THE SOUTH SHALL RISE AGAIN!!!
Thirty spokes share the wheel's hub;
It is the center hole that makes it useful.
Shape clay into a vessel;
It is the space within that makes it useful.
Cut doors and windows for a room;
It is the holes that make it useful.
Therefore profit comes from what is there;
Usefulness from what is not there.
Tao Te Ching (Ch-11)
Major General Benjamin Huger, CSA

The Sons of Confederate Veterans is an intriguing organization. I think it best shows how misunderstood the South has been over the recent years.
Addison Graves Wilson, Sr is a proud member of the SCV. Addison, also known as smoking Joe Wilson has been a proud member of his South Carolina District in the Congress of these here United States.
Addison just represents the best of South Carolina. The best that fine state has to offer. And the beauty ofit is, when someone like Addison sticks his neck out to voice HIS OPINION on some things, there is a home crowd so to speak watching his back. When this man demonstrated the fortitude, the love of his country and the concern for the great State of South Carolina by vomiting during a special Joint Session of Congress, he had his friends covering his backside:
"Mr. Wilson, never apologize for allowing your love of truth to overrun your desire to be polite," the SCV Tea Party declared on its website. "It is the liar who must apologize, not the one who identifies the liar!"
You betchya!!!! Just exactly what rush said.
http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200909100018?lid=1063906&rid=34455905
Once Lyons helped install his close friend, Ron Wilson, as president of the SCV, the organization's political newsletter, The Southern Mercury was transformed into a propaganda mill for crude white supremacist cant. Mailed to all dues-paying members of the SCV until it folded in 2008, the Mercury published articles describing blacks as genetically inferior to whites, calling African-Americans as "a childlike people," and warned that if Obama runs for re-election, race riots of an "exceedingly violent nature" would immediately ensue, leaving "entire sections of some of our cities in ruins."
Here are a few highlights from the Southern Mercury:
"After the turn of the 20th century,
the white Southerners had disfranchised and segregated the blacks, in perhaps
the mildest reaction possible at that time to the blacks' transgressions. The
blacks--then a childlike people--had been selling their votes to the Democrats en
masse for $.25 apiece in national elections."
--"Where We Stand Now, And How We Got Here," by Frank Conner, Southern Mercury,
September/October 2003
• Mark McKinnon: Send Joe Wilson Home"Previously, anthropologists had routinely recorded the notable differences in IQ among the races; but at Columbia, a liberal cultural anthropologist named Franz Boas...decreed that there were no differences in IQ among the races, and the only biological differences between the blacks and whites were of superficial nature... Meanwhile, the liberals in the media heaped special praise upon black athletes, musicians, singers, and writers--and treated them as typical of the black race. The liberals were creating a false image of the blacks in America as a highly competent people who were being held back by the prejudiced white Southerners."
This is what rush and sean and weiner savage and hume and mcconnell and boner and Buchanan are referring to when they harangue the LIBERAL PRESS. They were going to institute IQ tests in the South so that you would have to qualify prior to voting. But some research has demonstrated that only 20% of the whites would qualify--most of them being Democrats--so the idea was temporarily shelved.
Not only is it clear that white folks built this country as Buchanan likes to point out. http://newsjunkiepost.com/2009/07/16/video-white-people-built-this-country-pat-buchanan/ and here http://www.care2.com/causes/politics/blog/pat-buchanan/
I mean except for a few things like the U. S. Capitol building, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cGCK7_9RkXs, what have the African-Americans contributed to this country? I ask you.
I mean if it were not for the balls. I mean the football and the basketball and baseball and now the golf ball, the damn blacks would have nothing. And SCV knows this and in trying to point things out. I mean its time to put an embargo on balls. If something is not done soon, the white man will have nothing to watch at all on tv except NASCAR and golf when Tiger is laid up awaiting another surgery.
Well the balls and Jazz and Rock and...well lets just say a whole lotta music. And I suppose a whole lotta artists in general, and a whole lot of journalists, and a whole lotta authors, and...aah forget it. I forgot my point.
The SCV has demonstrated that the south faces many fears and much travail over the next few years:
It is very clear to me that if Barack
Obama should be elected President, he would be extremely anti-white and would
demand reparations for slavery and press hard for affirmative action to the
degree that it would hurt young whites who were seeking jobs or admission to
College and Graduate Schools."
--"Americans Face The Worst Presidential Candidates In History," by Robert
Slimp, Southern Mercury, May/June 2008
"I believe that [Obama's] rhetoric and
anti-white legislative proposals would stir up racial riots. If he were running
for re-election, these riots would turn into an exceedingly violent nature that
would seriously damage race relations in America, and leave entire sections of some of our
cities in ruins."
--Slimp, May/June 2008
I mean, WHERE THE WHITE WOMEN AT?
What we do know is that while serving as a state senator, Wilson led an SCV-inspired campaign in 2000 to keep the Confederate flag flying above South Carolina's state capitol. "The Southern heritage, the Confederate heritage, is very honorable," Wilson proclaimed at the time, responding to critics of the Confederate flag.
