« Arthur of the Roundish table--The Confessional | dickday's Blog | Arthur of the Roundish Table--A Tale of Two Visions »
Gandhi's Diaper
Despite Protests, Gandhi Auction Is to Go On
By Jennifer 8. Lee AND Robert Mackey
Antiquorum An auction for Gandhi's possessions, including this watch, is scheduled to proceed on Thursday.Despite direct appeals from the Indian government and a last-minute stay from an Indian court, an auction of personal items of Mohandas K. Gandhi's -- including his sandals, bowl, watch and spectacles -- is scheduled to go ahead as planned on Thursday in New York City, the auction house said Wednesday morning.
"It's still planned, still going ahead," said Julien Schaerer, director of the New York watch department of Antiquorum, a leading watch auctioneer. Antiquorum is handling the auction in part because the possessions include a 1910 sterling Zenith pocket watch belonging to Gandhi, the political and spiritual leader of India's independence movement.GM is going bankrupt.
Ford & Chrysler not far behind
Merril Lynch and BOA
Any investment is just goin in blind
What to do with my capital today
I'm gonna buy Gandhi's diaper
Stock market looks like crap
Banks are failing right & left
Investment options are a trap
Offering no real return & bereft
Of any one real option
I'm gonna buy Gandhi's diaper
CNBC kept saying the market
Would stabilize soon
That we were really in a
Short downturn
Now they are tellin me
We are in an eternal slow burn
I'm gonna buy Gandhi's diaper
All my life I worked and slaved
Rather than celebrate
Rather than spend I always saved
So hard to concentrate in these tough times
Where should I put my money
I'm gonna buy Gandhi's diaper
Advertisement












If India wants the objects, I'm sure India can come up with the money to buy them. Last I heard, Gandhi hasn't been eleveated to the status of a saint or god, but if there are some who want to consider these objects to be holy relics, they need to place the highest bid.
March 5, 2009 11:57 AM | Reply | Permalink
ps - nice lyrics!
March 5, 2009 11:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
I cannot leave this blog without thanking you Astral. You are the only one who liked my poem.
It was the poem I published. I just added the NYT
so that people would know what I was Poeming about.
hahahahhaahaha
March 5, 2009 9:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
The holiest man of the century, gave up all personal possessions, really.
And now somebody wishes to 'capitalize' on sandals.
March 5, 2009 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
I would be nice if they were donated to a museum. I've been following this story and read that the Indian government made an insultingly low offer for the items, so the owner was put off. I don't know, if Gandhi had given them to me, would I take the million? Probably.
March 5, 2009 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I know, I was just talking about honor in Wattree's blog. Here's a million bucks, now go give speeches about our terrific health system.
Men, including me, can be so lowly. But to make money off of a real saint.
But men have been making money off of saints for thousands of years.
March 5, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
In the Middle Ages, it was common practice to break open the tombs of saints, break up the bodies into each individual bone, and sell the "relics" to as many churches as were willing to pay. That in mind, I guess we should be glad that Gandhi's finger bones, femurs and skull aren't being auctioned off.
March 5, 2009 12:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, the grave robbers will always be with us.
March 5, 2009 12:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ironic as hell, isn't it?
March 5, 2009 1:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Take a vow of poverty, lead the second most populated nation in the world into a democracy--well 1 1/2 democracies, and people desire trinkets associated with you.
March 5, 2009 1:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
Irony supremo. But irony I like to think Bappu would get a real kick out of. He didn't ask everyone else to give up all their worldliness, what he asked is that they give up their violence. He used his own celebrity, and he knew that it had value, value that can be assigned monetarily or in other ways. Certainly he would prefer a charity auction of his own relics, but I don't think he would be offended that people wanted them, rather, it would make him laugh.
March 5, 2009 5:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know ArtA, You hit on something here. Yes, I think he would laugh. I am no expert but I fell in love with one of his autobiographies and the movie. And I have read much on the subject over fifty years I suppose. The man could quote scripture in several religions.
And it was not like he joined the peace corps when he ended up in South Africa for 17 years.
The man had a dedication.
