CIVILITY
While viewing my favorite A.M. show, Mornin' Joke With Jughead, I was impressed with a message that jughead was attempting to send to all Americans, except those with donated, yet up to date PC's in their PJ's.
Jughead was reiterating his belief that the math just does not add up. I mean our deficit for this year is going to reach 13% of the GDP. We are all going to hell in a hand basket. Pure insanity, jughead says.
And our favorite Peggy Noonan, twitching per pretty 60 year old nose (that has undergone some changes in the name of infrastructure reinhancement) chimes in: He is just trying to dooo toooo much. All the while shaking her pretty head.
Meanwhile, a twitter just came in and was read on the air at the insistence of jughead:
Joe, why can't you for
once take your head out of your ass and see that there are 47 million people
out there who have no adequate access to health care.
See, this is what I am
talking about, replied Jughead. For
the first time, our President showed us a side of him that I have not seen
since the inauguration. Roll the tape Fido:
The President is shown during his appearance at
Jughead notes that that is what this President promised during his campaign. The man whom Jughead would never vote for, but the man who promised a new way of governing. The man who for a hundred and ten days preferred to shove his agenda down the American People's throat.
All the while, jughead noted that he was above the normal political stances taken by those who would polarize the country. After all, jughead was only doing the math. Math after all, in jughead's mind is politically neutral. And we are all headed for hyperinflation and hell in a hand basket.
Touching really. When he has time, he likes to echo the complaints of dear Peggy, that our President is just attempting to do toooooo much during a time of crisis. Sure something has to be done with health care, but this is not the time.
What is civility after all. Marc Antony lost the person he most loved in the universe, Julius Caesar. The love of his life had been stabbed repeatedly and lay in a pool of blood. Carrying the body to the crowd that was amassing outside, filled with grief and ire he gives a speech:
Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me
your ears;
I come to bury Caesar, not to praise
him.
The evil that men do lives after them;
the good is oft interred with their bones;
So let it be with Caesar. The noble
Brutus hath told you Caesar was ambitious: If it were so, it was a grievous
fault and grievously has Caesar answered it.
Here under leave of Brutus and the
rest --- for Brutus is an honorable man --- so are they all honorable men ---
come I to speak in Caesar's funeral. He was my friend, faithful and just to me
--- but Brutus says he was ambitious and Brutus is an honorable man.
He has brought many captives home to
When the poor have cried, Caesar has
wept --- ambition should be made of sterner stuff. Yet Brutus says he was
ambitious and Brutus is an honorable man.
You all did see that on the Lupercal I
thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse --- was this
ambition? Yet Brutus says he was ambitious and, sure, he is an honorable man.
I speak not to disprove what Brutus
spoke,
But here I am to speak what I do know.
You all did love him once, not without cause.
What cause witholds you then, to mourn
for him now?
Oh judgment! Thou art fled to brutish
beasts and men have lost their reason.
Bear with me. My heart is in the
coffin here with Caesar and I must pause til it come back to me.
But yesterday the word of Caesar might
have stood against the world; now he lies there.
And none so poor to do him reverence.
Oh masters, if I were disposed to stir
your hearts and minds to mutiny and rage, I should do Brutus wrong, and Cassius
wrong, who, you all know, are honorable men.
I will not do them wrong; I rather
choose to wrong the dead, to wrong myself and you, than I will wrong such
honorable men.
But here's a parchment with the seal
of Caesar --- I found it in his closet, 'tis his will: Let but the people hear
this testament, which, pardon me, I do not mean to read, and they would go and
kiss dead Caesar's wounds and dip their napkins in his sacred blood, yea, beg a
hair of him for memory, and, dying, mention it within their wills, bequeathing
it as a rich legacy unto their issue.
Have patience, gentle friends, I must
not read it; it is not right you know how Caesar loved you. You are not wood,
you are not stones, but men; and, being men, bearing the will of Caesar, it
will inflame you, it will make you mad! 'Tis good you know not that you are his
heirs, for if you should, oh, what would come of it!
