« Dadaism: The Answer to Republicanism | dickday's Blog | A Perfect Day »

CASTE WARFARE


Where is the money going to come from? ask the repubs when presented with health care legislation.

Where is the money going to come from? ask the repubs when presented with new education legislation.

Where is the money going to come from? ask the repubs when presented with other budget considerations.

Just the other day, someone on cable was discussing the problems with SEC enforcement. The enforcement division is short on help and there is no money to bring on more staff, was the reply.

In bankruptcy court, there is a trustee appointed. The trustee and the court are paid out of the proceeds--the assets of the bankrupt estate that must be distributed among various creditors--after costs.

Court costs and attorney's fees are oft times awarded in a civil action.

The SEC and the DOJ could make billions of dollars prosecuting the thieves that run our capitalist structure today. Billions. The taxpayers would make money off of these prosecutions. Who is kidding whom?  Somebody is caught in a one billion dollar scheme of some sort, I do not care what you call it. You fine the bastard one billion dollars and put him in prison. Today.

A tax of one percent on all stock and bond trades would take care of half our national budget. Today. They all ready do this in Europe.

Americans are idiots.

Our leaders are idiots. Or are they?

 

THE CASTE SYSTEM

Aryans migrated from Central Europe and settled in the very fertile Indus Valley. Aryans were very clever. They implemented division of labor in their society. The most clever members of society were selected and given the task to teach others. The bravest people were selected and given the task to protect society. The dullest types of individuals who were able to tolerate a heavy workload were selected and given the task of supplying labor to others whenever needed. The rest of the people of the society were given the tasks to grow food, produce materials, trade, and supply the goods to others.

In Nepal however, there are truly only three categories of caste: Tagadhari (twice born), Matwali (liquor drinking) and Pani Nachalne. The Tagadharis include Nepals highest castes: Brahmins, Thakuris, and Chetris. The mid-ranking Matwalis include most of Nepals Tibeto-Burman and Indo-European tribal groups. The Pani Nachalne are untouchables associated with specific traditional occupations. These castes are ranked along an axiom of purity and pollution This caste system was codified in Nepal by the National Legal Code (Muluki Ain) of 1853 by Nepals Rana rulers. It lasted until 1951 when the Ranas were overthrown. It heavily favored the Brahmins and brought ruling against them when violating caste rules.

http://internet.cybermesa.com/~rotto/caste1.html

 

Several characteristics distinguish a caste system. The first is the tendency toward endogamy, meaning that people marry within the same caste exclusively. Caste mobility is also extremely rare; one cannot transform from a laborer to a scholar except in very rare circumstances, for example. Higher castes traditionally hold all of the political power, and the castes may be divided further through language, culture, and economics. Within a caste system, each member generally knows his or her place, and your social status is usually apparently to others as well. http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-a-caste-system.htm

Late Friday, Ruth Madoff reached an agreement with prosecutors that forfeits all but $2.5 million.

Saul and Sara Alpern also figure in another way in the ongoing investigation of Ruth Madoff. She had been claiming--as her own money not related to Bernie's fraud--nearly $85 million. That's $84.6 million, including $40 million in cash and securities in bank accounts, $22 million in real estate, and the remainder in boats and personal property, including $2.6 million in jewelry. http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-06-27/the-madoff-family-splinters/3/

Can you really picture some wife of a convicted drug dealer reaching an agreement with the prosecutor and ending up with three million bucks?

And what happens to the CEO's who fail? 

The sweetest sound on Wall Street these days? "You're fired."

The latest example is the $161.5 million retirement package collected by former Merrill Lynch (MER, news, msgs) chief Stanley O'Neal on his way out the doors of the troubled brokerage last month.

On O'Neal's watch, Merrill cranked out risky debt instruments backed by dodgy subprime mortgages. Then last month, O'Neal left the brokerage amid revelations of Merrill's heavy exposure to the imploding mortgage  market.