It is that Southern Heritage at work here and at work in the repub party. A proud heritage indeed.
Wilson's rebel yell at Obama has electrified the Republican grassroots, filled his campaign coffers with donations solicited on conservatives websites, and earned the previously unknown backbencher primetime appearances on right-wing talk shows. Interesting choice. http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-09-11/joe-wilsons-rebel-yell/2/
Now Addison began his political career working as an aide for that other stalwart of southern justice Strom Thurman, the most important South Carolinian in the 20th century. And Addison would like to take that heritage just a little further:
In December 2003, when Essie Mae Washington-Williams acknowledged that she was the illegitimate daughter of the recently-deceased South Carolina Senator Storm Thurmond, Joe "You Lie" Wilson said he didn't believe her. Rep. Wilson, a former page of Thurmond's, immediately told The State newspaper that he didn't believe Williams. He deemed the revelation "unseemly." And he added that even if she was telling the truth, she should have kept the inconvenient facts to herself:
"It's a smear on the image that [Thurmond] has as a person of high integrity who has been so loyal to the people of South Carolina," Wilson said. http://www.alan.com/2009/09/10/wilson-bashed-stroms-mixed-race-daughter-in-2003/
THIS IS THE NEW SOUTH, THE NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY.
















Arthur, TOTALLY off point, but I wanted to tell you that I am pulling your trick with using the computer at the library for an hour...what a bummer! (although I have to admit I am glad it is available, otherwise I would be computerless all weekend!)
Yesterday I tried to get on Jason's blog from here, but it was blocked (don't know if it was language or topic!) by the library! Can't wait to get home and see what all the fuss was about...
September 12, 2009 6:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
People went nuts. Jason carried the animus from a thread on my blog to his own. I think I showed up there late to speak with a couple of my friends like Q and Zip and Miguel, kind of staying off subject.
If it is pulled, my bet is Jason pulled it. I had 220 or more comments on mine and he had about the same number but it was climbing.
They are pretty strict at my little library, I mean like 59 minutes.
hahahahah
September 12, 2009 6:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
It wasn't pulled, I got a message from the library that it was a resricted page...Yeah, they are strict here, too, so I'm racing through!
September 12, 2009 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Children did not need to see that blog.
September 12, 2009 7:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dick, why do you think there aren't more black swimmers, suppose it could have been the chains?
http://www.emorywheel.com/detail.php?n=24448
September 12, 2009 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a delightful story in that link Jonnie. Thank you so much for that.
Remember that 'situation' where a group of Black kids were denied entry to the pool AFTER the fees had been paid?
Anyway, great story Jonnie.
September 12, 2009 7:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
This story exemplifies the rationale for denying those kids usage of the pool. It wouldn't have been safe, it's my understanding that less than half of those kids knew how to swim.
Promoting swimming in the inner cities sounds like such a wonderful cause, I wish them all the success they deserve.
September 12, 2009 7:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's a very interesting question - why aren't there more black swimmers? Here's my best guess.
That article itself gives a lot of reasons why there aren't more black swimmers. There is no culture of black swim teams and black parents don't encourage their children to learn to swim. there is also no tradition that blacks can succeed personally in organized team swimming as there is in baseball, football, and basketball. Nor is there a reason for such a tradition to develop because no one spends the money to provide the kinds of swimming pools and coaching staff such teams require. Since there is no popular demand for the sport, the city recreation departments do not bother to provide the (expensive) facilities and staffs in minority neighborhoods, perpetuating the problem. Some high schools might, but grammar and middle schools around there sure don't. They have other priorities for their money, and to develop world class athletes you have to start well before High school.
Even if all that were overcome, there are very few black coaches available. I know that I learned to swim and belonged to the YMCA swim team because my parents made sure that I learned when I was age 8 and my father took me downtown to the (then segregated) YMCA to learn. It was simply expected. But that itself was in part because my younger sister had earlier fallen into a swimming pool at age three and would have drowned had an adult not discovered her barely in time.
Parents have to push it, There need to be role models for the kids, it has to be started when the child is young and the pools and resources have to be available at a price to the families that makes it possible. Then there has to be some payoff that can be obtained that makes the investment in time and effort seem worth it to the parents, the children and to those providing the resources.
There was a very good movie in 2007 entitled "Pride" about Philadelphia swim coach Jim Ellis that showed blacks succeeding in competitive swimming in spite of major push back about segregation in the 60's and 70's. It shows the elements I just described and demonstrates why they are so rare. It's also a damned good movie.
September 13, 2009 12:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Parents do have a responsibility to push it...to guide, to push to urge their children on. And to guide, to push to urge their government on.
September 13, 2009 12:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, but they can't be expected to act on that responsibility if they aren't aware of it and if they don't have the resources to act.
If knowledge of the parental responsibility isn't already in the culture, then the government has to make sure it is known. That's the reason for public information about vaccinations and disease prevention, for example. And if parents are having troubles keeping a job, a car and a place to live, when do they take on the additional job of teaching the kids to read and write, let alone swim?