Will you be patient? Will you stay
awhile? I have overshot myself to tell you of it. I fear the honorable men
whose daggers have stabbed Caesar, I do fear it!
You will compel me, then to read the
will?
Then make a ring about the corpse of
Caesar, and let me show you him that made the will. Shall I descend? And will
you give me leave?
If you have tears, prepare to shed
them now. You all do know this coat --- I remember the first time Caesar put it
on. 'Twas on a summer's evening, in his tent, that day he overcame the Huns.
Look --- in this place ran Cassius'
dagger through! See what a rent the envious Casca made! Through this the
well-beloved Brutus stabbed, and as he plucked his cursed steel away, mark how
the blood of Caesar followed it, as rushing out of doors, to be resolved if
Brutus so unkindly knocked or no.
For Brutus, as you know, was Caesar's
angel --- judge, oh you gods, how dearly Caesar loved him. This was the most
unkindest cut of all! For when the noble Caesar saw his stab, ingratitude, more
strong than traitor's arms, quite vanquished him, then burst his mighty heart,
and in his mantle muffling up his face, even at the base of Pompey's statue,
which all the while ran blood, great Caesar fell.
Oh, what a fall was there, my
countrymen! Then I and you and all of us fell down, while bloody treason
flourished over us.
Oh now you weep and I perceive you
feel the dint of pity --- these are gracious drops. Kind souls, what weep you
when you but behold our Caesar's vesture wounded? Look you here! Here is
himself marred as you see with traitors.
Good friends, sweet friends, let me
not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny. They that have done this deed
are honorable. What private griefs they have, alas, I know not what made them
do it. They are wise and honorable and will, no doubt, with reasons answer you.
I come not, friends, to steal away
your hearts. I am no orator, as Brutus is; but, as you know me all, a plain
blunt man, that loves my friend and that they know full well that gave me
public leave to speak of him --- for I have neither wit, nor words, nor worth,
action nor utterance, nor the power of speech to stir men's blood.
I only speak right on; I tell you that
which you yourselves do know; show you sweet Caesar's wounds, poor dumb mouths,
and bid them speak for me ...
but were I Brutus, and Brutus,
Anthony, there were an Anthony would ruffle up your spirits and put a tongue in
every wound of Caesar that should move the stones of
But friends, you go to do you know not
what! Wherein has Caesar thus deserved your love? Alas, you know not --- I must
tell you then --- You have forgot the will I told you of.
Here is the will, and under Caesar's
seal. To every several man, seventy-five drachmas!
Moreover, he has left you all his
walks, his private arbors and new-planted orchards --- he has left them all to
you.
And to your heirs forever, common
pleasures, to walk abroad, to recreate yourselves.
Here was a Caesar! When comes another?
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friends,_Romans,_countrymen,_lend_me_your_ears"
There is a lesson to be learned here in rhetoric.
Forty seven million people in this country are without any
access to health care except for understaffed emergency rooms across the country. Some hospitals shut
these people out and say, go elsewhere. Hence the moniker for
Here lie the dead from our disregard Mr. Jughead. And the millions who carry permanent wounds with them have assembled.
Oh, but jughead is an honorable man and Dear Peggy an honorable woman. They seek only the best for the American People.
But the people keep dying. The mortality rate increases. Deaths that could be avoided keep mounting, day by day, week by week, month by month.
Oh, but jughead is an honorable man and Dear Peggy an honorable woman. And the deaths have been mounting for years, nay decades. These deaths, like the poor, will always be with us as our Lord & Savior has noted (blesses himself) and what is a mother to do? We do the best we can with what we have. That is what we do and how can we blame the most honorable man and woman? It is not like this duo is personally responsible for stabbing the victims deeply and twisting the most evil of knives into their bodies.
But the people keep dying. And others become sick, sore and disabled. People who could otherwise be of use to the nation, producing and purchasing the goods made available by other Americans. Pain and suffering abounds.
