Promises To Keep

Well to start all this off, I think we should all sing along to the Woo Hoo Pokeman Song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-I7Z7swNMs
Woo hoo Woo hoo Woo hoo Woo hoo Woo hoo Woo hoo
All righty then. Senator John Ensign began his carreer in a similar vein to Lindsey Graham:
In 1994, Ensign won the Republican nomination for Nevada's 1st congressional district, based in Las Vegas. He was far behind four-term Democratic incumbent James Bilbray for most of the campaign. However, Ensign gained considerable momentum after reports surfaced that a Bilbray aide stood to make a huge profit from lands legislation sponsored by Bilbray.
So basically, Ensign was one of those revolutionaries riding into Congress with Gingrich Wave, capitalizing on the rising tide of fascism in this country with the added benefit of taking on an opponent charged with graft. And like Lindsey, Ensign rose to the level of Senator and had the opportunity to vote for the impeachment of Bill Clinton for moral failings. The Las Vegas Sun has reported:
The one-time mistress and campaign treasurer of Sen. John Ensign saw her salary double during the time of the affair, according to federal election documents.
It seems that Cynthia Hampton, doubled her pleasure and her fun as her salary went from $1400/month to $2800/month during this version of Wife Swap. Her boy even got into the act picking up over five grand for his help on Ensign's campaign.
Doug Hampton had been earning about $160,000 annually since he started on the senator's payroll on Nov. 8, 2006. He was one of the top paid aides in the office, receiving pay equal to the senator's chief of staff. http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2009/jun/17/ensign-resigns-gop-leadership-post/J. Patrick Coolican (contact), Lisa Mascaro (contact)
Okay then. Well we gotta lotta things going here, do we not? I mean we have a man who is a:
Born again Christian (I suppose he could get born again again? I mean what is to stop this? And further mistakes and he could do it again and again and again)
Promise Keeper. Thanks to Steve Katz, I was given a link to this wonderful organization. It claims five and a half million members. Of course this would be hyperbola but it tells me there are more than a million who think they are promise keepers and I would think that Senator Ensign will not be asked to speak at their yearly convention any time soon.
Minority Leadership Positions in the Senate. Not anymore.
Potential Presidential Candidate. Come on, get serious.
Senator from the great State of Nevada. Let us see about that.
Well the Senate has its own ethics rules. And it will be fun to see how the ethical considerations play here. Cannot you see the answers to some of the questions without even seeing the questions:
A. Ms. Hampton showed real development in her role with the campaign and I felt it important that she be rewarded for her new found production.
B. Ms. Hampton's role in the campaign shifted at the time of her raise, due to her newly discovered talents.
C. There are others in my Senate Office and in my Campaign that are charged with deciding the proper monies that should be paid to employees, I am above such things.
Well I could go on and on here. But how best to defend a brother in a situation like this? Well Lindsey has come to the defense:
In an interview with Politico about Sen. John Ensign's recent admission of an affair with a campaign staffer, Sen. Lindsey Graham said he had his own secret "sins."
"I think he will be welcomed back by his colleagues and go back to being a good senator," said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who said Ensign shouldn't have resigned his leadership spot.
Graham downplayed the political impact this would have on the GOP, saying, "Most Americans look at this as a personal situation."
Graham let out a laugh and said: "I've got plenty of sins that I'm not going to share with anyone else." HuffPo.
Well what kind of sins could we be talking about here? Both Graham and Ensign gave wonderful speeches about how and why Clinton should have been impeached; one in the House and one in the Senate.
I usually do not go for Chris Rock's style of humor although it turns out he is a great dad and a great husband in spite of his spiels. But he did a great monologue about Clinton during the impeachment process. Basically he was saying:
I mean he cheated on his wife and lied about it. IS NOT THAT WHAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO DO?
He was asked about extra marital affairs and he lied about it. IS NOT THAT WHAT HE WAS SUPPOSED TO DO?
But our friend Lindsey, he thinks that Ensign's problems are personal in nature. And after all, everybody has some sins they are not going to share with anyone else. I mean where is the forgiveness here? Where is the understanding?
Well I checked out the web. And it appears that our southern friends in South Carolina, the capital of the Confederacy--forget that Richmond stuff--have some misgivings with our bachelor Senator. Well the Charleston City Newspaper has come questions back in September of 2007:
Is Lindsey Graham gay?
