« What Will It Be? Money or Planetary Death? | Dogtail's Blog | No It's True. Elk Grove Unified School District, CA Warning Parents About Obama Speech »

How the New Age Movement Has Killed The Progressive Movement or Hunter S Thompson was the last real liberal


It all started at a Kerry fundraiser I attended when, after a solid bit of some damn good political discussion which we now label and stigmatize as "ranting" so as to degrade any justified show of emotion and passion whatsoever, a woman dressed in a big swirly skirt and a head scarf shoved her business card in my hand and told me I "don't have to live with my anger." She offered some kind of New Agey goobly gook class so I can "live in peace yet work on change constructively." It wasn't till the drive home it hit me what in the hell she was doing. What they all do now--shame us out of our VERY justified rage and anger about what is happening right now from bailouts to climate change. She was also hoping to make a little dough on my outburst. Oh the beauty of narcissism.

These people are extremely dangerous and have killed, yes killed, the Democrat Party and the Progressive Movement.

The New Agers as far as I can tell, are old Baby Boomer hippies that went from drugs,
narcissism and some incidental social change to just straight old narcissism. The "N" in New Age stands for NARCISSISM.

It isn't the GOP that is sucking the passion out of the progressive movement. It is the progressive movement sucking the passion out of the progressive movement. I call them "Liberal Police." They patrol progressive conferences, workshops, meetings and even house parties for proper "liberal" behavior and if you're angry or worse, verbal about it, they pounce on your ass quicker than Nancy Pelosi can take impeachment off a table. 

They're job is to shame you out of our perfectly justified fury. (Which even more dangerous, could lead to actual ACTION--ANGRY action).  Lord, what would they have done with Martin Luther King? Taken him to a retreat where he could get in touch with his inner child? Tell him to attend a workshop where he could learn to read his own aura? Would progressives nowadays support Martin Luther King or beg him to "settle down" and "get a massage."? I really do not think Progressives would be able to support an angry black man because it would look really really bad. I mean, he is an "angry black man" and well, we just can't have that. An angry black man or even an angry white man...well, this would make progressives look like what they REALLY are. Really fucking angry.

The Liberal Police are brilliant at shaming passionate people for showing ANY emotion at all and they are great at making you feel like there is something really wrong with you for being angry.

But I have no tolerance for the pathetic little worms anymore (I'm sorry, they never take a stand against anything. They are pathetic little worms).

I feel sorry if any of these folks approach me now because my response is YEA, SO I"M ANGRY AND GUESS WHAT? I AM FINE WITH MY ANGER. I LOVE MY ANGER. I EVEN ROLL AROUND WITH MY ANGER! MY ANGER AND I ARE CRAZY ABOUT ONE ANOTHER! Then I ask them why in the hell aren't they angry? There's alot to be pissed off right now. Wake up! Lobotmy over!

But alas. No. Self-righteous New Agers can NEVER get angry so instead they just get passive aggressive. The liberal progressive new age movement is dripping with passive aggressive behavior. Watch your back.

In thinking about it, the last real liberal was Hunter S Thompson who felt things down to the depths of his soul. Who had a buttload of guns and loved firing them. Who spoke his mind. Who didn't give a crap about political hedging and parsing. Who did a lot of drugs. Who lived his damn life but by a code. A code the woman in the swirly ass skirt and head scarf does haven't a clue about because she's too busy patroling people for proper behavior. Hunter would have made this woman turn inside out.

Real passion ain't pretty.

How I long for this kind of progressive again. Hell I long for anyone with a goddamned personality. But I think personalities have been banned as well. Not professional to have one.
Sidebar: Handy job tip. If you are looking for a job, esp in a corporation or government agency,
the first thing you want to get rid of is your personality. Right before you go through the door, pretend you have had a lobotomy. It's fun! (No laughing out loud though. This blows it).  Learn meaningless and mindless small talk and make sure you hit the vending machine at least once a day and "hang out" with your other co-workers to discuss what you crap you will buy from it that day. Great way to bond!).