An effective society is built on a combination of strong personal responsibility combined with social systems that support those who need information and additional help. That's the core argument behind universal health care, for example. It's why universal health care is a Human Right, not a commodity that is only available to those with money right at the time when they need the care.
September 13, 2009 3:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
These chains too shall be broken; it's good to see someone taking on this problem.
September 13, 2009 1:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Swimming is also more expensive, since you have to belong to a pool, and get coached from a very young age. While we're on it; how many black ice skaters do you see. Same problem; you just have to show up at a basketball court, or baseball or football field, and all those sports take place in elementary schools.
Swimming and Ice skating require much more from a financial as well as a time investment. There are no doubt black parents who are willing and able to devote themselves to helping their children evolve and excel in sports (see Tiger Woods [golf] and the Williams sisters [tennis]) but it simply is not typical.
Many upper middle-class black parents who have the time and money to do it, don't want their children to achieve simply because of sports; they encourage them academically rather than focusing purely on sports.
September 13, 2009 6:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Might I suggest that perhaps Wilson and his ilk should have only the Confederate Flag 'waving' at/in their offices and draped over their coffins!
I have yet to encounter a racist who doesn't extend their destructive idiocy to embrace chauvinism, condemn gays and even 'foriegners'.
I have realized that I too am prejudiced - Yes, full confession - I am extremely prejudiced against any and all ignorant bigots! (And all bigotry is mired in ignorance.) Now, I just gotta find a t-shirt and bumper sticker!
September 12, 2009 7:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
THESE ARE THE TEABAGGERS Auntie. For sure. And those who are not official members of the SCV surely would like to join if they had the proper info.
September 12, 2009 7:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
And who, with an active brain, can deny that when their idiotic gatherings are broadcast via television that they all don't prove my stance?!? IDIOTS! Seriously, not only do they have marginal I.Q.s but are also without a shred of common sense or ounce of credibility! Waste of oxygen - talk about poster models for 'What I don't want to be when I grow up!' Sad to say, I give more due to thieves!
September 12, 2009 7:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.zazzle.com/bigot+bumperstickers
September 12, 2009 7:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Jonnie...
Thanks for link, but none of these really embodies my stance. A couple were funny tho' and others, well, not so much.
Simplest I can create:
Bigots = Idiots
September 12, 2009 9:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or, simplified, Bigidiots My word coinage for the day.
September 12, 2009 10:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
You left out Jews.
September 13, 2009 12:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
Oh the Confederates really did not and do not countenance the Hebrews, but they do enjoy their book.
September 13, 2009 12:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lol, channeling Lewis Black I love it.
September 13, 2009 1:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
If one were to read the definition on dictionary.com, you would realize that we are all prejudiced. But there are many degrees of prejudice! Most do not culminate in hate or violence.
September 13, 2009 8:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
We are all certainly prejudiced Cap'n. No doubt about that AT ALL.
Our duty is to accept that fact, recognize what those prejudices are and do our best to deal with them.
September 13, 2009 12:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well this is interesting, DD. I have tried to post a comment on this three times and it has not gone through. One of the SC publications I mentioned was Garden and Gun magazine...
Do you suppose that the "gun" word triggers some sort of hold while the content is analyzed by the manangment?
September 12, 2009 7:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well it showed up for me Belle.
Garden and Gun magazine. Sounds like it came from an SNL skit or something John Stewart cooked up.
I worried about you AFTER if posted. You and Seashell and other friends come from the Deep South.
I was not sure I made it clear that there are WONDERFUL PEOPLE IN THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES.
You ease my mind....
September 12, 2009 7:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just tried again and no dice. So if my comment eventually shows up four times, please excuse the redundancy.
September 12, 2009 7:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not to worry, DD. Liberal southerners (not an oxymoron) concur with what you are saying, although we may be driven to point out the exceptions we can find, as well as pointing out the sources that demonstrate exactly what you are saying. All's fair when true.
September 12, 2009 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, there are wonderful people from the Deep South. Wendy, Seashell, our dear Missy, and more.
That Confederate flag, though. To me it is the American equivalent of the WWII German swastika, and they at least learned the error of their ways over there. (Display one, get arrested.)
September 12, 2009 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Way to go Grouch. So many friends I have from places I would never have guessed.
Oh and some of them from the South that is, like Sanford, are rather funny at times. hahahaah
September 12, 2009 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Old Grouch The crybabies of the South only had General Sherman to 'teach them a lesson' and his much over ballyhooed 'March To The Sea' was effective but humane and like a walk on the Appalachian Trail compared to what Zhukov's Red Army did to Germany and the Germans who did not flee to the west.
September 13, 2009 4:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
These people are mindboggling. Where were they during 8 years of Bush’s lying, cheating and stealing while raping the constitution? Where were they when Bush and his gang of morons were shipping all the jobs overseas and emptying the government coffers into the pockets of big business and their rich friends? Who were they listening to as thousands on the left were trying desperately to get them to pay attention? Now that the country is in dire straights created by the right and the left is bailing the country and them out yet again they finally wake up to see the country is in trouble only to blame the left? Who were they listening to all those years? The liars telling them everything would be OK, telling them tax cuts for the rich is the only way to grow the economy, telling them that regulation of industry and commerce was bad, telling them less regulation was good and to trust corporate America because they will do the right thing. And now they want to be obstructionists?