At 52, the life-long bachelor has been fodder for such rumors for years, but with the resignation of Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho -- the anti-gay politician who pled guilty to disorderly conduct after allegedly soliciting sex in an airport men's room -- the internet is abuzz over who's next, and they're dying to know what's going on in Graham's bedroom. Is it the latest grasp for the light switch in South Carolina's powerful political closet? Or the inevitable labeling of "closet-clinging self-hater" that befalls any content bachelor?
Mainstream media often avoids asking older, single politicians what they do in their free time. While there were rumors dating back 25 years, it wasn't until blog reports about Craig trolling cruisy D.C. restrooms that The Idaho Statesmen put a reporter on the story. And even though they held the story until after Craig's arrest was made public, some still accused the paper of orchestrating a witch hunt.
When GQ asked last year, Graham wasn't mean, just dismissive. He said he's not gay, just a loner. But that denial isn't stalling renewed interest in the question. In a post on who's next out of the closet following Craig's arrest, blogger Michael Signorile (www.signorile.com) first points a questioning finger at Graham. http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A32974
In another blog site called 'Down With Tyranny" it was noted that:
Lindsey Graham (R-SC), an unmarried/never married 52 year old with a funny, forced way of walking, has been far more fastidious with his homosexuality. Again, "everyone" knows-- except the voters in conservative South Carolina. Not that it doesn't come up from time to time; people talk. In fact, the head of the Democratic Party in South Carolina said something when the effeminate Lindsey decided to run for Thurmond's senate seat. "He's a little too light in the loafers" to succeed Strom Thurmond. Graham got into a really queenie tizzy fit and loudly threatened to sue-- although he didn't. (They never do.) http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2007/02/is-lindsey-graham-homo-does-pope-go.html
Look, normally I would not care if Lindsey is gay or not. But if he is, he is just another son of a bitchin' repub living his double life, projecting phony standards that do not apply to him. He and Ensign speaking out against gay rights, for phony Constitutional Amendments, challenging Democrats as being against 'family values'; its all a bunch of hooey. But we must remember that Lindsey, he took over the seat of one of the biggest hypocrites in history, old Strom Thurmond.
'Segregation now, segregation forever. Except in my bedroom'
















These self-righteous, preening closet cases infuriate me no end.
Having two gay relatives, and knowing as I do that they are not only family members but wonderful human beings, anyone who seeks to further, or even continue, discrimination against them - for whatever reason - is my enemy. No one attacks my family members without earning my enmity.
And it's always the closet cases that are the most vocal. Keep "those people" away from the rest of us, they cry, don't let them live normal lives, or express their love for each other in anything remotely like commitment. And certainly don't let them have the same rights as the rest of us.
Got news for you, Lindsey Graham, it's changing around you whether you like it or not. Deal or crawl back into your closet. And leave my family, and those they choose to love, the bloody hell alone.
June 18, 2009 6:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very well put, me. I haven't a thing to add.
Except - another good one, Dick!
June 18, 2009 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you. Just...thank you.
June 18, 2009 7:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Missy. thank you for your support as always.
June 18, 2009 8:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh Grouch I get so mad at these people, especially when they pontificate.
June 18, 2009 7:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Promises To Keep
and Promisers To Dump
June 18, 2009 7:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Eds, thanks for dropping by. There is more to this than hypocrisy and I really am trying to get ahold of it.
It is lying to your constituency for power and of course money for your friends while you are in power.
It is attacking a minority group for no other reason than retaining the same power....
The word hypocrisy just does not do justice.
This promise keeper organization is opening their arms to Ensign anyway. ha
June 18, 2009 8:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Promise Keepers. Just Words!
June 18, 2009 7:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah. I mean, who really is on the record as being against promises?
Except maybe insurance companies according to FAce today. Ha
June 18, 2009 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I feel a little bit sad for people who stay in the closet, especially the politicians who are so frightened that they'll be outted that they rail against who they are. In my perfect world, everyone is free to be.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCg9XLb-vHY&feature=PlayList&p=57713EBD807FA9D6&index=0&playnext=1
June 18, 2009 7:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi O. Thank you for the link. I actually played fifteen minutes of it. I remember this.
Marlo was always a favorite of mine.
