Home for the (Wingnut) Holidays
Some of the facts are:
~ That the current President has gone out of his way during his campaign and still to guard what he really thinks and shield who he really is in order to be seen as a more moderate politician than he really is.
~ I did not say that the current President hates whites, I only brought up his quote about his grandmother
~ By his own admission he said to judge him by the company he keeps; the people he has surrounded himself with so far for the most part are people who see themselves as above the law (failing to pay taxes), openly state how much they admire people such as Mao & Castro, deride the free market/ Capitalism and speak openly of redistribution of wealth.
~ He has been taped making statements that reflect the same beliefs (redistribution of wealth) and stated that under his Presidency rates for electricity would necessarily skyrocket (all in the name of ecology), regardless of the consequences for our economy or the welfare of the average citizen. (this reflected in the Cap & Trade Bill)
~ The current President consistently says one thing then does the complete opposite
~ The current President says something and then denies he said it, even when it is documented
~ The current administration is seeking to silence those who don't agree with their views (change FCC laws to alter talk radio)
Obviously there is much more and I won't go on.
But what is most disturbing to me is that the so- called liberal or progressive party has zero tolerance for opposing viewpoints and while speaking as though they are for the underpriviledged or disenfranchised, in fact enact policies and laws that make them more dependent on Big Government and take away the personal responsibility, freedoms and at the same time opportunities that our founding fathers saw as our birthright. They disparage large corporations while supporting them financially as well as legislatively, taking their money at the same time destroying medium and small businesses that make up this country.
Doesn't your brain hurt a bit after reading that? I guess I'm curious as to how we respond to someone who really doesn't know what a "fact" is, and wouldn't know a logic train if it ran over them?













I would reply with the following:
I sure found the issues you put forth very interesting.
Since I have found that too often the 'news' reported by any outlet can be skewed at best or sometimes sometimes just cherry picks the 'facts', I would greatly appreciate if you could send me the cites they (or anyone) are using to provide proof of these statements.
I find no political or published entity to be without 'sin' and hold them all to the same standard to provide proof and valid substance for what they publish as truth.
I appreciate your bringing this to my attention and look forward to reviewing the factual documentation and sources for the information they cited as fact.
(And I'll be glad to do the same for any 'news' I pass on too!)
November 3, 2009 3:45 PM | Reply | Permalink