<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>dharmabum&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/dharmabum//4188</id>
   <updated>2008-10-31T14:02:41Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Is Goldfarb McCain&apos;s Igor?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/2008/10/is-goldfarb-mccains-igor.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/dharmabum//4188.241363</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-31T13:57:10Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-31T14:02:41Z</updated>
   
   <summary>There are many serious things to be said about this election, and others say it better, so I&apos;ll just stick with being silly:While watching this clip of Michael Goldfarb stumbling around his whopper of a fib, I kept thinking it...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>dharmabum</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/">
      <![CDATA[<br />There are many serious things to be said about this election, and others say it better, so I'll just stick with being silly:<br /><br />While watching <a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/241204.php">this clip</a> of Michael Goldfarb stumbling around his whopper of a fib, I kept thinking it reminded me of something I'd seen before.<br /><br />Then I realized:&nbsp; it reminded me of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DqT9edmTGNU&amp;feature=related">this little scene</a> in one of my favorite movies.&nbsp; <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>A frivolous post that became halfway thoughtful</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/2008/10/a-frivolous-post-that-became-h.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/dharmabum//4188.237359</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-15T20:27:37Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-15T21:01:08Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[I was terribly amused at David Kurtz's post this morning where he said: "Tonight's the big night: the season finale of Project Runway. Also, a presidential debate."Indeed. Must I choose between watching Tim Gunn or Barack Obama?&nbsp; Both are tall,...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>dharmabum</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/">
      <![CDATA[<br />I was terribly amused at David Kurtz's post this morning where he said: "<i>Tonight's the big night: the season finale of Project Runway. Also, a presidential debate."</i><br /><br />Indeed. Must I choose between watching Tim Gunn or Barack Obama?&nbsp; Both are tall, elegant, dignified, beautifully-spoken men.&nbsp; This season Tim has had to endure the snarks from the Season 5 villianess, Kenley.&nbsp; Barack Obama has had to endure snarks from John McCain.&nbsp;&nbsp; At one point this season, after Kenley became extremely disrespectful towards Tim, his parting comment was:&nbsp; "Mind your game, Kenley."&nbsp; All day I've been entertaining myself by thinking of Obama telling McCain to mind his game. <br /><br />That's all pretty trivial and superficial&nbsp; -- but we need those escape hatches, don't we?&nbsp; And yet, it has set me to thinking about certain parallels.&nbsp; The season finale of Project Runway is the big show on the catwalk in Bryant Park, during fashion week in New York City.&nbsp; It's pure show and entertainment. High drama and last-minute preparations precede the event. Excellent presentation is expected. Great style is rewarded.&nbsp; After the show, the fashion reporters run about and interview various celebrities and fashion luminaries about their impressions.&nbsp; <br /><br />Now how different is that from a televised political debate?&nbsp; I know, one event is no more than cloth and frippery (that most of us could never afford) being paraded down a catwalk. The other is a discussion of the critical issues that our world is facing, including economic matters that will affect our ability to buy the fundamentals of life.&nbsp; And yet, for many people, much of what they respond to in the debates is style and presentation.&nbsp; <br /><br />For that reason, the debates frustrate and fascinate me.&nbsp; It will be interesting viewing tonight.&nbsp; Carry on. <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Just sayin&apos;</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/2008/10/just-sayin.php" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/dharmabum//4188.236957</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-14T17:26:26Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-14T17:52:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[I find it terribly entertaining to watch the expressions and body language of the person who isn't speaking when McCain and Palin are at a joint rally.&nbsp; The joint rally yesterday (October 13) amused me greatly, but then again, I...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>dharmabum</name>
      