Oh but the jughead and the nose twitcher are honorable in
their wishes for a better
But the ghosts of those who needed the help, who needed the proper diagnosis, who needed the proper medicines, who needed the proper care, cry out for justice. And those survivors, those who lost their loved ones for no good reason, they cry out for justice. And those sick, sore and disable cry out for justice too.
You see now how civility can work? Marc Antony (with help from the immortal Bard) spoke at first softly and civilly before raising his voice and sending a blood thirsty crowd into a frenzy ready to organize and destroy the murderers who killed his friend and ruler.
Oh and just for the record, my real feelings here are basically summed up with this phrase:
FUCK
The end.













Sure, sure, pretty words. That Marcus Antonius gave a nice speech.
But so did Hitler!!! "Countrymen" indeed, mwahahaha!!!
I kid, I kid.
By the way, that old shoving-down-my-throat metaphor always catches my attention. For such a colorful metaphor, isn't it awfully pervasive? Maybe these buttoned-up conservative broadcast personalities are, in their spare and private time, secret Linda Lovelace fans.
May 18, 2009 10:00 AM | Reply | Permalink
Deep Throaters, all. Ha. Thank you Citizen. I refrain from calling such smart man worthless. ha!!
May 18, 2009 10:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
I always want to tell them, "You'd like that, wouldn't you?" And then I imagine a soundtrack of smooth, quiet funk music.
May 18, 2009 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
If you care so much about healthcare then let's just terminate Social Security and pretend that those obligations never existed. We have to pay for the new health care program some how, not just the "downpayment" but the rest of it.
I'm all for doing tooo much if you can pay for it.
May 18, 2009 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
oh yeah good idea MCB. What a delightful idea. People pay into a system for forty years, screw em.
Get rid of the 7% contributed by the employer, how many $7.00/hr jobs could be created with that change.
What an idea. Why do you not start your own party MCB
The GET RID OF SOCIAL SECURITY PARTY. Boy, you will go far.
May 19, 2009 12:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well then how are we going to pay for it? Spend a lot of money now and just hope that the economy picks up enough so we can repay the debt later.
A lot of people in 2004 spent a lot of money to buy big houses that they couldn't afford. The hope was that house prices always go up so you could always sell the house at a higher price in the future. It didn't matter if you didn't have the cash flow to pay for the mortgage.
That didn't work out too well. This is heading down the same path
May 19, 2009 6:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Since you can read and I assume that you have read all the latest papers that show universal health care will cost less than what the federal government spends now, would you like to explain your statement?
It's not like this is an unproven area and nobody really knows how it will turn out. The US is the only country without universal health care, yet it pays more in health costs per GDP than any of those other countries. Can you explain why that is? Do you think what we have now is particularly efficient?
I don't know where you live, but where I live getting in to see a doctor, where you are already a patient, can involve a 3 month wait. From what I understand, much of the country has the same waiting times. Hospital emergency rooms here routinely have to divert because they have no room, and we have some big hospitals, including Emory, Grady and the VA. Do you think that is health care that other countries are just dying to emulate, if only they were so stupid?
Truly, I can't figure out what Republicans find that is so great about our health care system. As usual, the fantasy in their heads is better than the reality on the ground. Can you show me how that is not true?
Can you give one, two or three rational reasons for keeping what the US has? Seriously?
May 19, 2009 2:35 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seashell. You should be ashamed. I mean, do you think that you are a member of Congress for chrissakes (blesses himself) ha
May 19, 2009 2:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
As I think you know, dd, I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts.*
:-)
*Will Rogers.
May 19, 2009 3:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
I have not read the papers that show that universal health care will cost less than what the government spends now. Perhaps you can share them. I wonder what their assumptions are?
If it costs less than why is Obama talking about ways to raise taxes to pay for it? I assume you've read about taxes on our healthcare benefits? Rolling back the Bush tax cuts? Taxes on beer/alcohol/soda/cigarettes etc? Higher taxes on non-profit hospitals, etc. Congress is talking about all of this. Why would they do this if the new system would cost less?