I guess I am just really mad at Lindsey for impeaching MY PRESIDENT. ha
June 18, 2009 7:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm being funny and fictitious when I say this. But when my Gay daughter comes home with her partner , where she is completely welcomed as is her partner , I always wait to feel "the threat to my marriage"; it never happens. I like the attitude in what Old Grouch said. "These self- righteous , preening closet cases infuriate me to no end." I hate them too.
But dickday what's up with a obviously Gay Senator like Lindsey Graham not only denying who he really is but "attacking" , at many levels , Gay people and the Gay culture. It's akin to something like what happens to some Black people in America who , as a result of having been raised in a country that's obviously hostile to them , they buckle under this type of treatment and the effect is you have Black people that end up not appreciating who they are as people and , in fact , end up being "closet haters" of who they are. In my opinion this is a defiant state to have yourself in. So what I'm saying is that Lindsey Graham in the end is hating himself. In time this behavior is going to come back and effect Lindsey Graham adversely. Just like the warehouse suit guy says; I guarantee it.
June 18, 2009 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Viper I was trying to draw parallels to the two senators. Now one senator is just what he is-if we believe rumors-and the other is actually committing adultery.
And they are both pushing the same hypocritical message, both dumping on gays the best they know how.
Most of the time they get away with it.
June 18, 2009 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Makes you wonder what promises they ARE keeping. So often it doesn't seem to be to constituents or wives. Or being honest when they criticize people's orientation if they are one of them
Good piece, DD. Re'd.
June 18, 2009 8:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Maggie. hahahaha
June 18, 2009 8:53 PM | Reply | Permalink
All I have to say on this one DD is that this particular picture of Lindsay Graham really creeps me out.
June 18, 2009 8:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought that too. That is why I chose it. Came from the somewhat homophobic blog I quote that I think is not homophobic at all but rather written by a Gay or by one who spends a lot of time writing for Gay causes.
Graham has no defense to his position, if these rumors are true.
June 18, 2009 8:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think he should be free to stay in the closet if he wants to. He's an old southern man. Different generation. I ran into a few of the "closet" gays in my lifetime, and I think they would have been happiest staying there. Just my own experience.
What he is NOT free from, is charges of hypocrisy. He has no family so he shouldn't espouse on family values. He's clueless. If he'd like to take up the cause of "loners," (and there are plenty,) let him do so. He can leave families, openly gay people, and others out of his rhetoric, though.
I don't think anyone takes him too seriously, anyway.
June 18, 2009 8:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
"take up the case of loners" - I like that!
Linzey for Loners.
June 18, 2009 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry... "take up the cause for loners" (misquoted you there) ;)
June 18, 2009 10:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
hahahha. You get a chuckle out of me!!
June 18, 2009 10:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's OK. I miss you, this place isn't half as nice
I'd imagine it takes it's toll. Take all the time you need.
It's just good to read you.
June 18, 2009 10:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak!! I don't know where the chatroom is and I never see ANYONE anymore :(
And this was an awesome post, Dick! I was reading it in my RSS feed, and it compelled me to log in!
June 18, 2009 11:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Burnedout. Listen we closed up early. but check out tomorrow:
http://widget.mibbit.com/?settings=7a731d035e7e4a1205ccf106b1333be1&channel=%23tpm-aholics
Make sure you put a name in before connecting.
Good to see you again!!!
June 18, 2009 11:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bookmarked! Thanks so much!
June 18, 2009 11:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know what you mean. It may be a great deal of time. You know how to reach me. (There is a place where you can private message. Think on that one.)
I miss you too. And everyone. I need this time.
June 21, 2009 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
What he is NOT free from, is charges of hypocrisy. He has no family so he shouldn't espouse on family values."
EGGSACTLY
June 18, 2009 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
BUT, he's John McCain's 'BFF'! And surely Senator McCain (Rep.) would not support Senator Graham's (Rep.) duplicity!
I don't know dd, that would be so unlike the GOP who tout their banner of Christianity and Honesty. Are you suggesting that (gulp) they are hypocrites and preach their righteous convictions, yet are hypocrites and living lies?!?
And gee, I've always thought Senator Graham (Rep.) and his ilk were always honest in thought and deed. (heh heh)
Great post. Rec'd.
June 18, 2009 9:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok Auntie. Well, yes they ARE ALL HYPOCRITES. HAHAHAHAH
June 18, 2009 9:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
And indeed WE may, but the Republicans certainly do not.