   </author>
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/">
      <![CDATA[I find it terribly entertaining to watch the expressions and body language of the person who isn't speaking when McCain and Palin are at a joint rally.&nbsp; The joint rally yesterday (October 13) amused me greatly, but then again, I am easily amused.&nbsp; Palin had on a white blouse and a skirt and wore her hair down.&nbsp; While standing behind McCain, she reminded me of a piano student who was next in line to play at the recital, and who very much believed that they were better than the person who was currently playing.&nbsp; <br /><br />When McCain made a comment that was critical of the Bush economic policies of the last 8 years, Palin visibly knotted her brows together, as if she disagreed with that statement.&nbsp; On a very simple level, she can't do the smile and nod-in-agreement as well as either Cindy McCain or her hubby Todd.&nbsp; And I bet she likes Bush better than McCain.&nbsp; I half expected her to whomp him on the back and say:&nbsp; "Hey! Stop sayin' that 'bout my W!" <br /><br />There's any number of reasons that people have given for why she wasn't a good pick for McCain, but in watching her, it's almost palpable that she thinks she's the star and she should be running the show.&nbsp; She does not play well with others if she is not in charge.&nbsp; I would there's a lot of grating going on behind the scenes and it's only helping to keep the McCain campaign off-kilter.&nbsp; He want her as spokesmodel and she wants to rule the world. <br /><br />She also delivers her speeches in the same cadence and tone of voice that Rachael Ray uses when she's really cranked up on her cooking show.&nbsp; (Granted, Rachael does not emply the "Fargo" accent and usually pronounces the "g" at the end of "ing" words.)&nbsp; It's one thing to use that loud, chirpy voice and cutie-pie demeanor on a cooking show, it's another thing to use it when delivering speeches as a vice-presidential candidate.&nbsp; MSNBC ran a good 10 minutes of a Palin speech on Sunday, and she never modulated down into quieter or more serious tones.&nbsp; Good lord, at least Rachael Ray can quiet down, or she just goes to commercial breaks! &nbsp; I would have hoped the media consultants could have trained Palin to hold it down a bit, but maybe they don't want to, or maybe she just refuses.&nbsp; <br /><br />To tie this all up,<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGzBGTawE3I"> this</a> is probably the closest to having Rachael and Sarah on the same stage.<br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Call me way over the top</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/10/call-me-way-over-the-top.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.221936</id>
   
   <published>2008-10-04T16:38:18Z</published>
   <updated>2008-10-04T16:38:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[.... because I probably am being that way, but here's my gut reaction to this McCain&nbsp;ad about Obama.First, I think they're&nbsp;using the old trick of making Obama's skin tone look darker.&nbsp; Second, the photo of Obama at the start, where...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>dharmabum</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/">
      <![CDATA[<p>.... because I probably am being that way, but here's my gut reaction to <a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/10/obama_and_mccain_trade_new_att.php">this McCain&nbsp;ad about Obama</a>.<br /><br />First, I think they're&nbsp;using the old trick of making Obama's skin tone look darker.&nbsp; Second, the photo of Obama at the start, where he's looking up and to the side, forehead wrinkled, reminded me of&nbsp;someone.&nbsp; <a href="http://itn.co.uk/news/story18ddd2dffa074a5764f63d118d7a5103.jpg">This person</a> is often pictured with that expression on his face.<br /><br />Since he's in the news these days, if there's an attempt at subliminal (or not-so-subliminal) tweaking, that sort of stinks.&nbsp; But I'd put nothing past the Rovians.</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>No pity for Palin</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/no-pity-for-palin.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.220324</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-27T19:39:18Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-27T19:39:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Being a woman, I read with some interest Judith Warner's blog&nbsp;in the New York Times, where she professes pity for Sarah Palin.&nbsp; It made me groan.&nbsp; I feel no pity for Palin whatsoever.&nbsp; What I have noticed recently is how...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>dharmabum</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/">