They need to crawl back in their holes, put the cotton back in their ears adding some in their mouths in the process and after we have fix all the problems the right created we'll let them know it's safe to come out again.
September 12, 2009 8:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
And most of these teabaggers are not rich, they do not benefit from any 'program' pushed by the repubs Mr. Clean.
I am always lost. You know culture will trump economics....
September 12, 2009 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know. I'm a blue collar guy turned white collar, construction. Came up though the field and have been management for 20 years or so. I deal with all levels, owners architects engineers and of course the tradesmen and small business owners. I’ve worked all over the country and have run union projects, non union projects and open shop projects, you name it I’ve run it. Union field guys are mostly blue state types non union are mostly red state types. That boggles my mind as the blue collar red state types gain nothing, not a thing from voting republican yet the Republicans could not win one seat anywhere without them. And the Republicans never even throw them a bone. They just use them and abuse them and the blue collar guys keep coming back like a woman who won’t leave an abusive husband. It’s a mystery.
September 12, 2009 9:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
As a Texan in a Right-to-Work state I have wondered about that too. Why do so many southerners and Texans vote Republican when they personally get nothing out of it? I have long considered that to be a result of the undercurrent of unadmitted racism that still runs through the White culture here. It is still taught in the White evangelical conservative churches here and is normally found in White bars and social clubs.
This morning I was reading a postscript that Dr. Bob Altemeyer posted to his book "the Authoritarians" just before and after the Election last November. In it he says that racists do not respond to overt public racist demagoguery, but that they do respond in racist ways to the kinds to subtle dog-whistles the Republican Party is rightly famous for.
I'm guessing that the racists here do not respond to outright overt racism because the social pressures declaring overt racism wrong intimidate them. But they still hear it from their friends and in their churches, and deep down they are sure they are superior to black and Mexicans, so they act on that deep down "knowledge" when they vote.
They just feel a lot more comfortable in their White enclaves with their feelings of racial superiority and strongly reject the government efforts to bring those they consider less competent into a position of parity with them.
September 13, 2009 2:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Where were they? They were out in front at the Bush rallies, cheering him on. Cheering as he handed over their towns to the MTR miners, sent their sons off to die for oil, and gave tax cuts to the people sending their jobs overseas.
September 13, 2009 2:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yes they were Matt, yes they were.It is like rootin for the Packers or the Vikes.
At least if you are in Green Bay you probably own a few shares in the team.
Since I was never into sports betting, the vikes never did a goddamn thing for me. But I rooted for em.
September 13, 2009 4:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
Damn right they were Matt. I went to Washington five different times over the invasion if Iraq, three to try to prevent the invasion and twice to try to halt it. “They” were there, in very small numbers I might add, calling us names and unpatriotic, cursing us and threatening us. (takes real big balls to threaten peaceniks) But that’s all for another blog I’ve got cooking. Anyway, “they” were there at the highly orchestrated Bush rallies but a lot more of them just went along like lemmings and cheered those criminals in the Bush administration on like armchair warriors while real brave warriors went off to fight ill equipped and ill informed.
September 13, 2009 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
September 12, 2009 8:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
You got that right midnight. I was stunned. No kidding.
And the guy that runs this cabal is proud that the CVA has moved past that honorable kkk tradition.
NO KIDDING.
September 12, 2009 8:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very good, Mr. Day.
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/hate.jsp#s=SC.
September 12, 2009 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
If I had any money Flower, I would donate to the SPLC, I really would. Probably top on my list.
They do such fine work. They are fighting battles were do not even know about.
Thank you for this link.
September 12, 2009 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes..um..and so will Jesus but I ain't holdin my breath.
C
September 12, 2009 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Like they say, the matter will be in the heavenly courts for a million years....
September 12, 2009 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
...or longer.
September 12, 2009 11:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I guess you mean the new 'old' South.
September 12, 2009 11:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
You got that right Sync. Seashell will talk about Atlanta, wonderful things although she has told me she is actually more comfortable in Florida.
I am so old I recall the different centennials marking battles and such of that terrible struggle.
Now,over the next few years, 150 years will mark those save events. ha
I could have made this ten pages or complete a three hundred pager demonstrating how these hate machines will spew out THE EXACT language of our modern day demagogues.
CAN YOU IMAGINE?
September 13, 2009 12:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
What we have in America is a large population who are able to get along in America as things are, often just barely, but are afraid of having what security they have achieved taken away from them. It happens often enough to be a real threat.
Then we have another large group of people who mislead and prey on that first group with a combination of demagoguery, propaganda and scams, most of which scams the predators have made legal or have stopped the government from regulating and preventing.
The predators use their propaganda to convince the prey that the problems are primarily moral and that the government has been taken over by the immoral who reject the lies they prey have been taught to believe such as White racial superiority. This is where the conservative evangelical churches fit into the system of predation.