June 18, 2009 9:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
You got that right Rowan. hahahahaha
June 18, 2009 9:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
June 18, 2009 10:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is great Psuedo, I mean this is really great.
Not that you care that much but I hereby award you the Dayly Link/cites Award for the DAy at this here TPMCafe site, given to all of you from all of me.
This is more than precious!!!
June 18, 2009 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Promises. Always!
June 19, 2009 2:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey quite a lilt Miguel. Quite a lilt.
June 19, 2009 3:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Harvey Milk had it about right.
June 19, 2009 2:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
YES HE DID INDEED!!! Well put Joe.
June 19, 2009 3:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good one! I say "grind the bastards down"
tnx for the shout out...
June 19, 2009 11:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
woo hoo woo hoo woo hoo woo hoo
June 19, 2009 11:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
You need a woo hoo Song 2. Blur.
June 19, 2009 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh to be young and on amphetamines.
Ha!!!
June 19, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
This post would have been better served had you left conjecture about someone's private life out of it. There is more than enough hypocrisy in the Promise Keepers/Ensign scenario to float a boat.
You say,
"Look, normally I would not care if Lindsey is gay or not. But if he is, he is just another son of a bitchin' repub living his double life, projecting phony standards that do not apply to him."
AND IF HE'S NOT?
June 19, 2009 2:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Take a look at Bwak's comment.
June 19, 2009 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Graham's parents died when he was 21/22 and he adopted his younger sister to legally be responsible for her.
I think commenting on someone's values, whether it be familial or spiritual, without first hand knowledge is irresponsible.
I'm not saying Graham is not a hypocritical on many levels. Syncronicity's blog " Beyond Paradox: Painting With A Broader Palette" hits the bullseye here. Any person is capable of holding certain values dear while casting others to the heap.
June 19, 2009 6:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am shocked, SHOCKED to find out another member of our government is corrupt.
June 19, 2009 4:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
ha! Methinks you protest too much. hahahaha
June 19, 2009 5:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Plenty of examples of people who have deliberately made their personal lives public or have made statements about their personal lives public, perhaps reluctantly because of actual factual revelations that demonstrate their hypocrisy.
IMHO, though, to put forth only added conjecture about someone's personal life can be destructive.
I am hardly an advocate for Sen. Graham and there are countless concrete examples of his hypocrisy, but I'm going to respect the guy's right to privacy on this particular issue. The conjecture is none of my business.
Ensign, on the other hand, chose, albeit reluctantly, to make his personal life our business by calling a press conference and admitting to an affair and he'll have to face the public fallout.
Of course there's a pattern of hypocrisy and members in congress should be held to account for that.
But there's a line you're straddling here that I've seen crossed so frequently on right-wing extremist blogs. What I know of you tells me there is no way you could cross that line as maliciously as some lunatics in the blogosphere do.
I can't recommend this post, DD. I have no holier than thou feelings about it, I go too far sometimes too.
My blessing is that I have friends that offer a word of caution for me simply to consider when I do.
June 19, 2009 5:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well stated. If it were easier for me to type, I would have more adequately presented tpmgary's sentiments in my reply to DD.
June 19, 2009 5:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
THIS GUY IMPEACHED MY PRESIDENT ON THE BASIS OF SOME GODDAMNABLE PHONEY MORALITY./ HE IS A DIRTY ROTTEHN BASTARD ASND I HOPE HE ROTSW IN FUCKING HELL
June 19, 2009 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now, you've written something in which we have total agreement
June 19, 2009 6:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't like the guy either, DD. But he's not worth my contempt on the grounds of conjecture.
There's so much else about the guy with which to vilify him and publicize his immorality, though, that's on the record.
June 19, 2009 6:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
woo hoo wooo hooo hooo woo hoo wooo hooo hooo
woo hoo wooo hooo hooo woo hoo wooo hooo hooo
June 19, 2009 6:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
is...is that a Kill Bill reference:)) I think you're making a Kill Bill reference. 5,6,7,8s?
crazy 88s?
June 19, 2009 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
Iran's supreme leader The Grand Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is a charlatan, a practicer of chicanery, and a hypocrite!
lifer is in my pants, guys
(and gals)
June 19, 2009 5:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
HAHAHAHAHAHAH
June 19, 2009 6:15 PM | Reply | Permalink