.http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/CompanyFocus/The5RichestPayoffsForFiredCEOs.aspx

It's been more than two years since Procter & Gamble (PG, news, msgs) took over Gillette, putting Gillette CEO James Kilts out of a job. A lot of CEOs have left their corner offices since then, but Kilts' golden goodbye was so huge it still takes the No. 4 slot for the all-time biggest retirement payouts this millennium. His take: $165 million,

The sheer size of former Home Depot (HD, news, msgs) CEO Robert Nardelli's golden goodbye sparked outrage on many fronts when he left the company in early 2007. First, Home Depot stock declined nearly 8% under his six-year watch. Next, he got all the loot even though he had already collected huge sums in annual pay -- including $219.7 million in the two years before leaving the company, according to The Corporate Library.

Under Henry McKinnell's watch from early 2001 through 2006, the shares of Pfizer (PFE, news, msgs) declined 40%. That cost shareholders $140 billion. No matter. He still left the CEO slot in July 2006 with a $213 million golden goodbye, thanks to an extremely generous board.

Given the strength in energy stocks since 2000, it probably comes as no surprise that the richest golden goodbye this millennium went to Lee Raymond, who retired as CEO of ExxonMobil (XOM, news, msgs) in 2006. He got $351 million. That's a lot for a guy who earned $70 million in his last year of work, or $34,457 an hour, according to The Corporate Library. His cash-out included a $98.4 million lump-sum pension payment.

Time reported in October of last year:

In the first half of the year, which is the latest available data from the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, the total fees that the investment banks and brokerage firms collected were nearly $166 billion. That's more than triple the $55.5 billion the firms had in revenue back in the first half of 2002. But the big difference is that in 2002, Wall Street was making money -- nearly $8 billion in the first half of that year. This year financial firms are deeply in the red. They lost more than $15 billion in the first half of the year alone, and that was before the market's big plunge in the past few months. Says Frank Bruconi, chief economist in the New York City comptroller's office: "Had the federal government not stepped in with a bailout plan and other moves, the pay and the employment situation on Wall Street would be much worse."

Three times what was collected in fees from 6 years prior.  Think about this. All made in a LOSING year.

Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Gretchen Morgenson discusses the latest news in bailouts and banking -- including the recent revelation that insurance giant AIG plans to pay $450 million in executive bonuses to the employees who work in the unit that crippled the company and contributed to its $40.5 billion loss. http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101936770

Just think what $450 million might do for road construction or a special medical coverage law.

What are some measures that we might consider in an effort to break down the walls of the current caste system?

I WANT ALL THESE CROOKS IN PRISON AND ALL THEIR MONIES CONFISCATED AS WELL AS THE ENTIRE WEALTH OF THEIR FAMILIES. NOW!!!

Instead we tax them between 5 and 15%--when we are lucky. Most of their taxes are 'deferred' anyway. Do not defer anything, ever. I want my money now.

And when the corporation ends up firing 'the help' way down on the ladder because of management's mismanagement of assets, when the administrative assistant loses his only visible means of support and commits suicide, CHARGE MANAGEMENT WITH MURDER. And fine the individuals involved one billion dollars.

When a janitor loses his job because of management's mismanagement of company assets; and the janitor's daughter dies because lack of access to medical care; CHARGE MANAGEMENT WITH MANSLAUGHTER. And fine the individuals involved on billion dollars.

When an insurer denies coverage to an insured based on some hidden 'clause', and that insured dies, CHARGE THE INSURER WITH MURDER. And fine the individuals involved one billion dollars.

Oh but you say, the great minds, those great achievers of MBA's....they will go elsewhere.

Good, send them to Haiti or Argentina. Who the f....are they kidding.

There are brilliant men and women smuggling drugs into this country every hour of every day. Brilliant. They do not 'go elsewhere' even though they face losing everything and finding themselves in prison for eternity.