It depends on keeping the government from acting to prevent the predators from conducting their predations. That was what Reagan meant when he said that government is the problem, not the solution. He was selling two myths. One was that the government is not responsive to the people and instead is trying to manipulate them for its own benefit, and two was that the government is not competent enough to actually solve the problems liberals are trying to use it to solve. If the prey are convinced they can do nothing to influence the government and that even if they could it is useless, then they reject it as another predator. There is enough truth to both of those arguments to make them semi-believable.
But what is the alternative when the economy is too large for any one private organization to even understand, let alone control; and when a disease from Asian chickens or Latin American hogs can sweep across the human world from literally nowhere in a few months? Many modern problems are so large and widespread that no organization smaller than the government can possibly deal with them. The conservatives of course offer the services of their God for those situations and demand that no one else interfere.
The problem is that the conservative solution to all significant problems, orchestrated by wealthy oligarchs who object to government interference with their often predatory practices, is to stop the government from doing anything at all and let the predators with their profit-oriented business organizations and their power-oriented churches take over the job of protecting the prey. And right now they are inciting the prey to rise up and attack the only possible source of protection they have - a democratic and often responsive government.
It's as though the wolves are getting the sheep to attack the shepherd and the sheep dogs.
September 13, 2009 4:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Evening Dick. You know, of course, that none of this would be possible except for a slyly skewed expression of facts in the media markets of areas of the south. Having lived in NC, MS and FL I've witnessed this and to see how different the presentation of the news is from NY or more liberal areas of the country is a real eye opener. As long as we have the media owned by persons with an agenda who illicitly and dishonestly pursue that agenda it'll be difficult to change this. This is little more than propagandist in nature. The FCC doesn't want to tangle with this from a free speech perspective but fails to recognize that propagation of falsehoods is a violation of the public charter.
It's a very sticky wicket but really reflects the common heresy where freedom of speech is taken to specify that truth is subordinate to freedom. Quite obviously though, nothing could be more corruptive of freedom. Sadly enough we have a not insignificant number of politicians who pay little heed to this and have not the slightest inclination of the harm this is doing. Unfortunately, the corporatists insist they possess a citizens right to spew these falsehoods. This perspective could not possibly be more in error.
September 13, 2009 12:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hard to disagree with this TPC.
But we could also just review the difference in textbooks. The Minnesota History texts vs. South Carolina History Texts....
Remember every other year we would get Washington's Birthday off and then Lincoln's. I always wondered how Lincoln's went down in Atlanta or Dallas.
So its as much historical propaganda as day to day current events on local channels I suppose.
But these 'hate mills' on the radio. TV will not put rush on his own show. They sure like to 'replay' him and then call it 'controversial'. ha. Instead of obscenity.
To be sure, the corporatists gain something from all of this.
September 13, 2009 1:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice post, dd. If it weren't so late, I'd elaborate. I'll just say the New South is not restricted or defined by The South so much anymore. It is rural but everywhere across America. Nonetheless, it is a useful rallying concept for skinheads, neo-Nazis, and good 'ol boy-type racists who will never become good old men.
September 13, 2009 2:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks Ripper. I know you are correct of course.
But the South is really the home of the repub party.
Idaho, Utah are solid red. The home of the Morman Church. Does not make all Morman's bad, our majority leader follows the Book of Morman. But they fit in so well with Southern Justice.
I am just rambling...good night.
September 13, 2009 2:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
The ones who really, realy confuse me are like this gal I know who's all about tea bagging. She goes on Facebook and takes a survey to see what decade best fits her erpsonality. She get's classified with the 1950s! Thing is, it wasn't until the 60s that she was even born. These folks have this perception of the good old days as told to them by the parents with no real, immediate grasp of those times that might suggest they think of it some other way. how can I long for a return to the good old days if I have never had any?!? LOL!!
September 13, 2009 2:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
The good old days. When were the good old days. I told someone this week that Cicero would speak of the 'good ole days' over two thousand years ago; all the time knowing there really had been no 'good ole days'.
If I was black and living ANYWHERE in this country in the fifties, I had a long row to hoe as they say.
Women were not doing all that well as a group either.
September 13, 2009 3:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
The good old days were the days when only your own subculture mattered in the media and everyone else was your servant.
Servants were to be seen rarely, never heard, work productively and to retreat to their ghettos when the sun went down. We had blacks in their ghettos and the unionized workers from the oil refineries (many Cajuns from Louisiana)in theirs. And we never saw people from the port area in the better parts of town.
I was young in the 50's, but I remember those days.
September 13, 2009 4:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
Since I like history and since this blog deals with the subject, I found this tidbit about pre-Civil tensions that were so hot the winds blew all the way to the west coast.
September 13, 2009 2:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great link.
I am constantly amazed at how some seemed to 'escape' the entire mess. I mean Twain, born in '35 ended up in some self organized 'troop' in Missouri and it just evaporated. Technically, at least some say, he was a deserter.
Go West Young Man...well he found he could 'escape' into the west. And yet, like you say, there were 'tensions'.
September 13, 2009 3:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks 1849. Good and useful information as always! May Broderick's memory and courage live on!
September 13, 2009 9:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Perhaps one of your best DD. Thank you!
