THE PAPER DRIVE
The Tao is an empty vessel; it is used, but never filled.
Oh, unfathomable source of ten thousand things!
Blunt the sharpness,
Untangle the knot,
Soften the glare,
Merge with dust.
Oh, hidden deep but ever present!
I do not know from whence it comes.
It is the forefather of the emperors.
Tao Te Ching (Ch-4)
| Dwight D. Eisenhower |
| 34th President of the United States |
|---|
September 24, 1957
He would die within five years of acute alcoholism. There he was, resting upon Archie Bunker's throne with his 'beer and a bump'.
The rabbit ears had been carefully positioned on the Black & White. There was an art to all this. I mean the right ear was bent ever so slightly. Some days the turning of an ear ritual would have to be completed every hour or so, although when the weather was hospitable, a clear picture could be had little longer. That 'snow' would appear and the sound distorted if the ritual were not properly followed.
My father was about to reach his 33rd birthday. He was a WWII veteran having served on a secret American Air Base in the old Czechoslovakia. There had been approximately 17 Americans stationed at that base which was about the number of Americans stationed in Czechoslovakia.
His favorite obscenities were: Bullshit!!! and Goddamnit!!!! and Ni...........!!!!
Two of which I have adopted as my own precious condemnations. You must understand that Dad was a Roman Catholic who never went to church; a dyed-in-the wool Democrat and an avowed racist.
The real irony was that he made his money selling used cars to the lower middle class in a poorer side of town. The main hazards of the business involved repossessions of automobiles from those who did not carry through with 'their end' of the bargain and parking tickets. Where the irony in all of this came was that his main clientele were African-Americans.
The year before, I had participated in my first Presidential Election. I remember looking at the ballot. There were two choices: The President of the United States and...the other guy. Of course I voted for The President of the United States of America of course.
I mean you had to be one of those communists portrayed on 'I Led Three Lives' to vote for 'the other guy.' I recall telling my parents my choice in this very important election. They laughed.
I was then instructed that 'we' were Democrats and that I
should never vote for a Republican again. I have honored this promise over the
next five decades.
We are watching the
President of the United States tonight boys, just as the President was
about to speak.
But he is a Republican
and we are Democrats, Daddy
THIS IS THE PRESIDENT
OF THE UNITED STATES, NOW SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP AND LISTEN FOR A CHANGE.
All righty then!!! I got that message.
Now I must add a little background here and Wiki does it so well at times:
The Little Rock Nine were a group of African-American students who were enrolled in Little Rock Central High School in 1957. The ensuing Little Rock Crisis, in which the students were initially prevented from entering the racially segregated school by Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus, and then attended after the intervention of President Eisenhower, is considered to be one of the most important events in the African-American Civil Rights Movement.[1]
The U.S. Supreme Court issued its historic Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, on May 17, 1954. The decision declared all laws establishing segregated schools to be unconstitutional, and it called for the desegregation of all schools throughout the nation.[2] After the decision the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) attempted to register black students in previously all-white schools in cities throughout the South. In Little Rock, the capital city of Arkansas, the Little Rock School Board agreed to comply with the high court's ruling. Virgil Blossom, the Superintendent of Schools, submitted a plan of gradual integration to the school board on May 24, 1955, which the board unanimously approved. The plan would be implemented during the 1958 school year, which would begin in September 1957.
There is another personal story relevant here. Six months before all this our school had a 'paper drive'. This was during a time when newspapers were delivered to your door for about a dime a day. People would store up and bundle those papers, at least the ones not used for new puppies and such. Then the schools would have drives where everyone would place all their bundles in front of their homes on a certain designated morn and vans would come by and pick them up and deliver them to the schools.
The Newspaper companies would eventually pick up all the newspapers and give the schools a sum representing remuneration for their trouble. The School Board would designate the proper charity to which the remuneration would go. That year an all Black school in Little Rock, Arkansas was designated as the destination for our charitable contribution.
We had been taught that the poor Negro Students were being discriminated against by the evil white people in Little Rock and they needed our help and our consolation. So we all wrote letters about how we hoped everything would turn out better for these children and how happy we were that we might help them in their quest for a decent education.
I found out later in college, that at the same time my school was working on our paper drive, a school in Little Rock, Arkansas had conducted their own paper drive. The final destination of that school's charitable contribution? A charity in Minneapolis that helped American Indians who were being treated terribly by the Northern Racists. The students in Little Rock wrote their letters of consolation to members of the Chippewa Tribes up here in Minnesota hoping that one day they too could receive a decent education.