(Just saw this after my post from June 6th, a blog I missed: http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/problem_is/2009/06/ruth-madoff-forfeits-assets-le.php)



47 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

(Sharpens pitchfork)

Yeah!!


user-pic

hahahaha

user-pic

I'm with ya.

user-pic

May I sign your caste?

user-pic

Why of course Donal. ooooh, a little higher please!!!

user-pic

"that Government OF the Wealth and Privileged class, BY the people of the Wealth and Privileged class, FOR the people of the Wealth and Privileged class, shall not perish from the earth”

user-pic

Yes I feel this way at times Resistance.

user-pic

Add to your list of possible money-makers for government realistic fees for patent and copyright protection and other ways government serves the interests of the upper caste. And how about a share of the profit off products and services created by government supported research? Intellectual property rights are younger than this nation. Surprise, surprise--people thought quite well without them. One of my pet peeves is the practice of buying up copyrights on academic materials--not for the sake of profiting from them, but to keep them from competing with similar products already in publication by one of the conglomerate publishing houses.

I love your description of this as caste, rather than class warfare, and your raising the issue of endogamy. To marry outside of one's caste or class one must have opportunity to meet members of other castes/classes. We've eliminated de jure racial segregation though we're a long way from eliminating de facto segregation by race. How many recognize we continually support de jure segregation by class?.

The tools are the tools of zoning and land use regulation. Set a minimum lot size of three acres and you're creating a haven for persons who prefer not to mix with them. Zone for single use, there goes the mom and pop store with the apartment above. These tools are a little over a century old, and guess who introduced them? The "progressive" political faction of the times. I hope to do a piece or two on reforms gone awry beginning in a day or two. Then I won't have to clutter up your blog with tediously long comments. (apologies for that).

user-pic

Great, great. You have it. But intellectual property

I had not thought about that. without the government there is no such thing. Licensing based upon money made off of the property

ha

I like this a lot.

Land use and reg and zoning and restrictive covenants....You already know Professor these go back centuries...

And now, exclusivity....

Thank you for this Amike. Thank you very much

user-pic
Land use and reg and zoning and restrictive covenants....You already know Professor these go back centuries...

Yup. Arthur of the Roundish Table would recognize this...I think they called it Feudalism or something like that. No poaching the King's deer. Poaching the King's dear was another matter--rumor hath it that it happened from time to time.

user-pic

Amike
Another tool is education.

Primary school funding is local and even schools,
in the same districts, are allocated differing assets.

At the secondary level of education there is
a high dropout rate that saves money from being spent in
certain geographic, social, or racial areas of a school district.

Colleges use the same principals by funding differing
studies within the college or university to different levels.

Secondary and colleges use the high drop out rate to subsidize
those who graduate during their early years at each institution.

This is seen easiest in collages where the 100 and 200 level classes are lecture halls and most profitable. By the time a class has moved into its third year and the teacher to student ration decreases there has been the largest percent of dropouts.

I think that for all the kids that started school in the first grade together across the country the college graduation rate may be around 12% to 17%. I hope I am wrong.


user-pic

I realize you are speaking to the Professor but I cannot help myself. He certainly would know more about this than me.

But I really am intrigued by this 'conspiratorial' theory. Yes, 'they' would save money with a higher drop out rate.

And property taxes as a means to fund schooling or any municipal or county function is inherently unfair is it not?

Very fine comment. I can tell you are THINKING. ha!

user-pic

Yes dickday the local governments save money
but there is a second effect for the college graduates.

The students who drop out of college during the large
lecture hall classes actually "subsidize" those who graduate.

When one hears I paid my own college expenses or I worked my way through
by my own efforts, remember the "COMMUNITY" of those who dropped out subsidized them by paying part of their tuition!

user-pic

No conspiracy is needed. Just watch Caddyshack.

As Judge Smails says, the world needs ditch-diggers, too. The status quo is served by the status quo. If ignorance and poverty were good enough for your grandfather, they're good enough for you, just as long as it maintains my superior position.

user-pic

I'm just dismayed watching the privitization of education. It's going to be like insurance. The corporations will cherry pick who they want in their private schools, leaving the malcontents to drop back into public schools that are overwhelmed with an "unnatural", if you will,high percentage of underperforming students needing more funds per capita then your typical public school today. That public schools will flounder will be a truth driven by the cast offs of the private schools, which, of course, will be publicly funded with our vouchers, but certainly not available to everyone. If you are from the wrong side of the tracks, those schools will be full, but not too full for those kids from the right side.

user-pic
I think that for all the kids that started school in the first grade together across the country the college graduation rate may be around 12% to 17%. I hope I am wrong.

