September 11, 2008, 1:51AM
Or is it, maybe, simply the arrogance of people who post crap like the following:
Those dissatisfied, of course, have the option of changing the channel.
I haven't found there to be a real serious problem. All of my comments and posts have appeared, though in many cases, especially during the mid-day peak period, it has taken a couple of minutes.
If those posting multiple times, those posting total BS, those posting unsolicited campaign advice, those posting breaking news that was posted hours previously wither here at TPM or the other sites most of us regularly visit,and those who post those insufferably long, meandering posts weren't posting here things would be a lot different. Additionally, if the serial book posters would set up their own blogs, things would be quite different.
Most of what is posted, in my opinion, is not worth reading.
Posted by Chris Brown
For what little it's worth, I find the notion that 'there is no real problem here' to be offensive.
I posted something a couple of days ago. It went right through and I was hoping that all the trouble I'd had was gone. I went about my real world business and checked back a few hours later to see if I had any comments or recs. (I generally get at least a few comments on anything I post, and a few recs... every once in a while, I get enough recs to become a 'recommended post' for a day or so, which is always cool.)
I was a little surprised to discover that I had no comments yet, and no recs. Then I checked the sidebar, and could not find my post anywhere. Yet there it was, on my blog. But...
A few other people had posted after me, and all of them had posted over and over and over again. When three or four people post after you, usually you still stay in the sidebar for most of a day... but when three or four people post the same thing four or five or eight or nine times each, it drives the sidebar down relentlessly, and you pretty quickly drop off.
I cannot tell you how discouraging this is to me.
None of us are getting paid for this. ALL of us are doing it for, basically, attention. (That's nothing to be ashamed off, it's a basic human need.) When the servers are disfunctional to the point where multiple errors are driving fresh posts off the sidebar into oblivion within a few hours of being posted, well... that's a pretty significant problem.
Still, it's pretty obvious that I must fall into at least one, and probably more than one, of the categories Mr. Brown has nothing but contempt and disdain for, so, I guess I will take my talents, such as they are, elsewhere.
September 9, 2008, 7:30AM
...then Obama wins.
Hands in his pockets.
It isn't even
anything as meaty as the issues, or his policies. That stuff has very
little mass or weight with a majority of the voters, anyway. It's all
about viscera. Graphics. Quick hits. Visuals. How it feels to most people. What it looks like.
And
let's face it, if McCain has really conceded the point that this
election is about 'change' and 'reform' -- and certainly, he seems to
have by picking Palin and trying to package her as a non mainstream
maverick reformer just like him -- then he's taking the losing side of
the bet. Why?
Look at them.
You want change? You want reform? You want something different from this day forward?
Well,
who you gonna call? The skeevy old white guy who is lying just as
fast as a horse can trot, spouting hypocritical platitudes out of both
sides of his mouth? The one who's been kneedeep in the Washington
hoopla since the 1980s, always on the side of the corporate
establishment regardless of what he claims now? The one whose entire
campaign is staffed with high powered lobbyists and being run by Karl
Rove? Yeah, there's something new and different, something voters don't
see every couple of years like clockwork. Sure.
Or, y'know, you
can vote for that young black man who is obviously as smart as a whip,
and who isn't part of the political mainstream in any particular. Who
has no lobbyists on his payroll, whose campaign isn't being run by
party hacks.
Which of these packages is truly different?
McCain's
pick of Palin was meant to address this, meant to present more of an
image of 'change' and 'reform'. On the surface she sure seems
different from the usual VP pick... say, Joe Biden. But (a) people
don't really vote for the VP on the ticket, although many will vote
AGAINST a truly disastrous choice, and (b) Palin's image as a reformer,
as 'something different', is just barely skin deep. She's no
reformer. She's a typical 'get it while the getting is good'
conservative/Republican. She's racist, corrupt, deceitful, spoiled,
shallow, and mean... a poster girl for Abrahamoff-era Washington.
That's not change. That's not reform. That's just more of not only
the same-old same-old, but the absolute worst of the same-old same-old,
in a hot MILF package.
So if McCain truly has allowed this
election to move forward on Obama's terms... if he really has decided
he needs to cut a big slice of that 'change' pie off for himself if he
wants to have any chance whatsoever of winning... then he has no chance
whatsoever of winning. It's like he's decided to use rope-a-dope on
Mohammed Ali, like he's going to throw harder punches than Mike Tyson,
like he's going to scramble faster and pass more accurately than
Michael Vick.
Like he's going to challenge the Flash to a foot race, and win.
McCain, for Change? McCain, the Reformer?
Nuh UH.