Thanks for letting me know that I can read. I am not in favor of keeping status-quo but I don't like what Obama is proposing - it will lead to: 1) less patient flexibility about what doctors I can see; 2) poorer quality of doctors - many will leave the profession if they can't have a private practice or make as much income as before; 3) patients aren't likely to curb their drug costs or doctor visits so costs will likely be higher than they are today; 4) and many services that can be insured today likely won't be covered under my new government plan.
These are just a few reasons why.
And I live in NY without health insurance and don't have such a long wait to see my doctor. I've also been to the emergency room and wasn't diverted. But how do you think your waiting times compare to other countries? And why do so many foreigners come to the US to get operated on or to receive treatment?
There's no silver bullet to fix what we have but I'd rather keep it in private hands where people (rather than their employers) pick their own insurance coverage. We need to keep competition in the system and a national plan doesn't do that
May 19, 2009 6:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
4) and many services that can be insured today likely won't be covered under my new government plan.
Can we take this to mean that you either work for the gov't in a health care capacity or you copied and pasted this from somebody's plan. I'll bet $10.00 it was a conservatives plan. Do you know what services you won't be offering?
And why do so many foreigners come to the US to get operated on or to receive treatment?
How many 'foreigners' come to the US to get operated on or to receive treatment? All the Canadians I know go back to Canada and so do those from Western Europe unless it's an emergency and they are stuck here. So where are these 'foreigners' coming from? Unless it's treatment that they can't get in their home country and the US is the only place to get it,
my guess would be not many, if any at all. They would have to be crazy to come here and pay our prices if they could get the same thing somewhere else.
2) poorer quality of doctors - many will leave the profession if they can't have a private practice or make as much income as before;
And this information comes from where? It hasn't happened in any of the other Western countries, why would it happen here? Only to the ones who entered medicine for the money in the first place. Believe it or not, more enter because of a calling rather than the money. And they are probably the better doctors.
1) less patient flexibility about what doctors I can see
Under most insurance plans there is very little flexibility to choose your own Doctor. If you're lucky, you can pick among several, but only the very expensive plans offer total doctor flexibility. Right now your best bet for doctor flexibility is if you remain uninsured.
These are not rational answers, MCB. Before we get into the money part, let's go for rational answers on the easy stuff.
May 19, 2009 7:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
Seashell, you're trying to reason with a deliberately unreasoning troll.
No Class Bill (Bill the NoClasshole?) is nothing other than a spewer of already discredited talking points. An original thought would die of loneliness in his fevered brain.
Facts don't interest him nearly as much as the next bag of Cheetos and two-liter of Mountain Dew his mother's bringing back from the grocery and carrying down to the basement for him.
Now if he'd only bathe and discover the concept of the comb...
May 19, 2009 7:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well it's like this, OG, this time I was trying to take the opposite tack and have him reason with me. But right off the ole bat things trended downwards toward the unfinished basement, with no bathroom, when he said that some services wouldn't be covered under his government plan. (Point 4).
All I asked for was one, two or three rational answers. I'm nothing if not flexible. Instead, I got somebody else's irrational answer.
Rarely is the question asked: Is our troll learning? :-)
May 19, 2009 8:37 AM | Reply | Permalink
The answer is almost invariably "no".
May 19, 2009 8:53 AM | Reply | Permalink
Like I said it will be "my" new government plan because when Obama is done with his healthcare initiative, I will be forced to be covered under the government's public option (the only option that will be left). So I will be insured and "my" plan will be the nationalized plan. Do you get it now?
PS - why do you speak to people you don't agree with in such an insulting tone?
May 20, 2009 1:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Once again the Grouch proves that all he can add to the debate is useless jibberish.
Have you ever actually tried to make a counter argument to someone's point?
May 20, 2009 1:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
To answer your questions (and by the way - why are you so insulting?)