Meanwhile, back at the ranch, the Great Speech began on CBS:
Good Evening, My Fellow Citizens: -- For a few minutes this evening I want to speak to you about the serious situation that has arisen in Little Rock...
In that city, under the leadership of demagogic extremists, disorderly mobs have deliberately prevented the carrying out of proper orders from a Federal Court. Local authorities have not eliminated that violent opposition and, under the law, I yesterday issued a Proclamation calling upon the mob to disperse.
This morning the mob again gathered in front of the Central High School of Little Rock, obviously for the purpose of again preventing the carrying out of the Court's order relating to the admission of Negro children to that school.
The proper use of the powers of the Executive Branch to enforce the orders of a Federal Court is limited to extraordinary and compelling circumstances. Manifestly, such an extreme situation has been created in Little Rock. This challenge must be met and with such measures as will preserve to the people as a whole their lawfully-protected rights in a climate permitting their free and fair exercise. The overwhelming majority of our people in every section of the country are united in their respect for observance of the law - even in those cases where they may disagree with that law.
They deplore the call of extremists to violence.
We then turned to 'The Honeymooners'.
I have my own confession to make here. When w was appointed President of the United States by the Supreme Court of the United States, I was devastated. I would rant and rave that the rich will now rape this country, that the poor will be abandoned, that the military-industrial complex will be even more energized and that we were all going to hell in a hand basket.
The first year I turned it around and gave w some deference. He was President of the United States. I would watch him speak, or whatever he was doing in order to communicate anyway. Besides, in a few years there would be another election and the Dems might quit yelling at each other, and we would get a good man as chief executive because the American People may not have liked how he had stolen the election in 2000.
Then I watched the towers get hit and I gave w the benefit of the doubt again.
And then I started hearing that we were going to invade Iraq. All the hijackers save one were Saudis. I would watch cable news--which was my only source of news--and try to discover WHAT IN THE HELL IRAQ HAD TO DO WITH ALL THIS.
Then a man by the name of Paul O'Neill who had been Secretary of the Treasury came on these cable shows and said that the President had told him and his National Security team that "We are goin into Iraq find a way." EIGHT MONTHS BEFORE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001:
From the very beginning, there was a conviction, that Saddam
Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go," says O'Neill, who adds that
going after Saddam was topic "A" 10 days after the inauguration -
eight months before Sept. 11.
"From the very first instance, it was about Iraq. It was about what we can do to change this regime," says
Suskind. "Day one, these things were laid and sealed."
As treasury secretary, O'Neill was a permanent member of the National Security
Council. He says in the book he was surprised at the meeting that questions
such as "Why Saddam?" and "Why now?" were never asked.
"It was all about finding a way to do it. That was the tone of it. The
president saying 'Go find me a way to do this,'" says O'Neill. "For me,
the notion of pre-emption, that the U.S. has the unilateral right to do whatever we decide to do, is a
really huge leap." http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/main592330.shtml
I was so angry I cannot fully relate the extent of that anger here. I never watched a full speech of w after that. I lost any respect for w that I had once mustered. And every single time one of his administration would come on television, they would lie. I new they were lying. Hell Tom Brokaw knew they were lying and they were getting away with it.
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/1849/2009/09/teaching-parents-a-lesson.php#comments
1849 had a post concerning the President's speech dedicated to children upon their first day of school. Some people actually kept their children home from school to avoid the disgusting propaganda that was sure to be spewing from My President's mouth. Other schools omitted the speech from their curriculum during the day. Catch JSFOX's beautiful tribute to the children who desired to hear their Chief Executive. http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/jsfox/2009/09/and-a-child-shall-lead-us.php?ref=reccafe
White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs appeared on "Fox & Friends," the Fox News morning show, to preview President Obama's speech to Congress tonight on health care reform. Gibbs ribbed the morning show hosts about the fact that Fox broadcast channel is choosing to run the dance reality show "So You Think You Can Dance?" instead of the President's speech.
"I do hope the viewers of FOX will find a way to watch this speech tonight," Gibbs said. "I know the network, instead of dealing with the reality of millions of people on health insurance reform have decided to show a reality show called 'So You Think You Can Dance?'"