I think you're a bit on the pessimistic side with this. One of my favorite sites to is American Factfinder provided by the Department of the Census.
Find it at http://factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_lang=en
You can find all sorts of statistics at levels from state to census tract. And you can graph them. It really is wonderful.

The figures are a bit out of date now--the 2000 census is the one available for most charting characteristics. IF Michelle Bachmann lets us have another Census in 2010 we can see what the new millennium has done to us.

Anyhow, for the country as a whole, in 2000, 24.4% of the population had a bachelor's degree or higher. The figure varies widely from state to state...In Massachusetts the 2000 figure was 33.3%. In Mississippi, 16.9%. I'm not suggesting a political correlation--yes I am. So perhaps these census figures to support DDay's Caste Warfare thesis. The figures also vary widely between rural and urban areas as one might expect.

user-pic

There was a case, long ago, in Chicago, of the execs of a company being charged for allowing this condition to exist: Employees, who in most cases read and spoke English poorly, if at all, at a silver recovery plant (a by-product of film processing chemistry), were poisoned by the chemicals the plant used in its daily operations. The warning labels were only in (scientific) English.

I don't think anyone ever did time, though.

What we really need is an end to "corporate personhood" to bring some of this about. Make boards and officers responsible for illegal actions and consequences of those actions.

user-pic

Absolutely, absofrickinlutely. Personhood. Damn!!!

You know grouch there are laws on the books for corporate individuals...reckless indifference, gross negligence causing danger and grievous harm to others, along with intentional conduct causing grievous harm....

WHO ENFORCES IT?

Good points Grouch. New laws put pressure on those in charge to prosecute and the individuals involved to WATCH THEIR BLOODY STEP.

user-pic

At the time of the Revolution, corporations were created for a limited time. Now we have these companies hundreds of years old. People die, but evidently some corporations do not.

user-pic

Yeah Gregor, and that SOLIDIFIES THE CASTES. HA

user-pic

Doesn't it though...

user-pic

I believe that was in 1982 in Elk Grove Village, IL, with Film Recovery Systems. OSHA under St. Ron of the RayGun was run by Thorne Auchter in his capacity as Undersecretary of OSHA. He had something of an anti-OSHA personality from his previous employment. Anyway the company got an OSHA inspection but because of regulations limiting inspection scope was unable to visit a nearby building where workes were being poisoned. After there was a death and a body to explain, OSHA got in and proposed some fines which were routinely negotiated down in those days. You could go to the OSHA website and get the history of fines for this company if you want. My citation is kind of funky: NEWSWEEK Dec. 11, 1989.

user-pic

Thanks tao, I have written down the date and I will take a gander at the mag. Sounds like a repub OSHA to me!!!

user-pic

Grouch & DD - here is a much better citation: http://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/establishment.inspection_detail?id=15933419
Summary: First inspection 11/24/82 - records only. OSHA had implemented a directive that Employers who had kept a log that showed their Lost Workday case rate was less than the average for their industry, would not be inspected since they were clearly not the high hazard shops OSHA was looking for. Word got around and the log went from the realm of statistical only information into the realm of an OSHA compliance tool. The very next year there was the most remarkable drop in BLS statistics on Lost Workday cases that was ever seen, BTW. So the inspector never got past the receptionist that day. OSHA pointed out that their cooperative program with employers was working out well and took credit for the drop in cases. With an almost straight face.
Second inspection 2/22/83, 3 months later. Fatal Accident investigation resulting in 8 Serious and 12 Other Than Serious violations of OHSA regs, mostly for ventilation and respiratory protection. Total fines of $3870 were reduced by half to $1935 in an informal settlement hearing.
After Widdledub's Utah coal mine disaster, it was no big surprise to see the head of MSHA was a coal mine owner who had a financial interst in not increasing the cost of coal production. Reagan and Poppy get credit for this little employee safety cogwheel that makes the big wheel spin around.

user-pic

That's the one.

