The Oil We Conserve
In a Washington Post editorial, The Gas Prices We Deserve, George Will assigns blame for our present high gas prices. He blames, "Seventy-two of today's senators -- including Schumer, of course, and 38 other Democrats, including Barack Obama, and 33 Republicans, including John McCain," that voted against drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. He blames Bill Clinton for vetoing 1995 legislation to permit drilling in ANWR. He also blames anyone, "who voted to put 85 percent of America's offshore territory off-limits to drilling."
Will doesn't blame anyone for driving an SUV, or buying a McMansion way out in the suburbs, of course. In his view, our oil problems are all supply-side. Although he is a conservative, he won't ask anyone to conserve fossil fuel.
Will seems to assume that wherever we choose to drill, there will be massive quantities of oil, even citing the Jack #2 claim that led to so many, "You don't know Jack," jokes a few years ago. There are such things as overhyped prospects and dry holes. There are also fields so deep under the seabed that they might as well be on the moon.
But most interesting is his conclusion: "America says to foreign producers: We prefer not to pump our oil, so please pump more of yours, thereby lowering its value, for our benefit. Let it not be said that America has no energy policy."
Whether such a policy is intentional or not, true or not, how can you argue with conserving our resources for our descendants? Peak Oil spokesman Rep Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD), who describes himself as 'conservative - but not stupid', argues against drilling in ANWR for precisely the reason that he has scads of grandchildren, and that they may need the oil more than we do now.
Will doesn't blame anyone for driving an SUV, or buying a McMansion way out in the suburbs, of course. In his view, our oil problems are all supply-side. Although he is a conservative, he won't ask anyone to conserve fossil fuel.
Will seems to assume that wherever we choose to drill, there will be massive quantities of oil, even citing the Jack #2 claim that led to so many, "You don't know Jack," jokes a few years ago. There are such things as overhyped prospects and dry holes. There are also fields so deep under the seabed that they might as well be on the moon.
But most interesting is his conclusion: "America says to foreign producers: We prefer not to pump our oil, so please pump more of yours, thereby lowering its value, for our benefit. Let it not be said that America has no energy policy."
Whether such a policy is intentional or not, true or not, how can you argue with conserving our resources for our descendants? Peak Oil spokesman Rep Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD), who describes himself as 'conservative - but not stupid', argues against drilling in ANWR for precisely the reason that he has scads of grandchildren, and that they may need the oil more than we do now.