The Fox News hosts defended their sister network's decision, noting that the Fox News channel would be carrying the speech live. Gibbs replied: "I do hope people will check in to the reality of what's going on in America rather than the distraction of a reality TV show. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/09/gibbs-on-fox-news-critici_n_280309.html
This is the President of the United States giving a major speech to a Joint Session of Congress. However it goes, it is history, real history. There are not that many speeches given in this manner by the Chief Executive of this country. It is a rarity, indeed.
DO YOU REALLY WISH TO DANCE?
















Sadly, our government processes may be the ultimate representation (pun intended) of a tacky, whacky reality show! Should be a warning posted not just for bad content, but also 'dangerous to your health'!
We are in this horrific condition, because too many of We, The People, have already tuned out.
FAUX is just a symptom of what ails us.
Great post. So much here. Back later.
Appreciate as always.
Rec'd.
September 9, 2009 3:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh Auntie, thank you so much for the kind words.
I do not know how to 'calm the waters'. I really don't. I thought I detested Nixon but w comes out much worse in my mind.
If I cannot handle my hatred toward the other side, how are they ever going to handle their hatred of my side?
September 9, 2009 3:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Um, exactly what, why and who do you hate on the 'other side'?
September 9, 2009 4:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Guns, health care, taxes, regulation, racism, religious fanaticism, public welfare, equality in educational facilities, feigned patriotism, faux family values platforms, hypocrisy, greed, inconsistency, perception of US vis a vis the rest of the world, corporate greed, corporate lies,corporate theft, faux science....
September 9, 2009 4:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hey DD, thanks for writing this. Enjoyed it and I agree with Gibbs. Liking the guy more and more--especially how he puts himself out there instead of being a mere mouthpiece.
September 9, 2009 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do also Matyra. He is much like he was before the election. And I have seen him give interviews concerning how he met O'Bama, telling him at first he 'was not ready' yet for national office.
September 9, 2009 4:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
Great Post DD.
Seems my recollection of events and my reactions corresponds with yours.
Keep flowing with your observations please.
September 9, 2009 4:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
A long time ago, in a universe far, far away Biker.
September 9, 2009 4:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
My memories of Ike are a bit thin, as I have a few less years on me. Seemed like a genial old guy, I guess.
Then JFK came along and was vigorous and lively - and got killed. And from there it has been mostly a steady stream of deterioration. LBJ was both far-seeing and an old-school crook, Nixon, well, the less said there the better, I suppose. (I blame him for the repellent nature of the Republican Party these days.) Ford was a footnote, Carter a footnote to that footnote. Reagan was the smiling face of Satan. Bush the Elder, well, four years on "pause" if you will.
Clinton was the most Republican Democrat I have seen in a long time and still not enough of a Republican for them.
About Bush the Younger, well, there is not space here for enough vituperation to properly savage his two terms. "Worst" falls short. The man - and his entire administration - was a living, breathing obscenity thrown in the face of everything America could be.
Somehow, we have finally elected a smart guy. Bad luck for him, huh? A smart guy elected President of the stupidest version of America I can recall. How the bloody hell does anyone with two brain cells to rub together buy into this racist, reactionary Republican nonsense? (And that's just the "R's"!)
Frankly, Obama deserves better than the America he was elected President of last fall.
And yes, I sort of remember paper drives. And marches in Chicago, and riots in 1968, and the South and West Sides in flames when Dr. King was killed. And my own shock and grief when Robert Kennedy followed him in death by an assassin's hand a few short months after.
For me, a lot of America died with them. It's been reborn, somewhat, yet the people who would upend things for their own game are still in the wild.
I will watch tonight, and may have reactions for you tomorrow, DD. I'm hoping for the best. Why does America seem to bring the worst so goddamned often?
September 9, 2009 6:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I wish I could answer that question. Auntie Sam is a good progressive and like she says, why do you hate them?
I could put ten more 'reasons' for vitriol here.
But how could I ever 'see' things as beck or rush or savage or sean or hume? I cannot even see things the way brokaw and friedman see them and at least they do not call for riots in the streets or 'military guards'.
My little sketch was attempting to demonstrate that there is and always was enough hypocrisy to go around. But there is a limit is there not to the vitriol of saxy chambliss or McConnell or Boehner?
Tata for now.
September 9, 2009 7:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I hope there's a limit, Mr. Day. If there is not.......Scarlett and I will think about it tomorrow.