I was living in Chicago then, working (of all things!) at a film lab. I was in the printing darkrooms, though, and only very rarely had anything to do with processing - and then, only making changes at the dry end or flipping the track developer applicator off for silent footage.

And we had our own silver recovery machines attached to the chem drainage.

user-pic

You're on fire, dd! Go get 'em! :-)

user-pic

Hi TheraP. You know I can always cross post up on yours if you ever wish. I do not think you have quite figured what you want.

At any rate I will be up there tomorrow AM.

user-pic

Dick, when I saw Dame Madoff was being knocked down a few pegs to just $2.5M, I too thought something was off. Great analogy about how the government would deal with the wife of a drug dealer regarding confiscation of wealth. And great analogy overall. Castes/class... brilliant!

user-pic

More outrage than brilliance I am afraid Miguel. Cuomo is the only one with a proper taste of blood; seeeing all of this in the context or RICO and related statutes.

We need a thousand Cuomos. hahaha

user-pic

This stuff drives me nuts, Dick. Bankers' bonuses are back - but mainly for those involved in running banks' proprietary trading book - i.e. the gamblers who got us here in the first place. The banks are downsizing, but that means firing back-office personnel and the few loan officers that remain - i.e. those who do the risk-management and controls. Banks are no longer banks. They are no longer concerned about the long-term viability of their allocation of capital. Nor do they retain any capacity to evaluate it. That is no longer their business-model. They are a group of high-roller, high-risk poker players who are all too big to fail, so that none can in fact lose. We all know the problem is that they are too big to fail, so what do we do? We make them consolidate into even bigger Much too big to fail institutions. NUTS!!!

As for fraud, well we can't do anything about that, because it's the only way banks can make money. Take a look at Taibbi's piece in Rolling Stone (google it - there's a scan copy on Zero Hedge if you can't afford a paper copy, Dick). It's really solid. Goldman Sachs openly flaunts its fraud strategy: marketing and selling mortgage backed securities (and before that Internet IPOs) to good faith clients, while having a net short position on the same instruments so that they can make money off the sales-fees AND make money when the instruments eventually plummet. That is the essence of financial fraud. AND THEY PROCLAIM IT LOUDLY! Sure they get prosecuted, but the legal penalties cost them about one percent of the profit off these schemes. Hardly a deterrent. Why don't they face stiffer (prison?) penalties? Because the SEC and DOJ are too incompetent to build a serious case. And why are they incompetent? Because the banks poach all the competent staff. And why can they do this? Because they have so much government subsidy to corrupt the regulators and Congress.

How the hell do we get out of this vicious circle? I used to think that we'd get a second chance to fix the banks since they still have to book half of the losses tied to the financial crisis. But it looks like that won't happen. The Fed has been buying up the toxic mortgage and credit card backed stuff at inflated prices to recapitalize the banks, so in a couple of years, after Bernanke's been reconfirmed, they'll say 'oops' and come clean on the tax-payer's losses. That storm will eventually wear off and the banks will already be on to their next bubble playing on Carbon trading derivatives, inflating the price so much that the poor will suffer disproportionately. That is why everyone loves carbon caps instead of carbon taxes. Because the banks will make a ton of money instead of giving the government revenue that could be used to mitigate the harm to to poor. It's a kleptocracy. Helped along by the MSM, the Administration, Congress. The banks are the new Leviathan.
(sorry for the monday morning rant, there...)

user-pic

And how much did the Obama campaign collect from the friendly bankers at Goldman Sachs?

user-pic

About a million dollars, I saw somewhere, Ellen. But that can't really be where their power emanates from, can it? It's got more to do with the kind of caste-system Dick is talking about. the GS boys are the philosopher kings, the best and brightest encouraged to mix banking with public service, and thereby confuse the public good with profit.

user-pic

Obey, of course I demand rants, I never attempt to deter them. ha!!

I must say, you doth not ease my savage ire this morning though.

We had a chance to really change our social structure here and now.

MAYBE NEXT TIME.