1. Right now I am at a small company that self-insures (ie no coverage). But if we did get private insurance it would be better than what I would be forced to take under nationalized healthcare. (The "my" refers to the potential new plan that I would be forced to have if/when the government forces all Americans to take the public option.
2. Please read the linked article which cites the number of foreigners treated each year by the Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic and Johns Hopkins.
http://www.ncpa.org/sub/dpd/index.php?Article_ID=17197
3. My doctor has told me that he's worried his private practice won't survive under national healthcare.
4. Flexibility - good example of this is the recent decision by Medicare to not cover virtual colonoscopies. You can bet a nationalized health care system would follow the same path. Want to avoid the traditional colonoscopy and get the cheaper, less invasive virtual test? Well, you won't be able to get it under the government's plan.
May 19, 2009 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Still curious how if universal healthcare will cost less than what the government spends now, why is Obama and Congress talking about ways to finance the new healthcare plan? If it cost less than what we're spending now, then we wouldn't need to raise taxes to pay for it, right?
May 21, 2009 12:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
I just sent a prayer to the Goddess of blogs (er, blesses herself?) that she should take good care of dickday and never let him be stabbed or hurt by anyone.
I promised that in return for your safety, you would always report on the Jughead Joke and pithily comment on the infrastructure re-enhancements (respelled out of respect for the Goddess of spell checks) of the subprime Peggy N.
And then I promised that in the end, or the terminus ad quem as Marc may have said about that fateful day, you would neatly tie a bow around the latest stupidities of the GOP and give them a good hard shove off the dock of civility. FUCK SCARBOROUGH AND FUCK PEGGY NOONAN.
And the Goddess said (er, blesses herself again?), "It shall be done".
(At least that's what I think she said.)
May 18, 2009 10:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
heheheheheeeee. Seashell. Ready for battle at such an early hour. You liked my allusion to infrastructure, huh. You have a happy day!!!
May 18, 2009 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is the same "Jughead" who just last week was preaching how our "friend" -- wait make that "fiend" -- Dick Cheney was right, that just two days after being inaugurated Obama had made the country less safe, and how the economy was doomed to tank any second now.
The same Jughead who regaled us during the campaign with the critical indicators that Obama was a far left lefty commie pinko French socialist celebrity Muslim anti-Christ abortionist (not to mention the "angry black femi-Negress" Michelle who hates her country").
This is the same Jughead who spends three hours each weekday morning bloviating on MSNBC and when that warm-up is done trots over to a radio station to spew his best venom. The same Jughead who cannot bear to be contradicted even when the facts prove him wrong.
Do not get me started on that aging phony ShirleyTemple wanna-be voice thick and smarmy with faux sincerity... artificial "empathy"...
Yep. Civility, my ass.
May 18, 2009 10:49 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Femi-Negress"? Did he really say that? Wow!!!!
May 18, 2009 11:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well Jade, I guess you have just about said it all. See he will pretend he is a 'moderate', we know he is a far right hypocrite. I heard everything you talked about except for the 'negress'.
WHAT A PRICK HE IS!!!
May 18, 2009 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
I reread your comment and it is superb beyond superb. I hereby award you The Dayly Comment of the Day Award for this here TPMCafe site, given to all of you from all of me.
You have a way with words Jade and of course, your tone and politics, never dissuade me. Really fine English, really fine writing. Damn you are good!!! No kidding. ha!!!
May 19, 2009 2:04 AM | Reply | Permalink
dd,
Your post, while to some may appear to be about the healthcare issue, is about so much more!
Oh, if only Cleo's asp was still around to slither up their togas as they dance around the sick beds of dying children and on the graves of those who died.
Another terrific post.
So appreciated. rec'd.
May 18, 2009 10:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
heeeehehheheheheee. Look at the asp on that one. hahahaha. Auntie you have me laughing.
May 18, 2009 12:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
DD, I need to write myself a little macro to auto-recommend every post you put up.
What I want to know is: How can Jughead read a prompter feed with his head so far up his own ass?