September 9, 2009 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Flower, if change cannot come with THIS GUY, it never will.
September 9, 2009 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have a lot of hope for Obama. I think he understands what is happening in Washington, can manage a strategic management team masterfully, and he and his team know how to read the political lay of the land, decide where they are going, build a plan to get there and carry it out. And they don't leak. The press has no clue what's happening.
The media - they hate being cut out, so all they can to is gossip. That's what they do. And most gossip is mean-spirited. But they are still cut out of what really matters. That's assuming they could rise above the gossip and horse race stories long enough to recognize what was really happening if they saw it.
Right now we are all living in interesting times. The new dynasty has not yet taken control. But Obama has a good chance of doing it. That frightens the Republicans because they thought they were the ones taking control and in the last couple of years it has literally melted away from them. Is it any wonder they are acting so crazy?
September 9, 2009 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think they are afraid as you say Richard. If the repubs were not afraid, they would not act like this.
History was made tonight. This was not some press conference at noon about a new appointment.
THIS WAS A JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS.
September 9, 2009 11:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mr Wilson probably had his own "joint" session?
September 10, 2009 8:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe if the media gave responsible reporting of events, Obama might trust them to manage a decent portrayal of infomration. But they no longer portray information. They are all guilty of coloring it with their favorite pigments. FOX cannot get enough of Red and Black. MSNBC cannot put enough Blue on there. CNN has there pinkish/mauve shades that oddly enough do not suggest they have any affection for pinkoes, but they are not Right enough to be Red unless Lou Dobbs is broadcasting his bile. CBS, ABC, PBS, completes the rainbow, but they all have this awful red tint. Even MSNBC has Joe Scarborough. Where's the news? WWWCD? What would Walter Cronkite do?
September 10, 2009 5:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
These creeps are looking for an armed insurrection.
I offer a view or perspective from a Religous standpoint
Throughout Biblical History when destruction is brought upon the people there are two prominent features. (ONE) The MOST HIGH uses natural phenomenon Floods, Hailstones, fire and sulfur etc.
(TWO) He allows the people to turn against themselves. Killing themselves.
I see this event unfolding before my eyes. It seems the World is about to explode because men of reason are drowned out
In our Nation alone, the hatred of people over ideology is about to turn bloody, as in bloody Revolution. Armed Camps.
Calling our President a liar, in the hallowed place; the Peoples house, is sacrilege. Disrespectful. What’s next, open rebellion?
September 9, 2009 10:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I agree Resistance. My own vitriol has been over the top and I count for little.
Screaming FU at at Senator set new standards by our last VP.
Now a congressman doing this, never before have I seen this type of behavior.
I do not know what to do about it.
Personally I am meditating some and even say a prayer from time to time.
I must work on my own venom first I guess, till my own garden.
September 9, 2009 11:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe you and I have what is called a passion.
But we don't allow our passion, to progress to murderous intent.
These rightwing Nut jobs are hell bent on causing harm if their demands are not met.
Neanderthal Jerks, incapable of reason, resorting to primitive behavior, "lets get the clubs and beat someone and take"
Maybe?
September 9, 2009 11:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
Desiderata
by Max Ehrmann
Go placidly amid the noise and the haste,
and remember what peace there may be in silence.
As far as possible, without surrender,
be on good terms with all persons.
Speak your truth quietly and clearly, and listen to others,
even to the dull and ignorant;
they too have their story.
Avoid loud and aggressive persons;
they are vexatious to the spirit.
If you compare yourself with others,
you may become vain or bitter,
for always there will be
greater and lesser persons than yourself.
Enjoy your achievements as well as your plans.
Keep interested in your own career
however humble;
it is a real possession in the
changing fortunes of time.
Exercise caution in your business affairs,
for the world is full of trickery.
But let this not blind you
to what virtue there is;
many persons strive for high ideals,
and everywhere life is full of heroism.
Be yourself.
Especially do not feign affection.
Neither be cynical about love,
for in the face of all aridity and disenchantment,
it is as perennial as the grass.
Take kindly the counsel of the years,
gracefully surrendering the things of youth.
Nurture strength of spirit
to shield you in sudden misfortune.
But do not distress yourself with dark imaginings.
Many fears are born of fatigue and loneliness.
Beyond a wholesome discipline,
be gentle with yourself.
You are a child of the universe
no less than the trees and the stars;
you have a right to be here.
And whether or not it is clear to you,
no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.