Otherwise it might be time for Bwak's pitchforks.

user-pic

Here, and not for the first or last time, one of my favorite apothegms --

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it! Upton Sinclair

user-pic

Probably less than the repubs, but still.

user-pic

dd,

In a discussion about a public healthcare option, two statements were made that I haven't had time or opportunity to research. So, I will of course, ask you and others if these statements are factual..

1. Is it true that we are the only nation where health care insurance is a for profit business?

2. Is it true that insurance companies profits are not subject to IRS taxes as are other entitie's profits?

(These topics may have been covered here already and if I missed it, a link would be greatly appreciated.)

Terrific post dd and thanks!

user-pic

Auntie, thank you for taking the time to review.

I will get back to you within the hour.

For profit corps have to pay taxes, the problem is that they usually pay almost nothing (relatively) for a variety of reasons.

Second, as far as Western countries (Europe, Canada and US) I believe we are the only country with 'for profit' health insurers. And of course you would include Cuba and China.

I believe that:

Health insurers should not be for profit.

Corporations should be paying meaningful taxes.

user-pic

Auntie, I stole this from TPMGary's blog today:

http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2009/06/diagnosis-reform.html

I think a lot of answers are right there.

user-pic

Thanks dd - I've copied and saved link. Will read it in depth ASAP. Appreciate your taking the time to help me ascertain facts.

user-pic

By the way, back when I worked for the SEC, it made much more than it spent just from the filing fees it took in.

Can't imagine it much different these days.

user-pic

Hey biker. Yup. That is what the goddamn fees were for!!! (blesses himself) And some fines go into the tens of millions of dollars.

WE CANT AFFORD STAFF

For our biggest money makers?

user-pic

Here's another example of the Caste system:
http://www.accountingweb.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=107090&d=883&h=884&f=882&dateformat=%o+%B+%Y

Remember the UBS tax shelter scandal involving 50,000 of the wealthiest Americans?

"The IRS is encouraging UBS account holders to voluntarily come forward and file amended returns reporting the income that has been hidden overseas, pay the back taxes, interest, and a negotiated penalty in exchange for potentially avoiding a prison sentence for tax evasion."

user-pic

Bill, I think the name of the TV station in Network was UBS.

Fifty thousand felons get off the hook. 2.5 million of the plebians are in prison.

DAMN, DAMN, DAMN

user-pic

Yeah, they were offered a deal to pay part of their penalty in exchange for not paying the other (more important) part of the penalty, jail time.

Like the criminals had any negotiating power to begin with.

Why don't we see marijuana sentences of $1,000 and 2 years in jail negotiated to just $1,000 in exchange for no jail time?

user-pic

Maryjane, possession (without intent to sell) of anything, shoplifting,

People are in prison for the most ridiculous reasons imaginable. The local constabulary does not like them. Driving with a restricted license....

In some states, three strikes and your out applies to misdemeanors.

Yeah, I believe there are upwards of a million people in prison who are animals who would eat your child, or half a million anyway. I mean there are 40,000 murders a year or some such...

But geeeeeeeeeeeeez

And the taxpayer pays for all this.

user-pic

Dick, please give this Dutch documentary about the U.S. drug war a chance:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1386118039908585182&ei=4gVJSpaiB5verAK-uLniAw&q=drug+war+documentary&hl=en&dur=3

90% is in English, and it is jaw dropping. Especially the details about the local level incentives.

user-pic

And then watch this speech by former LAPD NARC Mike Ruppert on the CIA's role in the drug trade:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7009998324250484369&ei=pgZJSrXHIYqUqQLptLiLBg&q=cia+drugs&hl=en

I'm still in the middle of this one. I had to turn it off last night:)

Leave a comment

dickday

user-pic

Following: 284
Followers: 132

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Virginia, MN
  • Party Democrat
  • Politics Fabian Socialist

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs huffington post Slate
  • Favorite Books Le Morte D'Artur, Justice at Nuremburg, Heroditus' An History, Foote's Civil War, Chaucer's Canterbury Tales, and of Shaw's plays
  • Favorite Quotes A horse is a horse of course, of course -- a matter of strategery-- all men are created equal,

Bio

retired atty crotchety old man

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address