How I long for Ed Abbey, Molly Ivins, Kurt V....all progressives in their own right. All with, gasps, big personalities, and all who effected real social change in this country and had the courage to do so only because they never thought about that what they had was courage..

They just gave a damn.

 

 



33 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

You, me, a few others here and Barney Frank, Rahm Emanuel and Howard Dean. Lewd, rude, crude dudes. And socially unacceptable.

user-pic

Don't forget Bernie Sanders. Gotta love a self proclaimed "socialist" who has served MANY years in the House and Senate.

I am a pacifist in terms of my physical actions but that doesn't apply at all to my thoughts and speech. Can't back down from these intellectual goons gotta have the passion to stand up and fight back against their lunacy. And not in a polite, accomodating way either...be as nasty as them.

user-pic

The point is some people confuse a real intellectual discussion with being "negative."

They don't recognize a real conversation anymore.

Hell, I am not even talking socially unacceptable in my sphere...I just want a real goddamned conversation and maybe we end up visiting our legislators we get so fired up.

But lately all I get is pot lucks and of course, a band. You have to have the band. And the liberal police roam throughout the room...

Nothing will happen at the meeting or "fundraiser" but you'll have a darn good time.
Maybe you'll even write a check.

user-pic

Dude you invoked the name of my hero in the title of this blog. If Dr. Gonzo was still with us he would be dropping f-bombs all over the f'ing place about what is going on. You have to be intellectually ruthless and vicious when trying to do battle with these weasels. They are insane, their ideas are wacky and dangerous, and they should be ridiculed then destroyed like any other undead zombie brain eater needs to be.

user-pic

Well, I have been labeled "angry" and unfortunately, this delights me to no end and it's way fun to watch them get their panties in a wad...

No kidding but let's face it, if Dr. Gonzo was around right now he'd blow his brains out.

Dt

user-pic

None of this stuff got Thompson down...it got him pissed. The reason he blew his brains out was because of chronic and intense physical pain which he did not want to endure anymore. He decided his time was up so he checked himself out.

Man could we use him right now. Not many around like Thompson anymore. Ivins was a great loss too. For me right now the leaders of the progressive movement are people like Sen. Sanders, David Sirota and Jello Biafra. The few who are still willing to take on "The Establishment"™.

Great blog...

user-pic

Dr Gonzo isn't around right now because he blew his brains out. Dr Gonzo was a libertarian not a Progressive/Liberal. Dr Gonzo's lost his only run for public office because of his narcissism (see below). Maybe you need a new hero, you should definitely lose the sexist attitude.


from wikipedia'


"With polls showing him with a slight lead in a three-way race, Thompson appeared at Rolling Stone magazine headquarters in San Francisco with a six-pack of beer in hand and declared to editor Jann Wenner that he was about to be elected the next sheriff of Aspen, Colorado, and wished to write about the Freak Power movement.[18] Thus, Thompson's first article in Rolling Stone was published as The Battle of Aspen with the byline "By: Dr. Hunter S. Thompson (Candidate for Sheriff)." Despite the publicity, Thompson ended up narrowly losing the election. While actually carrying the city of Aspen, he garnered only 44% of the county-wide vote in what became a two-way race as the Republican candidate for sheriff agreed to withdraw from the contest a few days before the election in order to consolidate the anti-Thompson votes, in return for the Democrats withdrawing their candidate for county commissioner. Thompson later remarked that the Rolling Stone article mobilized his opposition far more than his supporters.[19]"

user-pic

I liked the New Age movement in the early 70's. It was then about asking questions: What role, say, do unresolved emotions and beliefs play in our sickness? Which foods provide better health? Are there hands-on techniques for helping bodies with pain and dysfunction? How much disease is caused by doctors and dubious pharmeceuticals? Like that.

Then, by the mid-80's, New Age Fascism rose up: Scads and scads of people making pronouncements. Once folks KNEW they knew the truth, and began scolding others, things got all squirrely.