I think from now on it should be decreed that the generic term "southern" or "southerners" or "southern heritage" should be banned without the prefix of "white" coming before it lest there be some mistake that the term is somehow nonexclusive. It has always pissed me off that the unspoken meaning when refering to all things southern including the regional designation of "the south" in common parlance has almost always, even to this day, excluded a vast portion of southerners who are not white. The tentacles of slavery and white supremacy are long and hard to finally kill. We will certainly prevail over the perverse offshoots of those tentacles but the battle is not yet won. Until it is, I think making sure we say "the white south", etc... will help us remember just exactly what we're talking about.
September 13, 2009 9:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hit the wrong button Oleeb, my response is down a couple comments.
Have a nice Sunday
September 13, 2009 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lincoln made a mistake. Should have let them go. They do not share in the basis under which this nation was established.
September 13, 2009 11:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
Let them go or make them go Barth. ha
September 13, 2009 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Such kind words on a Sunday Morn. Thank you.
We will certainly prevail over the perverse offshoots of those tentacles but the battle is not yet won. Until it is, I think making sure we say "the white south", etc... will help us remember just exactly what we're talking about.
Maybe even the Old White South. I do know this. This is a very pretty line Oleeb. Perverse offshoots of thos tentacles. Marvelous.
September 13, 2009 12:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
The post-WWII Germany analogy is apt. There were, and are still, Nazi sympathizers in Germany. But as a country, Germany has become a far more just and liberal place than the United States in some ways.
Not that the South has - sadly, far from it.
But I'm sick of people saying "oh, but I don't hate the Southern LIBERALS - just the South itself." In what culture do you think the Southern liberals whom you claim you respect grew up? They're part of southern culture too, and when you make the jump from hating the haters to tarring all Southerners with that same hate-slathered brush, you cripple your own cause.
And oleeb: I'd like to see racists who are white southerners have their feet held to the fire and forced to admit they're denying their own mulatto culture.
I'd like to see the term "Southern" (with no color coding) applied to everyone who's come from the region and who's contributed culturally. Southern cultures owe too great a debt to their African-American (and Hispanic, and - this is where i betray my own roots - French and Creole) members.
September 13, 2009 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do not think Oleeb is being cruel here.
I did have an opportunity to read some books on the Confederate states and the Civil War a couple years ago. I was amazed at the high percentage of Southerners who DID NOT WISH TO SECEDE. I had no previous idea as to how quickly Louisiana was taken back into the fold for instance.
No I have too many friends from the Deep South here and have learned much from them.
September 13, 2009 1:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have lived in Texas for most of my life, and I had to pay a poll tax to vote the first time. In High School I was invited to go out N****r-bashing on occasion. The High School was still segregated, and the idea of integrating it panicked the city fathers. When it came time to do it they built a new high school in the White west end of town and tore my High School down. This was 60 and 61, and we still had professional people talking with obvious anger about the commie FDR.
But Texas was also primarily an agricultural state then, too. Sometime in the last two decades the majority of people were in large cities, and the older post-ww II suburbs incorporated to avoid city taxes and public transportation have found they have all the problems of the big cities. As I keep pointing out, last November every major city in Texas voted Democratic and for Obama (except Fort Worth, and that was the DFW big business community in north Fort Worth.)
Atlanta went Democratic, too. In fact, most of the big cities in the South did. The conservatives are a rural culture and they are being replaced. It's part of what feeds into their fear, anger and extremism.
Back to Texas. We have had state government dominated by rural conservatives until last Fall. The most powerful politician in Texas is the Speaker of the House, and the House kicked out the rural conservative from Midland in January and replaced him with a much more modern (still Republican) lawyer from Waco. It was a tectonic shift from rural to urban control, and it's only the beginning.
The problem that I see is that American governments are designed to give additional power to Senators who tend to be very wealthy and rural, both conditions that cause conservatism. The UK has spent nearly two centuries taking power away from the House of Lords and shifting it to the Commons for that exact same reason, and they aren't through yet. The institutions of political power run about one or two generations behind the changes in society. So do the wealthy oligarchs who run the government.
America has just had a generation of Civil Rights followed by a generation of Reactionism, and one of the outcomes is that the kids I attend college with right now simply do not understand what the racism and discrimination talk is all about. (There are more conservatives in the computer programming classes.) That's why Obama got the youth vote. (They don't vote as reliably, but they will as they get older. Families do that to people.) For someone who was shocked at the blatant racism he saw in high school in the JFK period it's a whole new and very different and improved world, and the changes are coming even faster now. It's a process of urbanization. The South is headed that way, too. Just slower.
Does the Tao Te Ching have any advice on patience that might apply here?
September 13, 2009 9:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I keep looking and have not given up yet. I just keep finding a new one every day and ponder.
September 13, 2009 11:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lincoln made a mistake. Should have let them go. They do not share in the basis under which this nation was established.
September 13, 2009 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
We gotta pick our enemies BTW. Can't be against the South. There is no question, of course, that South Carolina has come some kinda history and whatall, and who would have thought that my browser would become so used to my search "The State," almost like a hometown newspaper!
