just as easily be agitprop. Anonymous sources are not uncommon, and staying anonymous is certainly the practical response to an organized government crackdown.
July 9, 2009 8:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
"With all due respect"...this phrase always makes me smile.
It's more than the fact that the sources are anon, Donal. It's that the piece is filled with sensational dubious claims that, given the situation, are impossible to verify.
With all due respect.....you don't know from agitprop.
July 9, 2009 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well the Guardian is carrying very similar claims, and Iran is moving to crush today's demonstrations.
Tweets:
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/07/livetweeting-the-revolution-day-28.html
Video (most of which I can't see at work):
http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2009/07/more-footage-from-iran-today.html
July 9, 2009 1:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Guardian disclaimer in the lede is noticably missing from the Le Figaro story. The statement in the Guardian piece is from one of the same sources cited by Ms Minoui and I'm still skeptical.
One thing that's confusing is that there have supposedly only been 20 dead reported, basically the same total reported on June 25:
Twenty people including, eight Basij members, have been killed during the post-election unrest in Tehran, Iranian officials say. All the Basij members were killed by gunfire, indicating that there were gunmen fomenting unrest among protesters, the officials said.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=98984§ionid=351020101
I haven't gone through all of the subsequent Press TV accounts so don't have any idea whether or not Iran is claiming no further deaths in the interim.
But, I did run across this article that indicates some under-the-radar movement between US and THEM:
US frees Iranian diplomats in Iraq
Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:01:11 GMT
Iran's ambassador to Baghdad says five Iranian diplomats who were kidnapped by US forces have been handed over to the government of Nouri al-Maliki. "US occupying forces have handed over the five Iranian diplomats to the Iraqi Prime Minister [Nouri al-Maliki]," the ambassador told Fars news agency on Thursday. "The diplomats will be transferred to the Iranian Embassy after meeting with the prime minister," Hossein Kazemi-Qomi said.
Three of the diplomats were among the five staff abducted in January 2007 by US troops in the northern Iraqi city of Arbil during a raid on the Iranian Consulate. Two of the abductees were released later, and the three who were kept locked up were later joined by two other Iranians kidnapped elsewhere in Iraq by the US occupation troops.
Although they have never been charged or tried for any offence, the five remained in detention until today, despite repeated requests by the Iraqi government for their release.The Iraqi President Jalal Talabani said in February that, not only was his government pressing for their release, but that he even 'would throw a party to celebrate their release together'.
Press TV's correspondent in Iraq, Wisam al-Bayati, says the Iranians who were released almost an hour ago were working with Iran's Embassy in Baghdad before being detained by US troops. Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki has thanked his Iraqi counterpart, Hoshyar Zebari, over the release in a telephone conversation. The Iranian official also expressed hope that stability would return to the war-torn country as soon as possible. The released diplomats are expected to appear at a Thursday news conference planned by the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad.
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=100226§ionid=351020101
This is good news if true.
July 9, 2009 9:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
The youtube clips in the comments are more interesting than the press releases.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsHE_uUJJdw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRY6wghSRcI
July 9, 2009 10:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
The youtube clips in the comments are more interesting than the press releases
Like Howard C Berkowitz, I don't "do" youtube and find exhortations to "look at at this!" without any indicator of the contents to be unpersuasive.
July 10, 2009 3:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
"First, let's be clear that we are not in a recession, but a contraction. Recession means a slowdown in growth, contraction means outright shrinkage."
This is just wrong. Recession, by the commonly accepted definition, means "outright shrinkage" for consecutive quarters. Contraction is therefore a synonym.
Also, splitting the world into two neat categories like the author chooses to do is a joke. Standards of living in the wealthier cities of the Middle East and Asia is already comparable to First World cities. Cities are cities, and capital is capital. A renewed cycle of growth in the third world could be funded by American entrepreneurs, and a tech boom in the American suburban heartland could be to the benefit of Indian venture capital.
National borders are no longer the bars to economic life they once were. Which makes neat stories about rich countries and poor countries harder to tell.
July 8, 2009 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Contraction does seem to equal recession, which also used to equal depression, but doesn't anymore. Tertzakian seems to be using contraction to mean something more dire and longer lasting, perhaps even permanent. You should go to the Calgary comments and call him on it.
As far as Wealthy vs Wanting, we have split the world into Industrialized and Developing for decades. I took Wealthy to mean those countries with a large middle class, and Wanting as those with a working class that aspired to middle class status, which is hardly a joke. Again, you would do better to comment at the Herald.
July 8, 2009 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Actually I commented there already.
July 8, 2009 8:27 PM | Reply | Permalink