Therefore, be at peace with God,
whatever you conceive Him to be.
And whatever your labors and aspirations,
in the noisy confusion of life,
keep peace in your soul.
With all its sham,
drudgery, and broken dreams,
it is still a beautiful world.
Be cheerful.
Strive to be happy.
September 10, 2009 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Three times I have read this. It must have been decades since I have read this.
But I could not have understood it. This has me crying, no kidding Flower.
What a delightful poem.
It reminds me of a short scene in Shakespeare, more comedic. The father? is quickly issuing instructions to a son going on a trip. But this poem is the Tao.
I certainly attempted some of these goals but too much noise, much too much noise in my head.
When I awaken I shall read this again and I think that I shall paste it on word with a proper title:
Child Flower of Mine.
September 10, 2009 12:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is not the first time I have posted The Desiderata on TPM and probably won't be the last. These are the words I return to again and again, to....recalibrate.
I hope you had a good sleep, Mr. Day.
September 10, 2009 12:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you for this post DD. I listened to the President speak tonight and was amazed at his calm demeanor in the face of the insulting screech from the far right. They look so pitiful at this point.
Like Ike says in the following letter, I think President Obama tried to "stabilize the spirit of our population." I sure hope it helped, although I'm not sure it reached the folks who needed most to hear it. If most of rural America only gets faux newwz...Maybe things are way beyond civil now, but I'm not giving up yet.
His speech clarified healthcare as both a human right AND a commodity. I'm still not convinced that will work well for the people. Where is there morality in corporate affairs? I'm not a "consumer" first, I'm a human being. His moral argument could have been a lot stronger.
This is part of the letter written by President Eisenhower to a constituent in another rough political period - 1959.
http://www.eisenhowermemorial.org/presidential-papers/second-term/documents/1051.cfm
:
September 10, 2009 2:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
What a wonderful follow up Strato. Just wonderful.
I know there really never were any good old days. Hell Cicero really knew there really were no good old days for him either, even though he would include the concept in his oratory.
But Ike, to me, is the vision of a real leader.
Here is the task. You must take this heterogeneous jumble of nations and soldiers AND VANQUISH THE TYRANT WHO HAS CONQUERED IT. Commies, conservatives, aristocrats, peasants....
He had his goal and he got there.
Thank you so much for this and the link.
September 10, 2009 2:28 AM | Reply | Permalink
I had a paper route and my recollection is that the daily paper was a nickel delivered to your door and the Sunday edition was twenty cents. The daily went to seven cents after a while. And I remember well the paper drives. The daily and Sunday could be had under subscription for fifty cents when I started. It went to sixty cents and remained there for a long time. I delivered the paper in my own neighborhood and remember one Christmas having gotten enough money from Christmas greeting calendars to get a new 10 speed bike. I wore that sucker out. I also had one of those Schwinns with the spring in front. That bike was way cool. I got it for $20 or $25 used. It was a tank and indestructable. I rode that one year round, even all winter. I also remember that I was a skinny kid not more than seventy pounds soaking wet hauling a wagon full of the Sunday edition and dragging that wagon through two feet of snow on some Sunday mornings in the winter. I'm sure the papers and wagon weighed more than I did. My mom worried it was too much for me. On the occasional very bad winter morning once or twice a season she would walk the route with me. I have twelve brothers and sisters. I'm the second oldest. I'll never forget her.
September 10, 2009 6:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
TPC, this brings a tear to my eye for many reasons I guess. Maybe the way cool Schwin. Maybe the fact that we knew we had to kind of get out there on our own and make a buck.
I was the second oldest of five but I was the eldest son. Junior.
My mother had little idea what I did all day. hahaha
One tear for sure concerns Mom following you. That is precious.
September 10, 2009 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks DD. I just had to pass that along because of the newspaper stuff. I knew you would appreciate it. I'm like you otherwise. Especially in summers. From my early teens on I would run around the streets all night and she never worried. Of course, I didn't dare screw up. My dad handled that and he didn't tolerate screwing up. Just follow the rules or you got your bell rung. Simple even for a dumb kid. No wonder kids have a hard time now. We've made life too complex.
September 10, 2009 11:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great post, dickday. I, too, remember having deference for President Reagan when I was a kid even though my mom, sis, and I had been adversely affected by his deep cuts in social programs. He was, after all, the President of the United States and he looked like a kindly grandfather to boot.