DD I had no idea that young Addison had served so proudly for Strom! How QUAINT!
We're headed to a collision this week. This has to be dealt with, though, IMHO.
The Mark McKinnon article is very interesting and a delightful expression of enlightened decency. They want to be able to control the party again (McKinnon was a big strategizer for Bush) but he can't see how he can do it with Birthers and Buttheads leading the charge: ">http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-09-11/send-joe-wilson-home//link>
"Wilson couldn’t even apologize with any class. He made it clear he was saying 'sorry' only because he’d been forced to by the Republican House leadership: 'Well, I, uh, last night I heard from the leadership that they wanted me to contact the White House and, uh, say that, uh, my statements, uh, were inappropriate. I did.'
Read it again carefully. He was asked to say something by the leadership so he said what they asked; that's it! Some apology! If he gets ahead this way, there'll be six of them interrupting next time demanding to see his birth certificate, with Joe as a media talking head sharing about how he too was wronged. Extremely embarrassing by the way that some chuckleheads even on here thought it was important for Joe to speak his bigoted mind in the President's face, mid-speech (holy smokes!), spouting raw idiocies about Question Period in House of Commons.
And how far are we really from "If anyone was offended by my firing the gun, it's a shame that their feelings were hurt, but I got emotional when I realized the death panels would end the lives of seniors, and I have a duty to protect them under the Constitution."
September 13, 2009 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's right OT. And he still maintains that our President is a liar.
And everyone should realize this man is a racist of the first order.
September 13, 2009 2:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I should not post this comment in that I don't have time today to participate in the fray that will almost certainly ensue from the comment I am about to make. Nonetheless, I ask all of you to think about what I have to say, carefully, to see if you, too, might come to the conclusion that there is some validity to it.
Yes, I agree -- how could I not? -- that the old south mentality arrogantly voiced by a particular subset of white men through multiple generations shows every sign, at the moment, of continuing to manifest itself in gross rationalization of offensive thought as well as aberrant, abusive and markedly adolescent behavior.
This mentality is inexcusable -- it has endangered blacks of both genders from the advent of slavery to the present, as it has poisoned the attitudes of women and children of both races who soak up the hate and, in allegiance to their husbands, brothers, friends and fathers, perpetuate it until it is their own.
Yes, it would be a good thing, then, just as a start, for the CVA to disband and for the Confederate flag to be, once and for all, permanently retired (as Robert E. Lee recommended immediately after the Civil War ended). The proper place for it is an ill-lit corner of a museum dedicated either to thankfully lost causes, or at least to unnecessary mayhem.
But, after those important symbolic gestures have been made, it would also be a good thing if people, everywhere, understood that the current crop of vocal asshats in the south make it far too easy to label them as "the problem" -- when that designation conveniently ignores the same fundamental attitudes held and demonstrated -- as Flower pointed out -- by, say, all the white supremacist groups located on the SPLC map throughout the country as well as by the armed militia groups located in the West and Southwest...whose poster boys might be, say, W. and Dick Cheney, neither of whom is southern, both of whom were Ivy-educated in the northeast (well, educated at least in the sense that they both attended Yale; but whether they learned anything there is debatable.)
So when y'all -- and I do emphasize y'all -- start pointing fingers at the South, as if it is the only region of the country where willful ignorance and malice is extant, I start out trying to see things from your perspective, in which there is, in fact, more than a grain truth .... but I end up, after reading serial diatribes on the subject, thinking that it is not regional adjustment that will quench this fiery rhetoric, but instead -- take a breath -- a little soothing gender adjustment because the testosterone level is way too high..... which is the good 'ole boy problem to begin with, idn't?
Or is it? Maybe the problem is not a surfeit of testosterone, but just mebbe, not enough. Because underneath the rhetoric of the white southern male, and underneath the rhetoric of the male from elsewhere, lurks a fundamental fear of "losing" -- whether a war, an election, or an argument -- that men, of all ages of all persuasions -- seem to conflate with concepts and degrees of "manliness."
I'm referring, forgive me, to the small dick fear syndrome, personified, imo, by Dick Cheney and W. and echoed by southern white males, militiamen from the west and southwest and men everywhere, in every country, in every culture who must apparently dominate and "win" to feel manly.
Give it a rest, my valued male friends, please? We love you, just as you are. We do not measure your value in inches; we measure it in merit. So I don't want to write the blog that examines the sad Freudian projection of penis envy onto women (Really? You actually think we want one of those of our own, to deal with every day, instead of just warmly welcoming a beloved visitor?) I don't want to write the blog that examines other male projections; for example, the one in which we might discuss which gender is actually motivated by physicality versus thought process, or which gender has actually accrued power by wearing skirts ( how do you spell clergy?)
But I won't write those blogs. Because if I did, I would guilty of the same emotional over-reaction, the same need to blame "the other" for my own transgressions and mistakes that I see in this wholesale vilification of the south.
How, my dear friends, is a wholesale vilification of the south different than the Republican vilification of the Democratic party, or their vilification of all Muslims throughout the world.