But he had a bit of the Buddha in him. And I think you are right. I think he would laugh.
March 5, 2009 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
So. New knight rushes to center stage followed by his whining squire, announces he is at this moment the One and Only in Possession of the ancient cup, throws an RPAC bash resulting in only a few gouges in the roundish table- offers securitized shares in the Grail for sale to the faithful?
March 5, 2009 12:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
hahahahhaahahha. I am speechless.
March 5, 2009 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7886389.stm
So it looks like the unnamed collector went through some effort to assemble the collection. It doesn't appear that Gandhi's friends and family had any problem selling these items that were given to them.
I don't see any problem with the collector attempting to recoup his investment.
March 5, 2009 12:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
It doesn't appear that Gandhi's friends and family had any problem selling these items that were given to them.
Indeedy do.
March 5, 2009 5:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
An entrepeneur wants to hang them on the wall of Planet Bollywood.
March 5, 2009 12:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
If that is true, it sounds ok to me. A movie museum. At least the relics would be there for all to see.
March 5, 2009 12:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
It seems a little disgraceful to auction off these items expecting $20-30K. If it weren't for the history of ownership attached to them they would have a value of much, much less. It's difficult to put a price on historical value...is it priceless? Or price-less?
Yet, certain people want these things at any price...and they don't care about the condition of country/world as it is right now. They have the spare change, they want to spend it, and really, it's none of anyone's business how rich people spend their money, except that regular folks are hurting so right now....it's kind of shameless in a way.
Mr. Otis seems willing to work with the Indian government, if they want the items so badly.
But, of course, improving health care or any other such notable aide for the destitute would cost far more than $20-30K so it's kind of a hollow offer.
In the end, peace activist Mr. Otis will get his money, India might get the items if they are the highest bidder, the 'untouchables' will get no help, the rest of us will sigh and dream about all the bills we could pay with $20,000, and the beat goes on.
March 5, 2009 12:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Five or ten years from now, there will be hundreds of sandals and eyeglasses for sale claiming false origination.
March 5, 2009 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry, I meant that as a joke. Planet Bollywood, Planet Hollywood ... pop culture relics on the wall, etc. Right next to the a section of the set from Slumdog Millionaire.
March 5, 2009 1:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
It might be illuminating to know who the owner of these items is and why they are selling them.
March 5, 2009 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well Astral has a lot of info on this. Oleeb if your question is, why are they selling the relics NOW. That is a valid question. Something happened.
Generally of course, grave robbers have been selling relics for five thousand years.
March 5, 2009 1:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
I looked in to it a little. Seems weird all round. The guy who owns and is selling the stuff won't say how he got it or where and tries to position himself in a way to make himself look benevolent yet who, with good intentions, would not give these things to India?
March 5, 2009 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
More's the fool who buys the relics if the seller won't provide provenance.
March 5, 2009 5:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Fuck 'em all, DD. All these ghouls. Yeah yeah, this guy's a great humanitarian. He's selling the results of one of Gandhi's BLOOD TESTS. I can't even joke about this. Fuck people.
March 5, 2009 1:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
I think that the human being is flawed. I know you are not joking. But your anger makes me laugh just the same. I have that same anger sometimes.
March 5, 2009 1:36 PM | Reply | Permalink
As ever, Quinnesque, thank you for saying what I was thinking.
They cannot have his body because it was cremated. D'oh. And just because people have been robbing graves for centuries, it was nevertheless a wrong thing to do. Napoleon took stuff out of Egypt - wrong thing to do. Elgin marbles in Britain, the wrong thing to do. Jeez.
Ghouls is the right word.
Fuck people.
March 5, 2009 3:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
And oh yeah -- Or the Axum Obelisk. What of the 170,000 items looted from Baghdad's museum in the midst of war? Well, the thieves who stole and their clients who got all those goodies are fab deal weavers, no? Fuck no! Well, in the eyes of *some* who think money should get them whateverthefuck they want and be the final arbiter of all things, yeah. Makes me sick.
I hope all these items turn out to be marvelous hoaxes like the James Ossuary.
March 5, 2009 3:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know I saw this story, And I thought, what the hell is going on here?