Today, a whole lotta kids all over the U.S. have been told by their parents that Obama is NOT their president, that he's an illegal and a socialist and a fascist and a racist and a communist (I do wish these people could gets their 'ists figured out, actually). Some of those kids were kept home from school in order to keep them from being 'indocteranated' by that 'black-skinned-not-president-not-American' guy. What must those kids think about the office of the president now? Hell, I'm 39 and I'm scared of the word 'indocternated,' too! It sounds like maybe it's about getting an operation on your privates or something. So there it is. Even the most basic respect for the POTUS by school children has been sacrificed on the alter of wing-nuttery.
We are burning, dickday, and the greased-pocket politicians gladly accompany the corporations who quietly fiddle amongst the flames....okay, horrible metaphor, but you get the sentiment, I'm sure.
September 10, 2009 7:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nothing quiet about their fiddling - there's as much profit to be had in destruction as rebuilding. They're having a party right now.
September 10, 2009 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Today, a whole lotta kids all over the U.S. have been told by their parents that Obama is NOT their president, that he's an illegal and a socialist and a fascist and a racist and a communist (I do wish these people could gets their 'ists figured out, actually).
This is a great line with a sad truth. I get angry about this Billy. Thank you for weighing in.
September 10, 2009 10:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I stood up and booed the SOB at a Cub game when he made an appearance there. He deserved it. No longer the worst President of my lifetime, but still in the top three.
September 10, 2009 3:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
DD - my intertubez went out last night so I didn't get to rec or comment, but this was a wonderful read.
Unfortunately, despite their "respect for the office" (yeah, right) the Republicans DISGRACED themselves with their behavior the past few months and put it all on display for the public last night. Although Joe Wilson is getting all the flack, there were others who were just as awful, and they should be called out, too.
I mean, geez. I HATED W. I actually lost it with him before you did - he said something really, really stupid in the 2000 campaign (big surprise) and I remember thinking...no way is is this bozo going to be president. He makes Bozo look like an intellectual. And then his dad's connections stole the election for him and I couldn't handle it. During 9/11 I gagged during his ground zero speech. It felt wrong to see that mockery of a human being being cheered in that place.
But, I watched every speech to Congress - he's the president and he's speaking to the country. You watch it. You don't have to like it, but you at least hear him out. And, sometimes he said things I begrudgingly agreed with. And, you'd better believe if I'd been in the House of Representatives I would NOT have heckled the guy (out loud, anyway).
There are some things mature grown ups just don't do. One of them is invite a guest over and heckle him. And the President was a guest in their chamber.
Anyway, I really, REALLY enjoyed this post, DD. Thanks.
September 10, 2009 9:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well you reflect upon the golden years with w much as I do. Hard to even get a chuckle out of it Burnie. Pitiful.
Like you say:
But, I watched every speech to Congress - he's the president and he's speaking to the country. You watch it. You don't have to like it, but you at least hear him out.
Oh yeah there is a difference. My President was elected to his first term. haha
See, I can still chuckle. You take care Burnie.
September 10, 2009 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
I sure Ike would consider jumping to the other side of the aisle now that those "demagogic extremists" have ascended throughout the GOP power structure and taken over the rhetoric.
September 10, 2009 12:58 PM | Reply | Permalink
And why the hell can the right no longer express proper rhetoric. McCain can sound courteous and all, but he has not handle on the art of expression like President Obama.
McConnell, Boehner? geeeeeeez give me a break.
People are yelling at Stenny. When Hoyer takes the dais, HE IS IN CHARGE. Obey, in his own way, knows how to speak.
But nobody can reach the cadences and gestures of an Obama.
Does it matter anymore? I wonder. With horrible speakers like palin and bachman,making millions on the lecture circuit it really astounds me.
Ike had prestige and status....HE WAS THE EMPEROR.
September 10, 2009 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think there might be something to the fact that the base of Republican-movement, the ones who decide who will make it through the primaries, respond to the aw-shucks, well there you go again kind of speakers, or the ones who remind them of their angry ministers and preachers, but none who might cause them them to ponder their own intellectual prowness and curiousity. One of the reason that wing-nuts on the right hate Obama so much that doesn't get as much blog time is just plain anti-intellectualism. You know, he's one of those guys who LIKES to think about things, and thinks knowledge is power.