Lots of it happened for profit, books, speaking tours, etc. PBS fundraisers aire some of the most hilarious claptrap: Dr. (Asshat) Wayne Dyer, who gets a new incarnation every time the wind blows; the "I'm Juicy" speaker (don't ask), etc.

But there are still sane helpers out there to help with uncovering emotional junk that has a stuck in place; the good ones don't impose their values on you, just lead you to self-discovery, which allows more choice about how we then behave.

I think if we are not angry part of the time, it's because we aren't paying attention, or are so afraid of conflict that we live in repressed denial. But at the same time, continuous rage is not sustainable, to either the health of our bodies or our souls.

A few bloggers here at TPM only have rage. My next-door-neighbor is like that: absolutely everything pisses him off. I know him and his history well, I know some of the causes. By now he is 63, a bachelor and almost-hermit. He is alone so much that he never gets his rough edges filed off by social interaction; by now he frankly Scares the Horses. He's constructed his own version of the world, and almost always agrees with himself!

I'm trying to say that he filters everything he sees through a clouded lens of anger by now, so his hatreds and paranoia grow and grow. By now he believes he can communicate with the wildlife on our neighborhood hill...

I don't know your writing well enough to know if you are always pissed, or just pissed about issues, and let loose. If it's the former, pay attention to that. But if the latter, Have At It. Righteous anger can really be an avenue of power and activism. It's a big reason why so many tea party people got on the street. The Left needs to borrow some of it, as long as we leave the Crazy at home.

(By the way, you left out Jim Hightower; he can do him some rant pretty darned GOOD!)

user-pic

Great post. Says a lot of things I've been trying to get across for awhile... without much success.

user-pic

Agreed.

user-pic

... on my lack of success, or...

;0)

user-pic
It all started at a Kerry fundraiser I attended when, after a solid bit of some damn good political discussion which we now label and stigmatize as "ranting" so as to degrade any justified show of emotion and passion whatsoever, a woman dressed in a big swirly skirt and a head scarf shoved her business card in my hand and told me I "don't have to live with my anger."

Let me quietly and respectfully offer a slightly different point of view--Not New Age--Old Age. Pre-boomer by some definitions.

A Discussion is composed of two actions.
One is talking.
One is listening.
One does these alternately, and in listening really listens, and in talking addresses directly what the other person actually said, insisting on the same behavior from the other person in the discussion. When it doesn't happen, the appropriate thing to do is walk away and spend one's time more productively.

I've had some pretty good discussions with Obey, when I've read what he said carefully and responded as well as I knew how. There are others I've simply walked away from, having better things to do with my time.

If someone gets in my face, yells as loud as they can, cares not a whit for what I have to say, plows right on to their next talking point as if I said nothing at all...end of discussion.

I ascribe to good old John Milton:

Where there is much desire to learn, there of necessity will be much arguing, much writing, many opinions; for opinion in good men is but knowledge in the making
But note where he begins this defense of free speech...where there is much desire to learn

Having said that I would probably walk away from the lady with the swirly skirt after politely refusing her business card--or after dumping it in the recycle pit if she flounced away to continue to distribute her advertising to somebody else. It's my job to manage my anger, not hers. I manage it as best I can, in whatever way furthers my cause--knowing it may be a mighty tool to keep me motivated but at the same time a not very effective tool for achieving my objectives.

user-pic

Can I have your card, Amike?
;0)

More seriously, I try to think harder about this. I don't really know or care if it is a generational thing. But there is an annoying overweening self-conscious self-therapeutic sickness that ails the left. And I think our host here gets at the source.