And like I said elsewhere, vow of poverty, a real saint, it was sickening.
Then I thought, who the hell is gonna buy it? An Ebay thing. Then what do you do with the things? Then I thought of some dumb investor and wrote the poem. Since I hear it on cable I went and googled who was reporting it in script.
You, Yva and Quinn really are mad about this. If you or Q does not do it, I will think of an homage to the most saintly of men in a hundred years.
March 5, 2009 4:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
I have an idea. Let's all moon in the direction of NYC. That way someone, e.g. a higher up from the SEC or a conservative baptist church might donate diapers to all of us, which we could then sell....?
March 5, 2009 2:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Pre-owned?
March 5, 2009 2:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh Thanks. As a NYC resident, I don't wish to be hit by any kind of residual "friendly fire", so could you please aim a bit more precisely?
March 5, 2009 2:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Corrupt capitalism achieves a new low. (And to think I thought selling Titanic items was sleazy....)
March 5, 2009 2:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Frankly I am waiting for OJ's glove
March 5, 2009 2:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
Or Tillman's blood-soaked uniform.
March 5, 2009 4:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
It and Mr. Tillman's personal effects were destroyed by the militaru as part of the cover-up.
March 5, 2009 6:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Of course. Used, even.
Mr.Smith1, I happen to love NYC, have family members living there, a forty year old son born there, etc, etc. I own a NYPD knit cap which I wear on 9/11 anniversaries though it's usually warm here on that day.
Note to participants (no pun intended): Google earth should l give a more precise location for the auction.
March 5, 2009 2:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
No prob ... just aim downtown, more towards Wall Street and not the Upper West Side where all the Liberals live. LOL
March 5, 2009 6:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Proofreader, make that 'should give'.
March 5, 2009 2:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Descendant sues Skull and Bones over Geronimo's bones
http://edition.cnn.com/2009/US/02/26/geronimo.remains/
March 5, 2009 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
So the NYT now says the items sold for $1.8 million. An Indian industrialist bought them and is apparently taking them back to India.
The seller, Otis, apparently had a change of heart and sent a lawyer to try and cancel the sale, but the Antiquorum company insisted it now had a legal DUTY to proceed.
I found THIS bit ever so touching, "As soon as Lot No. 364, the Gandhi items, came up for sale shortly after 3 p.m., a hush settled across the room and a slide show of Gandhi was displayed, with a recording of piano music."
Fuck Antiquorum.
AND their goddamn piano player.
March 5, 2009 5:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
You know if I put this in a story, just made it up, even my few readers would have trouble swallowing it. A slide show of a saint, and a recording of piano music.
I suppose if the 'items' end up back in India and end up in a place where the Indian People can see them, it would end up being a happy ending.
March 5, 2009 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
From the NYT article:
So the owner was attempting to use the items to benefit the poor of India, and since the government wouldn't work with him, he's using the proceeds to promote peace. Plus, the objects return to India.
Sounds okay to me. I think Gandhi would be pleased.
March 5, 2009 6:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep. He would have.
March 5, 2009 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
An Indian industrialist bought them and is apparently taking them back to India.
This is the way this game has been played for many years; I am sure no one involved ever thought they wouldn't eventually end up in India, and eventually publicly displayed there.
But earlier this week, some wealthy Chinese really threw a wrench in this traditional game.
(Current international law is that there is statute of limitations on restitution to the country of origin; this was a very ingenious way of protesting "the rule of law" as it were. If more manage to do it, that whole market will come tumbling down.)
Quinn,
As to your anger, people certainly have every right to be disgusted that someone would venerate Ghandi's diaper and glasses. But, on the other hand, if you think it is okay to do so, then you can't get away from the fact that that would give them monetary value as well. You can outlaw selling them, but if you assign psychological value to them, they still will have theoretical monetary value as well, you just can't get away from that. Even if you were back in a barter system. Your disgust, then, isn't it really at venerating these objects, and at value people assign to things like celebrity?
