Mobility makers

Stein at TTAC makes a debatable point that we want mobility more than just cars and references this NY Times op-ed: Have You Driven a Bus or a Train Lately?
The Obama administration should ask the companies, as a condition of financial assistance, to begin shifting from being just automakers to becoming innovative “transportmakers.” As Barack Obama’s new chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, recently said: “You don’t ever want a crisis to go to waste. It’s an opportunity to do important things you would otherwise avoid.”
As transportmakers, the companies could produce vehicles for high-speed train and bus systems that would improve our travel options, reduce global warming, conserve energy, minimize accidents and generally improve the way we live.
This better way forward has been kicking around Washington for more than 35 years. In a prescient 1972 article in The Atlantic, Stewart Udall, an interior secretary under John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, warned of America’s excessive dependence on cars and called for this approach.
At a time when almost no politicians and industry leaders were paying attention to this problem, Mr. Udall made a bleak but accurate prediction. He wrote that “the oil needs of the other industrialized countries are growing faster than ours” and that this “surge of demand will soon begin to send shock waves through the American economy and transportation system.”
I think people vastly prefer the safety and convenience of an enclosed auto for their mobility, but that they may have to learn to do without.





Can anyone imagine going to the beach for a week on a train? Well, I did, and the train was full of French vacationers with the same goal. We rode a fast train from Paris to Cape Ferat (the southern Atlantic coast, and it was a great trip, with good food, and we could drink a beer on the way!
Of course we didn't bring boogie boards for everyone, or towels and sheets; the system is set up for just this type of travel. We did, however bring 2 bicycles, and a minimum of luggage.
The trip was really fun -- everyone was going to the beach, after all, and in 5 hours (about half the drive-time) we were there. Europe is light-years ahead of us in life-style issues. We need to catch up!
Excellent post, and wonderful idea about the car industry. Ronald Reagan really despised the concept of public transportation; he poisoned the well for republicans, and I think his ideas (?) remain. Oh, and ask any repub what they think of the French...
November 16, 2008 10:23 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great blog post to highlight what both liberals and conservative must demand from the American government. Europe still has both factions, but they are focused on common sense solutions to common problems from divergent views rather than converting each other to some common identity before solving the problem. We need to find unity of purpose first and then cultivate healthy disagreement in tactics to provide progressive solutions those goals.
This is a subtle yet distinct difference in the Reagan & Rapture Right's characterization of "democratic socialism" and the actual implementation of it abroad.
I think what was prescient in the 1970s with regards to energy will finally come to be under an Obama administration because he will position it for the average American in a way that hasn't been done. I am sure it isn't lost on him what we've done wrong these last three decades. I am quite sure he saw the film Who Killed The Electric Car? and knows the answer. He probably also understands the same people killed public transportation systems before that - Big Oil and Big Auto.
I am confident that common sense has returned to America this year in a way we haven't seen in at least four decades.
November 16, 2008 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
We need to unpack this notion of "people vastly preferring" cars.
I don't doubt this is true, but the main problem--from an economic perspective--is that the main reason people prefer it is because they are given the infrastructure required to make automobility possible essentially for free.
If you start charging users the actual costs (e.g. environmental, national security, climate related, etc...) associated with driving they would soon be clamoring for alternatives.
The debate we need to be having is: where should our social and economic resources be targeted for maximum efficiency.
This report by McKenzie, Dower and Chen is useful for framing this discussion: http://www.wri.org/publication/going-rate-what-it-really-costs-drive
November 18, 2008 2:21 PM | Reply | Permalink