Nice use of The Bard...
May 18, 2009 11:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
THAT IS DAMN GOOD QUESTION GROUCH. HAHAHAHA
I did spit out some coffee when they read the twitter thingy. ha
May 18, 2009 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ok, dd, having completed my own post, I'm going to make my granola and settle down to read yours! :-)
May 18, 2009 11:39 AM | Reply | Permalink
Boy, what a read! You're getting better by the day, by the blog, dd! Your true calling. Orator. Bard!!!
I'm so glad I saw that blog of yours, seems ages ago now, on emptiness.
Your forever friend, TheraP :-)
May 18, 2009 1:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh you warm my heart TheraP. You truly do!!!
May 18, 2009 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
May 18, 2009 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hell of a link Miguel, more than a month old. Screw em. If they wish to sit on the sidelines, we do not need them anyway.
We invite them to the party. We have to. But I do not think the majority of Americans are going to buy this crap.
May 18, 2009 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just a thought Miguel as I am in my beers tonite. Give us a blog on health--oh hell I do not care what it is about.
Your recent addition of sunglasses with the shoes makes me laugh--every time. hahahahha
May 19, 2009 1:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
O that the name of Joe should be so smeared and denigrated by some and so uplifted and enriched by others.
The 'Scar'borough is a disgusting, ignorant sloth indeed. How easy to sit on one's behind and determine how to keep the economy moving when you have not the slightest clue how to make things work but what you do instead, because you couldn't offer solutions, is cricitize and 'encourage fear'.
It's just amazing that we have not elected Joe and Peggy to President and VP of BS(of course it would be a tough race... Hannity, O'Reilly, so many to choose from). It's really a tragedy that we don't get to vote on morning 'news' 'entertainers'.
If only they woud wear funny hats, googly eyes, a pirate patch or something to make their show more amusing and interesting... I mean at this rate the american public putting up with their BS is unsustainable! They just don't have enough brains to 'do' anything worthwhile:
Whadja do today Joe? 'Um, I told americans that we are screwed and that they should be terrified for the financial future of our country. I made sure that they were fully informed about that. And Peggy helped me knock the president 'cause you know, he's a democrat...good deeds are done for today.'
I have written to MSNBC to suggest that the 'Scar'borough's show belongs on FOX.
Once in a while I have been tempted to watch a segment online because of a guest that may have been on the MJ show but it's never worth the brain damage.
May 18, 2009 12:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lawerence O'Donnell is the real fighter. When he gets on watch the fireworks. But other than that, they all just sit and try to appease jughead.
Thank you for taking the time Sync, as always. And of course thank you for your in depth comments throughout our little cafe.
May 18, 2009 1:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
DD arn't you afraid of eye-ball-ear-drum-rot (EBEDR)?
Anyone catch Mika Brzezinski's letter to the New York Times in support of guess who, Defending Joe Scarborough
"This liberal?" Coulda' fooled me. Can someone please talk to her. Is she co-dependent (CODO)? Stockholm syndrome? Overpaid?
Thanks for the report and analysis cause I can't watch that s**t!...
May 18, 2009 12:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Mika gets me so mad, I try not to look at her face when I have this show on. I mean I have to figure out what the enemy is thinking somehow. WSJ after being purchased by Murdoch is sooooooo much worse that it once was. Which says a lot.
Poor Mika is a coward and an idiot.
May 18, 2009 1:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
Please don't call be a prude but what's with her and the pointy bras, and the tight blouses? My wife says that if she sneezes a button could take Joe's eye out. Maybe that's why he stays away so much. A plan is born...
May 18, 2009 3:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ya know its a damn shame. Mika's father is a great man, a good liberal...A couple fine speeches right on that show; one lauded at this site. ha
May 18, 2009 4:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
I remember once when he was on he showed "a father's displeasure" for something she said. He knows who she is and what she is doing...
May 18, 2009 4:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
I particularly liked when he said something to the effect that the superficiality with which Joe Scarboro understood international relations was stunning.