March 5, 2009 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's another way to think about this. The Indian industrialist, and the underbidder, are showing with cold hard cash that they value Ghandi's relics more than they value an expensive yacht or another McMansion. Is that good or bad? Would buying a yacht or a mansion be better because it's employing people to build them? Is that why it's bothersome?
Then you should really be questioning the morality of assigning intellectual or pyschological or asthetic value of any kind. You'd then, for example, have oil paintings worth only the cost of canvaS and paint materials and the same hourly charge for any painter's work.
Is it my business that my neighbor (and other people in the world willing to pay) values a Star Trek lunchbox so highly that he's willing to budget to pay a lot for it? Or George Harrison's guitar? Are they contributing to a sick system and values?
What about one of the period copies of the Declaration of Independence? Why is it worth so much in dollars, it's really just a piece of paper with ink on it?
Sentimental value becoming real value, is it immoral?
More or less immoral than assigning extra value to English tailoring or Ferrari engineering?
Or is it just that consumption of any kind by rich is offensive? Especially in a serious world recession? Why is that, really?
In the Great Depression, isn't it odd that so many loved to go see movies with carefree rich people in them, Fred and Ginger in evening clothes, dancing away the night like they didn't have a care in the world?
March 5, 2009 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
I can't get away from that? My standard reply has become this.
There are a great many things I "assign psychological value" to. Some of them, however, I also recognize as having value beyond those which can be rightly measured by the monetary and market system.
To have nothing of psychological value which cannot be bought is to allow money to eat the world. Or should we sell our Mother's bones? Or the right to piss on my Father's grave?
There. I just got away from that.
And like I said, Fuck Antiquorum. AND their goddamn piano player.
March 5, 2009 7:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
And to the follow-up comment, "You should really be questioning the morality of assigning intellectual or pyschological or asthetic value of any kind" - I have the same response. This is bollocks, and on a grand scale.
Value systems are NOT all commensurable. Money is NOT the measure of all things.
"A sick system and values?" Damned straight. Look around. Money ate the world, and is now devouring its inhabitants, because we refused to draw any lines around it.
Gandhi's bones & Star Wars lunchboxes - let's put 'em on the same scale. That pretty much sums it.
March 5, 2009 8:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
The seller was looking for payment in things other than money.
March 5, 2009 8:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
What? No insults this time, Bwak? Damn, a half-hour ago I was not just an "apologist," but apparently "superior," "above it all" and lacking "integrity." Nice.
I've asked before, and I'll ask again. If you can't stop with the personal insults, then go talk to someone else, ok?
March 5, 2009 10:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
?
OK
I won't argue with you.
March 5, 2009 10:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh definitely, the "eyes" that gave Gandhi (if you are going to write about him, spell his name correctly!!) the vision to free India is just a sweaty piece of crap, who cares, no? Oh, certainement! Jeez.
And since it is an artifact, hell, who ever "owns" it, sells it. How did Otis acquire this ownership? Did these items just miraculously appear in his house and in his ownership and purview? Really? Amazing quantum universe! Otis must be the Grand Master of The Secret. Asstounding.
And another thing, how come James Otis, an American, makes no such demands on his own government regarding helping the poor and the underfed and the undereducated children right here. Oh, wait, so much more heroic to make like he really cares for the downtrodden in another country while collecting items for sale which are of value to that nation's history. That's how it looks to me. James Otis, my hero. Um, like, freaking NOT.
Another thing, all this talk about how Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was a "pacifist" is crap. Gandhi was a practitioner of non-violence. Not of pacifism. The two, in his lexicon, were not the same. Not. Satyagraha is not pacifism as the West understands it. I learned that as a dewy eyed undergrad. Well, apart from the fact that my pa yammered on about it for a long time as well.
March 6, 2009 1:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, this was not supposed to be a response to Quinnesque. Sorry about that. It was supposed to be a stand alone. I agree with Quinnesque.
March 6, 2009 1:20 AM | Reply | Permalink
See comment at bottom, Yva. Ta.
March 6, 2009 2:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
Who cares? Its just a crappy pair of sandals and a few other items that wouldn't get you a buck at a local yard sale. I suppose there's a certain amusement value in the story in that it illustrates once again the insanity of our species. Some crazy person is going to pay x thousands of dollars for crap when for a hundred he could get a nice pair of tevas.