Temperance, please, before I both lose and loose my temper.
Tendered, if not tempered, with love.
September 13, 2009 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Good, good, good comment. You certainly merit the Dayly Comment of the Day Award for this here TPMCafe Site, given to all of you from all of me--but should be from all of us.
Illinois enacted a law that banned African-Americans from its borders, enslaved or otherwise.
My state was begun by anti anti slavers. No such laws enacted but I grew up listening to a lot of racist talks. Certainly not from my teachers.
Utah, Idaho, Wyoming, Montana, Oklahoma...large percentage of population in all three states of white supremacists.
You can find the evil in any major northern city.
I guess I am attempting to underline that the repub leaders seem to be from the south and the wilsons are more 'clear and proud' of their racists perspectives.
Anyway, as you point out, LEST WE FORGET.
September 13, 2009 5:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, excellent post. I think part of our problem in dealing with racism, sexism, homophobia, etc etc. is that it such a vast problem embedded into our very language, how we see the world. Tackling any of these issues let alone all of 'em is daunting to say the least. Subcultures such as those in the South that have more visible and tangible manifestations tend to get the focus.
I was standing in line at the store yesterday and noticed a guy in front of me with a tie-dye tank top and a tatoo on his arm consisting of two Confederate flags and southern soldier in between. My first thought was that it seemed to be incongrous, my own biases tend to associate tie-dyes with liberal views. But then I thought, of all the things this guy could have put on his arm, and which would be there permanently, and he chose that.
The couple in front of him may have been more racist and sexist than him, but he was the one I was putting my focus on.
It also brings up the a point I heard or read somewhere and has since been affirmed by a number of African-American friends, that at least from their perspective they prefered the whites in the south over the ones in the north because at least the ones in the south were honest about how they felt.
September 13, 2009 5:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I just said this (*immediately* above) and I had you and others in mind:
"We gotta pick our enemies BTW. Can't be against the South."
(I also acknowledged that the State has almost become my main newspaper, so WTF is up with that?)
September 13, 2009 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm glad you mentioned Boaz. When Carlton Putnam wrote his letters dismissing Boaz's theories and were published in every publication in the south after the Supreme Court decision was made to segregate schools, the Charleston Newspaper Editor made it his calling to spread Putnam's message of bigotry to the North by taking out advertisements in Northern papers.
Putnam's theories of white racial superiority became the new "gospel" of the south and so much of this thinking still prevails. Currently Jared Taylor has taken up the cause and made the comment after Katrina that when blacks are left to their own devices, any type of civilization is abandoned. I am always flabbergasted that this type of thinking still exists. I would be willing to bet a month's pay that Wilson is a huge fan of Putnam and Taylor.
September 13, 2009 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
I majored in Cultural Anthropology as they call it in the States and Franz Boaz was THE creator of Cultural Anthropology. Liked to sleep with his students, ha. Ruth Benedict and Margaret Meade--such fine anthropologists at time when women were not be accepted as professionals anywhere.
Their more than subtle message: ALL MEN AND WOMEN ARE CREATED EQUAL.....
Really pissed off Southern white supremacists.
Thank you for this Syd--did not know the connection was so clear.
September 13, 2009 4:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
I majored in Cultural Anthropology as they call it in the States and Franz Boaz was THE creator of Cultural Anthropology. Liked to sleep with his students, ha. Ruth Benedict and Margaret Meade--such fine anthropologists at time when women were not be accepted as professionals anywhere.
Their more than subtle message: ALL MEN AND WOMEN ARE CREATED EQUAL.....
Really pissed off Southern white supremacists.
Thank you for this Syd--did not know the connection was so clear.
September 13, 2009 4:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
And the reason so many colleges and universities have policies against professors having, ahem, "relations" with their students, both of whom are consenting adults is because of the power imbalance.
Many people have racist, sexist etc thoughts and views. That's a problem. But racism etc is the exercising of power based on those racist thoughts. Women who believed they should be subverient to men held a sexist view just as strongly as their male counterpart (and as is the case these kind of oppressive structures depend on the oppressed to buy in), yet since they were object of the oppression, rather than the beneficiary they were not the focus.
And in the end it should not be the individuals, whether men in dealing with the patriarchy, or the whites in dealing with racism, etc. but the infrastructures, systems (language being the supreme system), and institutions that maintain and enforce the oppression. It is the ability to impose oppression, to have the Power, is a critical factor in dealing with racism, etc.
Which is way the focus on the South from the civil war has special facet to it since it represents a political infrastructure that would be able to impose and maintian a racially oppressive regime. That is why in large part people celebrating and identifying with the Confederacy has a significance that needs to be attended to.
Indeed, to say "the south will rise again," which I hear enough as is here in the midwest, is on close to being on par with a white South African saying "Apartheid will rise again."
September 13, 2009 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
That is it. Apartheid. No doubt in my mind. And then I hear or read communiques from organizations like SCV. And those old feelings start coming back.
Then I note polls on anything from approval of our President to birthers to teabaggers.....
All those red dots kind of organized in one part of Al Franken's map.
September 13, 2009 7:38 PM | Reply | Permalink