May 18, 2009 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
A direct slap down. And jughead did not like it one bit. ha
May 18, 2009 5:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
(Links just turned blue at last. Red links on liberal site didn't make a lot of sense, did they?)
Well, dd. You have a stronger stomach than I do. I used to keep up with some of the conservatives just to know what the enemy is thinking, but no more. Alas, life is too short I decided to put myself through their tortured thinking, which tortured me. I still read The Atlantic and count it as my conservative fix for the month.
May 18, 2009 3:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
Katz was crying to me a week ago that mine changed and his did not. He thought I had some inside deal going. hahahahaa. I told someone here that I keep it on background. My head is turned. When I get too mad I switch to West Wing.
May 18, 2009 4:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dick, try not to look directly into the cathode ray machine between 6-9am, weekdays, when it is tuned to the frequency of the Microsoft National Broadcasting Company.
Not without wearing a strong viewblock, which will protect you from the harmful emissions of Cro-Magnon prattle.
May 18, 2009 4:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh Gary, I get mad and switch the channel. I will go days with the bastards. Then I turn him on at five when I cannot sleep.
I do follow his arguments though and sure enough, they are echoed by writers at other web sites.
THEY DO THIS PROPAGANDA WITH A STRAIGHT FACE!!!
May 18, 2009 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thing is, most people watching are getting angrier and angrier, and these airheads don't have a clue.
We need new pundits.
Thanks for the report, Dickon, I think it's not worth tuning in, at least for me. They're like, clowns. Overpaid, clueless, clowns.
May 18, 2009 9:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh no Bwak, you have a life. You go to work and produce and then come home and produce some more
I sit in my jammies and read and listen to idiots on tv. ha
May 18, 2009 9:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Do you sit and read the Newspapers? And smoke?
May 18, 2009 9:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bwak, that is why I am safe. The screen cannot burn and I cannot afford newspapers. hahhahahaa
May 18, 2009 10:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Now that I am "back to work" I'm no longer able to keep up, either with MSNBC or w/ TPM...much as I love my babies, it's left a bit of a hole...thanks for keeping me in touch at least a little bit! And making me laugh at the same time! I need all the multi-tasking help I can get!
May 18, 2009 9:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hi Stilli. Nice of you to drop by. Stay away from MSNBC in the morning to avoid heartburn!!! ha
May 18, 2009 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am 31. I have had Diabetes type I since 1990. Though I have worked on and off for 15 years, for half that time, I have had no insurance. I also am not eligiable for medicaid. To receive insurance, I'd have to pay out of my own pocket, and it is not worth it because the insura nce requires that you buy the more expensive strips and insulin, and the cheaper kind is only half the price out of pocket. The medicaid office said though I'm laid off, my unemployment is too much income, so I would have to claim disability. I am not disabled, so..
My point is this. I am stuck in a situation where
I cannot afford coverage, am not eligiable for assistance, and know that my pre-existing condition is for life, and that not seeing a doctor is reducing my quality of life, and perhaps ruining my future prospects for longeviety. I don't know what the government will do with a person like me.
May 19, 2009 12:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
Joe, this bugs the shit out of me!!!!! Lets put your story in a petition or letter and everyone on this site will sign on. I swear.
A lot of help that does you now. But goddamn it (blesses himself) everyone, and I mean everyone will sign off on it on this blog when I get through with it.
This is pissing me off.
Think about it. And we will ponder this further.
Oh and tell me what state you live in.
May 19, 2009 12:15 AM | Reply | Permalink
Misery
May 19, 2009 12:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
I live in the state of misery; MO.
I, a catalyst for reform?
Hmmm....
(In Joe's mind--Light Bulbs, Bells Ring, Die Walkure plays on Record player)
May 19, 2009 1:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
WHEN YOU AINT GOT NOTHIN'
YOU GOT NOTHIN TO LOSE
B. DYLAN
May 19, 2009 1:52 AM | Reply | Permalink