Put them in a museum or hang them on a wall? Why would anyone want to waste time looking at a dirty old worn out pair of sandals just because they happen to have been on the feet of some great man at one point in time? Crazy.
I can't imagine why anyone would give a shit about a pair of sandals, care enough to buy them, care enough to be upset that someone is going to buy them. If you care about Ghandi forget about the fucking sandals and read a book and learn about his life. Then actualize it as best as you can in your own life.
Given the years Ghandi lived, his vegetarian diet, and the large amount of beans he probably ate... and the length of my life and the number of breaths I've taken there's a high probability that I've breathed in an atom or 2 of Ghandi's farts. Doesn't make me holy and its about as meaningful as Ghandi's sandals.
March 5, 2009 5:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well, I guess you shouldn't bid on them then. And I guess you shouldn't bother to enter any museum in the world, since those very same museums hold the sweaty artifacts of history. You probably should avoid art museums as well, since they just have a bunch of oil paint slathered on canvas.
I had the experience a couple of decades ago, to enter the tomb of "King Tut" and even to climb up the inside of a pyramid. You would probably consider all that total BullShit, but guess what? It made me think in ways I never had before about what it took to build that thing, and how it was necessary to ignore the thousands of people who did the skut work to make it happen
It is partially, at least, through those physical viewings that we attempt to feel those ancient feelings; and that we try to empathize over the years and decades and even millenia.
If you don't get that, you probably never will. Sad for you, actually....and for your children as well.
March 5, 2009 9:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gandhi's sandal is the equivalent of King Tut's pyramid, give me a break. The only difference between the sandals that sold as part of a package for a reputed 1.8 million and hundreds of billions of other sandals worn by Indian people and in garbage dumps after they are worn out is that they touched the feet of Gandhi.
This is not some ancient artifact or some great work of art. The only possible way of distinguishing Gandhi's sandals from the sandals on many of the people you'd pass on the streets of India might possibly be dna testing. Same with his bowl, watch, glasses, diaper. If some local Indian broke the strap on his sandal as you were riding in his taxi to gaze awestruck at Gandhi's sandals you wouldn't pick up the sandals and carry them to the museum, nor would the museum exhibit them.
If some aide caring for Gandhi after one of his long fasts saved a turd from his bedpan you'd be gazing in worship at his holiness's sacred turd. If it wasn't his you'd flush it down the toilet like any other pile of shit.
March 5, 2009 9:46 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Given the years Ghandi lived, his vegetarian diet, and the large amount of beans he probably ate... and the length of my life and the number of breaths I've taken there's a high probability that I've breathed in an atom or 2 of Ghandi's farts. Doesn't make me holy ..."
Actually ... one of the closely guarded secrets of the universe is ... that it does. (Shh ... and remember, you didn't hear it from me, okay?)
March 5, 2009 6:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
This is just a side bar to the "Relics of Significant Persons", what happens to them and ties in with the Geronimo link Resistance supplied above.
The University of Michigan holds over a thousand artifacts and skeletal remains of Native American people that by law must be returned to the Tribes. The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act. It's been nearly 20 years since this law was passed. Google - Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act - if you want more info.
At the Pow Wow in Ann Arbor last year there was a silent protest. Over 1300 seats were roped off to represent the cardboard boxes filled with ancestors bones and relics. Many of these seats had names attached to the rope (ribbon, actually) because many of the skeletal remains are known ancestors of tribal members. The Uof M says it is up to the Tribes to verify the remains scientifically.
F*ck science.
All the Tribes want to do is bury their dead.
All Harlyn Geronimo wants to do is bury his great-grandpa. Even if the remains aren't his grandpa, if they are Native American they must, by law, be returned to the burial ground.
All Ghandi wanted was peace. I would reckon he wouldn't be one bit happy about today.
March 5, 2009 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Would it not be amazing to see him sitting with the Palestinians and the Jews right now? Where is our Gandhi now?
March 5, 2009 6:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
I am beginning to think there is no Ghandi out there for the masses right now. There is the Dalai Lama, but he wants to retire. :o) Maybe the best we can do for ourselves is to find a personal pacifist to emulate. I have a couple of Elders that are truly pacifists and they tell me I am an unending source of concern for them, that I am too easily called to war. But, so far, they haven't kicked me out of the teepee. ;o)
Hmmmm. Maybe will have to be our own Ghandis.
March 5, 2009 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101469307
March 5, 2009 8:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
WOW Forgiveness was what Mohandes preached.
March 5, 2009 8:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yez. It exists, and is all around us.
The question is: Will we see it?
March 5, 2009 8:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Did I tell you I like you today?
March 5, 2009 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
The story made me sob.
I love you DD
=D
March 5, 2009 8:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
These two people found their own peace through forgivness. That is good. They were their own Gandhis...or maybe each other's Gandhi. Migwetch (thanks) for the link, Bwak.
March 5, 2009 8:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Flower, I wish I could feel their forgiveness. Maybe I did for a second, and that's what made me cry.
You are welcome. I think I will ask for their book for my birthday.
=D
That's generally the only time I ask for anything.
March 5, 2009 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
I like to believe that each one of us has the capacity to be as Great as Gandhi, or the Dalai Lama
I enjoy reading the Holy Scriptures. The more you read and meditate the more it comes alive and I find peace in it’s wisdom.
“That one will teach you” is powerful “bringing back to your minds”
If you haven’t heard or read there’s not much to bring back.
As Gandhi taught, the ways to fight back; against opposition was to apply such teachings to YOU first. Teach yourselves the ways of peace, and you will come off victorious.
Taking in accurate knowledge, the Holy Spirit will reach into the deepest memories, drawing out whatever you have fed your mind.
(John 14:25-26) 25 “While remaining with YOU I have spoken these things to YOU. 26 But the helper, the holy spirit, which the Father will send in my name,
THAT ONE will teach YOU all things and bring back to YOUR minds all the things I told YOU.
March 6, 2009 7:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Any report on whether or not David Vitter has made a bid on the diaper yet?
March 5, 2009 8:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Vitter is interested in Family Values
He has done all he could to create more families.
What more do you want?
March 5, 2009 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quinn wrote: "Money ate the world, and is now devouring its inhabitants, because we refused to draw any lines around it."
That's such a great quote, I wanted to see it again.
March 5, 2009 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
DD, Excellent poem! ~~~and like your poem, this blog made me laugh and cry.
Here’s a great Greg Brown song.
March 6, 2009 1:21 AM | Reply | Permalink
oops - here's the link
Greg Brown song
March 6, 2009 1:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you Strato. That is all I did. A poem.
March 6, 2009 6:27 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yva, It's become farce at this point. This guy is running scared, changing his story right and left, and now... retreating from the fray entirely. I don't blame him, either. Idiot.
He started out looking to raise money - granted, he said a portion was for a cause I support, namely FOR. He accepted that the auction house would get their cut, but he had no specific India link in mind. He actually said he'd hoped Obama or the US Gov't might buy them and put them on display in DC - but admitted the auction risked the pieces being locked away by some private collector.
Then when India got upset, he proposed two (financial) options to them - that India increase by 4% of its GDP the amount spent on health, or that they fund a 78 nation tour to promote Gandhi's message. Again, I agree with the substance of both these changes, but you've already raised the little issue of why he didn't propose that his OWN nation raise health care spending, especially when proposing that the US Government buy the items.
As public upset rose, Otis apparently sent his lawyer to stop the proceedings, but the auction house wouldn't. At which point, his lawyer stated that the auction house was trying to make money on "the altar of Gandhi's legacy." A bit odd, given that Otis had already signed an agreement with the auction house that they could take their share. Suddenly he's wheeling in Gandhi's "altar."
We also now know the guy has a major film - and book, and multiple other tie-in's - coming out about Gandhi. But hey, he's argued that since Gandhi himself, when alive, auctioned his own stuff off for charity... he'd likely laugh when other people did it, after he was dead, for their own particular reasons.
Gandhi had a great sense of humor, but he also had a pretty good way to detect stuff going on beneath the surface. He might even ask - being a man somewhat interested in Empire - if Americans would think it ok if say, an Indian guy sold off George Washington's false teeth and JFK's blood test results to another country, like Iran or Russia or China, or maybe even their GOVERNMENT. And then, if Americans protested, whether it would be ok if the Indian seller announced that the US would have to divert an extra 4% of GDP into a proposal he'd selected (that'd be the equivalent of about $550 billion, by the way.) Who needs democracy, when you own their bones, eh?
And now - farce almost complete - Otis says he's "embarking on a 23 day fast to consider his actions, apparently meaning his desire to auction off the items."
And he also owns one of the world's largest collections of Dr Suess-related items. Maybe he'll hold Thing One and Thing Two ransom and demand a 40% cut in global carbon emissions.
But hey. It's all good, always is if you're raising money, right? All values are to be subsumed under monetary ones. It's not like we've run into any trouble on that front recently.
Though I suspect I'm elitist or something for thinking this way.
Second thought, naw. I'm not. The stench of money madness, swollen film-maker egos and Imperialism seems pretty damned clear from here.
Goodnight Gandhi! And hang onto your teeth old boy, we know where you live!
March 6, 2009 2:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Q, now we know what gets a Canuck up in arms and rightfully so.
Egads - could you imagine auctioning off the pink suit Jackie Kennedy was wearing when JFK was assassinated? It is beyond disgusting. Full stop.
March 6, 2009 9:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks for your response, quinnesque. I concur with your perspective and I did catch the viddie earlier this morning on Rediff where Otis "explains" himself. Perhaps this will be a Bardo for him, no? I hope he gets something out of it which should be more valuable than stained mammon. I'll hope for him.
Otis' wanting the Indian govt to contribute more to the health needs of the poorest is an admirable desire, to be sure, but as he points out, 75% of the health care is provided by private funding. And I'm quite sure that 75% is generally reasonable health care, not the best, but reasonable and yes, it can be improved.
Much, much more can and should be done, especially regarding HIV/AIDS than has been done, as well as actions enhancing childhood nutrition. However, this is true regarding health care in many countries as well, no? Just as much can be done here in America as well, as we all know.
For me the stench of his later do-gooder arrogance guised under a simple want for publicity and money is what set me off along with the type of items collected (blood. Jeez!). I'm astonished that he's surprised at the reactions. Like, really? What was he thinking?
Lastly, yes, very likely the Great Soul would have deadpanned about Empire. Gandhi, Einstein and Kurt Gödel are three of my favs in History, from that decade. :)
On that note, I've gotta go. Ta.
March 6, 2009 11:18 AM | Reply | Permalink
Hey Dij & Yva. Yeah, pretty obviously, it got me in a really bad mood yesterday. There was just something "off" about it. The guy is a lifelong peacenik, and was going to send the money to good groups & for good ends. I give him points for that. You know, he's probably done more good stuff in his life than I have, so I can't howl too loud.
But there's something slightly off about saying you believe in Gandhi's message, and then... COLLECTING all his stuff, right down to the blood. And then the decision to sell it, precisely at the moment when the world is RETHINKING the whole "anything can be bought & sold" money-mania. It's as though he's a good guy who got caught in a slight timewarp, and right when the world has turned HIS way, he reverses and does something that plays right back into the old money machine.
All in all, I hope the guy takes his 23 days off, and comes out with clearer thoughts than I have on this, and that his film and such do great. But just... can we maybe avoid selling Gandhi's blood? I think that would sorta piss me off. You know, can you imagine selling MARTIN LUTHER KING'S BLOOD from his assassination?
More happily though (ok, stick to commitment to be HAPPY today, not such a grouch) the Prince was great. Thanks Dij. Here's a nice groove from the subdudes.
March 6, 2009 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
That reminds me of a photo that appeared in Life magazine during World War Two; a young wife sitting, looking at a souvenir her husband had sent her from the war; a human skull. I think it was a Japanese soldier's skull. I was still in high school when I came across that image, and it's remained with me. I just kept thinking, that was somebody's father's skull and how sad they must be ...
March 6, 2009 9:51 AM | Reply | Permalink