      <![CDATA[Being a woman, I read with some interest <a href="http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/25/poor-sarah/?em">Judith Warner's blog</a>&nbsp;in the New York Times, where she professes pity for Sarah Palin.&nbsp; <br /><br />It made me groan.&nbsp; I feel no pity for Palin whatsoever.&nbsp; <br /><br />What I have noticed recently is how <em>well rested</em> she looks.&nbsp; I would expect to she her looking a bit frayed around the edges, with dark circles under her eyes from putting in overtime trying to learn the issues.&nbsp;&nbsp;And I&nbsp;don't see that, not one little bit.&nbsp;&nbsp;One would think she'd be&nbsp;burning the candle at both ends, learning as much as she can to become a credit to this ticket.&nbsp;&nbsp;Either than isn't happening, or the McCain campaign has decided the fresh pretty face is more important than actual substance.<br /><br />I also don't see desperation or panic in her face.&nbsp; I think she&nbsp;is&nbsp;narcissitic enough to assent to&nbsp;being on the ticket when she&nbsp;is utterly unqualified.&nbsp;&nbsp;She sees being on the ticket as a mark of her superiority.<br /><br />Palin also doesn't have a record of being especially compassionate for people who aren't her own.&nbsp;&nbsp;Let's not feel sorry for her.&nbsp; <br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Foreign policy and eye contact</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/foreign-policy-and-eye-contact.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.220292</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-27T16:04:50Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-27T16:04:50Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[A lot has been made about McCain's lack of eye contact with Obama, and certainly, watching him made me uncomfortable.&nbsp; All that grimacing and grinning and squinting when he wasn't talking&nbsp;really impacted my ability to listen to him when he...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>dharmabum</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/">
      <![CDATA[<p>A lot has been made about McCain's lack of eye contact with Obama, and certainly, watching him made me uncomfortable.&nbsp; All that grimacing and grinning and squinting when he wasn't talking&nbsp;really impacted my ability to listen to him when he was speaking.&nbsp; What I saw was a nasty, twitchy control freak.<br /><br />So&nbsp;on foreign policy, do we want a President who acts this way when talking to another head of state?&nbsp; Maybe that is why he doesn't want to speak to, or negotiate with,&nbsp;any head of state that isn't 100% on his side -- because he can't hold himself together well enough to listen in a calm and respectful manner.&nbsp;&nbsp;<br /><br />Don't Americans&nbsp;usually want that calm, rational, look-you-in-the-eye sort of President who will&nbsp;project&nbsp;a strong image to both them and to&nbsp;the rest of the world?&nbsp; That&nbsp;is where I thought Obama's comments regarding restoring&nbsp;the image of the U.S. to the rest of the world were excellent.&nbsp;&nbsp;Bush has torn that image down, and did the man&nbsp;standing next to Obama&nbsp;show&nbsp;the qualities needed to restore that image, or would he only build on the Bush&nbsp;legacy, only in an even&nbsp;more disrespectful and unlikable manner?&nbsp; <br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>It&apos;s all about Sarah</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/its-all-about-sarah.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.216008</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-12T01:34:38Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-12T01:34:38Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[In the Palin interview clips, it certainly didn't seem like she was very interested in talking about John McCain.&nbsp; While she was (at least some of the time) parroting his stances because&nbsp;the catch phrases had&nbsp;been drilled into her head, she...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>dharmabum</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/dharmabum/">
      <![CDATA[<p>In the Palin interview clips, it certainly didn't seem like she was very interested in talking about John McCain.&nbsp; While she was (at least some of the time) parroting his stances because&nbsp;the catch phrases had&nbsp;been drilled into her head, she certainly didn't say the things that I would expect, like "Senator's McCain's stance on that policy is..." or "I fully&nbsp;support Senator McCain's position, which is..."&nbsp; <br /><br />It's like she's forgotten who is at the top of the ticket.&nbsp; I have to wonder if the McCain camp has lathered up Palin to such an extent that she could care less whether she talks about old whatshisface.&nbsp; I think Gibson's use of the word "hubris" was perfect.&nbsp;&nbsp;I halfway expect to see her show up at a rally with a&nbsp;t-shirt that says:&nbsp; "It's all about ME."&nbsp; </p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