Let's just take Barney Frank's little outburst today. It wasn't any particular genius in choice of words, it was the outrage-cum-contempt for the worldview of his questioner that is striking. And in my mind, effective. Expressivity of emotion is important in communication, even when those emotions aren't pleasant or even respectful. Would you agree?

by the by, I was sorry to see the flame-war between you and Ripper. I try to stay out of these things, but it seemed to me to stem from a misunderstanding, as is often my impression when it happens between two people I respect enormously.

user-pic

Hugs all around, Obey. I guess what bugs me is that any time I try to exercise my own personality and speak in a way which keeps my own self respect I read something like

I am so sick and tired of thses holier than thous, self righteous, politically correct pseudo-progressives - I could puke
I read myself into the definition and take a small pile of umbrage. Actually I take a big pile of umbrage--but what can I do, except store it in my umbrage cellar? If I turn around and throw the holier than thow call back, what good does it do?

user-pic

Umbrage cellar - LOL!

As far as I'm concerned, you and Larry are our TPM sages, with a style as pleasant as it is different from that of, say, Q and Dick, our wackier wizards, or that of Bwak and the pitchfork brigade. There is no friction between these approaches.

I think the operative phrase picking out what grates is the 'holier-than-thou'. None of the above list gets into that posture. I can't speak for our poster, but speaking for myself, I can get ticked off by some responses -whether direct or indirect - to my more forceful posts or comments where I both express outrage and try to ground it in arguments. And these responses take issue with the attitude rather than the content, waving away the concerns listed, but just on grounds of my supposed inappropriate level of feeling. I wanna say 'don't frikking baby me', but - as you say - 'what good would that do...

user-pic

Oy, offering the wisdom of age on this thread? You're a brave one.

user-pic

I knew John personally, or so my students think. Also Lincoln, and Teddy Roosevelt. I do remember sitting in front of the old floor model Philco and wondering why my relatives were so sober and crying. Franklin's in White Springs had been announced. I work very hard to convince the students that Teddy and Franklin were not the same person.

user-pic

I read through everything trying to learn something new and when I finally what's relevant it's not new. Remember singing We Shall Overcome?

user-pic
These people are extremely dangerous and have killed, yes killed, the Democrat Party and the Progressive Movement.

The New Agers as far as I can tell, are old Baby Boomer hippies that went from drugs,
narcissism and some incidental social change to just straight old narcissism. The "N" in New Age stands for NARCISSISM.

Boy you got that right. I am so sick and tired of these holier than thou, self righteous, politically correct pseudo-progressives - I could just puke.

Phil Ochs was right. "Liberals - 10 degrees left of center when times are good, 10 degrees right of center when it effects them personally."

C

user-pic

Sigh. Now I'm a politically correct pseudo-progressive, and old to boot. And I have to stop listening to Phil Ochs based on his definition of what a liberal is, or I have to stop calling myself one on the basis that I'm not Hunter Thompsonand have no interest in being Hunter Thompson, or I have to apologise because I was born in 1941?

Clearly our digestive tracts react differently, and we also have a different perspective on where to find self-righteousness.

user-pic

I do not recall mentioning you by name, amike. I am a baby boomer as well but got really turned off by a large portion of "hippy movement" since they appeared to be very lacking in the sincerity department.

Far too many "wana-bees". With the correct clothes but little else, except for a strong desire to keep their sorry rear area from being used as target practice in South East Asia.

So when Nixon was impeached and the Vietnam war came to an end, these same folks went back to becoming Lawyers, Bankers and Business executives. The very same people they had previously professe to despise.

So yes...I guess I do have a bad attitude toward many of my generation. Especially since a good number of them are responsible for parenting the current crop of republicans.

C

user-pic

When I come across the self-righteous, I apply the Will Ferrell test. If Will Ferrell could play them in a film, I pay them little heed.

user-pic

On the question of what happened to our age peers I agree with you. So many withdrew after 1974 either because they thought they won or because they thought they could never win...worked real hard and bought themselves houses in the suburbs, if not the exurbs. I hate suburbia (there, I've admitted I hate something).

So I get their kiddies, and because I really do believe that education is a subversive activity I go about my way showing them what segregation by social class is doing to our culture, and what deserting cities or commandeering enclaves in them and converting those into upper class ghettos is doing to our culture. It works some of the time--especially when they're willing to question what I'm saying rather than writing it down because it might be on the test.

user-pic

upper class ghettos I love it !!