September 10, 2009 1:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
And someone just showed me this link on e-bay - $37,700 is the latest bid to have dinner with Palin as part of charity fund raiser. (Rovc is only at about $9,000 for a lunch date - ewwwwww)
http://cgi.ebay.com/Private-Dinner-for-Five-with-Sarah-Palin_W0QQitemZ260474255847QQcmdZViewItemQQptZTickets_Experiences?hash=item3ca579b9e7&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14
September 10, 2009 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dick, I delivered papers with my sister when my neighbor was on vacation. My father was a newspaperman for a great part of his working life; wrote speeches for politicians including Prime Ministers. He was from back in the day when you had to be informed to write for 'the paper'. I remember the paper drives at school. I remember Little Rock and how shocked my parents and I were about it, and every event you have written about here. Eisenhower was a hero, the last of the Republican heroes among Presidents. A decent man.
We now have a decent man in the White House once more, only some of us are unfamiliar with the concept.
September 10, 2009 1:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
See Loosey, I am getting feed back from people like you WHO REMEMBER. It was a different day. Like I told TPC we ran all over on our bikes, my Mom never knew where I was. I had to be home for dinner and I think I had a 9:00 curfew.
I will tell you one thing. The South knew not to screw with IKE.
NO BOOING IN THOSE DAYS. HAHAHAHA
September 10, 2009 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like Ike... Do I have to turn in my Progressive card?
September 10, 2009 1:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
No Steve. Remember, an awful lot of Republicans in those days believed in Civil Rights, worried about the poor...
Besides the SOB won WWII, what more do you want?
September 10, 2009 1:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Naw. We'll give him an honorary one. He may not have been the Prince of Progressives, but giving us the Warren Court with Brennen should earn him one if nothing else.
September 10, 2009 1:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
I seem to recall, though, that appointing Warren was one of Eisenhower’s greatest regrets. Maybe just an Unintentional Progressive card?
September 10, 2009 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I dunno. He said that, yes. But Ike was a conciliator. I mean he had to take different nations into a world war, AND LEAD THEM. See.
No he was never a progressive.
But geeeeeeeeeeez Warren is my God. Yes he is.
Repub Governor of California, and made Chief Justice of the Supreme Court after a rather decent Justice Vincent.
There is a story about a Chauffeur taking Earl for a ride and somehow the discussion got to staying at a local inn for the night, IN OUR NATION'S CAPITAL, and the Chauffeur demurring as to where he could stay.
Warren had no idea what his driver was talking about.
This repub, made history. And when you read the prose and really poetry that came out of his Court with the likes of Douglas and Black...you will weep. But it takes 100 or 300 cases to get into the real depth of what this Court addressed.
Oh but there are all these procedures and protocols to get through in order to get to this Court's docket.
Hell Black or Douglas would get a personal letter delivered to them for under a nickel and get the case heard and appoint Abe Fortis to argue the goddman thing in the idiot's behalf.
THERE WAS MAGIC IN THOSE DAYS.
And those days have been lost.
September 12, 2009 12:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
There was a great Australian film, 'Strictly Ballroom', wherein the protagonist, an over-the-hill ballroom dance champion, intones to the young up and comers who want to experiment with new ballroom moves, "There are NO new steps!". Like the Republicans who define agendas based on their fear of change, I'm sure he would have been a big fan of Fox Broadcasting.
September 10, 2009 2:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
With all the commutations and permutations involved in dancing...I love to watch some of the free lancers in the Woodstock Film.
A good cultural anthropologist would choke on a line like that. ha
Take tax credits. They make a difference to someone pulling down a couple of hundred grand a year. A real difference. Just as deductions do.
But that IS ALL THEY EVER COME UP WITH!!!
Are we to think that if the tax rate were cut to zero, we would fill up the tax coffers?
September 10, 2009 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do remember paper drives, but at our church. They'd have a truck in the church parking lot and people would take their bundled papers to the truck. We always had lots of papers - two local papers, two Detroit papers (or even three before the Times went kaput), the Sunday New York Times - Dad just couldn't live without multiple newspapers to read. I think the guy loading the papers into the truck probably thought we were bringing the neighborhood's contribution instead of just our own.
When newspapers first started setting up websites I started reading lots of them, sort of renewing Dad’s tradition. I don’t read as many now, there are so many other sites to read that I run out of time. But I think if he were still around Dad would probably have branched out beyond newspaper websites himself (that’s if he adapted to computers at all, which I suppose might not have happened with someone born before WWI).
September 10, 2009 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink