« NYT Points Out the 'Frustrating Paradox' in Afghanistan | diachronic's Blog | McChrystal/ MacArthur »
Pakistan Seizes the Moment, Decriminalizes Corruption
This is amusing, I guess.
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- The U.S. Senate approved legislation Thursday to triple civilian financial aid to Pakistan to $7.5 billion over five years, underscoring the country's vital role in the war in Afghanistan and the broader fight against international terrorism.
The legislation had been held up for months amid partisan wrangling, and the breakthrough came as the Friends of Democratic Pakistan assistance forum met on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, co-chaired by President Barack Obama.
As the U.S.-led campaign against the Taliban in Afghanistan falters, cooperation from neighboring Pakistan is crucial because Pakistan is the headquarters, a refuge and a source of financing and other support for al Qaida, for Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar and for other Afghan insurgent groups......
Separately on Thursday, an anti-bribery watchdog, Transparency International, warned that Pakistan has dismantled its laws against official corruption, a development that's likely to concern Washington and other countries that are pledging billions in additional aid to Pakistan.
No, it isn't going to concern Washington, and Pakistan knows it. As long as the generals ask for more troops and extremists find havens all over their country, we are a perfect way to make that dismantled law pay dividends. The Pakistanis, unlike us, know the virtues of expediency.
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan -- The U.S. Senate approved legislation Thursday to triple civilian financial aid to Pakistan to $7.5 billion over five years, underscoring the country's vital role in the war in Afghanistan and the broader fight against international terrorism.
The legislation had been held up for months amid partisan wrangling, and the breakthrough came as the Friends of Democratic Pakistan assistance forum met on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York, co-chaired by President Barack Obama.
As the U.S.-led campaign against the Taliban in Afghanistan falters, cooperation from neighboring Pakistan is crucial because Pakistan is the headquarters, a refuge and a source of financing and other support for al Qaida, for Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar and for other Afghan insurgent groups......
Separately on Thursday, an anti-bribery watchdog, Transparency International, warned that Pakistan has dismantled its laws against official corruption, a development that's likely to concern Washington and other countries that are pledging billions in additional aid to Pakistan.
No, it isn't going to concern Washington, and Pakistan knows it. As long as the generals ask for more troops and extremists find havens all over their country, we are a perfect way to make that dismantled law pay dividends. The Pakistanis, unlike us, know the virtues of expediency.
Advertisement
somehow I doubt anyone else will find this amusing.
September 25, 2009 12:03 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm laughing, too.
September 25, 2009 5:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
'The Pakistanis, unlike us, know the value of expediency'.
The U.S. money flowed after enabling legislation for graft immunity was secured. What part of this scenario did you not understand ?
It was required of them.
September 26, 2009 1:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Do you mean that obtaining U.S. money required Pakistanis to immunize grafting practices as a precondition, placed on them by the U.S. itself?
September 26, 2009 7:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, if that was what he meant, it would amuse far more than a select few.
September 26, 2009 4:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry. I've not been playing U.S. domestic politics so much as geopolitics and the environment of late : especially with Climategate on the go.
Yes, of course I mean immunizing from prosecution was a precondition : just as much as 'contractors' in Iraq ran rampant so crazily that nothing much was said until they raped the wrong staff member : an American.
How can I prove it ?
Get real.
But if you want to think on the U.S. practice of making sure legal bases are covered so they can get away with theft - and even deregulation of the loans industry shows that game plan - just take a look at exceeding Yoo's solicited 'opinion' being the basis of investigating 'torture'.
For years 'torture' was denied : water torture itself being 'interrogation.'
Sorry. Sadism is insufficient justification for generating false confessions : which muddied the waters.
But Congress set the tone in 2002.
Take a peek at the American Servicemen's Protection Act...which insulates from the International Court of Justice at the Hague.
December 15, 2009 11:13 PM | Reply | Permalink