C

user-pic

Stop and think about it. What is a gated community anyhow? The only principal difference is that the inhabitants don't know they're as much kept in as the outside world is kept out. The only real protection for a community is to really be a community.

user-pic

Consider some engagement with the rest of the world.
Go to your local townhall meeting and put a flowered lei around the neck of the most obnoxious deathpanelcrazie, then put a flower in their muzzle and smile and say peace love and public option.

user-pic

It could be prescription drugs or organic food and organic furniture etc.

Of course coal is organic.

Some energy is lost in the passing decades, on an individual basis. Hard to do a 15 min mile and I actually did a marathon in 3.5 hours...ha

Then I am stuck with the paradigm of Network:

I'M MAD AS HELL AND I AM NOT GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE.

Ok, then we need some screaming leaders at these rallies. I mean real rallies where the first speakers get up and prep everybody. Drown out the right wing bigots. When they do a pledge of allegiance, every body is led in song....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eYKY2lpxMg8

user-pic

This is the reason my TPM bio reads:

Original brand Hippie, gently aging. Caution: DO NOT POKE WITH STICK. Hippie may appear to be asleep/dead/stoned, but don't count on it.

The New Agers are just so phony and absolutely no fun at all. You can poke em with a stick all day long and you barely get em to squeak.

BTW, I do remember looking around in 1974 and wondering where everyone went. So, I shrugged my shoulders and carried on, eventually giving birth and raising two very fine progressive socialists, much to the chagrin of their pappy. heh heh heh.

user-pic

I think you may be conflating New Age with the Coue method and other forms of self help: the New Age movement more or less started with Blavatsky and the Theosophical Society. It is not a boomer phenomenon.

The Coue method is to repeat positive assessments of yourself and your life in order to force a change in consciousness and therefore life itself. Most of the Dyer/Chopra/Buscaglia hodge-podge is dressed up Coue method.

Quite frankly, I am dismayed by this post. I am risking association with the "liberal police," but I detect some hostility towards femininity moreso than New Age beliefs. I mean, can you actually name some New Age beliefs and key thinkers in the movement?

Since the 60s, this country has made huge liberal strides. We have also, however, suffered under a 20 year reactionary backlash funded by the wealthy. You have every rigut to be pissed off. But blaming the New Age for the downfall of liberalism is misdirected at best, misogyny at worst.

user-pic

Sorry. If I am not into the New Age movement then there is a damn good possibility I have no idea what the "Coue method" is and I bet there are a hundred more all meant to make sure I go inward and not outward, focus on myself, and sit on my cushion all day where I might come to some healthy realization about something but in my teeny ass little life span, it isn't going to matter to the world.

What is going to matter to the world after I am gone? Anything at all that I did?

Let me ask you this.

Thanks to all for your excellent posts.

Dt

user-pic

Saw Vonnegut speak shortly before he passed on. He was speaking to a college audience, and his primary message was: you're here to fuck around. to mix it up. To try new ways of doing whatever you do here on Earth. I enjoy your writing dogtail.

user-pic

One might consider you a glutton for...

but I am honored by all. Truly honored.

Thank you

Dt

user-pic

I'm a New Ager, and I have to agree, narcissim is epidemic in the New Age. It didn't used to be that way, in the '60s and '70s, the movement was about collective transformation, then it turned inward, all about the personal journey. The mantra became "by working on ourselves we are working on the world." Which turns out to be not true, obviously. Add this to the typical New Age-style interpretation of the Buddhist-style philosophy of "all is as it should be," and New Agers have become terribly complacent.

I just saw a column by Eugene Robinson at the Washington Post about progressives lack of anger and passion for things that matter, although he didn't single out New Agers exactly, it does echo this piece. But I like to think that the New Age movement can be shaken out of its complacency, because deep down New Agers do care very much about the state of the world. They just have to be grabbed and shaken a bit, woke up, given permission and encouragement to express what's in their hearts. Maybe this piece will open a few eyes. I'm trying to do my part at www.newagepride.org.

Leave a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address